Zróżnicowanie zespołów ryb w małych rzekach położonych na terenach zalesionych i niezalesionych

• Autorzy: Rechulicz J. , Plaska W.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Diversity of fish fauna in small rivers located in forested and non-forested areas

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The knowledge on the ichthyofauna community in forest complexes in our country is mainly limited to few information on fish species found in rivers and reservoirs located in the protected areas. Hence, the aim of present study was to evaluate the importance of forested and non−forested areas, which include small rivers, on the occurrence of fish communities. The main criteria of evaluation were species richness, biodiversity and density of fish from rivers located in forested and non−forested areas in Roztocze and Puszcza Solska (south−eastern of Poland). The 12 study sites in the two groups of small rivers located on forested and non−forested areas were chosen (tab. 1). The control fishing was performed by electrofishing using IUP−12 gear. The total of 779 individuals of fish and lamprey belonging to 22 species were caught during the study. In the sections of rivers located in non−forested areas we noted 18 species, while in the rivers in forested areas – 16 ones. The analysis of the abundance domination showed that the dominant species in the rivers sections on non−forested areas were perch, roach and gudgeon, while in rivers located in forested areas: gudgeon, dace and brown trout. Simultaneously, in abundance of fish fauna from rivers in forested area a significant share of eastern sculpin, burbot and European brook lamprey were noted. The fish communities from both habitats showed similar values of biological diversity indices, but slightly higher density was observed in the rivers located in non−forested areas. The fish species composition was highly dependent on the close surroundings of the watercourse and the type of riparian zone. For the habitats from river located in non−forested areas the common, associated with aquaculture and also invasive fish species were characteristic. However, in the rivers in wooded areas, the typical for small streams and the rheophilic fish species were more frequent. The results of present study showed, that the largest differences in the dominance in fish structure and indicators of fidelity to the habitat preferences between the groups of rivers were determined.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

tereny lesne; tereny niezalesione; zlewnie rzek; cieki wodne; rzeki; fauna; ryby; bogactwo gatunkowe; wskazniki roznorodnosci; zageszczenie zwierzat

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Sylwan
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 160
• Numer: 04
• Opis fizyczny: s.344-352,rys.,tab.,wykr.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Rechulicz J.

• Pracownia Rybactwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul.Dobrzańskiego 37, 20-262 Lublin

autor

Plaska W.

• Pracownia Rybactwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul.Dobrzańskiego 37, 20-262 Lublin

Bibliografia

• dos Anjos M. B., Zuanon J. 2007. Sampling effort and fish species richness in small terra firme forest streams of central Amazonia, Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 5 (1): 45-52.
• Barrella W., Martins A. G., Petrere M., Ramires M. 2014. Fishes of the southeastern Brazil Atlantic Forest. Environmental Biology of Fish 97: 1367-1376. DOI: 10.1007/s10641-014-0226-y.
• Danilkiewicz Z. 1994. Ryby (Pisces) rzek Roztocza. Fragmenta Faunistica 37: 367-388.
• Dudgeon D. 2000. The ecology of tropical Asian rivers and streams in relation to biodiversity conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 239-263.
• Gancarczyk A. 2013. Czynna ochrona ichtiofauny Drawieńskiego Parku Narodowego. W: Domagała J., Pilecka-Rapacz M., Czerniawski R. [red.]. Antropopresja na ekosystemy wodne a ochrona przyrody i aktywizacja rybactwa. Katedra Zoologii, Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Drewiński Park Narodowy, Stowarzyszenie Lokalna Grupa Rybacka „Partnerstwo Jezior”, Barlinek. 49-56.
• Garner G., Malcolm I. A., Sadler J. P., Hannah D. M. 2014. What causes cooling water temperature gradients in forested stream reaches? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 11 (6): 6441-6472. DOI: 10.5194/hessd-11-6441-2014.
• Gray C. L., Slade E. M., Mann D. J., Lewis O. T. 2014. Do riparian reserves support dung beetle biodiversity and ecosystem services in oil palm-dominated tropical landscapes? Ecology and Evolution 4: 1049-1060.
• Hladyz S., Tiegs S. D., Gessner M. O., Giller P. S., Rîşnoveanu G., Preda E., Nistorescu M., Schindler M., Woodward G. 2010. Leaf-litter breakdown in pasture and deciduous woodland streams: A comparison among three European regions. Freshwater Biology 55: 1916-1929.
• Imholt C., Soulsby C., Malcolm I. A., Gibbins C. N. 2012. Influence of contrasting riparian forest cover on stream temperature dynamics in salmonid spawning and nursery streams, Ecohydrology 6: 380-392. DOI: 10.1002/eco.1291.
• Johnston C. E. 1999. The relationship of spawning mode to conservation of North American minnows (Cyprinidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 55: 21-30.
• Jones E. B., Helfman G. S., Harper J. O., Bolstad P. V. 1999. Effects of Riparian Forest Removal on Fish Assemblages in Southern Appalachian Streams. Conservation Biology, 13 (6): 1454-1465.
• Kingsford R. T. 2011. Conservation management of rivers and wetlands under climate change: a synthesis. Marine Freshwater Researches 62: 217-222.
• Krebs C. J. 1999. Ecological methodology. University of British Columbia, Benjamin/Cummings. 639-641.
• Kukuła K., Bylak A. 2009. Badania ichtiofaunistycznie w Bieszczadzkim Parku Narodowym w latach 1995-2008. Roczniki Bieszczadzkie 17: 267-281.
• Kukuła K., Kukuła E. 2005. Piekielnica Alburnoides bipunctatus (Bloch, 1782), Pisces, Cyprinidae – gatunek z „Polskiej czerwonej księgi zwierząt”. Roczniki Bieszczadzkie 13: 285-294.
• Langford T. E., Jones J. G., Broadmeadow S., Armitage P., Shaw P. J., Davy-Bowker J. 2010. Biological diversity in New Forest Streams. W: Newton A. C. [red.]. Biodiversity in the New Forest. Pisces Publications, Newbury, UK. 157-172.
• Langford T. E. L., Langford J., Hawkins S. J. 2012. Conflicting effects of woody debris on stream fish populations: implications for management. Freshwater Biology 57: 1096-1111. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02766.x.
• Marczak L. B., Sakamaki T., Turvey S. L., Deguise I., Wood S. L. R., Richardson J.S. 2010. Are forested buffers an effective conservation strategy for riparian fauna? An assessment using meta-analysis. Ecological Applications 20: 126-134.
• Pierzgalski E. 2008. Relacje między lasem a wodą – przegląd problemów. Studia i Materiały CEPL 18: 13-23.
• Polska Norma PN-EN 14011:2006. 2006. Jakość wody. Pobieranie próbek ryb z zastosowaniem elektryczności. PKN, Warszawa. 1-17.
• Prus P., Wiśniewolski W. [red.]. 2014. Monitoring ichtiofauny w rzekach. Przewodnik metodyczny. Inspekcja Ochrony Środowiska. Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1146.7602.
• Przybylska K., Żołnierowicz K. M., Urbańska M., Mazurkiewicz J., Andrzejewski W. 2013. Metody monito-ringu dzikich populacji ryb rzek i jezior krajobrazu leśnego. Studia i Materiały CEPL 36: 310-316.
• Puwalski K. 2011. Ichtiofauna Welu i jego dopływów. Nowe Miasto Lubawskie, VEGA Studio Adv.
• Rechulicz J., Girsztowtt Z., Przybylski M. 2009. Ichtiofauna rzeki Tanew i jej dopływów. Roczniki Naukowe PZW 22: 119-139.
• Reiss J., Bailey R. A., Cássio F., Woodward G., Pascoal C. 2010. Assessing the contribution of micro-organisms and macrofauna to biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in freshwater microcosms. Advances in Ecological Research 43: 151-176
• Richardson J. S., Tylor E., Schluter D., Pearson M., Hatfield T. 2010. Do riparian zones qualify as critical habitat for endangered freshwater fishes? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 67: 1197-1204.
• Stachyra P., Tchórzewski M., Marczakowski P., Piskorski M., Kolejko M., Michalczuk W. 2011. Plan ochrony fauny Roztoczańskiego Parku Narodowego. W: Kaproń B. [red.]. Materiały do projektu planu ochrony Roztoczańskiego Parku Narodowego. Roztoczański Park Narodowy, Zwierzyniec. 87-128.
• Suurkuukka H., Virtanen R., Suorsa V., Soininen J., Paasivirta L., Muotka T. 2014. Woodland key habitats and stream biodiversity: Does small-scale terrestrial conservation enhance the protection of stream biota? Biological Conservation 170: 10-19.
• Witkowski A., Kotusz J. 2008. Stan ichtiofaunistycznych badań inwentaryzacyjnych rzek Polski. Roczniki Naukowe PZW 21: 23-60.