Morphometric analysis of body and claw dimensions of building Dwelling UK bat species: to aid knowledge of bat interactions with roosting surfaces

• Autorzy: Waring S.D. , Essah E.A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The increasing use of non-woven materials, such as breathable roofing membranes (BRMs) within buildings that either currently contain a bat roost or may do in the future, has led to concerns over bat safety by those involved in bat conservation in the UK. Whilst some information is currently available on the selection of roosts in roofs by bats, along with technical specifications of individual membranes, there is no research that has investigated the interactions between the two. Prior to determining the methods needed to test interactions between bats and BRMs, a series of preliminary investigations were conducted; including research and physical measurements on selected anatomical features of bats commonly found roosting in buildings in the UK. Data on body size and shape were gathered from a combination of experimental measurements of bat specimens (deceased) and information collated from literature. Data on bat claw morphology were collected by applying a method used to measure raptor talons, measurements obtained included; width, length and the curvature (hook ratio) of their claws. The results of this research provide additional information about bat body and claw morphometrics. It was found that bat species/group had a significant effect upon the length, width and curvature of the claws (to varying degrees). Pipistrelle species have the shortest and third narrowest claws, whereas serotines have the longest and widest claws on average. The curvature of the claws does not vary greatly between species; however, more variation was seen in the lower portion of the claws. The results from this research also demonstrate that the current standard industry tests do not represent the fine scale at which a bats claws interact with their roosting surfaces. Consequently, this information can be used to aid the development of industry tests for determining the suitability of BRMs for use in bat roosts.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Chiropterologica
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 18
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.527-534,fig,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Waring S.D.

• Technologies for the Sustainable Built Environment Centre, School of the Built Environment, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AF, UK

autor

Essah E.A.

• School of the Built Environment, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AF, UK

Bibliografia

• 1. Albrect, W. 2003. Fibrous material. Pp. 15–85, in Nonwoven fabrics: raw materials, applications, characteristics and testing processes ( W. Albrecht, F. Hilmar, and W. Kittelmann, eds.). Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 748 pp. Google Scholar
• 2. Barlow, K. E., and G. Jones. 1999. Roosts, echolocation calls and wing morphology of two phonic types of Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde, 645: 257–268. Google Scholar
• 3. Barlow, K. E., G. Jones, and E. M. Barratt. 1997. Can skull morphology be used to predict ecological relationships between bat species? A test using two cryptic species of pipistrelle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 264B: 1695–1700. Google Scholar
• 4. BSI. 1996. BS EN 863:1996. Protective clothing. Mechanical properties. Test method: puncture resistance. British Standards Institute, London, pp. 3–4. Google Scholar
• 5. BSI. 2000a. BS 747:2000. Reinforced bitumen sheets for roofing. Specification, GBM48 (Construction In General). British Standards Institute, London, pp. 6–8. Google Scholar
• 6. BSI. 2000b. BS EN 12310-1:2000. Flexible sheets for waterproofing. Determination of resistance to tearing (nail shank). Bitumen sheets for roof waterproofing. British Stand ards Institute, London, pp. 6–7. Google Scholar
• 7. Dietz, C., O. Von Helversen, and D. Nill. 2009. Bats of Britain, Europe and Northwest Africa, A. & C.Black, London, 400 pp. Google Scholar
• 8. Essah, E. A., C. Sanders, P. Baker, and A. S. Kalagasidis. 2009. Condensation and moisture transport in cold roofs: effects of roof underlay. Building Research & Information, 37: 117–128. Google Scholar
• 9. Fowler, D. W., E. A. Freedman, and J. B. Scannella. 2009. Predatory functional morphology in raptors: interdigital variation in talon size is related to prey restraint and immobilisation technique. PLoS ONE, 4: e7999. Google Scholar
• 10. Janssens, A., and H. Hens. 2003. Interstitial condensation due to air leakage: a sensitivity analysis. Journal of Thermal Envelope and Building Science, 27: 15–29. Google Scholar
• 11. Massenaux, G. 2003. Introduction to nonwovens. Pp. 15–85, in Nonwoven fabrics: raw materials, applications, characteristics and testing processes ( W. Albrecht, F. Hilmar, and W. Kittelmann, eds.). Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 748 pp. Google Scholar
• 12. Morris, C. 2008. The ‘Morris’ batslate. The Vincent Widlife Trust, Ledbury, England, 11 pp. Google Scholar
• 13. Neuweiler, G. 2000. The biology of bats. Oxford University Press, Oxford, ix + 310 pp. Google Scholar
• 14. Racey, P. A. 2008. Bats. Pp. 293–374, in Mammals of the British Isles: handbook, 4th edition ( S. Harris and D. W. Yalden, eds.). The Mammal Society, Southampton, England, 799 pp. Google Scholar
• 15. Schofield, H. 2008. The lesser horseshoe bat: conservation handbook. Vincent Wildlife Trust, Ledbury, 78 pp. Google Scholar
• 16. Waring, S. D. 2014. The interactions between bats and breathable roofing membranes. EngD. Thesis, University of Reading, Reading, 376 pp. Google Scholar
• 17. Waring, S. D., E. A. Essah, K. Gunnell, and R. H. C. Bonser. 2013. Double jeopardy: the potential for problems when bats interact with breathable roofing membranes in the United Kingdom. Architecture & Environment, 1(1): 1–13. Google Scholar
• 18. Witteveen, C. R., L. L. Lucas, and A. A. Cooper. 2000. To tear or not to tear. Technical Report, National Roofing Contractors Association, Rosemont, Illinois, 140: 128–139. Google Scholar
• 19. Yalden, D. W., and P. Morris. 1975. The lives of bats. Quadrangle Press, New York, 247 pp. Google Scholar

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.3161/15081109ACC2016.18.2.019