PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 70 | 04 |

Tytuł artykułu

Zawartość immunoglobulin G w mleku w zależności od rasy i wieku krów oraz fazy laktacji

Warianty tytułu

EN
Immunoglobulin G content in milk with regard to breed and age of cows and stage of lactation

Języki publikacji

PL

Abstrakty

EN
The aim of the study was to analyze the content of immunoglobulin G in milk, with regards to selected physiological (age of cows, stage of lactation), environmental (production season, somatic cell count) and genetic (breed of cows) factors. The study included five breeds of dairy cows: i.e. Polish Holstein-Friesian – Black-White and Red-White varieties, Jersey, Simmental, Polish Red and Whiteback. Milk samples were collected solely from cows with healthy mammary glands; during trial milking which occurred twice a year, once in the winter season, and again in the summer season. In each breed group, according to the breeding documentation, the cows (40 heads in the season) were selected in the appropriate age class (lactation I, II, III and IV) and stage of lactation (up to 120 days, from 121 to 200 days and from 201 to 305 days). A total of 480 milk samples were examined. In each sample the following parameters were determined: somatic cell count (SCC), percentage of protein, including casein, and lactose, concentration of selected whey proteins, i.e. α-LA, β-LG and lactoferrin, and the level of immunoglobulin G (IgG). It has been shown that the cows of local breeds produced a raw material with a higher content of immunoglobulin G. IgG concentration in the milk increased with the subsequent lactations, which might be associated with the significant rise in level of somatic cells with the age of cows, as it was indicated by the significant interaction (p ≤ 0.01) obtained between subsequent lactation and SCC. IgG content also varied significantly during the course of lactation, reaching a peak in the final stage. Moreover, a significant effect of SCC on IgG level in milk was found, which was confirmed by the high value of the correlation coefficient obtained (r = 0.507). A statistically (p ≤ 0.05) significant interaction between breed and SCC for IgG content in milk may indicate a different sensitivity of the analyzed breeds of cows on the somatic cell count increase. This may be due to a variable permeability of the blood-milk barrier in mammary glands.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

70

Numer

04

Opis fizyczny

s.237-241,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor
  • Katedra Towaroznawstwa i Przetwórstwa Surowców Zwierzęcych, Wydział Bioloogii i Hodowli Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin
  • Katedra Hodowli i Ochrony Zasobów Genetycznych Bydła, Wydział Biologii i Hodowli Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul.Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin
autor
  • Katedra Hodowli i Ochrony Zasobów Genetycznych Bydła, Wydział Biologii i Hodowli Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul.Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin
  • Katedra Towaroznawstwa i Przetwórstwa Surowców Zwierzęcych, Wydział Bioloogii i Hodowli Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin

Bibliografia

  • 1. Boudry C., Dehoux J., Portetelle D., Buldgen A.: Bovine colostrum as a natural growth promotor for newly weaned piglets: a review. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. 2008, 12 (2), 157-170.
  • 2. Caffin J. P., Poutrel B., Rainard P.: Physiological and pathological factors influencing bovine immunoglobulin G1 concentration in milk. J. Dairy Sci. 66 (10), 2161-2166.
  • 3. El-Loly M. M., Farrag A. F.: Isolation of immunoglobulin-rich fractions from whey. Milchwissenschaft 2007, 62 (2), 199-202.
  • 4. Gapper L. W., David E. J., Copestake D. E. J., Otter D. E., Indyk H. E.: Analysis of bovine immunoglobulin G in milk, colostrum and dietary supplements: a review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 389, 93-109.
  • 5. Garry F. B., Adams R., Cattell M. B., Dinsmore R. P.: Comparison of passive immunoglobulin transfer to dairy calves fed colostrum or commercially available colostral-supplement products. J. American Vet. Medical Association 1996, 208, 107-110.
  • 6. Goebel A., Buhner S., Schedel R., Lochs H., Sprotte G.: Altered intestinal permeability in patients with primary fibromyalgia and in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Rheumatology 2008, 47 (8), 1223-1227.
  • 7. Hamann J.: Relationship between somatic cell count and milk composition. Bulletin FIL-IDF 2002, 372, 56-59.
  • 8. Jones G. M., Bailey T. L.: Understanding the Basics of Mastitis. Virginia Cooperative Extension, 2006, Publication 404-233. Virginia Tech, USA, 1-5. doi: http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/404/404-233/404-233.
  • 9. Korhonen H.: Isolation of immunoglobulins from colostrums. Bulletin FIL-IDF 2004, 389, 78-84.
  • 10. Kostro K., Gliński Z., Nozdryn-Płotnicki Z.: Immunologiczne i immunopatologiczne aspekty zapalenia, [w:] Kostro K., Gliński Z. (red.): Białka ostrej fazy u zwierząt. PWRiL, Warszawa 2003, 7-52.
  • 11. Król J., Litwińczuk Z., Brodziak A., Barłowska J.: Lactoferrin, lysozyme and immunoglobulin G content in milk of four breeds of cows manager under intensive production system. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2010, 13 (2), 357-361.
  • 12. Krukowski H., Lisowski A., Różański P., Polkowska I.: Poziom IgG w mleku mastitowym krów. Roczn. Nauk. PTZ 2006, 2 (2), 65-69.
  • 13. Levieux D., Ollier A.: Bovine immunoglobulin G, β-lactoglobulin, α-lactalbumin and serum albumin in colostrum and milk during the early post partum period. J. Dairy Res. 1999, 66, 421-430.
  • 14. Lindmark-Månsson H., Brånning C., Alden G., Paullsson M.: Relationship between somatic cell count, individual leukocyte populations and milk components in bovine udder quarter milk. Inter. Dairy Journal 2006, 16, 717-727.
  • 15. Lindmark-Månsson H., Sensson U., Paulsson M., Alden G., Frank B., Johnsson G.: Influence of milk components, somatic cells and supplemental zinc on milk processability. Inter. Dairy Journal 2000, 10, 423-433.
  • 16. Litwińczuk Z., Król J., Brodziak A., Barłowska J.: Changes of protein content and its fractions in bovine milk from different cow breeds subject to somatic cell count. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 684-691.
  • 17. Liu G. L., Wang J. Q., Bu D. P., Cheng J. B., Zhang C. G., Wei H. Y., Zhou L. Y., Zhou Z. F., Hu H., Dong X. L.: Factors affecting the transfer of immunoglobulin G1 into the milk of Holstein cows. Vet. J. 2009, 182, 79-85.
  • 18. Mian-bin W., Yin-jun X.: Isolation and purification of lactoferrin and immunoglobulin G from bovine colostrum with serial cation-anion exchange chromatography. Biotechnol. Bioproc. E. 2009, 14, 155-160.
  • 19. Moatsou G.: Indigenous enzymatic activities in ovine and caprine milks. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2010, 63 (1), 16-31.
  • 20. Muller L. D., Ellinger D. K.: Colostral immunoglobulin concentrations among breeds of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1981, 64 (8), 1727-1730.
  • 21. Murphy B. M., Drennan M. J., O’Mara F. P., Earley B.: Cow serum and colostrum immunoglobulin (IgG1) concentration of five suckler cow breed types and subsequent immune status of their calves. Irish J. Agr. Food Res. 2005, 44, 205-213.
  • 22. Nudda A., Feligini M., Battacone G., Murgia P., Pulina G.: Relationship between somatic cells count, whey protein and coagulation properties in sheep milk. Proc. of the ASPA XIV Congress, Firenze, Italy 2001, s. 511-513.
  • 23. Ontsouka C. E., Bruckmaier R. M., Blum J. W.: Fractionized milk composition during removal of colostrum and mature milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 2005-2011.
  • 24. Park Y. W., Juarez M., Ramos M., Haenlein G. F. W.: Physico-chemical characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Ruminant Res. 2007, 68, 88-113.
  • 25. Rawal P., Gupta V., Thapa B. R.: Role of colostrum in gastrointestinal infections. Indian J. Pediatr. 2008, 75 (9), 917-921.
  • 26. Sanchez J., Markham F., Dohoo I., Sheppard J., Keefe G., Leslie K.: Milk antibodies against Ostertagia ostertagi: relationships with milk IgG and production parameters in lactating dairy cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 2004, 120 (4), 319-330.
  • 27. Séverin S., Wenshui X.: Milk biologically active components as nutraceuticals: Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2005, 45, 645-656.
  • 28. Soyeurt H., Bastin C., Colinet F. G., Arnould V. M.-R., Berry E., Wall D. P., Dehareng F., Nguyen H. N., Dardenne P., Schefers J., Vandenplas J., Weigel K., Coffey M., Théron L., Detilleux J., Reding E., Gengler N., McParland S.: Mid-Infrared prediction of lactoferrin content in bovine milk: Potential indicator of mastitis. Animal 2012, 6 (11), 1830-1838.
  • 29. Stelwagen K., Carpenter E., Haigh B., Hodgkinson A., Wheeler T. T.: Immune components of bovine colostrum and milk. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 3-9.
  • 30. Urech E., Puha Z., Schallibaum M.: Changes in milk protein fraction as affected by subclinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82, 2402-2411.
  • 31. Zhao S., Zhang C., Wang J., Liu G., Bu D., Cheng J., Zhou L.: Variation of immunoglobulins in colostrum and immune milk as affected by antigen releasing devices. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 23 (9), 1184-1189.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-3c0b48e2-d557-4929-a2dd-eb98314b4815
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.