PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 60 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

Comparison of the effect of the chosen species of saprotrophic fungi on the development of Toxocara canis and Ascaris suum eggs

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The study aim was to compare the antagonistic interaction between saprotrophic soil fungi and embryonic development of geohelminths Toxocara canis and Ascaris suum. The experimental cultures were fertilized eggs of T. canis and A. suum incubated together with mycelium of strains: Fusarium culmorum, Metarhizium anisopliae, Paecilomyces fumosoroseus, Trichoderma viride and Trichothecium roseum. In the control cultures the eggs of both nematode species were incubated without fungi. The experiment was conducted at temp. 26ºC for 60 days. Compared with the control, all of the tested species of fungi significantly extended the embryonic development of both T. canis and A. suum. Most inhibitory effect on the rate of embryonic development of T. canis and A. suum had three fungal species: P. fumosoreus, M. anisopliae and T. viride. Compared with the control, on the 60th day of incubation in the presence of each of the tested fungal species, a larger percentage (p<0.05) of morphological abnormalities was stated in developing embryos of T. canis (49–69%) than in A. suum (15.1–67.7%). Among the examined fungal species, only incubation with P. fumosoroseus resulted in significantly greater (p<0.05) incidence of embryonic malformations (embryopathies) in T. canis, as compared with A. suum. Also the percentage of dead larvae of T. canis in the control and in cultures with fungi (12% and 100%, respectively) was significantly higher in comparison with A. suum (0.5% and 10.3–36%, respectively). The highest percentage of non-viable larvae of A. suum was found in the presence of P. fumosoroseus, and the lowest in the presence of M. anisopliae. Findings may indicate that T. canis eggs are more sensitive to antagonistic interaction of the examined fungal strains than A. suum eggs.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

60

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.215-220,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Department of Hydrobiology, Ichthyology and Biotechnology of Reproduction, West Pomeranian University of Technology, K.Krolewicza 4, 71-550 Szczecin, Poland
  • Laboratory of Epidemiology, Voivodship Sanitary-Epidemiological Station, Spedytorska 6/7, 70-632 Szczecin, Poland
  • Chair and Department of Biology and Medical Parasitology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powstancow Wlkp.72, 70-111 Szczecin; Poland

Bibliografia

  • [1] Bethony J., Brooker S., Albonico N., Geiger S.M., Loukas A., Diemert D., Hotez P.J. 2006. Soiltransmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. www.thelancet.com 367: 1521-1532.
  • [2] Blaszkowska J., Wojcik A., Kurnatowski P., Szwabe K. 2013. Geohelminth eggs contamination of children’s play areas in the city of Lodz (Poland). Veterinary Parasitology 192: 228-233.
  • [3] Blaszkowska J., Kurnatowski P., Wojcik A., Goralska K., Szwabe K. 2014. In vitro evaluation of the ovistatic and ovicidal effect of the cosmopolitan filamentous fungi isolated from soil on Ascaris suum eggs. Veterinary Parasitology 199: 165-171.
  • [4] Gortari M.C., Galarza B.C., Cazau M.C., Hours R.A. 2008. Comparison of the biological properties of two strains of Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom) Samson associated to their antagonistic effect onto Toxocara canis eggs. Malaysian Journal of Microbiology 4: 35-41.
  • [5] Kołodziejczyk L., Mazurkiewicz-Zapałowicz K., Janda K., Dzika E. 2014. The effect of saprotrophic fungi on the development and hatching of Fasciola hepatica eggs. Folia Biologica 62: 149-154.
  • [6] Lýsek H. 1982. The problem of human geohelminthoses and the prospects for their biological control. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Facultatis Medicae 103: 315-328.
  • [7] Blaszkowska J., Wojcik A., Kurnatowski P., Szwabe K. 2013. Biological interactions between soil saprotrophic fungi and Ascaris suum eggs. Veterinary Parasitology 196: 401-408.
  • [8] Butt T.M., Jackson C., Magan N. 2001. Fungi as biocontrol agents. Progress, Problems and Potential. CABI Publishing, London UK.
  • [9] Jaborowska M. 2006. Badania nad ograniczeniem liczebności pasożytniczych geohelmintów za pomocą saprotroficznych grzybów glebowych i ich wydzielin. Annales Academiae Medicae Stetinensis 52: 37-46.
  • [10] Jaborowska M., Kuźna-Grygiel W, Mazurkiewicz-Zapałowicz K. 2006. Wpływ grzybów z rodzaju Metarhizium na rozwój embrionalny Ascaris suum. Annales Academiae Medicae Stetinensis 52: 19-23.
  • [11] Jaborowska M., Kuźna-Grygiel W., Mazurkiewicz-Zapałowicz K., Kołodziejczyk L. 2006. Comparative studies on the antagonistic effects of mould fungi on the embryogenesis of Ascaris suum. Advances in Agricultural Sciences 10: 45-50.
  • [12] Engelbrecht H., Buske M. 1970. Ein Beitrag zur Prüfung und Bevertung der oviciden Wirksamkeit von Desinfizienzien. Wiadomości Parazytologiczne 16: 448-455.
  • [13] Kuźna-Grygiel W., Kołodziejczyk L., Janowicz K., Mazurkiewicz-Zapałowicz K. 2001. Effect of some saprotrophic soil fungi on the embryonic development of Ascaris suum. Acta Mycologica 36: 283-291.
  • [14] Jarnicka-Stanios H., Wawrzkiewicz K. 1974. Działanie grzybów rodzaju Fusarium na rozwój Asca ris suum. Wiadomości Parazytologiczne 20: 829-839.
  • [15] Ciarmela M.L., Minvielle M.C., Lori G., Basualdo J.A. 2002. Biological interaction between soil fungi and Toxocara canis eggs. Veterinary Parasitology 103: 251-257.
  • [16] Ciarmela M.L., Arambarri A.M., Basualdo J.A., Minivielle M.C. 2010. Effect of saprotrophic soil fungi on Toxocara canis eggs. Malaysian Journal of Microbiology 6: 75-80.
  • [17] De Souza Maia Filho F., Nunes Vieira J., Aires Berne M.E., Stoll F.E., Nascente P.Da S., Pötter L., Brayer Pereira D.I. 2013. Fungal ovicidal activity on Toxocara canis eggs. Revista Iberoamericana de Micologia 30: 226-230.
  • [18] Bonants P.J., Fitters P.F., Thijs H., DEN Belder E., Waalwijk C., Henfling J.W. 1995. A basic serine protease from Paecilomyces lilacinus with biological activity against Meloidogyne hapla eggs. Microbiology 141: 775-784.
  • [19] Oclarit E.L., Cumagun Ch.J.R. 2009. Evaluation of efficacy of Paecilomyces lilacinus as biological control agent of Meloidogyne incognita attacking tomato. Journal of Plant Protection Research 49: 337-340.
  • [20] Basualdo J.A., Ciarmela M.L., Sarmiento P.L., Minvielle M.C. 2000. Biological activity of Paecilomyces genus against Toxocara canis eggs. Parasitology Research 86: 854-859.
  • [21] Wharton D. 1980. Nematode egg-shells. Parasitology 81: 447-463.
  • [22] Kołodziejczyk L., Kuźna-Grygiel W., Janowicz K., Mazurkiewicz-Zapałowicz K. 2001. Antagonistyczny wpływ saprofitycznych grzybów glebowych na rozwój pasożytniczych nicieni. Folia Universitatis Agriculture Stetinensis 42: 83-88.
  • [23] Robens J.F., Richard J.L. 1992. Aflatoxins in animal and human health. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 127: 69-94.
  • [24] Obrecht-Pflumio S., Dirheimer G. 2000. In vitro DNA and dGMP adducts formation caused by ochratoxin A. Chemico-Biological Interactions 127: 29-44.
  • [25] Bennett J.W., Klich M. 2003. Mycotoxins. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 16: 497-516.
  • [26] Mazurkiewicz-Zapałowicz K., Kuźna-Grygiel W., Janowicz K., Jaborowska M. 2004. Toksyczność grzybów entomofagicznych. In Abstracts: VII Międzynarodowa Konferencja Naukowa „Mikotoksyny i patogenne pleśnie w środowisku”, Bydgoszcz, 28-30.06.2004: 171-176.
  • [27] O’Brien E., Dietrich D.R. 2005. Ochratoxin A: the continuing enigma. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 35: 33-60.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-384cac02-3154-4256-a567-2108eed666f1
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.