An approach to the assessment of regulating agrecosystem services

• Autorzy: Makovnikova J. , Palka B. , Siran M. , Houskova B. , Kanianska R. , Kizekova M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Two different approaches to assess and map the potential of regulating agroecosystem services have been used, the assessment of the potential of regulating agroecosystem services based on a composite index and the assessment of the potential of individual regulating agroecosystem services were used in the Krupina study area. The overall composite index indicates a general overview of the performance of an agrosystem in terms of providing ecocosystem services. Result from our study showed that the composite index accumulates information on soil condition and its ability to perform regulating agroecosystem services, mainly the potential of water regime regulation and cleaning potential of ecosystem. The modeling and evaluation of individual regulating services allows more detailed assessment of regulating agroecosystem services and defiing the sources of variability and spatial differences. Moreover, the methodology developed in this paper is replicable and can be applied by planners if they are profiient in geographic information systems (GIS).

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Soil Science
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 52
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.95-112,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Makovnikova J.

• National Agricultural and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia

autor

Palka B.

• National Agricultural and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia

autor

Siran M.

• National Agricultural and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia

autor

Houskova B.

• National Agricultural and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia

autor

Kanianska R.

• Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia

autor

Kizekova M.

• National Agricultural and Food Centre, Grassland and Mountain Agriculture Research Institute, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia

Bibliografia

• Abbott, L.K., Manning, D.A.C., 2015. Soil health and related ecosystem services in organic agriculture. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 4(3): 116–125. DOI: 10.5539/sar.v4n3p116.
• Act No. 220/2004 Coll. on the conservation and use of agricultural land as amended (in Slovak).
• Alam, M., Dupra, J., Messier, C.H., 2016. A framework towards a composite indicator for urban ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 60: 38–44.
• Antal, J., Špánik, F., 2004. Hydrology of agricultural land (in Slovak). SPU, Nitra, 250 pp.
• Arshad, M.A., Martin, S., 2002. Identifying critical limits for soil quality indicators in agro-ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 88: 153–160.
• Barančíková, G., Gutteková, M., Halas, J., Koco, Š., Makovníková, J., Nováková, M., Skalský, R., Tarasovičová, Z., Vilček, J., 2011. Soil organic soil carbon in the agricultural landscape – modeling changes in space and time (in Slovak). VÚPOP, Bratislava, 85 pp.
• Barančíková, G., Makovníková, J., 2003. The inflence of soil humic acid quality on sorption and mobility of heavy metals. Plant Soil Environment, 49: 565–571.
• Barančíková, G., Koco, Š., Makovníková, J., Torma, S., 2010. Filter and transport functions of soil (in Slovak). Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Bratislava, 33 pp.
• Bujnovský, R., Balkovič, J., Barančíková, G., Makovníková, J., Vilček, J., 2009. Assessment and valuation of ecological functions of agricultural land of Slovakia (in Slovak). VÚPOP, Bratislava, 72 pp.
• Bujnovský, R., Vilček, J., Blaas, G., Skalský, R., Barančíková, G., Makovníková, J., Balkovič, J., Pálka, B., 2011. Assessment of soil capacities and effects from its use (in Slovak). VÚPOP, Bratislava, 70 pp.
• Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Müller, F., Windhorst, W., 2009. Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services – a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online, 15: 1–22.
• Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., Müller, F., 2012. Mapping supply, demand and budgets of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 21: 17–29.
• Burkhard, B., Kandziorai, M.S., Müller, F., 2014. Ecosystem service potentials, flws and demands – concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantifiation. Official Journal of the International Association for Landscape Ecology – Regional Chapter Germany (IALE-D), http://www.landscapeonline.de/103097lo201434
• Burkhard, B., Maes, J., 2017. Mapping Ecosystem Services. Advanced Books. DOI: 10.3897/ab.e12837.
• Costanza, R., 2008. Ecosystem services: Multiple classifiation systems are needed. Biological Conservation, 141: 350–352.
• Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S., Grasso, M., 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services, 28: 1–16.
• Coyle, C., Creamer, R.E., Schulte, R.P.O., O’Sullivan, L., Jordan, P., 2016. A functional land management conceptual framework under soil drainage and land use scenarios. Environmental Science & Policy, 56: 39–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.012.
• Daniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., von der Dunk, A., 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(23): 8812–8819. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109.
• Diehl, E., Sereda, E., Wolters, V., Birkhofer, K., 2013. Effects of predator specialization, host plant and climate on biological control of aphids by natural enemies: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50: 262–270. DOI: 10.1111/1365- 2664.12032
• Dominati, E., Patterson, M., Mackay, A., 2010. A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecological Economics, 69: 1858–1868.
• Dominati, E.J., Mackay, A., Lynch, B., Heath, N., Millner, I., 2014. An ecosystem services approach to the quantifiation of shallow mass movement erosion and the value of soil conservation practices. Ecosystem Services, 9: 204–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.006.
• EEA, 2013. Technical report No. 11/2013. The European Grassland Butterfl Indicator: 1990–2011. Publications Offie of the European Union, Luxembourg, 36 p.
• Forouzangohar, M., Crossman, N.D., Richard, J., MacEwan, R.J., Dugal Wallace, O., Bennett, L.T., 2014. Ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: A spatially explicit approach to support sustainable soil management. The Scientific World Journal, article: ID 483298, 13. DOI: 1155/2014/483298.
• Frélichová, J., Fanta, J., 2015. Ecosystem service availability in view of long-term land-use changes: A regional case study in the Czech Republic. Ecosystem Health and Sustainabilty, 1: 1–15.
• Haines-Young, R.H., Potschin, M.B. 2009. Methodologies for defiing and assessing ecosystem services. Final Report, JNCC, 69 pp, https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/cem/pdf/JNCC_Review_Final_051109.pdf
• Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., Kienast, F., 2012. Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecological Indicartos, 21: 39–53.
• Hönigová, I., Vackár, D., Lorencová, E., Melichar, J., Götzl, M., Sonderegger, G., Oušková, V., Hošek, M., Chobot, K., 2012. Survey on grassland ecosystem services. Report to the European topic centre on biological diversity. Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Prague, 78 pp.
• Kanianska, R., Jaďuďová, J., Makovníková, J., Kizeková, M., 2016. Assessment of relationships between earthworms and soil abiotic and biotic factors as a tool in sustainable agricultural. Sustainability, 8(9): 906. DOI: 10.3390/su8090906.
• Kheir , R.B., Greve, M.H., Böcher, P.K., Greve, M.B., Larsen, R., 2010. Predictive mapping of soil organic carbon in wet cultivated lands using classifiation-tree based models: The case study of Denmark. Journal of Environmental Management, 91: 1150–1160.
• Kibblewhite, M.G., Ritz, K., Swift, M.J., 2008. Soil health in agricultural systems. Philosophical Tansactions of the Royal Society B, 363: 685–701.
• Kizeková, M., Hopkins, A., Kanianska, R., Makovníková, J., Pollák, Š., Pálka, B. 2017. Changes in the area of permanent grasslands and its implications for the provision of bioenergy: Slovakia as a case study. Grass and Forage Science, 73(1): 218–232. DOI: 10.1111/gfs.12333
• Kobza, J., Barančíková, G., Dodok, R., Hrivňáková, K., Makovníková, J., Pálka, B., Pavlenda, P., Schlosserová, J., Styk, J., Širáň, M., 2014. Soil monitoring in Slovak Republic. Current status and development of monitored soil properties as a basis for their protection and further exploitation (2007–2012) (in Slovak). NPPC-VÚPOP Bratislava, 252 pp.
• Kobza, J., 2017. Quality of agricultural soils in Slovakia. Polish Journal of Soli Science, 50(2): 279–289.
• Krkoška Lorencová, E., Harmáčková, Z.V., Landová, L., Pártl, A., Vačkář, D., 2017. Assessing impact of land use and climate change on regulating ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2(3): e01210. DOI: 10.1002/ehs2.1210.
• Laishram, J., Saxena, K.G., Maikhuri, R.K., Rao, K.S., 2012. Soil quality and soil health: A review. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 38: 19–37.
• Makovníková, J., Barancíková, G., 2009. Assessment of transport risk of cadmium and lead on the basis of immobilisation capability of soil. Soil and Water Research, 1: 10–16.
• Makovníková, J., 2001. Distribution of Cd and Pb in main soil types of Slovakia. Agriculture, 47: 903–912.
• Makovníková, J., Barančíková, G., Pálka, B., 2007. Approach to the assessment of transport risk of inorganic pollutants based on the immobilisation capability of soil. Plant, Soil and Environment, 53: 365–373.
• Makovníková, J., Pálka, B., Širáň, M., Kanianska, R., Kizeková, M., Jaďuďová, J., 2017. Modeling and evaluation agroecosystem services (in Slovak). Belianum. Vydavateľstvo Univerzity Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici, 150 pp.
• MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Our Human Planet: Summary for Decision Makers. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series, Vol. 5, Island Press, Washington D.C.
• Montanarella, L., 2015. Agricultural policy: Govern our soils. Nature, 528: 32–33.
• Montoya, J.M., Raffaelli, D., 2010. Climate change, biotic interactions and ecosystem services. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365: 2013–2018. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0114.
• Power, A.G., 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365: 2959–2971. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
• Ryzhenko, N.O., Kavetsky, S.V., 2015. Heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Zn, and Cu) uptake by spring barley in polluted soils. Polish Journal of Soil Science, XLVIII(1): 11–129. DOI: 10.17951/pjss.2015.48.1.111.
• Van Camp, B., Bujarrabal, A.R., Gentile, R.J.A., Jones, L, Montanarella, L., Olazabal, O., Selvaradjpu, S.K., 2004. Reports of the Technical Working Groups Established under the Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. EUR 21319 EN/5 (2004) p. 872. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
• Vilček, J., Koco, Š., 2018. Integrated index of agricultural soil quality in Slovakia. Journal of Maps, 14(2): 68–76. DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2018.1428233.
• Vogel, H.J., Bartke, S., Daedlow, K., Helming, K., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lang, B., Rabot, E., Russell, D., Stößel, B., Weller, U., Wiesmeier, M., Wollschläger, U., 2018. A systemic approach for modeling soil functions. SOIL, 4: 83–92. DOI: 10.5194/soil-4-83-2018.
• Wischmeier, W.H., Smith, D.D., 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: Guide to conservation planning. Agricultural Handbook, No. 537, USDA, 58 pp.
• Yong, R.N., Mohamed, A.M.O., Warkentin, B.P., 1992. Principles of Contaminant Transport in Soils. Elsevier, London.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17951/pjss/2019.52.1.95