Content of zinc and iron in common bean seeds (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in different weed control methods

• Autorzy: Glowacka A. , Klikocka H. , Onuch J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A field experiment was conducted in 2010-2012 on a private farm located in the village of Frankamionka in the administrative district (powiat) of Zamość, on brown soil with slightly acidic pH, and the average abundance of zinc and iron. The experiment was set up in a random split-plot design with four replications, with seven methods for controlling weed infestation: 1) no weeding control, 2) hand weeding control, 3) linuron (Afalon dyspersyjny 450 SC), 4) linuron + metribuzin (Afalon dyspersyjny 450 SC + Mistral 70 WG), 5) linuron + chlomazone (Harrier 295 ZC), 6) linuron + chlomazone + metribuzin (Harrier 295 ZC + Mistral 70 WG), 7) bentazon (Basagran 480 SL twice). The objective of the study was to determine the effect of weeding control methods on the content of iron and zinc in the seeds of cv. Jaś Karłowy common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The highest seed yield, on average 29.39 dt ha-1, was obtained on the plots where weeds were controlled by the application of the herbicides Harrier 295 ZC + Mistral 20 WG just after sowing. The lowest seed yield was harvested on unweeded plots – 6.77 dt ha-1 on average. Statistical analysis showed a significant effect of the weed control methods and the weather conditions in growing seasons on the content of iron and zinc in bean seeds. The lowest amount of zinc, an average of 36.11 mg kg-1, was found in beans from unweeded plots. The use of the herbicides Afalon dyspersyjny 450 SC + Mistral 70 WG, Harrier 295 ZC and Harrier 295 ZC + Mistral 70 WG significantly increased the zinc content compared to the un weeded control and manual weeding. The highest iron concentration, on average 75.12 mg kg-1, was observed in seeds from unweeded plots. Significantly less iron accumulated in beans from plots weeded manually and by application of the herbicides Harrier 295 ZC and Harrier 295 ZC + Mistral 70 WG.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

zinc content; iron content; common bean; seed; Phaseolus vulgaris; weed control method; herbicide; hormesis; micronutrient; bentazon; linuron; chlomazone; metribuzin

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Journal of Elementology
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 20
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.293-303,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Glowacka A.

• Faculty of Agrobioengineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

autor

Klikocka H.

• Faculty of Agrobioengineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland

autor

Onuch J.

• Department of Management and Environment Protection, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• Adomas B., Piotrowicz-Cieślak A.I. 2007. Chemical control of lupine plantations versus yield quality. Part I. Herbicides applied to lupine plantations versus yield quality. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., 522: 87-98. www.zeszytyproblemowe.pan.pl/images/stories/ 2007/522/8-522.pdf (in Polish).
• App leby A.P. 1998. The practical implications of hormetic effects of herbicides on plants. Hum. Exp. Toxic., 17: 270-271. DOI: 10.1177/096032719801700511
• Beebe S., Gonzalez A.V., Rengif o J. 2000. Research on trace minerals in the common bean. Food Nutr. Bull., 21: 387-391. www.ingentaconnect.com/conent/nsinf/fnb/2000/00000021/00000004/art00008
• Blair M.W., Astudi llo C., Grusak M.A., Graham R., Beebe S.E. 2009. Inheritance of seed iron and zinc concentrations in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Molec. Breeding, 23(2): 197-207. DOI: 10.1007/s11032-008-9225-7
• Bowszys T., Wierzbowska J., Bowszys J. 2009. Content and removal of Cu and Zn with harvested with composted municipal sewage sludge. J. Elem., 14(1): 23-32. DOI: 10.5601/ jelem.2009.14.1.03
• Cakmak I. 2004. Plant nutrition research: Priorities to meet human needs for food in sustainable ways. Plant Soil, 247: 3-24. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021194511492
• Carvalho L.M.J., Correa M.M., Pereira E.J., Nutti M.R., Carvalho J.L.V., Ribeiro E.M.G., Freitas S.C. 2012. Iron and zinc retention in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) after home cooking. Food Nutrit. Res., 56: 15-18. DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v56i0.15618
• Cedergreen N., Streibig J.C., Kudsk P., Mathiassen S.K., Duke S.O. 2007. The occurrence of hormesis in plants and algae. Dose-Response, 5: 150-162. DOI: 10.2203/dose-response. 06-008.Cedergreen
• Devine M.D., Hall L.M. 1990. Implications of sucrose transport mechanisms for the translocation of herbicides. Weed Sci., 38: 299-304.
• Fıratlıgil-Durmuş E., Šárka E., Bubnik Z., Schejbal M., Kadlec P. 2010. Size properties of legume seeds of different varieties using image analysis. J. Food Eng., 99: 445-451. DOI:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.08.005
• Frossard E., Bucher M., Mächler F., Mozafar A., Hurrell R. 2000. Potential for increasing the content and bioavailability of Fe, Zn and Ca in plants for human nutrition. J. Sci. Food Agric., 80: 861-879. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(20000515)80:7<861::AID-JSFA601>3.3. CO;2-6
• Geiger D.R., Bestman H.D. 1990. Self-limitation of herbicide mobility by phytotoxic action. Weed Sci., 38: 324-329.
• Głowacka A. 2010. Production and utilization of grain legumes in Poland and the UE. Rocz. Nauk., 12(7): 18-22. (in Polish)
• Głowacka A. 2013. The influence of different methods of cropping and weed control on the content of Cu and Zn in fodder maize (Zea mays L.) and on their uptake by maize. J. Elem., 18(2): 211-225. DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2013.18.2.02
• Graham P.H., Ranalli P. 1997. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crop Res., 53: 131-146. DOI: 101016/S0378-4290(97)00112-3
• Gugała M., Zarzecka K. 2010. The effect of weed control methods on magnesium and calcium content in edible pea seeds (Pisum sativum L.). J. Elem., 15(2): 269-280. www.uwm.edu.pl/jold/index.1522010.pdf
• Hekmat S., Soltani N., Shropshire Ch., Sikkema P.H. 2008. Effect of imazamox plus bentazon on dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Crop Protect., 27: 1491-1494. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro. 2008.07.008
• Heems H.D.J. 1985. The influence of weed competition on crop yield. Agric. Systems., 18: 81-93. DOI: 10.1016/0308-521x(85)90047-2
• Iqbal A., Khalil I.A., Ateeq N., Kha, M.S. 2006. Nutritional quality of important food legumes. Food Chem., 97: 331-335. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.011
• Kahlon T.S., Smith G.E., Shao Q. 2005. In vitro binding of bile acids by kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), black gram (Vigna mungo), bengal gram (Cicer arietinum) and moth bean (Phaseolus aconitifolins). Food Chem., 90: 241-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.03.046
• Klikocka H. 2011. The effect of sulphur kind and dose on content and uptake of micronutrients by potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.). Acta Sci. Pol., Hort. Cult., 10(2): 137-151. www.acta.media.pl/pl/full/7/2011/0000702011000010000020013700151.pdf
• Klikocka H., Głowacka A. 2013. Dose the sulphur fertilization modifies magnesium and calcium content in potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.). Acta Sci. Pol., Hort. Cult., 12(5): 41-53. www.acta.media.pl/pl/full/7/2013/0000702013000012000050004100053.pdf
• Korus J., Gumul D., Achremowicz B. 2005. Chemical composition of five new kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. Żywność Nauka Technologia Jakość, 4(45): 81-86. www.ptzz.org/zyw
• Lin L., Harnly J.M., Pastor-Corrales M.S., Luthria D.L. 2008. The polyphenolic profiles of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Chem., 107: 399-410. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem. 2007.08.038
• Łabuda H. 2010. Runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus L.) – biology and use. Acta Sci. Pol., Hort. Cult., 9(3): 117-132. www.acta.media.pl/pl/full/7/2010/000070201000009000030011700132.pdf
• Meyer M.R.M., Rojas A., Santanen A., Stodd ard F.L. 2013. Content of zinc, iron and their absorption inhibitors in Nicaraguan common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Chem., 136 (1): 87-93. DOI: 101016/j.foodchem.2012.07.105
• Moraghan J.T., Padi lla J., Etchevers J.D., Grafton K., Acosta-Gallegos J.A. 2002. Iron accumulation in seed of common bean. Plant Soil, 246: 175-183. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020616026728
• Nchimbi-Msolla S., Tryphone G.M. 2010. The effects of the environment on iron and zinc concentrations and performance of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Asian J. Plant Sci., 9(8): 455-462. DOI: 10.3923/ajps.201.455.462
• Podleśny J. 2005. Legumes in Poland – prospective cultivation and seed utilization. Acta Agrophys., 6(1): 213-224. (in Polish) www.old.act-agrophysica.org/artykuly_acta_agrophysica/ActaAgr_125_2005_6_1_213.pdf
• Santalla M., Amurrio J.M., de Ron A.M. 2001. Interrelationships between cropping systems for pod and seed quality components and breeding implications in common bean. Euphytica, 121: 45-51. DOI : 101023/A:1012080303872
• Sikk ema P.H., Robinson D.E., Nurse R.E., Soltani N. 2008. Pre-emergence herbicides for potential use in pinto and small red Mexican bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) production. Crop Protect., 27: 124-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.croppro.2007.04.017
• Soltani N., Robinson D.E., Shropshire Ch., Sikkema P.H. 2006. Otebo bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) sensitivity to pre-emergence herbicides. Crop Protect., 25: 476–479. DOI: 10.1016/j.croppro. 2005.08002
• Stępniak-Sołyga P., Wojtasik J. 2003. Content of nutrients and minerals in seeds of pea (Pisum sativum), grass pea (Lathyrus datiwus), lentil (Wenus culinaris) and soybean (Glicyne max). Ann. UMCS, Sect. EE, 76: 175-185. (in Polish)
• Tryphone G.M., Nchimbi-Msolla S. 2010. Diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes in iron and zinc contents under greenhouse conditions. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 5(8): 738-747. DOI: 10.5897/AJAR10.304
• Whittaker P. 1998. Iron and zinc interactions in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 68(suppl): 442-446.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5601/jelem.2014.19.2.499