NPV simulation as a way to reduce uncertainty in the project

• Autorzy: Rach D.

Warianty tytułu

RU

Мodelirovanie NPV kak sposob snizhenija neopredelennosti o proekte

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

RU

Słowa kluczowe

EN

NPV simulation; project; uncertainty; simulation; modelling; cash flow; risk management

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Teka Komisji Motoryzacji i Energetyki Rolnictwa
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 14
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.211-221,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Rach D.

• Volodymyr Dahl East-Ukrainian National University, Molodizhny bl., 20а, Lugansk, 91034, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• 1. Aftanjuk O.V., 2000.: Calculation and optimization of net present value of the investment project in unstable economic conditions. Project management and development of production. 2(2). 57-60. (in Russian).
• 2. Aftanjuk O.V., 2010.: Account of unstable economic conditions at calculation and optimization of the project NPV. Project management and development of production. 1(33). 68-71. (in Russian).
• 3. Bek Ul'rih., 1994.: From industrial society to society of risk. Thesis. Vol. 5. 161-168. (in Russian).
• 4. Bek U., 2000.: Society of risk. On a way to other modern. Moscow: Progress-Tradition. 384. (in Russian).
• 5. Chirkova S., Chernov V., 2004.: Modelling of investment processes in the conditions of uncertainty: proc. of interinstitutional scientifictechnical conference. Saint Petersburg, SPbGPU, Part VII, 49-50. (in Russian).
• 6. Creating of administrative decision in conditions of uncertainty and risk, 2010.: Essence of uncertainty and risk. Available at: http://elearn.oknemuan.ru/?id=9&p=1. (in Russian).
• 7. Danich V., 2010.: Modelling of avalanche-like socioeconomic processes. TEKA. Comission of motorization and energetics in agriculture. 10A, 78- 90.
• 8. Dimova D., 2004.: Modelling of future net cashflows by the Monte Carlo method in the condition of the environment uncertainty. Management of organization: diagnostics, strategy, efficiency: proc. of XII international scientific and practical conference. Moscow, 195-196. Available at: http://www.creativeconomy.ru/articles/20648/. (in Russian).
• 9. Donchenko V., 2008.: Structures, uncertainty: mathematical modelling. Information science and computing: International book series. Book 7. Artificial Intelligence and Decision Making. ITHEA, Sofia, 243-253. Available at: www.foibg.com/ibs_isc/ibs-07/IBS-07-p35.pdf. (in Russian).
• 10. Efimovskih V., 2009.: Risk in modern society: socially-philosophical analysis. Abstract of thesis of dissertation of candidate of philosophy sciences: 09.00.11. Bashkir state university. Ufa. 18 (in Russian).
• 11. Ermasova N.B., 2009.: Risk management of organization. Moscow: Dashkov and Co. 380. (in Russian).
• 12. Garkavet’s S., 2010.: Phenomenological aspects of psychological displays of individual socialnormative behavior. TEKA. Comission of motorization and energetics in agriculture. 10A, 145-151.
• 13. GOST R ISO 31000-2010. 2010.: National standard. Risk management. Principles and guidances. Moscow: Standartinform. 21. (in Russian).
• 14. Guzairov M., Orlova E., 2012.: Modelling of innovative processes of regional systems in the conditions of risk. Announcer UGATU. Vol.16, No1(46), 226-232. (in Russian).
• 15. Kalinina N., 2012.: Comprehension of knowledge society transformation in society of risk in modern socially-humanitarian idea. Innovations in science: proc. of X international scientific and practical conference in absentia. Available at: http://sibac.info/index.php/2009-07-01-10-21-16/3370-2012-07-24-17-10-57. (in Russian).
• 16. Krasheninin A., Osenin J., Matvienko S., 2013.: Improving efficiency of train traction operational standards: an approach with usage of simulation. TEKA. Comission of motorization and energetics in agriculture. Vol.13, No.3, 98-102.
• 17. Kulikova E.E., 2008.: Risk management: innovative aspect. Moscow: Berator-Publishing. 112. (in Russian).
• 18. Kuz'min Е., 2012.: Uncertainty in economy: concepts and positions. Poins of management. No4(21). Available at: http://vestnik.uapa.ru/ruru/ issue/2012/04/10/. (in Russian).
• 19. Latkin M., Efremova A., Chumachenko I., 2005.: Risk identification during the project life cycle. Airspace technique and technology. No5(21), 62-65. (in Russian).
• 20. Latkin M., Chumachenko I., 2008.: Estimation of the project efficiency considering negative influence of risks and indemnification of losses. Project management and development of production. 1(25), 46-53. (in Russian).
• 21. Littl Todd, 2005.: Flexibility in a fight against complication and uncertainty. Open systems. No10.
• 22. Melihov D., 2012.: Modelling of the firm investment strategies in the conditions of uncertainty. Abstract of thesis of dissertation of candidate of economy sciences: 08.00.13. Volgograd state technical university. Volgograd. 20 (in Russian).
• 23. Mohor V.V., Bogdanov A.M., 2011.: Each section interpretation of ISO GUIDE 73:2009 “Risk management – Vocabulary”. Announcer of IPME NAN of Ukraine. Kiev. Iss. 59. 173-199. (in Russian).
• 24. Narin'jani А., 1998.: No-factors: inaccuracy and not-fully-uncertainty - distinction and intercommunication. Available at: http://viperson.ru/wind. php?ID=514361. (in Russian).
• 25. Narin'jani A., Telerman V., Ushakov D., Shvecov I., 1998.: Programming in limitations and not-fullydetermined models. Information technologies, No7, Moscow, 13-22. Available at: www.raai.org/about/persons/nariniani/NMODEL2.doc. (in Russian).
• 26. Neizvestnyj S.I., 2007.: The project’s brain. Moscow: Russian Science Publisher. 400. (in Russian).
• 27. Oslo Manual., 2006.: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. 3d ed. A joint publication of OECD and Eurostat. Organisation for economic co_operation and development. Statistical office of the european communities. Moscow. 192. (in Russian).
• 28. Pogorelov O., 2012.: Outline of a theory of semantic information and misinformation. TEKA. Comission of motorization and energetics in agriculture. Vol.12, No.4, 210-217.
• 29. Rach V.A., Rossoshanskaya O.V., Medvedeva E.M., 2010.: Project management: practical aspects of regional development strategies realization. Kiev: “K.I.S.”. 276 (in Ukrainian).
• 30. Rach V., Borzenko-Miroshnichenko A., 2012.: Features of project analysis of the portfolio of regional educational space. TEKA. Comission of motorization and energetics in agriculture. Vol.12, No.4, 235-239.
• 31. Risk management professional standard, 2012.: Risk management of organization. Qualification level 6, 7, 8. Moscow: RusRisk. 60. (in Russian).
• 32. Rossoshanskaya O., Scherbatyuk А., 2013.: Innovative labour as a tool of ensuring the strategic economic security for innovative project-oriented enterprises. Project management and development of production. 3(47), 5-18. (in Ukrainian).
• 33. Sapronova S., 2010.: Modelling of locomotive wheel profile form. TEKA. Comission of motorization and energetics in agriculture. 10C, 270- 278.
• 34. Terner J. Rodney, 2007.: Guidance on the projectoriented management. Мoscow: Publ. house of Grebennikov. 552 (in Russian).
• 35. The Lisbon European council – an agenda of economic and social renewal for europe. 2000.: Brussels. Feb. 28. Available at: http://www.ec.europa.eu/growthanjobs/pdf/lisbon_en.pdf
• 36. Tkachenko D. 2011.: Modelling and optimization of investment strategies in the conditions of uncertainty considering the project realization deadline. Management of economic systems. No12. Available at: http://www.uecs.ru/instrumentalniimetody- ekonomiki/item/886-2011-12-22-06-55-57. (in Russian).
• 37. To societies of knowledge, 2005.: JuNESKO. 239. (in Russian).
• 38. Voropaev V., 1995.: Project management in Russia. Moscow: Allans. 225. (in Russian).
• 39. World bank of reconstruction and development, 2013.: Risks and possibilities. Risk management in interests of development. Report about world development 2014. 66.