Sugar-sweetened beverages consumption during COVID-19 pandemic among office workers in semi-urban area in southern Thailand: a cross-sectional study

• Autorzy: Pouyfung P. , Sawekwang A. , Kaewnopparat P. , Dungkond T. , Pornpitayalaud P. , Chuaboon L. , Petchoo J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background. During COVID-19 pandemic, office worker has spent more than 6-8 hours per day sitting for online working following social distancing policy. Considering the popularity of online ordering and home delivery services, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) consumption have increased. However, the link between the types SSB consumption and their BMI was less well documented. Objective. To determine the association of the habitual intake (type, frequency, and volume) of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) with body mass index (BMI). Material and methods. A cross-sectional study, 337 office workers were selected according to probability proportionto- size and systematic random sampling. Data were collected using face-to-face interviews on the type, frequency, and volume of sugar-sweetened beverage intake. Samples of sugar-containing beverages were analyzed using high-throughput liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The chi-square test was used to determine the relationship of SSB consumption with BMI. Unadjusted binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess the associations between BMI and metabolic diseases. Results. Most respondents (56.1%) were overweight (BMI >23 kg/m2). The most consumed SSB was milk tea (e.g., Thai tea and green tea), which was significantly related with BMI (p=0.03). LC-MS/MS analysis showed that sucrose and lactose were the major sugars in milk tea (34.7 g/100mL, on average). 70.6% of the respondents consumed >24 g/day of sugar, which is more than the World Health Organization’s recommendation. Conclusions. Health control policies and health education, for example warning labels for the reduction of SSB consumption, may urgently be required to promote health in workplaces and prevent SSB-related metabolic diseases.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Roczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 73
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.453-462,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Pouyfung P.

• School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
• Food Technology and Innovation Research Center of Excellence, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand

autor

Sawekwang A.

• School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand

autor

Kaewnopparat P.

• School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand

autor

Dungkond T.

• School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand

autor

Pornpitayalaud P.

• School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand

autor

Chuaboon L.

• School of Pharmacy, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
• Biomass and Oil Palm Research Center of Excellence, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand

autor

Petchoo J.

• School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
• Food Technology and Innovation Research Center of Excellence, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand

Bibliografia

• 1. Qi X, Tester RF.: Fructose, galactose and glucose—in health and disease. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019;33:18-28. doi:10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.07.004
• 2. Haque M, McKimm J, Sartelli M, et al.: A narrative review of the effects of sugar-sweetened beverages on human health: a key global health issue. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2020;27:e76-e103. doi:10.15586/jptcp. v27i1.666
• 3. Phulkerd S, Thongcharoenchupong N, Chamratrithirong A, et al.: Changes in population-level consumption of taxed and non-taxed sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) after implementation of SSB excise tax in Thailand: a prospective cohort study. Nutrients 2020;12:3294. doi:10.3390/nu12113294
• 4. Macdonald IA.: A review of recent evidence relating to sugars, insulin resistance and diabetes. Eur J Nutr. 2016;55:17-23. doi:10.1007/s00394-016-1340-8
• 5. Oh W, Abu-Elheiga L, Kordari P, et al.: Glucose and fat metabolism in adipose tissue of acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2 knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:1384-1389. doi:10.1073/pnas.0409451102
• 6. Sun SZ, Empie MW.: Fructose metabolism in humans—what isotopic tracer studies tell us. Nutr Met. 2012;9:89. doi:10.1186/1743-7075-9-89
• 7. Stanhope KL, Schwarz JM, Keim NL, et al.: Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:1322-1334. doi:10.1172/JCI37385
• 8. Blüher M.: Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15:288-298. doi:10.1038/s41574-019-0176
• 9. James WP.: Obesity: a global public health challenge. Clin Chem. 2018;64:24-29. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2017.273052
• 10. Rønn PF, Andersen GS, Lauritzen T, et al.: Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue and associations with cardiometabolic risk in Inuit, Africans and Europeans: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e038071. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038071
• 11. Shuster A, Patlas M, Pinthus JH, et al.: The clinical importance of visceral adiposity: a critical review of methods for visceral adipose tissue analysis. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:1-10. doi:10.1259/bjr/38447238
• 12. Rippe JM, Sievenpiper JL, Lê KA et al.: What is the appropriate upper limit for added sugars consumption? Nutr Rev. 2017;75:18-36. doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuw046
• 13. Chatelan A, Gaillard P, Kruseman M, et al.: Total, added, and free sugar consumption and adherence to guidelines in Switzerland: results from the first national nutrition survey menu CH. Nutrients. 2019;11:1117. doi:10.3390/nu11051117
• 14. Daneshmandi H, Choobineh A, Ghaem H, et al.: Adverse effects of prolonged sitting behavior on the general health of office workers. J Lifestyle Med. 2017;7:69-75. doi:10.15280/jlm.2017.7.2.69
• 15. Kim BM, Lee BE, Park HS, et al.: Long working hours and overweight and obesity in working adults. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2016;28:36. doi:10.1186/s40557-016-0110-7
• 16. Sungur Ş, Kilboz Y.: Determination of sugar profiles of sweetened foods and beverages. J Food Nutr Res.2016;4:349-354. doi:10.12691/jfnr-4-6-2
• 17. Sakai H, Yamashita A, Tamura M, et al.: Simultaneous determination of sweeteners in beverages by LC-MS/MS. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2015;32:808-816. doi:10.1080/19440 049.2015.1018341
• 18. Hedrick VE, Comber DL, Estabrooks PA, et al.: The beverage intake questionnaire: determining initial validity and reliability. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:1227-1232. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2010.05.005
• 19. Sakboonyarat B, Pornpongsawad C, Sangkool T, et al.: Trends, prevalence and associated factors of obesity among adults in a rural community in Thailand: serial cross-sectional surveys, 2012 and 2018. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:850. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09004-w
• 20. Bleich SN, Lawman HG, LeVasseur MT, et al.: The association of a sweetened beverage tax with changes in beverage prices and purchases at independent stores. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020;39:1130-1139. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01058
• 21. Cuadrado C, Dunstan J, Silva-Illanes N, et al.: Effects of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax on prices and affordability of soft drinks in Chile: a time series analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2020;245:112708. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112708
• 22. Ferretti F, Mariani M.: Sugar-sweetened beverage affordability and the prevalence of overweight and obesity in a cross section of countries. Global Health. 2019;15:30. doi:10.1186/s12992-019-0474-x
• 23. Cuy CD, Miller ME: Exploration of sugar-sweetened beverage intake in a Latinx population. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020;52:281-289. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2019.08.013
• 24. Stanhope KL, Havel PJ.: Fructose consumption: considerations for future research on its effects on adipose distribution, lipid metabolism, and insulin sensitivity in humans. J Nutr. 2009;139:1236S-1241S. doi:10.3945/jn.109.106641
• 25. Kuhnle GG, Tasevska N, Lentjes MA, et al.: Association between sucrose intake and risk of overweight and obesity in a prospective sub-cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer in Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk). Public Health Nutr. 2015;18:2815-2824. doi:10.1017/S1368980015000300
• 26. Varma V, Boros LG, Nolen GT, et al.: Metabolic fate of fructose in human adipocytes: a targeted 13C tracer fate association study. Metabolomics. 2015;11:529-544. doi:10.1007/s11306-014-0716-0
• 27. Hannou SA, Haslam DE, McKeown NM, et al.: Fructose metabolism and metabolic disease. J Clin Investig. 2018;128:545-555. doi:10.1172/JCI96702
• 28. Herman MA, Samuel VT.: The sweet path to metabolic demise: fructose and lipid synthesis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2016;27:719-730. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2016.06.005
• 29. Ma J, McKeown NM, Hwang SJ, et al.: Sugarsweetened beverage consumption is associated with change of visceral adipose tissue over 6 years of follow-up. Circulation. 2016;133:370-377. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018704
• 30. Do GY, Kwon EY, Kim YJ, et al.: Supplementation of nondairy creamer-enriched high-fat diet with D-allulose ameliorated blood glucose and body fat accumulation in C57BL/6J mice. Appl Sci. 2019;9:2750. doi:10.3390/app9132750
• 31. Lin WT, Kao YH, Sothern MS et al.: The association between sugar-sweetened beverages intake, body mass index, and inflammation in US adults. Int J Public Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):45-53. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01330-5.
• 32. Liu C, Li P, Li H et al.: TREM2 regulates obesityinduced insulin resistance via adipose tissue remodeling in mice of high-fat feeding. J Transl Med. 2019 Sep 2;17(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-2050-9.
• 33. Cignarelli A, Genchi VA, Perrini S, et al.: Insulin and insulin receptors in adipose tissue development. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:759. doi:10.3390/ijms20030759
• 34. Hammarstedt A, Gogg S, Hedjazifar S et al.: Impaired Adipogenesis and Dysfunctional Adipose Tissue in Human Hypertrophic Obesity. Physiol Rev. 2018 Oct 1;98(4):1911-1941. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00034.2017.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.32394/rpzh.2022.0228