Zooplankton of Mokraya Sura river

• Autorzy: Yakovenko V. , Fedonenko E.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Structural and functional characteristics of zooplankton as well as the results of biotesting were researched to indicate the ecological status of Mokraya Sura river sites. Zooplankton sampling was performed at the sites of Mokraya Sura river in autumn 2014 and in spring 2015. Species composition and abundance of zooplankton showed that zooplankton is most depressed at the upper sites of the river due to joint effect of slime accumulation eutrophication and industrial sewage. Biotesting results estimated water quality of the site near aeration plant sewage emergency discharge as most polluted of the river sites where large abundance and biomass of zooplankton were created mostly by planktonic rotifers. Large figures of filter-seeding crustaceans as well as low saprobity index indicate improvement in water quality at the sites 3 km and 2 km upstream from the river mouth.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Ukraine; Mokraya Sura River; zooplankton; zooplankton biomass; rotifer; Rotifera; crustacean; Crustacea; saprobiont; eutrophication; industrial sewage; small river; ecological status

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: International Letters of Natural Sciences
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 51
• Opis fizyczny: p.29-35,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Yakovenko V.

• Department of General Biology and Water Bioresourcesrsity, Faculty of Biology, Ecology and Medicine, Oles Honchar Dnipropetrovsk National University, P.M.B. 49050, Dnеpropetrovsk, Ukraine

autor

Fedonenko E.

• Department of General Biology and Water Bioresourcesrsity, Faculty of Biology, Ecology and Medicine, Oles Honchar Dnipropetrovsk National University, P.M.B. 49050, Dnеpropetrovsk, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• [1] B. Baranovskiy (2000). Macrophytes of the channel plain reservoirs, Dnepropetrovsk, 172p.
• [2] E. Biesinger G. Christensen (1972). Effects of various metals on survival, growth, reproduction, and metabolism of Daphrria magna J. Fish. Res.Board Canada, Vol. 29, pp. 1691 – 1700.
• [3] R. Claudia, P. Elena (1979). Life tables of Philodina roseola (Rotifera) under conditions of chronic cadmium and zinc stress, Bolletino di zoologia, Vol. 46 (3), pp. 209-216
• [4] A. Dyha, V. Rubanenko (1977). Dynamics of zooplankton of Zaporozskoe reservoir bays under the eutrophication process, Circulation of matter and energy in water bodies, Listvennichnoe on Lake Baikal, pp. 166–169.
• [5] E. Gladyshev M. Meselson (2008). Extreme resistance of bdelloid rotifers to ionizing radiation, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 105(13), pp. 5139–5144.
• [6] I. Grib, A. Merezhko (1991). The main directions of the strategy to protect and restore the ecosystems of small rivers, ІІ All-Union Conference on fisheries toxicology, Vol. 1., St. Petersburg, pp. 135 – 136.
• [7] I. Kiselev (1956). Methods of Plankton Study, in the Life of Fresh Waters, Moscow, Vol. 4 (1), pp. 183-265.
• [8] I. Konovets, L. Kinnis (2006). Biotesting of surface water bodies and bottom deposits by using of Cladocers, in Methods of of surface waterbodies hydroecological studies, edited by. V. D Romanenko, Кiev, pp. 340 – 365.
• [9] A. Krylov (1996). The Zooplankton of Small Rivers under Different Anthropogenic Loads, Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Borok.
• [10] A. Krylov (1993). The Zooplankton and Water Quality in a Small River Exposed to the Effect of Industrial Wastewater Discharge, in Zoocenoses of Water Bodies in the Upper Volga Basin under Conditions of Anthropogenic Influence, Vol. 69 (72), pp. 39-48.
• [11] L. Кutikova (2005). Bdelloid rotifers of Russia fauna // Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS. Vol. 305, Moscow. KMK Scientific Press Ltd., 315 p.
• [12] A. Merezhko (1987). Ecological problems of small rivers exploitation, Hydrobiological journal, Vol. 23 (1) , pp. 3 – 7.
• [13] D. Nielsen, G. Watson (2008). The response of epibenthic rotifers and microcrustacean communities to flow manipulations in lowland rivers, Hydrobiologia, Vol. 603, pp. 117–128
• [14] C. Ricci (1987) Ecology of bdelloids: How to be successful. Hydrobiologia, Vol. 147, pp. 117–127.
• [15] S. Rozhko-Rozhkevich (1937). Zooplankton of tributaries and baulks of stepped Dnipro part and transformations of zooplankton under impact of Dnipro hydro-electric power station // Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk hydrobiological station, Dniepropetrovsk. Vol. 2, pp. 85 – 104.
• [16] V. Yakovenko (2009) Zooplankton of the Dnieper reservoir under conditions of anthropogenic pressure : Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Kiev.
• [17] V. Zhadin (1960). Methods of hydroecological study, Higher School, Moscow.
• [18] V. Zhukinskyy (2006). Methods of complex ecological estimation of surface water bodies quality, in Methods of of surface waterbodies hydroecological studies, edited by. V. D Romanenko, Кiev, pp. 379 – 401.
• DOI References
• [2] E. Biesinger G. Christensen (1972). Effects of various metals on survival, growth, reproduction, and metabolism of Daphrria magna J. Fish. Res. Board Canada, Vol. 29, pp.1691-1700. 10.1139/f72-269
• [3] R. Claudia, P. Elena (1979). Life tables of Philodina roseola (Rotifera) under conditions of chronic cadmium and zinc stress, Bolletino di zoologia, Vol. 46 (3), pp.209-216. 10.1080/11250007909440300
• [5] E. Gladyshev M. Meselson (2008). Extreme resistance of bdelloid rotifers to ionizing radiation, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 105(13), pp.5139-5144. 10.1073/pnas.0800966105
• [13] D. Nielsen, G. Watson (2008). The response of epibenthic rotifers and microcrustacean communities to flow manipulations in lowland rivers, Hydrobiologia, Vol. 603, pp.117-128. 10.1007/s10750-007-9251-6
• [14] C. Ricci (1987) Ecology of bdelloids: How to be successful. Hydrobiologia, Vol. 147, pp.117-127. 10.1007/bf00025734

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.51.29