Conceptualization of geo-economic threats in small countries with transition economies

• Autorzy: Kvinikadze G.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Konceptualizacja zagrożeń geoekonomicznych w małych krajach z gospodarkami przejściowymi

• Języki publikacji: EN PL

Abstrakty

EN

Subject and purpose of work: The main goal of this work is to identify and systematize the geoeconomic threats that directly affect the development of small countries with economies in transition. The subject of the study is geoeconomic security (GES) of small countries with economies in transition. As an independent variable is GES, and the dependent GES of Georgia. Materials and methods: The research is of an empirical nature, and belongs to the category of qualitative research. The case-study method is used as a basic methodological approach. Results: The future of the country should be viewed in a geo-economic context.The country’s security should be developed through economic cooperation, which would not only ensure stability and economic growth would also benefit both in terms of political and in the economic security. Conclusions: Georgia needs to fully use its geo-economic potential (both internal and external), which is a reliable source of weakening geo-economic threats.

PL

Przedmiot i cel pracy: Głównym celem tej pracy jest identyfikacja i usystematyzowanie zagrożeń geoekonomicznych, które mają bezpośredni wpływ na rozwój małych krajów z gospodarką w okresie przejściowym. Przedmiotem badań jest bezpieczeństwo geoekonomiczne (GES) małych krajów z gospodarkami w okresie przejściowym. Jako zmienną niezależną przyjmuje się GES, a jako zmienną zależną GES Gruzji. Materiały i metody: Badania mają charakter empiryczny i należą do kategorii badań jakościowych. Podstawowym podejściem metodologicznym jest metoda studium przypadku. Wyniki: Przyszłość kraju powinna być postrzegana w kontekście geopolitycznym. Bezpieczeństwo kraju należy rozwijać poprzez współpracę gospodarczą, która nie tylko zapewni stabilność i wzrost gospodarczy, ale również przyniesie korzyści w zakresie zarówno bezpieczeństwa politycznego jak i gospodarczego. Wnioski: Gruzja musi w pełni wykorzystać swój potencjał geoekonomiczny (zarówno wewnętrzny, jak i zewnętrzny), który jest niezawodnym czynnikiem redukującym zagrożenia geoekonomiczne.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Georgia; transition economy; geoeconomics; economic hazard; economic security

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Economic and Regional Studies
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 10
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.42-52,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kvinikadze G.

• Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Ivane Javakhshvili Tbilisi State University, Ilia Tchavtchavadze 1, 0179 Tibilisi, Georgia

Bibliografia

• 1. Blackwell R., Kissinger H. (2016), War by Other Means. A CFR Book. Harvard University Press, Harward.
• 2. Burton D. (1994), Competitiveness: Here to Stay. The Washington: Quarterly, autumn. p. 99-109.
• 3. Cohen S. (1991), Global Geopolitical Change in the Post–Cold War Era. Annals, Association of American Geographers, issue 81, pp. 551-80.
• 4. Cable V. (1995), What Is International Economic Security? International Affairs, April, Vol. 71, no. 3.
• 5. Desouza P. (ed.) (2000), Economic Stratege and National Security. Boulder: Westview Press, 3
• 6. Dicken P. (1998), A new qeo-economy // Global Shift: transforming the world. New York: Guilford Press.
• 7. Drucker P. (1989), The new realities: in government and politics, in economics and business, in society and world view. Harper & Row, New York.
• 8. Goodwin C.D. (ed.) (1991), Economics and National Security. History, of Their Interaction. Duke University Press, Durnham.
• 9. Goldman M. (2008), Moscow’s New Economic Imperialism. Current History, vol. 107 issue 711, pp. 322-329.
• 10. Ismailov E., Papava,V. (2006), The Central Caucasus: Essays on Geopolitical Economy. Stockholm: CA&CC Press.
• 11. Leyshon A. (2003), Alternative Economic Spaces. London: SAGE.
• 12. Luttwak E. (1984), February. The Grand Strategy Of The Soviet Union. New York: Martin’s Pres.
• 13. Luttwak E. (1990), From Geo-politics to Geo-economics. Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce. //The National Interest. Summer, No. 20.
• 14. Luttwak E. (1993 a), The coming global war for economic power: there are no nice guys on the battlefield of geo-economics. The International Economy 7(5): 18-67.
• 15. Luttwak E. (1993 b), The Endangered American Dream. New York: Simon and Schuster.
• 16. Luttwak E. (2012 a), The Rise of China vs.the Logic of Strategy. Cambridge: Harvard Universiti Press.
• 17. Luttwak E. (2012 b),China’s rise against the logic of the strategy. Cambridge: Belkhap Press of Harvard University Press.
• 18. Loughlin J., Anselin, L. (1996), Geo-economic Competition and Trade Bloc Formation:United States, German, and Japanese Exports 1968-1992. Clark university:Economic Geography, vol. 72, no. 2.
• 19. Papava V. (2017a), For Georgia GEENTRANCE Is Coming! (accessed: http://www.eurasiareview.com/05012017-for-georgiageentrance-is-coming-oped/
• 20. Papava V. (2002), On the Special Features of Georgia’s International Economic Function. Central Asia and the Caucasus No 2(14) pp. 143-147.
• 21. Papava V. (2017b), A Eurasian or a european future for post-soviet Georgia’s economic developments: Which is Better? Archives of business research, vol. 5, No 1.
• 22. Papava V., Gogatadze N. (1998), Prospects for Foreign Investment and Strategic Economic Partnership in the Caucasus. Problems of economic transition, vol. 41, No 5, pp. 79-88
• 23. Papava V. (2013c),The Eurasianism of Russian Anti-Westernism and the Concept of “Central Caucaso-Asia”. Russian Politics and Law, vol. 51, no. 6, November–December pp. 45–86.
• 24. Post R.(1985), National Security and the amended Freedom of Information Act // Yale law Journal, Vol. 85.
• 25. Kennedy P. (1987), The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and to Military Conflict From 1500 2000. New York: Vintage Books.
• 26. Kvinikadze G.(2017 a), Some Opinion on the Notion of Geo-Economic Security. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research. Vol. 5, Issue 2.
• 27. Kvinikadze G.(2017 b), Challenges Of The 21st Century: The Position of the Small State in Geo-Economic View from Georgia. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research. Vol. 5, Issue 2.
• 28. Kvinikadze G.(2008), Geoeconomics. Textbook, Tbilisi: Universal (in Georgian).
• 29. Kvinikadze G.(2016), Geoeconomic essays: From Friedrich Liszt to Edward Luttwak. Tbilisi: Tbilisi state university press. (In Georgian).
• 30. Muradyan I. (1997), Geoeconomic assessment of the countries of the Transcaucasian region. IRAN and CAUCASUS I. Researarch Papers from the Caucasian Center for Iranian Studies, Yerevan- Tehran, Vol. 1 - Vol. 14, No. 2. (in Russian).
• 31. National Security Concept of Georgia, 2014 (accessed: http://www.mfa.gov.ge/MainNav/ForeignPolicy/NationalSecurity-Concept.aspx?lang=en-US).
• 32. Nester W. (1995), International Relations: Geopolitical and Geoeconomic Conflict and Cooperation. Illinois: Harpercollins College Div.
• 33. Rondeli A. (2000), Security Problems in the Caucasus. In William Ascher and Natalia Mirovitskaya (Eds.). The Caspian Sea: A Quest for Environmental Security. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. pp. 125-134.
• 34. Rondeli A.(2004a), State Building in the Post-Soviet South Caucasus. In The OSCE and the Multiple Challenges of Transition: The Caucasus and Central Asia. Edited by Farian Sabahi and Daniel Warner. Ashgate Publishing, pp. 107-11.
• 35. Rondeli A. (1998), Security threats in the Caucasus , georgias’s view perspecton. vol III No 2, June-august 1998 pp. 43-53.
• 36. Rondeli A. (1999), TRACECA a tool for regional cooperation in the Caucasus. Marco polo magazine No 1 pp. 28-31.
• 37. Rondeli A.(2001), The Coice of Indefendent Georgia in The Security of the Caspian sea Region. Ed Gennady Chufrin, New York , Oxford University Press, 2001 pp. 195-211.
• 38. Rondeli A. (2004b), The South Caucasus : pipeline politics and Regional Economic Interest. In: the south Caucasus : Promoting values throght cooperation, edites by Jean Dufourcq and Lionel Ponsard NATO defense collage Rome, pp. 43-52.
• 39. Rondeli A.(2009), Small state international system, second revised edition. GFSIS “Nekeri” Publishers Tbilisi (In Georgian).
• 40. Spykman H. (1942), American’s Strategy in the world politics: the United State and the balance of power. New-York: Haroourt, Brace.
• 41. Westing A. (1986), Global Resources and International Conflict: Environmental Factors in Strategic Policy and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.