Detection of root canals in historical population from Radom (Poland)

• Autorzy: Przesmycka A. , Tomczyk J. , Pogorzelska A. , Regulski P. , Szopinski K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: The aim of this study was to analyse the number of root canals in maxillary first premolars, first molars and mandibular first molar teeth from an 18th to 19th century Radom (Poland) population, and then assess whether the diversity of root canals has fluctuated for about two hundred years. Materials and methods: A total of 139 human permanent teeth were analysed by cone beam computed tomography in three projections. The types of root canal systems were classified in each tooth root separately. Results: In one-rooted maxillary premolars, two canals occurred most often (53%). In two-rooted majority buccal (91%) and every palatal roots there is one canal. All three-rooted maxillary premolars have one root canal. In two-rooted first maxillary molars, fused roots have two canals. All mesiobuccal roots presented type 2-1 canal configurations. In three-rooted maxillary first molars in the mesiobuccal roots the most common root canal type is 2-1 (72%). A second mesiobuccal canal occurred in 86%. The distobuccal and palatal roots presented one canal in all cases. First mandibular molars occurred in two-rooted form in 98%. In mesial roots, two root canals predominated (59%). Most distal root (66%) had one canal. In three-rooted teeth one root canal was the most frequent finding. Conclusions: Knowledge about the variation in root canals is important in studies of past populations. This evidence may be important in relation to assessing the variability of human populations. The analysis carried out show the cohesion between the historical population of Radom and other groups from modern Poland. (Folia Morphol 2019; 78, 4: 853–861)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 78
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.853-861,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Przesmycka A.

• Department of Anthropology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

autor

Tomczyk J.

• Institute of Biological Sciences, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Pogorzelska A.

• Dentomaxillofacial Radiology Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Regulski P.

• Dentomaxillofacial Radiology Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
• Centre of Digital Science and Technology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Szopinski K.

• Centre of Digital Science and Technology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Abella F, Patel S, Durán-Sindreu F, et al. Mandibular first molars with disto-lingual roots: review and clinical management. Int Endod J. 2012; 45(11): 963–978, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02075.x, indexed in Pubmed: 22681628.
• 2. Agwan AS, Sheikh Z. Identification And Endodontic Treatment Of Threecanalled Maxillary First Premolar. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2016; 28(3): 627–629, indexed in Pubmed: 28712254.
• 3. Ahmed HA, Abu-bakr NH, Yahia NA, et al. Root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular molars in a Sudanese population. Int Endod J. 2007; 40(10): 766–771, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.1283.x, indexed in Pubmed: 17714468.
• 4. Albuquerque DV, Kottoor J, Velmurugan N. A new anatomically based nomenclature for the roots and root canals-part 2: mandibular molars. Int J Dent. 2012; 2012: 814789, doi: 10.1155/2012/814789, indexed in Pubmed: 22505910.
• 5. Al-Qudah AA, Awawdeh LA. Root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molar teeth in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J. 2009; 42(9): 775–784, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01578.x, indexed in Pubmed: 19549153.
• 6. Amardeep NS, Raghu S, Natanasabapathy V. Root canal morphology of permanent maxillary and mandibular canines in Indian population using cone beam computed tomography. Anat Res Int. 2014; 2014: 731859, doi: 10.1155/2014/731859, indexed in Pubmed: 24895538.
• 7. Awawdeh L, Abdullah H, Al-Qudah A. Root form and canal morphology of Jordanian maxillary first premolars. J Endod. 2008; 34(8): 956–961, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.013, indexed in Pubmed: 18634927.
• 8. Barańska-Gachowska M. Endodoncja wieku rozwojowego i dojrzałego. Czelej, Lublin 2004.
• 9. Baratto Filho F, Zaitter S, Haragushiku GA, et al. Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods. J Endod. 2009; 35(3): 337–342, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.022, indexed in Pubmed: 19249591.
• 10. Buhrley LJ, Barrows MJ, BeGole EA, et al. Effect of magnification on locating the MB2 canal in maxillary molars. J Endod. 2002; 28(4): 324–327, doi: 10.1097/00004770-200204000-00016, indexed in Pubmed: 12043874.
• 11. Ceperuelo D, Lozano M, Duran-Sindreu F, et al. Root canal morphology of Chalcolithic and early bronze age human populations of El Mirador Cave (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain). Anat Rec. 2014; 297(12): 2342–2348, doi: 10.1002/ar.22958, indexed in Pubmed: 24943458.
• 12. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CCS. Root and root canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: a literature review. J Endod. 2006; 32(9): 813–821, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.04.014, indexed in Pubmed: 16934622.
• 13. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CCS. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular second premolar: a literature review. J Endod. 2007; 33(9): 1031–1037, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.03.020, indexed in Pubmed: 17931927.
• 14. Cucina A, Tiesler V, Wrobel G. Afinidades biológicas y dinámicas poblacionales mayas desde el Preclásico hasta el periodo Colonial. Los Investigadores de la Cultura Maya. 2005; 13: 559–567.
• 15. Gani OA, Boiero CF, Correa C, et al. Morphological changes related to age in mesial root canals of permanent mandibular first molars. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2014; 27(3): 105–109, doi: 10.1590/S1852-48342014000300001, indexed in Pubmed: 25560687.
• 16. Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, et al. Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars. Int Endod J. 2002; 35(1): 56–62, indexed in Pubmed: 11853239.
• 17. Hess W, Zurcher E. The Anatomy of Root Canals of the Teeth of the Permanent and Deciduous Dentition. William Wood & Co, New York 1925.
• 18. Huang YD, Wu J, Sheu RJ, et al. Evaluation of the root and root canal systems of mandibular first premolars in northern Taiwanese patients using cone-beam computed tomography. J Formos Med Assoc. 2015; 114(11): 1129–1134, doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2014.05.008, indexed in Pubmed: 25174647.
• 19. Johnstone M, Parashos P. Endodontics and the ageing patient. Aust Dent J. 2015; 60: 20–27, doi: 10.1111/adj.12281, indexed in Pubmed: 25762039.
• 20. Karunakaran JV, Samuel LS, Rishal Y, et al. Root Canal Configuration of Human Permanent Mandibular First Molars of an Indo-Dravidian Population Based in Southern India: An Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2017; 9(Suppl 1): S68–S72, doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_163_17, indexed in Pubmed: 29284938.
• 21. Kottoor J, Albuquerque DV, Velmurugan N. A new anatomically based nomenclature for the roots and root canals-part 1: maxillary molars. Int J Dent. 2012; 2012: 120565, doi: 10.1155/2012/120565, indexed in Pubmed: 22216031.
• 22. Kottoor J, Albuquerque D, Velmurugan N, et al. Root anatomy and root canal configuration of human permanent mandibular premolars: a systematic review. Anat Res Int. 2013; 2013: 254250, doi: 10.1155/2013/254250, indexed in Pubmed: 24455268.
• 23. Lee JH, Kim KD, Lee JK, et al. Mesiobuccal root canal anatomy of Korean maxillary first and second molars by cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 111(6): 785–791, doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.11.026, indexed in Pubmed: 21439860.
• 24. Lin YH, Lin HN, Chen CC, et al. Evaluation of the root and canal systems of maxillary molars in Taiwanese patients: A cone beam computed tomography study. Biomed J. 2017; 40(4): 232–238, doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2017.05.003, indexed in Pubmed: 28918912.
• 25. Lipski M, Woźniak K, Łagocka R, et al. Root and canal morphology of the first human maxillary premolar. DAJ. 2005; 12(2-3).
• 26. Martins JNR, Ordinola-Zapata R, Marques D, et al. Differences in root canal system configuration in human permanent teeth within different age groups. Int Endod J. 2018; 51(8): 931–941, doi: 10.1111/iej.12896, indexed in Pubmed: 29363147.
• 27. Mirmohammadi H, Mahdi L, Partovi P, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the Detection of a second mesiobuccal root canal in Endodontically treated teeth: an ex vivo study. J Endod. 2015; 41(10): 1678–1681, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.011, indexed in Pubmed: 26282565.
• 28. Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Jafarzadeh H. Extra roots and root canals in premolar and molar teeth: review of an endodontic challenge. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013; 14(5): 980–986, indexed in Pubmed: 24685809.
• 29. Naseri M, Safi Y, Baghban AA, et al. Survey of Anatomy and Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary First Molars Regarding Age and Gender in an Iranian Population Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Iran Endod J. 2016; 11(4): 298–303, doi: 10.22037/iej.2016.8, indexed in Pubmed: 27790259.
• 30. Nosonowitz DM, Brenner MR. The major canals of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary 1st and 2nd molars. N Y J Dent. 1973; 43(1): 12–15, indexed in Pubmed: 4508675.
• 31. Nosrat A, Deschenes RJ, Tordik PA, et al. Middle mesial canals in mandibular molars: incidence and related factors. J Endod. 2015; 41(1): 28–32, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.004, indexed in Pubmed: 25266468.
• 32. Olczak K, Pawlicka H. The morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a polish population. BMC Med Imaging. 2017; 17(1): 68, doi: 10.1186/s12880-017-0243-3, indexed in Pubmed: 29284426.
• 33. Peiris R. Root and canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Sri Lankan and Japanese population. Anthropol Sci. 2008; 116(2): 123–133, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01428.x.
• 34. Piątkowski S. Radom - zarys dziejów miasta. Wyd. Radom, Radom 2000.
• 35. Prado-Simón L, Martinón-Torres M, Baca P, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of root canal morphology in lower second premolars of early and middle Pleistocene human populations from Atapuerca (Burgos, Spain). Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012; 147(3): 452–461, doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22015, indexed in Pubmed: 22282075.
• 36. Ramírez-Salomón M, Vega-Lizama E, Tiesler V, et al. The C-shaped canal molar: an Endodontic-Archaeological study of the relationships between Mayan pre-Hispanic and contemporary population of Yucatán. Int Endod J. 2014; 47(11): 1084–1089, doi: 10.1111/iej.12255, indexed in Pubmed: 24471812.
• 37. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna: Austria 2013. http://www.R-project.org.
• 38. Rózyło TK, Miazek M, Rózyło-Kalinowska I, et al. Morphology of root canals in adult premolar teeth. Folia Morpholl. 2008; 67(4): 280–285, indexed in Pubmed: 19085869.
• 39. Saini T, Wilson CA. Taurodont molars: Review of literature and radiological features. Saudi Dent J. 1990; 2: 68–70.
• 40. Scott EC. Dental wear scoring technique. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1979; 51(2): 213–217, doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330510208.
• 41. Scott GR, Turner CG. The Anthropology of Modern Human teeth. Cambridge University Press, UK 1997.
• 42. Scott G, Dahlberg A. Microdifferentiation in tooth morphology among Indians of the American southwest. In: Kurten B (ed.). Teeth: form, function and evolution. Columbia University Press, New York 1982: 259–291.
• 43. Sert S, Sahinkesen G, Topçu FT, et al. Root canal configurations of third molar teeth. A comparison with first and second molars in the Turkish population. Aust Endod J. 2011; 37(3): 109–117, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00254.x, indexed in Pubmed: 22117717.
• 44. Skidmore AE, Bjorndal AM. Root canal morphology of the human mandibular first molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32(5): 778–784, doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(71)90304-5, indexed in Pubmed: 5286234.
• 45. Smith BH. Patterns of molar wear in hunger-gatherers and agriculturalists. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1984; 63(1): 39–56, doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330630107, indexed in Pubmed: 6422767.
• 46. Studebaker B, Hollender L, Mancl L, et al. The incidence of second mesiobuccal canals located in maxillary molars with the aid of cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2018; 44(4): 565–570, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.026, indexed in Pubmed: 29153734.
• 47. Sulaiman AO, Dosumu OO, Amedari M. Maxillary first premolar with three root canals: a case report. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2013; 11(2): 105–108, indexed in Pubmed: 25161429.
• 48. Thomas RP, Moule AJ, Bryant R. Root canal morphology of maxillary permanent first molar teeth at various ages. Int Endod J. 1993; 26(5): 257–267, indexed in Pubmed: 8300257.
• 49. Tian XM, Yang XW, Qian L, et al. Analysis of the root and canal morphologies in maxillary first and second molars in a chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2016; 42(5): 696–701, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.017, indexed in Pubmed: 26994598.
• 50. Torres A, Jacobs R, Lambrechts P, et al. Characterization of mandibular molar root and canal morphology using cone beam computed tomography and its variability in Belgian and Chilean population samples. Imaging Sci Dent. 2015; 45(2): 95–101, doi: 10.5624/isd.2015.45.2.95, indexed in Pubmed: 26125004.
• 51. Turner CGI, Nichol CR, Scott Gr. Scoring procedures for key morphological traits of the permanent dentition: the Arizona State University dental anthropology system. In: Kelley MA, Larson CS (ed.). Advances in dental anthropology. Wiley-Liss, New York 1991.
• 52. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984; 58(5): 589–599, doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90085-9, indexed in Pubmed: 6595621.
• 53. White TD, Folkens PA. The human bone manual. Academic Press, The Netherlands, Amsterdam 2005.
• 54. Zapłata R. Wstępne wyniki badań archeologicznych w wykopie 1/2010 na stanowisku 1 „Majdan” i w wykopie I-2/2010 na stanowisku 2 „Osada” w Radomiu. In: Buko A, Główka D, Trzeciecki M (ed.). Radom: korzenie miasta i regionu. Tom 2, Wyd. Instytutu Archeologii i Etnologii PAN, Warszawa 2011: 89–112.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2019.0014