PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 64 | 3 |
Tytuł artykułu

Land use and land cover change in protected areas: using remote sensing to survey suitable habitats of brown bear Ursus arctos

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In recent years, brown bear Ursus arctos populations in Iran have experienced a clear trend of reduction and the species is now officially listed as threatened under provincial legislation. Anthropogenic habitat alteration and increasing human access to previously remote landscapes are potential source of stress for this species in Iran. Therefore, land cover changes in the Chelcheli protected area were mapped for 1991–2013 using time sequential Landsat TM and ETM at 30 meters resolution. Moreover, Maximum entropy (MaxEnt) modeling was used to investigate habitat selection of brown bear. The results showed that suitable patches overlapped with forest areas (Hyrcanian forest) and rivers. Our results also indicate that the brown bear habitat suitability is negatively influenced by human disturbance (e.g., roads, settlements). Increased human disturbance in brown bear habitat in recent decades may cause bears to avoid the disturbed areas. Therefore, the management plans should focus on reducing the human infrastructures around brown bear habitat. A suggestion is to place the core secure areas for brown bear inside the suitable habitat close to rivers where the human access is restricted. Promoting awareness of biodiversity conservation among tourism should also be one of the major focuses of management plans.
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
64
Numer
3
Opis fizyczny
p.420-430,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resource and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
autor
  • Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resource and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
  • Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Bibliografia
  • Austin M. 2007 — Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches — Ecol. Model. 200: 1–19.
  • Awade M., Boscolo D., Metzger J.P. 2012 — Using binary and probabilistic habitat availability indices derived from graph theory to model bird occurrence in fragmented forest — Landscape, Ecol. 27: 185–198.
  • Barea-Azcon J.M., Virgo E., Ballesteros-Duperon E., Moleon M., Chirosa M. 2007 — Surveying carnivores at large spatial scales: a comparison of four broad-applied methods — Biodiv. Conserv. 16: 1213–1230.
  • Bellemain E., Nawaz M.A., Valentini A., Swenson J.E., Taberlet P. 2007 — Genetic tracking of the brown bear in northern Pakistan and implications for conservation — Biol. Conserv. 134: 537–547.
  • Boscolo D., Metzger J.P. 2011 — Isolation determines patterns of species presence in highly fragmented landscapes — Ecography, 34: 1018–1029.
  • Chapron G., Kaczensky P., Linnell J.D.C., Von Arx M., Huber D., Andrén H. et al. 2014 — Recovery of large carnivores in Europe's modern human-dominated landscapes — Science, 346: 1517–1519.
  • Edge J., Beyer Jr D., Belant J., Jordan M., Roel B. 2011 — Livestock and domestic dog predations by wolves in Michigan — Hum. Wildlife. Interact. 5: 66–78.
  • Elith J., Graham C.H., Anderson R.P., Dudik M., Ferrier S., Guisan A., Hijmans R.J., Huettmann F., Leathwick J.R., Lehmann A. et al. 2006 — Novel methods improve prediction of species distributions from occurrence data — Ecography, 29: 129–151.
  • Elith J., Phillips S.J., Hastie T., Dudik M., Chee Y.E., Yates C.J. 2011 — A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists — Divers. Distrib. 17: 43–57.
  • Fan F., Weng Q., Wang Y. 2007 — Land use land cover change in Guangzhou China from 1998 to 2003 based on Landsat TM/ETM+ imagery — Sensors, 7: 1323–1342.
  • Graves T.A., Kendall K.C., Royle J.A., Stetz J.B., Macleod A.C. 2011 — Linking landscape characteristics to local grizzly bear abundance using multiple detection methods in a hierarchical model — Anim. Conserv. 14: 652–664.
  • Hansen M.J., Franklin S.E., Woudsma C.G., Peterson M. 2001 — Caribou habitat mapping and fragmentation analysis using Landsat MSS TM and GIS data in the North Columbia Mountains British Columbia Canada — Remote. Sens. Environ. 77: 50–65.
  • Hegel T.M., Cushman S.A., Evans J., Huettmann F. 2010 — Current state of the art for statistical modelling of species distributions (In: Spatial Complexity Informatics and Wildlife Conservation, Eds: S.A. Cushman, F. Huettmann) — Springer Tokyo Japan pp. 273–311.
  • Herrero S., Smith T., Debruyn T.D., Gunther K., Matt C.A. 2005 — Brown bear habituation to people — safety risks and benefits — Wildlife. Soc. B. 33: 362–373.
  • Iftikhar Dar N., Minhas R.A., Zaman Q., Linkie M. 2009 — Predicting the patterns perceptions and causes of human-carnivore conflict in and around Machiara National Park Pakistan — Biol. Conserv. 142: 2076–2082.
  • Jarnevich C.S., Reynolds L.V. 2011 — Challenges of predicting the potential distribution of a slow-spreading invader: a habitat suitability map for an invasive riparian tree — Biol. Invasions, 13: 153–163.
  • Johnson C.J., Nielsen S.E., Merrill E.H., McDonald T.L., Boyce M.S. 2004 — Resource selection functions based on use-availability data: theoretical motivation and evaluation and methods — J. Wild. Manage. 70: 347–357.
  • Kaczensky P., Knauer F., Krze B., Jonozovic M., Adamic M., Gossow H. 2003 — The impact of high speed high volume traffic axes on brown bears in Slovenia — Biol. Conserv. 111: 191–204.
  • Katajisto J. 2006 — Habitat use and population dynamics of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Scandinavia — PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
  • Klar N., Fernandez N., Kramer-Schadt S., Herrmann M., Trinzen M., Buttner I., Niemitz C. 2008 — Habitat selection models for European wildcat conservation — Biol. Conserv. 141: 308–319.
  • Krauss J., Bommarco R., Guardiola M., Heikkinen R.K., Helm A., Kuussaari M. et al. 2010 — Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time-delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels — Ecol. Lett. 13: 597–605.
  • Kumar S., Stohlgren T.J. 2009 — MaxEnt modeling for predicting suitable habitat for threatened and endangered tree Canacomyrica monticola in New Caledonia — Ecol. Nat. Environ. 1: 94–98.
  • Lindenmayer D.B., Fischer J. 2006 — Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape Change — Island Press Washington DC.
  • Loe J., Roskaft E. 2004 — Large carnivores and human safety: a review — Ambio, 33: 283–288.
  • Manly B.F.J., McDonald L.L., Thomas D.L., McDonald T.L., Erickson W.P. 2002 — Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies — Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht.
  • Martensen A.C., Pimentel R.G., Metzger J.P. 2008 — Relative effects of fragment size and connectivity on bird community in the Atlantic Rain Forest: implications for conservation — Biol. Conserv. 141: 2184–2192.
  • Martin J., Basille M., Van Moorter B., Kindberg J., Allainé D., Swenson J.E. 2010 — Coping with human disturbance: spatial and temporal tactics of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) — Can. J. Zool. 88: 875–883.
  • McDermid G.J., Coops N.C., Wulder M.A., Franklin S.E., Seitz N.E. 2010 — Critical remote sensing contributions to spatial wildlife ecological knowledge and management (In: Spatial Complexity Informatics and Wildlife Conservation, Eds: S.A. Cushman, F. Huettmann) — Springer Tokyo Japan, pp. 193–221.
  • McGarigal K., McComb W.C. 1995 — Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon Coast Range — Ecol. Monogr. 65: 235–260.
  • McLellan B.N., Hovey F.W. 2001 — Habitats selected by grizzly bears in a multiple use landscape — J. Wildlife. Manage. 65: 92–99.
  • Nawaz M.A., Martin J., Swenson J.E. 2014 — Identifying key habitats to conserve the threatened brown bear in the Himalaya — Biol. Conserv. 170: 198–206.
  • Nellemann C., Støen O.G., Kindberg J., Swenson J.E., Vistnes I., Ericsson G., Katajisto J., Kaltenborn B.P., Martin J., Ordiz A. 2007 — Terrain use by an expanding brown bear population in relation to age recreational resorts and human settlements — Biol. Conserv. 138: 157–165.
  • Newmark W.D. 1995 — Extinction of mammal populations in Western North — American national parks, Conservation Biol. 9: 512–526.
  • Northrup J., Stenhouse G., Boyce M. 2012 — Agricultural lands as ecological traps for grizzly bears — Anim. Conserv. 15: 369–377.
  • Olson T.L., Gilbert B.K., Fitkin S.H. 1990 — Brown Bear and Human Activity at Salmon Streams in Katmai National Park Alaska (Final Report, Interagency Agreement IA9700-7-8028) — Utah State University Logan, 123 pp.
  • Pal M., Mather P.M. 2003 — An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification — Remote. Sens. Environ. 86: 554–565.
  • Pearson R.G., Raxworthy C.J., Nakamura M., Townsend Peterson A. 2007 — Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar — Biogeography, 34: 102–117.
  • Phillips S.J., Anderson R., Schapire R. 2006 — Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions — Ecol. Model. 190: 231e259.
  • Rode K.D., Farley S.D., Robbins C.T. 2006 — Sexual dimorphism reproductive strategy and human activities determine resource use by brown bears — Ecol. 87: 2636–2646.
  • Saunders D., Hobb R.J., Margules R. 1991 — Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review — Conserv. Biol. 5: 18–32.
  • Schwartz C.C., Haroldson M.A., White G.C., Harris R.B., Cherry S., Keating K.A., Moody D., Servheen C. 2006 — Temporal spatial and environmental influences on the demographics of grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem — Wildlife. Monogr. 16: 1–68.
  • Shehzad W., Riaz T., Nawaz M.A., Miquel C., Poillot C., Shah S.A., Pompanon F., Coissac E., Taberlet P. 2012 — Carnivore diet analysis based on next-generation sequencing: application to the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in Pakistan — Mol. Ecol. 21: 1951–1965.
  • Swenson J.E.N. Gerstl B., Dahle Anda Z. 2000 — Action plan for the conservation of the brown bear in Europe (Ursus arctos) — Council of Europe Nature and Environment No, 114 Strasbourg France.
  • Swets J.A. 1988 — Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems — Science, 240: 1285–1293.
  • Valentini A., Miquel C., Nawaz M.A., Bellemain E., Coissac E., Pompanon F., Gielly L., Cruaud C., Nascetti G., Winker P., Swenson, J.E., Taberlet P. 2009 — New perspectives in diet analysis based on DNA barcoding and parallel pyrosequencing: the trnL approach — Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9: 51–60.
  • Warren M.S., Hill J.K., Thomas J.A., Asher Jfox R., Huntley B., Roy D.B., Telfer M.G., Jeffcoate S., Harding P., Jeffcoate G., Wills S.G., Greatorex-Davies J.N., Moss D., Thomas C.D. 2001 — Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change — Nature, 414: 65–69.
  • Wielgus R.B., Vernier P. 2003 — Grizzly bear selection of managed and unmanaged forests in the Selkirk Mountains — Can. J. For. Res. 33: 822–829.
  • Wilson G.J., Delahay R.J. 2001 — A review of methods to estimate the abundance of terrestrial carnivores using field signs and observation — Wildlife. Res. 28: 151–164.
  • Woodroffe R. 2000 — Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores — Anim. Conserv. 3: 165–173.
  • Woodroffe R., Ginsberg J.R. 1998 — Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas — Sci. Total. Environ. 280: 2126–2128.
  • Yuan F., Sawaya K.E., Loeffelholz B.C., Bauer M.E. 2005 — Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) metropolitan areas by multi temporal Landsat remote sensing — Remote. Sens. Environ. 98: 317–328.
  • Ziaie H. 2008 — A Field Guide to Mammals of Iran 2d ed. — Iran Wildlife Center Tehran Iran.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-3e8407ec-3865-4734-910d-8f61479f3082
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.