Principles of developing limnological restrictions in the planning process

• Autorzy: Hakuc-Blazowska A. , Cymerman R.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Our study was carried out in the rural areas of the Olsztyn Lakeland in Poland. The obtained results provided a basis for determining principles accounting for hydrological requirements in the planning process, and for introducing to the Polish planning procedure a new document detailing the terms of managing lake buffer zones (a new opinion on limnological restrictions to a planning permit). Three zones where different planning constraints apply were identified in the study. The width of protective lake zones was then determined by applying an adjusting factor that accounts for the zone's slope gradient. The proposed method for developing limnological restrictions to a planning permit supports the identification of stagnant surface waters in the planning process. The results of the procedure should be taken into account at the stage of determining the functional characteristics of the surveyed terrain and proposing land management solutions for shoreline zones in rural areas.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 20
• Numer: 6
• Opis fizyczny: p.1501-1511,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Hakuc-Blazowska A.

• Department of Lake and River Fisheries, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Fisheries, University of Warmia and Mazury, Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Cymerman R.

• Department of Planning and Land Development, Faculty of Geodesy and Land Management, University of Warmia and Mazury, Prawocheńskiego 15, 10-724 Olsztyn, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. THE ACT on Water Law of 18 July 2001 OJ L115, Item 1229, as amended, 2001.
• 2. DIRECTIVE of the European Parliament and the Council 2000/60/EC establishing a framework community action in the field of water policy. OJ L327, 22.12.2000, pp. 1, 2000.
• 3. HAKUĆ-BŁAŻOWSKA A. Catchment and morphometric conditions of lakes as determinant of spatial management ofrural area. Doctoral thesis, 2008 [In Polish].
• 4. FISCHER R. A., FISCHENICH J. C. Design recommendations for riparian corridors and vegetated buffer strips. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory. Vicksburg, MS, 2000.
• 5. UUSI-KAMPPA J., BRASKERUD B., JANSSON H.,SYVERSEN N., UUSITALO R. Buffer zones and constructed wetlands as filters for agricultural phosphorus. J. Environ. Qual. 29, (1), 151, 2000.
• 6. CHEŁMICKI W. Water. Resources, degradation, protection. PWN, Warsaw, 2002 [In Polish].
• 7. PARKYN S. Rewiew of Riparian Buffer Zone Effectiveness. MAF Technical Paper No 2004/05. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, New Zealand, 2004.
• 8. HILLBRICHT-ILKOWSKA A. The protection of lakes and lakeland landscape – problems, processes, perspectives. Kosmos. 54, 2-3, (267-268), 285, 2005 [In Polish].
• 9. SYVERSEN N. Effect and design of buffer zones in the Nordic climate: The influence of width, amount of surface runoff, seasonal variation and vegetation type on retention efficiency for nutrient and particle runoff. Ecol. Eng. 24, 483, 2005.
• 10. VERHOEVEN J.T.A., ARHEIMER B., YIN C., HEFTING M.M. Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 96, 2006.
• 11. KOPACZ M., TWARDY S., KOSTUCH M. Nitrogen load from agricultural sources and changes in the land use in the upper Vistula basin. Water-Environment-Rural Areas, IMUZ Falenty, 7, 2b, (21), 87, 2007 [In Polish].
• 12. MAYER P.M., REYNOLDS JR S.K., MCCUTCHEN M.D., CANFIELD T.J. Meta-analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers. J. Environ. Qual. 36, (4), 1172, 2007.
• 13. HERZOG F., PRASUHN V., SPIESS E., RICHNER W. Environmental cross-compliance mitigates nitrogen and phosphorus pollution from Swiss agriculture. Environ. Sci. Pol. 11, (7), 655, 2008.
• 14. WHITE M.J., ARNOLD J.G. Development of a simplistic vegetative filter strip model for sediment and nutrient retention at the field scale. Hydrolog. Proces. 23, (11), 1602, 2009.
• 15. WOJCIECHOWSKI I. Ecological foundations of environmental management. PWN, Warszawa, 1987 [In Polish].
• 16. HILLBRICHT-ILKOWSKA A. (Ed.) Lakes of the Masurian Landscape Park - state of eutrophication, directions for conservation. “Człowiek i Środowisko” 1, 1989 [In Polish].
• 17. BNIŃSKA M. Basic guidelines for evaluation of the natural environment state and for elaboration of the principles of the use and protection of lakes. Kom. Ryb. 3, 1, 1992 [In Polish].
• 18. LENAT D.R., CRAWFORD J.K. Effects of land use on water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina Piedmont streams. Hydrobiologia 294, 185, 1994.
• 19. WANG X. Integrating water-quality management and landuse planning in a watershed context. J. Environ. Manage. 61, (1), 25, 2001.
• 20. TONG S.T.Y., CHEN W. Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality. J. of Environ. Manage. 66, (4), 377, 2002.
• 21. KOPACZ M. A concept of simplified modelling the “land use – water quality” relation in small mountain catchments. Woda – Środowisko – Obszary wiejskie 4, 2a (11), IMUZ Falenty, pp. 465-479, 2004 [In Polish].
• 22. UDAWATTA R.P., HENDERSON G.S., JONES J.R., HAMMER R.D. Runoff and sediment from row-crop, rowcrop with grass strips, pasture, and forest watersheds. Rev. Sci. Eau. 19, (2), 137, 2006 [In French].
• 23. BAJKIEWICZ-GRABOWSKA E. Physical and geographical structure of a catchment – lake and its effect on the rate of natural eutrophication of lakes. In: ZDANOWSKI B., KAMIŃSKI M., MARTYNIAK A. (Eds.) The functioning and protection of aquatic ecosystems in protected areas. Wyd. IRS, Olsztyn, pp. 77-85, 1999 [In Polish].
• 24. BAJKIEWICZ-GRABOWSKA E. The influence of the physical geographic environment on the biogenous matter delivery to the lake. J. Hydrol. Sci. 8, 1-4, 63, 1981.
• 25. BAJKIEWICZ-GRABOWSKA E. The physical and geographic structure of a catchment as the basis of assessment of biogenic matter supply to lakes. Pr. St. Geogr. 7, 65, 1985 [In Polish].
• 26. BAJKIEWICZ-GRABOWSKA E. Evaluation of Natural Susceptibility Shallow Lakes to Degradation. Geo-Journal 14, (3), 367, 1987.
• 27. KUDELSKA D., CYDZIK D., SOSZKA H. System oceny jakości jezior. Inst. Kształt. Środ., Warsaw, pp. 39, 1983 [In Polish].
• 28. BAJKIEWICZ-GRABOWSKA E. Degree of natural vulnerability of lakes to eutrophication exemplified with selected Poland's lakes. Gosp. Wod. 12, 270, 1990 [In Polish].
• 29. VOLLENWEIDER R. Scientific Fundamentals of the Eutrophication of Lakes and Flowing Waters, with Particular Reference to Nitrogen and Phosphorus as Factors in Eutrophication. OECD DAS/CSI/68.27, Paris, pp. 250, 1968.
• 30. RECKHOW K.H. Quantitative Techniques for the Assessment of Lake Quality. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA - 440/5-79-015, pp. 146, 1979.
• 31. SCHINDLER D. W. A hypothesis to explain differences and similarities among lakes in the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA), northwestern Ontario. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 28, 295, 1971.
• 32. KEREKES J. The index of lake basin permanence. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 62, (2), 291, 1977.
• 33. LIU X., ZHANG X., ZHANG M. Major factors influencing the efficacy of vegetated buffers on sediment trapping: A review and analysis. J. Environ. Qual. 37, (5), 1667, 2008.
• 34. DUCHEMIN M., HOGUE R. Reduction in agricultural non-point source pollution in the first year following establishment of an integrated grass/tree filter strip system in southern Quebec (Canada). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 131, (1-2), 85, 2009.
• 35. RATY M., UUSI-KAMPPA J., YLI-HALLA M., RASA K., PIETOLA L. Phosphorus and nitrogen cycles in the vegetation of differently managed buffer zones. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 86, (1), 121, 2009.
• 36. YUAN Y., BINGNER R.L., LOCKE M.A. A review of effectiveness of vegetative buffers on sediment trapping in agricultural areas. Ecohydrology 2, (3), 321, 2009.
• 37. CARON E., LAFRANCE P., AUCLAIR J.-C., DUCHEMIN M. Impact of grass and grass with poplar buffer strips on atrazine and metolachlor losses in surface runoff and subsurface infiltration from agricultural plots. J. Environ. Qual. 39, (2), 617, 2010.
• 38. UUSI-KAMPPA J., JAUHIAINEN L. Long-term monitoring of buffer zone efficiency under different cultivation techniques in boreal conditions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 137, (1-2), 75, 2010.
• 39. DILLAHA T.A., RENEAU R.B., MOSTAGHIMI S. LEE D. Vegetative filter strips for agricultural non point source pollution control. Transactions of the ASAE 32, (2), 513, 1989.
• 40. LEE D.L., DILLAHA T.A., SHERRARD J.H. Modeling phosphorus transport in grass buffer strips. J. Environ. Eng. 111, (2), 409, 1989.
• 41. VOUGHT L.B.-M., PINAY G., FUGLSANG A., RUFFINONI C. Structure and function of buffer strips from a water quality perspective in agricultural landscapes. Landsc. Urb. Plan. 31, (1-3), 323, 1995.
• 42. MANDER U., KUUSEMETS V., LOHMUS K., MAURING T. Efficiency and dimensioning of riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments. Ecol. Engin. 8, 299, 1997.
• 43. BORIN M., VIANELLO M., MORARI F., ZANIN G. Effectiveness of buffer strips in removing pollutants in runoff from a cultivated field in North East Italy. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 105, (1-2), 101, 2005.
• 44. DORIOZ J.M., WANG D., POULENARD J., TREVISAN D. The effect of grass buffer strips on phosphorus dynamics-A critical review and synthesis as a basis for application in agricultural landscapes in France. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 117, (1), 4, 2006.
• 45. ZIEGLER A.D., TRAN L.T., GIAMBELLUCA T.W., SIDLE R.C., SUTHERLAND R.A., NULLET M.A., VIEN T.D. Effective slope lengths for buffering hillslope surface runoff in fragmented landscapes in northern Vietnam. Forest Ecol. Manage. 224, (1-2), 104, 2006.
• 46. OWENS P.N., DUZANT J.H., DEEKS L.K., WOOD G.A., MORGAN R.P.C., COLLINS A.J. Evaluation of contrasting buffer features within an agricultural landscape for reducing sediment and sediment-associated phosphorus delivery to surface waters. Soil Use Manag. 23, (1), 165, 2007.
• 47. DIEBEL M.W., MAXTED J.T., ROBERTSON D.M., HAN S., VANDER ZANDEN M.J. Landscape planning for agricultural nonpoint source pollution reduction III: Assessing phosphorus and sediment reduction potential. Environ. Manage. 43, (1), 69, 2009.
• 48. ZHANG X., LIU X., ZHANG M., DAHLGREN R.A., EITZEL M. A review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution. J. Environ. Qual. 39, (1), 76, 2009.
• 49. MANKIN K.R., NGANDU D.M., BARDEN C.J., HUTCHINSON S.L., GEYER W.A. Grass-shrub riparian buffer removal of sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen from simulated runoff. J. Amer. Water Res. Assoc. 43, (5), 1108, 2007.
• 50. COLLINS A. L. HUGHES G., ZHANG Y., WHITEHEAD J. Mitigating diffuse water pollution from agriculture: Riparian buffer strip performance with width. CAB Reviews: Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Res., 4, (39), 15, 2009.
• 51. SHERIDAN J.M., LOWRANCE R.R., BOSCH D.D. Management effects on runoff and sediment transport in riparian forest buffers. Transactions of the ASAE 42, (1), 55, 1999.
• 52. LOWRANCE R., SHERIDAN J.M. Surface runoff water quality in a managed three zone riparian buffer. J. Environ. Qual. 34, (5), 1851, 2005.
• 53. OSBORNE L.L., KOVACIC D.A. Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water – quality restoration and stream management. Freshwat. Biol. 29, 243, 1993.
• 54. CASTELLE A.J., JOHNSON A.W., CONOLLY C. Wetlands and stream buffer size requirements – a review. J. Environ. Qual. 23, (5), 878, 1994.
• 55. WENGER S. A Review of the Scientific Literature on Riparian Buffer Width, Extent, and Vegetation. Office of Public Service and Outreach, Inst. Ecol., University of Georgia, Athens, pp. 58, 1999.
• 56. MAGETTE W.L., BRINSFIELD R.B., PALMER R.E., WOOD J.D. Nutrient and sediment removal by vegetated filter strips. Transactions of the ASAE 32, (2), 663, 1989.
• 57. GILLEY J. E., EGHBALL B., KRAMER L.A., MOORMAN T.B. Narrow grass hedge effects on runoff and soil loss. J. Soil Water Conserv. 55, (2), 190, 2000.
• 58. WHITE W.J., MORRIS L.A., PINHO A.P., JACKSON C.R., WEST L.T. Sediment retention by forested filter strips in the Piedmont of Georgia. J. Soil Water Conserv. 62, (6), 453, 2007.
• 59. DILLAHA T.A., SHERRARD J.H., LEE D., MOSTAGHIMI S., SHANHOLTZ V.O. Evaluation of vegetative filter strips as a best management practice for feed lots. J. Water Poll. Contr. Fed. 60, (7), 1231, 1988.
• 60. NIESWAND G. H., HORDON R.M., SHELTON T.B., CHAVOOSHIAN B.B., BLARR S. Buffer strips to protect water supply reservoirs: A model and recommendations. Water Res. Bull. 26, (6), 959, 1990.
• 61. ROBINSON C.A., GHAFFARZADETH M., CRUSE R.M. Vegetative filter strip effects on sediment concentration in cropland runoff. J. Soil Water Conserv. 51, (3), 227, 1996.
• 62. KOSTUCH R. The natural basics of meadow-pastural management in mountains. PWRiL, 106, pp. 152, 1976 [In Polish].
• 63. PALONE R. S., TODD A. H. (Eds.) Cheaspeake Bay riparian handbook: a guide for establishing and maintaining riparian forest buffers. U.S. Departament of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, 1998.
• 64. PATALAS K. The score point system in evaluation of the productivity of lakes in the Węgorzewo region. Rocz. Nauk Rol. seria B 77, 299, 1960 [In Polish].
• 65. BAJKIEWICZ-GRABOWSKA E., MIKULSKI Z. General hydrology. PWN, Warsaw, 1996 [In Polish