Antagonistic properties of Streptomyces isolated from forest soils against fungal pathogens of pine seedlings

• Autorzy: Golinska P. , Dahm H.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Biological control of plant diseases has received worldwide attention in recent years mainly as a response to use of hazardous chemicals in the environment. Soil actinomycetes particularly Streptomyces spp. enhance soil fertility and have antagonistic activity against wide range of soil-borne plant pathogens. In study of antifungal activity of streptomycetes against plant fungal-pathogens Fusarium oxysporum (Schlecht.), F. culmorum (Wm. G. Sm.) Sacc. and Rhizoctonia solani (Kühn) causing damping-off of pine seedlings, in vitro and in vivo tests were carried out. Two types of in vitro tests in mixed cultures of actinomycetes and fungi were performed. In majority of the cases, an inhibitory effect of actinomycetes on fungi was noticed. Three isolates (SG9, SR2, SR4) were highly active against pathogenic fungi and were chosen for exopolysaccharides extraction and in vivo tests. The sensitivity to exopolysaccharide action was noted in fungi from the genus Fusarium. Fusarium oxysporum showed a higher sensitivity to the analyzed exopolysaccharides than F. culmorum. Biocontrol interactions both in sterile and non-sterile soil were found for the actinomycete Streptomyces cyaneus (strain SG9) isolated from root free soil of the pine. The latest experiment confirmed the strong pathogenicity of the fungus Rhizoctonia solani. Antifungal properties of Streptomyces cyaneus (strain SG9) need further comprehensive studies.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Dendrobiology
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 69
• Opis fizyczny: p.87-97,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Golinska P.

• Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, 87-100 Torun, Poland

autor

Dahm H.

Bibliografia

• Aghighi S., Shahidi Bojar G.H., Rawashdeh R., Batayneh S., Saadoun J., 2004. First report of antifungal spectra of activity of Iranian Actinomycetes strains against Alternaria solani, Alternaria alternata, Fusarium solani, Phythophthora megasperma, Verticillium dahliae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 3: 463–471.
• Barabasz W., Vo išek K. 2002. Biodiversity of microorganisms in soil environments. In: Microbial activity in diverse environments. Barabasz W. (ed.). Kraków: Akademia Rolnicza, pp. 23-34. (In Polish with English Summary)
• Berg G., Zachow Ch., Lottmann J., Gõtz M., Costa R., Smalla K. 2005. Impact of plant species and site on rhizosphere – associated fungi antagonistic to Verticillium dahliae Kleb. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71: 4203–4213.
• Bressan W. 2003. Biological control of maize seed pathogenic fungi by use of actinomycetes. BioControl 48: 233–240.
• Chattopadhyay S.K., Nandi B. 1982. Inhibition of Helminthosporium oryzae and Alternaria solani by Streptomyces longisporus (Krasil’ nikov) Waksman. Plant and Soil 69: 171–175.
• Chmiel A. 1982. Why do microorganisms produce antibiotics? Postępy Mikrobiologii 21: 211–234. (In Polish with English Summary).
• Coombs J.T., Michelsen P.P, Franco C.M.M. 2004. Evaluation of endophytic actinobacteria as antagonists of Gaeumannomyces graminis var tritici in wheat. Biological Control 29: 359–366.
• Crawford D.L. 1988. Biodegradation of agricultural and urban wastes. In: Actinomycetes in Biotechnology. In: Goodfellow M., Williams S.T., Modarski M. (eds). London: Academic Press, pp. 433–459.
• Crawford D.L., Lynch J.M., Whipps J.M., Ousley M.A. 1993. Isolation and characterization of actinomycete antagonists of fungal root pathogen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59: 3899–3905.
• Dahm H., Różycki H., Strzelczyk, E. 1986. Bacteria and actinomycetes of the soil and the root zone of forest trees. Postępy Mikrobiologii 25: 103–120. (In Polish with English Summary).
• Davelos A.L., Kinkiel L.L., Samac D.A. 2004. Spatial variation in frequency and intensity of antibiotic interactions among Streptomycetes from prairie soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70: 1051–1058.
• de Boer M., Boom P., Kindt F., Keurentjes J.J.B., Van der Sluis I., Van Loon L.C., Bakker P.A.H.M. 2003. Control of Fusarium wilt of radish by combining Pseudomonas putida strains that have different disease-suppressive mechanisms. Phytopathology 93: 626–632.
• de Boer W., Gunneweik P.J.A., Lafeber P., Janse J.D., Spit B.E., Woldendorp J.W. 1998. Anti-fungal properties of chitinolytic dune soil bacteria. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30: 193–203.
• Dong H.Z, Li W.J., Zhang D.M., Tang W. 2003. Differential expression of induced resistance by an aqueous extract of killed Penicillium chrysogenum against Verticillium wilt of cotton. Crop Protection 22: 129–134.
• Dumroese R.K., Jamek R.L., Wenny D.L. 1998. Interactions among Streptomyces griseoviridis, Fusarium root disease, and Douglas-fir seedlings. New Forests 15: 181–191.
• Fravel D.R., Roberts D.P.1991. In situ evidence for the role of glucose oxidase in the biocontrol of Verticillium wilt by Talaromyces flavus. Biocontrol Science and Technology 1: 91–99.
• Getha K., Vikineswary S. 2002. Antagonistic effects of Streptomyces violaceusniger strain G10 on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 4: Indirect evidence for the role of antibiosis in the antagonistic process. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 28: 303–310.
• Gohar Y., Beshay U., Daba A., Hafez E. 2006. Bioactive compounds from Streptomyces nasri and its mutants with special reference to proteopolysaccharides. Polish Journal of Microbiology 55: 179–187.
• Golińska P., Dahm H. 2011a. Enzymatic activity of actinomycetes from the genus Streptomyces isolated from the bulk soil and rhizosphere of the Pinus sylvestris. Dendrobiology 65: 37–46.
• Golińska P., Dahm H. 2011b. Occurrence of actinomycetes in forest soil. Dendrobiology 66: 3–13.
• Hopwood D.A. 2007. Streptomyces in nature and medicine. The antibiotic makers. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Hoster F., Schmitz J.E., Daniel R. 2005. Enrichment of chitinolytic microorganisms: isolation and characterization of a chitinase exhibiting antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi from a novel Streptomyces strain. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 66: 434–442.
• Kämpfer P. 2006. The Family Streptomycetaceae, Part I: Taxonomy. In: The Prokaryotes. Vol. 3: Archaea. Bacteria: Firmicutes, Actinomycetes. Dworkin, M., Falkow, S., Rosenberg, E., Schleifer K-H., Stackebrandt E. (eds). New York: Springer, pp. 538–604.
• Kucuk C., Kivanc M. 2003. Isolation of Trichoderma spp. and determination of their antifungal, biochemical and physiological features. Turkish Journal of Biology 27: 247–253.
• Kutzner H.J. 1981. The Family Streptomycetaceae. In: The Prokaryotes. A Handbook on Habitats Isolation and Identyfication of Bacteria. Starr, M.P., Stalp H., Truper H.G., Balows A., Schlegel H.G., (eds). Berlin Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 2028–2090.
• Lechevalier M.P. 1988. Actinomycetes in agriculture and forestry. In: Actinomycetes in Biotechnology. Goodfellow M., Williams S.T., Modarski M., (eds). San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 327–358.
• Mahadevan B., Crawford D.L. 1997. Properties of the chitinase of the antifungal biocontrol agent Streptomyces lydicus WYEC108. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 20: 489–493.
• Mańka K. 1992. Forest phytopathology. Warszawa: PWRiL. (In Polish).
• Marcinowska K. 1993. Occurrence of antagonistic actinomycetes in soils of mountain grassland ecosystems. Studia Ośrodka Dokumentacji Fotograficznej 22: 161–179. (In Polish with English Summary).
• Marcinowska K. 2002. Properties, occurrence and significance of actinomycetes in nature. In: Microbial activity in diverse environments. Barabasz W. (ed). Kraków: Akademia Rolnicza, pp. 121–130. (In Polish with English Summary).
• McCarthy A.J. 1987. Lignocellulose degrading actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 46: 145–163.
• McCarthy A.J., Williams S.T. 1992. Actinomycetes as agents of biodegradation in the environment – a reviev. Gene 115: 189–192.
• Oskay M., Tamer A., Azeri C. 2004. Antibacterial activity of some actinomycetes isolated from farming soils of Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology 3: 441–446.
• Paul E.A., Clark F.E. 2000. Soil microbiology and biochemistry. Lublin: UMCS. (In Polish).
• Raupach G.S., Kloepper J.W. 1998. Mixtures of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhance biological control of multiple cucumber pathogens. Phytopathology 88: 1158–1164.
• Rudawska M. 2000. Significance of ectomycorrhizae in biological preservation of forest trees against soil pathogens. Sylwan 4: 27–38. (In Polish).
• Russel S. 1977. Antibiotics. Warszawa: PWN. (In Polish).
• Saadoun I., Gharaibeh R. 2003. The streptomyces flora of Badia region of Jordan and its potential as a source of antibiotics active against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Journal of Arid Environments 53: 365–371.
• Shirling E.B., Gottlieb D. 1966. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 16: 313–340.
• Shirokikh I.G., Zenova G.M., Zvyaginstev, D.G. 2002. Actinomycetes in the rhizosphere of barley grown on acid soddy podzolic soil. Microbiology (Moscow) 71: 455–459.
• Shoda M. 2000. Bacterial control of plant diseases. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 89: 515–521.
• Sturz A.V., Carter M.R., Johnston H.W. 1997. A review of plant disease, pathogen interactions and microbial antagonism under conservation tillage in temperate humid agriculture. Soil and Tillage Research 41: 169-189.
• Tian X.L., Cao L.X., Tan H.M., Zeng Q.G., Jia Y.Y., Han W.Q., Zhou S.N. 2004. Study on the communities of endophytic fungi and endophytic actinomycetes from rice and their antipathogenic activities in vitro. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 20: 303–309.
• Trejo-Estrada S.R., Paszczyński A., Crawford D.L. 1998. Antibiotics and enzymes produced by the biocontrol agent Streptomyces violaceusniger YCED-9. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 21: 81–90.
• Whipps J.M. 2001. Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 487–511.
• Williams S.T., Goodfellow M., Alderson G., Wellington E.M.H., Sneath P.H.A., Sackin M.J. 1983. Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related genera. Journal of General Microbiology 129: 1743–1813.
• Yuan W., Crawford D.L. 1995. Characterization of Streptomyces lydicus WYEC108 as a potential biocontrol agent against fungal root and seed rots. Applied Environmental Microbiology 61: 3119–3128.
• Zaitlin B., Turkington K., Parkinson D., Clayton G. 2004. Effects of tillage and inorganic fertilizers on culturable soil actinomycete communities and inhibion on fungi by specific actinomycetes. Applied Soil Ecology 26: 53–62.
• Zakalyukina Y.V., Zenova G.M., Zvyagintsev D.G. 2002. Acidophilic soil actinomycetes. Microbiology (Moscow) 71: 342–345.
• Zakalyukina Y.V., Zenova G.M., Zvyagintsev D.G. 2004. Peculiarities of growth and morphological differentiation of acidophilic and neutrophilic soil streptomycetes. Microbiology (Moscow) 73: 74–78.

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu