The Terminologia Anatomica matters: examples from didactic, scientific, and clinical practice

• Autorzy: Strzelec B. , Chmielewski P.-P. , Gworys B.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The proper usage of the anatomical terminology is of paramount importance to all medical professionals. Although a multitude of studies have been devoted to issues associated with the use and application of the recent version of the anatomical terminology in both theoretical medicine and clinical practice, there are still many unresolved problems such as confusing terms, inconsistencies, and errors, including grammar and spelling mistakes. The aim of this article is to describe the current situation of the anatomical terminology and its usage in practice, as well as explain why it is so important to use precise, appropriate, and valid anatomical terms during the everyday communication among physicians from all medical branches. In this review, we discuss some confusing, obsolete, and erroneous terms that are still commonly used by many clinicians, and surgeons in particular, during the process of diagnosis and treatment. The use of these ambiguous, erroneous, and obsolete terms enhances the risk of miscommunication. We also provide some edifying examples from everyday clinical practice. (Folia Morphol 2017; 76, 3: 340–347)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 76
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.340-347,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Strzelec B.

• Division of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
• Department and Clinic of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Chmielewski P.-P.

• Division of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Gworys B.

• Division of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Aresti N, Ramachandran M. Nonoriginal Malappropriate Eponymous Nomenclature: examples relevant to paediatric orthopaedics. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2012; 21(6): 606–610, doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e328356f9a5, indexed in Pubmed: 22814740.
• 2. Chmielewski P, Borysławski K, Chmielowiec K, et al. Longitudinal and cross-sectional changes with age in selected anthropometric and physiological traits in hospitalized adults: an insight from the Polish Longitudinal Study of Aging (PLSA). Anthropol Rev. 2015; 78(3): 317–336, doi: 10.1515/anre-2015-0025.
• 3. Conti AA. Calling the heart by name: distinguished eponyms in the history of cardiac anatomy. Heart Surg Forum. 2011; 14(3): E183–E187, doi:10.1532/HSF98.20101047, indexed in Pubmed: 21676685.
• 4. DiPoce J, Jimenez G, Weintraub J. Historical perspective: eponyms of vascular radiology. Radiographics. 2014; 34(4): 1120–1140, doi:10.1148/rg.344130125, indexed in Pubmed: 25019445.
• 5. FCAT Terminologia Anatomica. International Anatomical Terminology. 2nd edition. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart. 2011.
• 6. Gielecki J, Zurada A, Osman N. Terminologia anatomica in the past and the future from perspective of 110th anniversary of Polish Anatomical Terminology. Folia Morphol. 2008; 67(2): 87–97, indexed in Pubmed: 18521806.
• 7. Golanó P, Vega J, de Leeuw PAJ, et al. Anatomy of the ankle ligaments: a pictorial essay. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18(5): 557–569, doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1100-x, indexed in Pubmed: 20309522.
• 8. Hill M, Davis M. Local control of microvascular perfusion. Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences, New York. 2013.
• 9. Hirsch BE. Does the Terminologia Anatomica really matter? Clin Anat. 2011; 24(4): 503–504, doi: 10.1002/ca.21140, indexed in Pubmed: 21509816.
• 10. Kachlik D, Baca V, Bozdechova I, et al. Anatomical terminology and nomenclature: past, present and highlights. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008; 30(6): 459–466, doi: 10.1007/s00276-008-0357-y, indexed in Pubmed: 18488135.
• 11. Kachlík D, Bozdechová I, Cech P, et al. [Ten years after the latest revision International Anatomical Terminology]. Cas Lek Cesk. 2008; 147(5): 287–294, indexed in Pubmed: 18630187.
• 12. Kachlik D, Bozdechova I, Cech P, et al. Mistakes in the usage of anatomical terminology in clinical practice. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2009; 153(2): 157–161, indexed in Pubmed: 19771143.
• 13. Kachlik D, Musil V, Baca V. Terminologia Anatomica after 17 years: inconsistencies, mistakes and new proposals. Ann Anat. 2015; 201: 8–16, doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2015.04.006, indexed in Pubmed: 26094127.
• 14. Kachlik D, Musil V, Baca V. Contribution to the anatomical nomenclature concerning general anatomy and anatomical variations. Surg Radiol Anat. 2016; 38(7): 757–765, doi: 10.1007/s00276-016-1627-8, indexed in Pubmed: 26946463.
• 15. Kumka M, Bonar J. Fascia: a morphological description and classification system based on a literature review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2012; 56(3): 179–191, indexed in Pubmed: 22997468.
• 16. Kutia SA. Eponyms in biliary tree. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2014(10): 106–110, indexed in Pubmed: 25911940.
• 17. Martin BD, Thorpe D, Barnes R, et al. Frequency in usage of FCAT-approved anatomical terms by North American anatomists. Anat Sci Educ. 2009; 2(3): 94–106, doi: 10.1002/ase.83, indexed in Pubmed: 19459207.
• 18. Martin B, Thorpe D, DeLuna V, et al. Frequency in Usage ofTerminologia AnatomicaTerms by Clinical Anatomists. J Biomed Edu. 2014; 2014: 1–9, doi: 10.1155/2014/950898.
• 19. Martin BD, Thorpe D, Merenda V, et al. Contrast in usage of FCAT-approved anatomical terminology between members of two anatomy associations in North America. Anat Sci Educ. 2010; 3(1): 25–32, doi: 10.1002/ase.114, indexed in Pubmed: 19890984.
• 20. Matusz P. Misleading Latin/English equivalents for some liver terms in Terminologia Anatomica. Anat Sci Educ. 2010; 3(3): 156–157, doi: 10.1002/ase.133, indexed in Pubmed: 20186839.
• 21. Mirilas P, Skandalakis JE. Benign anatomical mistakes: the correct anatomical term for the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Am Surg. 2002; 68(1): 95–97, indexed in Pubmed: 12467328.
• 22. Pawlina W, Drake R. Moving forward with Terminologia Anatomica. Anat Sci Educ. 2009; 2(3): 93, doi: 10.1002/ase.89, indexed in Pubmed: 19496153.
• 23. Sakai T. Historical evolution of anatomical terminology from ancient to modern. Anat Sci Int. 2007; 82(2): 65–81, doi: 10.1111/j.1447-073X.2007.00180.x, indexed in Pubmed: 17585563.
• 24. Schaller O. Illustrated veterinary anatomical nomenclature. Enke Verlag, Stuttgart. 2007.
• 25. Schleip R, Jäger H, Klingler W. What is ‘fascia’? A review of different nomenclatures. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012; 16(4): 496–502, doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.08.001, indexed in Pubmed: 23036881.
• 26. Urbanowicz Z. Mała encyklopedia anatomii człowieka. Czelej, Lublin. 2003.
• 27. Vogl AW. Awareness of and access to a unified terminology by anatomists. Anat Sci Educ. 2009; 2(3): 139–140, doi: 10.1002/ase.85, indexed in Pubmed: 19496162.
• 28. Waseem M, Khan M, Hussain N, et al. Eponyms: errors in clinical practice and scientific writing. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005; 71(1): 1–8, indexed in Pubmed: 15792200.
• 29. Weber JC. Shearer’s manual of human dissection. McGrawHill, New York 1999.
• 30. Wendell-Smith C. Terminological desiderata. Clin Anat. 2003; 16(1): 98–103, doi: 10.1002/ca.10131, indexed in Pubmed: 12486743.
• 31. Whitmore I. Terminologia anatomica: new terminology for the new anatomist. Anat Rec. 1999; 257(2): 50–53, indexed in Pubmed: 10321431.
• 32. Yabuki Y. Clinical anatomy of the subserous layer: An amalgamation of gross and clinical anatomy. Clin Anat. 2016; 29(4): 508–515, doi:10.1002/ca.22579, indexed in Pubmed: 26621479.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2016.0078