Field-scale spatial autocorrelation of some sodium and potassium forms in a Luvisol humic horizon

• Autorzy: Dlugosz J. , Kobierski M. , Piotrowska-Dlugosz A. , Gozdowski D.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Korelacja przestrzenna wybranych form sodu i potasu w poziomie orno-próchnicznym gleby płowej w skali pola uprawnego

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Knowledge of the spatial variability of the content and transformations of soil nutrients is important for precision agriculture and environmental protection. Spatial patterns of exchangeable (Na-Exch, K-Exch) and water soluble (Na-WS, K-WS) forms of sodium and potassium were examined in Luvisol soil lying in the region of Cuiavia and Pomerania, northwest Poland, so as to identify their spatial distribution for the implementation of site-specific management. In April 2007, soil samples were collected in a system of 10 x 10 m grids ( n = 50) from an area of 0.5 ha located in an intensively used arable field. Water soluble forms of Na and K were determined after extraction with distilled water in a 1:5 soil to water ratio, while the exchangeable forms of these elements were assayed in 0.1 M BaCl 2 . The data were analyzed both statistically and geostatistically from semivariograms and their modelling. The spatial autocorrelation of a data set is described with the Moran’s correlograms, hence adequate correlograms were drawn. Among all the properties determined, it was only water soluble K that showed significant spatial autocorrelation. Other soil properties (Na-WS, Na-Exch, K-Exch) did not demonstrate any spatial autocorrelation (the Moran’s values were close to zero at p < 0.05), which indicated their random spatial variability. In order to assess the spatial variability of K-WS, a spherical model with the nugget effect was fitted into the calculated semivariogram. The results were assigned to the moderate variability class (the nugget effect 52%), and the range of the spatial impact stretched for 38 m.

PL

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Journal of Elementology
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 19
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.339-349,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Dlugosz J.

• Chair of Soil Science and Soil Protection, University of Technology and Life Sciences in Bydgoszcz, Bernardynska 6/8 St., 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland

autor

Kobierski M.

• Chair of Soil Science and Soil Protection, University of Technology and Life Sciences in Bydgoszcz, Bernardynska 6/8 St., 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland

autor

Piotrowska-Dlugosz A.

• Departament of Biochemistry, University of Technology and Life Sciences in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland

autor

Gozdowski D.

• Chair of Experimental Design and Bioinformatics, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• Aishah A.W., Zauyah S., Anuar A.R., Fauziah C.I. 2010. Spatial variability of selected chemical characteristics of paddy soils in sawah sempadan, Selangor, Malaysia. Malaysian J. Soil Sci., 14: 27-39.
• Ardahanlioglu O., Oztasw T., Salih E.S., Yilmaz H., Yildirim Z. N. 2003. Spatial variability of exchangeable sodium, electrical conductivity, soil pH and boron content in saltand sodium-affected areas of the Igdir Plain (Turkey). J. Arid Environ., 54: 495-503. DOI: 10.1006/jare.2002.1073
• Aşkin T., Kizilkaya R. 2006. Assessing spatial variability of soil enzyme activities in pasture topsoils using geostatistics. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 42(1): 230-237.
• Aşkin T., Kizilkaya R., Yilmaz R., Olekhov V., Mudrykh N., Samofalova I. 2012. Soil exchangeable cations: A geostatistical study from Russia. Eurasian J. Soil Sci., 1: 34-39.
• Bergstrom D.W., Monreal C.M., Millette J.A., King D.J. 1998. Spatial dependence of soil enzyme activities along a slope. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 6: 1302-1308.
• Burzyńska I., Pietrzak S. 2010. The content of soluble forms of potassium and doc in the soil layer from under long-term manure storage place. Water-Environment-Rural Areas, 10(4): 23-32. (in Polish)
• Cambardella C.A., Moorman T.B., Novak J.M., Parkin T.B., Karlen D.L., Turco R.F., Konopka A.E. 1994. Field-scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58: 1501-1511.
• Cerri C.E.P., Bernoux M., Chaplot V., Volkoff B., Victoria R.L., Melillo J.M., Paustian K., Cerri C.C. 2004. Assessment of soil property spatial variation in an Amazon pasture: basis for selecting an agronomic experimental area. Geoderma, 123: 51-68. DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma. 2004.01.027.
• Flower M., Weisz R., White G. 2005. Yield-based management zones and grid sampling strategies: Describing soil test and nutrient variability. Agron. J., 97: 968-982.
• Franzen D.W. 2011. Collecting and analyzing soil spatial information using kriging and inverse distance. In: GIS applications in agriculture: nutrient management for energy efficiency. Clay D.E., Shanahan J.F. (Eds.). Taylor and Francis, 61-80.
• Kerry R., Oliver M.A. 2004. Average variograms to guide soil sampling. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 5: 307-325.
• Kobierski M., Długosz J., Piotrowska A. 2011. Spatial variability of different magnesium forms in luvisols formed from glacial till. J. Elem., 16(2): 205-214. DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2011.16.2.01.
• Li Y., Qin J., Guo Z., Wang Z., Ao Y. 2012. Spatial variability of soil quality and asparagus spear yield in an area of plastic-greenhouse cultivation on Chongming Island, China. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 7(15): 2262-2272. DOI: 10.5897/AJAR10.052
• McBratney, A.B., Webster R. 1983. Optimal interpolation and isarithm mapping of soil properties: V. Coregionalization and multiple sampling strategy. J. Soil Sci., 34: 137-162.
• Moran P. 1948. The interpretation of statistical maps. J. Royal Stat. Soc., Ser. B, 10: 243–251.
• Patil S.S., Patil V.C. Al-Gaadi K.A. 2011. Spatial variability in fertility status of surface soils. World Appl. Sci. J., 14(7): 1020-1024.
• Piotrowska A., Długosz J. 2012. Spatio–temporal variability of microbial biomass content and activities related to some physicochemical properties of Luvisols. Geoderma, 173-174: 199-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.12.014.
• Prośba-Białczyk U., Mydlarski M. 2002. The effect of sodium chloride sprayed on leaves on productivity and technological value of sugar beet. Bull. Plant Breed. Acclimat. Inst., 222: 215-222. (in Polish)
• Ragály P., Kádár I. 2005. Long term effects of mineral nutrition on the yield and element content in grass. Fertilizers Fertilization, 5: 395-400.
• Randame-Malvi U. 2011. Interaction of micronutrients with major nutrients with special references to potassium. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 24(1): 106-109.
• Santra P., Chropra V.K., Chakraborty D. 2008. Spatial variability of soil properties and its application in predicting surface map of hydraulic parameters in an agricultural farm. Curr. Sci., 95(7): 937-945.2008.
• Škarpa P., Hlušek J. 2012. Effect of years, fertilization and growing regions on the content and forms of potassium in soil. J. Elem., 17(2): 305-315. DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2012.17.2.12
• Szulc M.P., Kobierski M., Nowakowski M., Kubicki K. 2008. The effect of sodium fertilization on the yield and quality parameters of sugar beet roots. Bull. Plant Breed. Acclimat. Inst., (Bull. IHAR), 248: 77-85. (in Polish)
• Tabi F.O., Ogunkunle A.O. 2007. Spatial variation of some soil physico-chemical properties of an Alfisol in Southwestern Nigeria. Nig. J. Soil Environ. Res., 7: 82-91.
• Wilding L.P. 1985. Spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation, and implication to soil surveys, In: Nielsen D.R., Bouma J. (Eds.). Soil spatial variability. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp. 166-194.
• Vieira, S.R. 2000. Geostatistical study of spatial variability of soil, In: Novaris, Topics in soil science. R.F. Alvarez, V.V.H. Schaefer, C.E.G.R. (Eds.). Brazilian Society of Soil Science, Campinas, SP, Brazil (in Portuguese), pp. 1-54.
• Yanai J., Sawamoto T., Oe T., Kusa K., Yamakawa K., Sakamoto K., Naganawa T., Inubushi K., Hatano R., Kosaki T. 2003. Spatial variability of nitrous oxide emissions and their soil-related determining factors in an agricultural field. J. Environ. Qual., 32(6): 1965-1977.

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5601/jelem.2014.19.2.663