PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 84 | 2 |
Tytuł artykułu

Changes in vegetation and soil seed bank of meadow after waterlogging caused by Castor fiber

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Soil waterlogging is among abiotic stresses that influence species composition and productivity in numerous plant communities. The aim of the study was to find answer to the question of how waterlogging caused by beavers’ activity induces quantitative and qualitative changes of vegetation and soil seed bank levels of variable-moist meadows. An immediate effect of the waterlogging at the level of vegetation was the decline in species richness and a decrease in the values of the biodiversity index. Water stress inhibited growth and development of plants already present and, primarily, impeded recruitment of new individuals of species characteristic of variable-moist meadows, e.g. Cirsium rivulare, Filipendula ulmaria and Lythrum salicaria, which were replaced by Carex acutiformis. Prolonged waterlogging did not induce equally substantial changes in the soil seed bank as in the vegetation. Both in the waterlogged and control patches, slightly decreased species richness and biodiversity index were recorded. After waterlogging withdrawal, the reserves of the soil seed bank were slightly higher than the initial values. The differences were not statistically significant. In the waterlogged patch, the qualitative floristic similarity between taxa identified in the soil seed bank and vegetation cover declined, which was evidenced by the value of Jaccard’s index decreasing from 0.46 to 0.36. A reverse relationship was found in control patch, where the value of the similarity index slightly increased from 0.41 to 0.48.
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
84
Numer
2
Opis fizyczny
p.189-196,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Akademicka 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland
autor
  • Department of Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Akademicka 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Grime JP. Plant strategies, vegetation processes and ecosystem properties. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons; 2001.
  • 2. Grootjans AP, van Diggelen R, Wassen MJ, Wiersinga WA. The effects of drainage on groundwater quality and plant species distribution instream valley meadows. Vegetatio. 1988;75(1–2):37–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00044624
  • 3. Grootjans AP, Hunnemana H, Verkielb H, van Andel J. Long-term effects of drainage on species richness of a fen meadow at different spatial scales. Basic Appl Ecol. 2005;6(2):185–193. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.baae.2005.01.008
  • 4. Roy V, Ruel JC, Plamondon AP. Establishment, growth, survival of natural regeneration after clearcutting and drainage on forestedwetlands. For Ecol Manage. 2000;129(1–3):253–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00170-X
  • 5. Sarkkola S, Hokka H, Lacho R, Paivanen J, Penttila T. Stand structural dynamics on drained peatlands dominated by Scots pine. ForEcol Manage. 2005;206(1–3):135–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.064
  • 6. Blom CWPM. Adaptations to flooding stress: from plant community to molecule. Plant Biol. 1999;1(3):261–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1999.tb00252.x
  • 7. Lenssen JPM, Menting FBJ, van der Putten WH, Blom WPM. Vegetative reproduction by species with different adaptations to shallowfloodedhabitats. New Phytol. 2000;145(1):61–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00557.x
  • 8. Lenssen JPM, Menting FBJ, van der Putten WH. Plant responses to simultaneous stress of waterlogging and shade: amplified orhierarchical effects? New Phytol. 2003;157(2):281–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00666.x
  • 9. Kotowski W, van Andel J, van Diggelen R, Hogendorf J. Responses of fen plant species to groundwater level and light intensity. Plant Ecol.2001;155(2):147–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013214716842
  • 10. Gibbs J, Greenway H. Mechanisms of anoxia tolerance in plants. I. Growth, survival and anaerobic catabolism. Funct Plant Biol.2003(1);30:1–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/PP98095
  • 11. Jackson MB, Colmer TD. Response and adaptation by plants to flooding stress. Ann Bot. 2005;96(4):501–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci205
  • 12. Vartapetian BB, Jackson MB. Plant adaptations to anaerobic stress. Ann Bot. 1997;79(A suppl): 3–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a010303
  • 13. Clevering OA. Effects of litter accumulation and water table on morphology and productivity of Phragmites australis. WetlandsEcology and Management. 1998;5(4):275–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008233912279
  • 14. Edwards AL, Lee DW, Richards JH. Responses to a fluctuating environment: effects of water depth on growth and biomass allocation inEleocharis cellulosa Torr. (Cyperaceae). Can J Bot. 2003;8:964–975.http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/B03-091
  • 15. Warwick NM, Brock MA. Plant reproduction in temporary wetlands: the effects of seasonal timing, depth, and duration of flooding. Aquat Bot. 2003;77(2):153–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(03)00102-5
  • 16. Lenssen JPM, van Kleunen M, Fischer M, de Kroon H. Local adaptation of the clonal plant Ranunculus reptans to flooding alonga small-scale gradient. J Ecol. 2004;92(4):696–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00895.x
  • 17. Mommer L, Visser EJW. Underwater photosynthesis in flooded terrestrial plants: a matter of leaf plasticity. Ann Bot. 2005;96(4):581–889.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci212
  • 18. Huber H, Jacobs E, Visser EJW. Variation in flooding-induced morphological traits in natural populations of white clover (Trifoliumrepens) and their effects on plant performance during soil flooding.Ann Bot. 2009;103(2):377–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn149
  • 19. McDonald AW, Bakker JP, Vegelin K. Seed bank classification and its importance for the restoration of species-rich flood-meadows. J VegSci. 1996;7(2):157–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3236315
  • 20. Bekker RM, Oomes MJM, Bakker JP. The impact of groundwater level on soil seed bank survival. Seed Sci Res.1998;8(3):399–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0960258500004323
  • 21. Hölzel N, Otte A. The impact of flooding regime on the soil seed bank of flood-meadows. J Veg Sci. 2001;12(2):209–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3236605
  • 22. Hölzel N, Otte A. Assessing soil seed bank persistence in floodmeadows: the search for reliable traits. J Veg Sci. 2004;15(1):93–100.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02241.x
  • 23. Bonis A, Lepart J, Grillas P. Seed bank dynamics and coexistence of annual macrophytes in a temporary and variable habitat. Oikos.1995;74(1):81–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3545677
  • 24. Gurnell AM. The hydrogeomorphological effects of beaver dambuilding activity. Prog Phys Geogr. 1998;22(2):167–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/030913398673990613
  • 25. Rosell F, Bozśer O, Collen P, Parker H. Ecological impact of beavers Castor fiber and Castor canadensis and their ability to modifyecosystems. Mamm Rev. 2005;35(3–4):248–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00067.x
  • 26. Johnston CA, Naiman RJ. Boundary dynamics of the aquatic–terrestrial interface: the influence of beaver and geomorphology. LandscEcol. 1987;1(1):47–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02275265
  • 27. Westbrook CJ, Cooper DJ, Baker B. Beaver dams and overbank floods influence groundwater – surface water interactions of a RockyMountain riparian area. Water Resour Res. 2006;42(6):1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004560
  • 28. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos. 1994;69(3):373–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3545850
  • 29. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology. 1997(7);78:1946–1957. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2265935
  • 30. Wright JP, Jones CG, Flecker AS. An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale. Oecologia.2002;132(1):96–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0929-1
  • 31. Wright JP, Jones CG. The concept of organism as ecosystem engineers ten years on: progress, limitations, and challenges.BioScience. 2006;56(3):203–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006- 3568(2006)056%5B0203:TCOOAE%5D2.0.CO;2
  • 32. Czarnecka B, Janiec B. Abiotic conditions affecting the biodiversity of the “Szum” landscape reserve in Roztocze. Ekologia (Bratislava).2001;20(4 suppl):207–214.
  • 33. Czarnecka B, Janiec B. River breaks of Roztocze region as model objects in environmental education. Lublin: Maria Curie-SkłodowskaUniversity Press; 2002.
  • 34. Czarnecka B. Plant cover of the Szum River valley (Roztocze, southeast Poland). Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2005;74(1):43–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2005.008
  • 35. Dzwonko Z. Guidebook to phytosociological studies. Poznań: Sorus Press; 2007.
  • 36. Gross KL. A comparison of method for estimating seed number in the soil. J Ecol. 1990;78(4):1079–1093. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2260953
  • 37. Thompson K, Bakker JP, Bekker RM. The soil seed banks of north west Europe: methodology, density and longevity. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press; 1997.
  • 38. Csapodỳ V. Keimlingsbestimmungsbuch der Dikotyledonen. Budapesti: Akademiai Kiado; 1968.
  • 39. Muller FM. Seedlings of the north-western European lowland. A flora of seedlings. The Hague: Dr W. Junk B.V. Publishers; 1978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9981-7
  • 40. Krebs CJ. Ecology. The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers PWN; 2011.
  • 41. Mirek Z, Piękoś-Mirkowa H, Zając A, Zając M, editors. Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland – a checklist. Kraków: W. SzaferInstitute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 2002. (Biodiversityof Poland; vol 1).
  • 42. Matuszkiewicz W. The guide for identification of Polish plant communities. Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers PWN; 2008.
  • 43. Nolet BA, Rosell F. Comeback of the beaver Castor fiber: an overview of old and new conservation problems. Biol Conserv. 1998;83(2):165–173.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00066-9
  • 44. Hacker SD, Gaines SD. Some implications of direct positive interactions or community species diversity. Ecology. 1997;78(7):1990–2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2265939
  • 45. Bailey-Serres J, Voesenek LACJ. Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59(1):313–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092752
  • 46. Sairam RK, Kumutha D, Ezhilmathi K, Deshmukh PS, Srivastava GC. Physiology and biochemistry of waterlogging tolerance inplants. Biol Plant. 2008;52(3):401–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10535-008-0084-6
  • 47. Ernst WHO. Ecophysiology of plants in waterlogged and flooded environments. Aquat Bot. 1990;38(1):73–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(90)90099-7
  • 48. Visser EJW, Bögemann GM, van de Steeg HM, Pierik R, Blom PM. Flooding tolerance of Carex species in relation to field distributionand aerenchyma formation. New Phytol. 2000;148(1):93–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00742.x
  • 49. Kobojek E. Environmental effects of the reintroduction of the beaver (Castor fiber) in the Rawka valley. Prz Geogr. 2005;77:383–396.
  • 50. Anderson CB, Rosemond AD. Ecosystem engineering by invasive exotic beavers reduces in-stream diversity and enhances ecosystem function in Cape Horn, Chile. Oecologia. 2007;154(1):141–153. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0757-4
  • 51. Terwilliger J, Pastor J. Small mammals, ectomycorrhizae and conifer succession in beaver meadows. Oikos. 1999;85(1):83–94. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/3546794
  • 52. Matus G, Verhagen R, Bekker RM. Soil seed bank and vegetation composition of two fen-meadow stands in the Netherlands.Acta Bot Hung. 2001;43(3):349–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/ABot.43.2001.3-4.10
  • 53. Falińska K. Seed bank pattern and floristic composition of vegetation patches in a meadow abandoned for 20 years. Fragm Flor Geobot.2000;45(1–2):91–110.
  • 54. Bekker RM, Verweij GL, Smith REN, Reine R, Bakker JP, Schneider S. Soil seed bank in European grassland: does land use affect regenerationperspectives? J Appl Ecol. 1997;34(5):1293–1310. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2405239
  • 55. Grubb PJ. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev. 1977;52(1):107– 145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1977.tb01347.x
  • 56. Harper JL. Population biology of plants. London: Academic Press; 1977.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-39286790-a624-4a6b-80d6-5924bd2aa103
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.