PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 66 | 1 |
Tytuł artykułu

Detection of Mechanically Recovered Poultry Meat (MRPM) in traditional Egyptian luncheon (emulsion type sausage)

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Detection of MRPM in emulsion type products is a challenge facing meat industry. Where, most of meat products processors in Egypt illegally replace beef meat partially or totally with MRPM in meat products to reduce products cost. Commercial and experimentally produced emulsion type sausage (traditional Egyptian luncheon) formulated with 0, 10, 30, 50, 70, 90% MRPM instead of the meat mass and cooked to different core temperature (70, 80 and 90°C) were examined for technological properties, ash, bones, cartilage and calcium (Ca) content, in addition to histological sections stained with H&E and Trichrome blue. Results indicated that all market samples showed unacceptable texture and binding scores with high ash, collagen, cartilage, bone and Ca content. Histological section showed the presence of skin and cartilage. Addition of 10% MRPM to luncheon formulation could not be detected at different cooking temperatures. While the use of 30% or more MRPM to luncheon formulation, signifi cantly changed technological properties and chemical composition of the product. Thermal treatments of luncheon sausages changed their chemical composition as well as induced structural changes in bone and cartilage content.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
66
Numer
1
Opis fizyczny
p.17–23,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
Bibliografia
  • 1. Abdullah B., Al-Najdawi R., Functional and sensory properties of chicken meat from spent-hen carcasses deboned manually or mechanically in Jordan. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 2005, 40, 537–543.
  • 2. AMSA, American Meat Science Association. 1995, Research guidelines for cookery, sensory evaluation and instrumental tenderness measurements of fresh meat. Chicago, IL, USA: American Meat Science Association.
  • 3. Anonymous, Bestimmung der geweblichenZusammensetzung von Fleisch, Fleischerzeugnissen und Wurstwaren. Routineverfahren zur qualitativen und quantitative histologischen Untersuchung. 2006, in: Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Amtliche Sammlung von Untersuchungsverfahren nach § 64 LFGB, § 35 Vorlufiges Tabakgesetz, § 28b GenTG. 1 (2, 06.13): 1–14. Berlin, Wien, Züric: Beuth.
  • 4. AOAC, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official Methods of Analysis. 1995, Association of Official Analytical Chemists,16th ed., Washington, DC, USA.
  • 5. Banchroft J.D., Stevens A., Turner D.R., Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques, 4th Ed., 1996, Churchill Livingstone, New York, London, San Francisco, Tokyo.
  • 6. Benitez B., Archile A., Rangel L., Bracho M., Hernandez M., Marquez E., Nutritional quality and acceptability of a product formulated with mechanically deboned poultry meat, plasma and bovine red cell. Arch. Latinoam. Nutr., 2002, 52, 307–312.
  • 7. Beraquet N.J., Carne mecanicamenteseparada de aves. 2000, in: Seminário e CursoTeórico-Prático “Agregando Valor à Carne de Aves”, 2000, Campinas. Campinas: CTC (in Italian).
  • 8. Bodner J.M., Sieg J., Fiber. 2009, in: Ingredients In Meat Products (ed. R. Tarté). Springer Science, Business Media, LLC, pp. 83–109.
  • 9. Branscheid W., Histologische Untersuchung von Fleischerzeugnissen mit Gemengecharakter, 2007, in: Qualität von Fleisch und Fleischwaren, Vol. 2 (eds. W. Branscheid, K.O. Honikel, G.v. Lengerken, K. Troeger). Deutscher Fachverlag, Frankfurt, pp. 907–916.
  • 10. Branscheid W., Judas M., Höreth R.H., The morphological detection of bone and cartilage particles in mechanically separated meat. Meat Sci., 2009, 81, 46–50.
  • 11. Brasil, Ministério da Agricultura. Divis~ao de Inspeção de carnes e derivados.Servicço de Inspeçao de Produtos de Origem Animal – Regulamento da Inspeçsimao Industrial e Sanitãria dos Produtos de Origem Animal.Brasǐlia: Ministério da Agricultura, 1981, Circular 28/ DICAR.
  • 12. Dawson P.L., Sheldon B.W., Ball H.R., Extraction of lipid and pigment components from mechanically deboned chicken meat. J. Food Sci., 1988, 53, 1615–1617.
  • 13. Dingman S.E., May S.G., Smithey S.L., Meat Emulsion Product. United States Patent, 2002, 1, 10.
  • 14. Emara M.M.T., Use of chlorine, benzoate and lactic acid as decontaminators to mechanically separated poultry meat and application in traditional Egyptian luncheon. Vet. Med. J. Giza, 2005, 53 (1), 153–162.
  • 15. ESS 2005/1114: Egyptian Standard Specification for Traditional Egyptian luncheon (beef luncheon). Published and updated by Egyptian Standard organization for specification.
  • 16. EU Regulation, Commission regulation (EC) No 2074/2005. Official J. European Union. L 338/27, 2005.
  • 17. Field R.A., Mechanically separated meat, poultry and fish. 1988, in: Edible Meat By-Products (eds. A.M. Pearson, T.R. Dutson). Elsevier Applied Science, New York, pp. 83–128.
  • 18. Field R.A., Ash and calcium as measures of bone in meat and bone mixture. Meat Sci., 2000, 55, 255–264.
  • 19. Field R.A., Mechanically recovered meat. 2004, in: Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  • 20. Froning G.W., Mechanical deboning of poultry and fish. 1981, in:Advances in Food Research (eds. C.O. Chichester, E.M. Mark, G.F. Stewart). Academic Press, London, pp. 109–147.
  • 21. Gill C.O., Microbiology of edible meat by products. 1988, in: Edible Meat By-Products (eds. A.M. Pearson, T.R. Dutson). Elsevier Applied Science. Barking, pp. 47–82.
  • 22. Henckel P., Vyberg M., Thode S., Hermansen S., Assessing the quality of mechanically and manually recovered chicken meat. LWT – Food Sci. Technol., 2004, 37, 593–601.
  • 23. Hildebrandt G., Raucher K., Stenzel W.R., Analysen merkmale zum Nachweis von Separatorenfleisch 2 MikroskopischeUntersuchung. Fleischwirtschaft, 2006, 86, 111–114 (in German).
  • 24. Kanner J., Oxidative processes in meat and meat products: Quality Implications. Meat Sci., 1994, 36, 169–189.
  • 25. Kingston H.M., Jassie L.B., Introduction to Microwave Sample Preparation. 1988, ASC.Professional Reference Book. Washington, DC. U.S.A.
  • 26. Mahendrakar N.S., Dani N.P., Ramesh B.S., Amla B.L., Effect of post-mortem conditioning treatments to sheep carcasses on some biophysical characteristics of muscles. J. Food Sci. Technol., 1988, 25, 340–344.
  • 27. Mielnik M.B., Aaby K., Rolfsen K., Ellejaer M.R., Nilsson A., Quality of comminuted sausages formulated from mechanically deboned poultry meat. Meat Sci., 2002, 61, 73–84.
  • 28. Navarro C., Optimizaci´on del procesos de obtenci´on de gelesc´arnicospartir de carne de avemec´anicamenterecuperada, 2005. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad Miguel Hern´andez, Elche, Spain.
  • 29. Neuman R.E., Logan M.A., Determination of hydroxyproline content. J. Biol. Chem., 1950, 184, 299–306.
  • 30. Official Standard, 1989, Amtliche Sammlung von Untersuchungsverfahren nach § 64 LFGB, Bestimmung der geweblichen. Zusammensetzung von Fleisch, Fleischerzeugnissen und Wurstwaren L 06.00.13, Berlin: Beuth Verlag. p. 14.
  • 31. Pearson A.M., Gillett T.A., Sausages. Processed Meats. 1999, Aspen Publishers Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, pp. 210–241.
  • 32. Pickering K., Evans C.L., Hargin K.D., Stewart C.A., Investigation of methods to detect mechanically recovered meat in meat products. III: Microscopy. Meat Sci., 1995, 40, 319–326.
  • 33. Raphaelides S.N., Grigoropoulou S., Petridis D., Quality attribute of pariza salami as influenced by the addition of mechanically deboned chicken meat. Food Qual. Pref., 1998, 9,237–242.
  • 34. Salman H.K., Aqueous processing influences on composition and functionality of mechanically separated broiler meat. 1995.Ph.D. Dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.
  • 35. Seiquer I., Delgado-Andrade C., Haro A., Navarro M.P., Assessing the effects of severe heat treatment of milk on calcium bioavailability: in vitro and in vivo studies. J. Dairy Sci., 2010, 93, 5635–5643.
  • 36. Serdaroğlu M., Turp G.Y., Bağdatlioğlu N., Effects of deboning methods on chemical composition and some properties of beef and turkey meat. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 2005, 29, 797–802.
  • 37. Tyburcy A., Toszek E., Cegiełka A., The comparison between the raw material composition of chemical characteristics of poultry and pork frankfurters offered for retail sales on the Warsaw market. Zywność. Nauka. Technologia. Jakość, 2005, 3(44), 105–112 (in Polish).
  • 38. Woessner J.F., The determination of hydroxyproline in the tissue and protein samples containing small proportions of amino acid. Arch. Biochem. Bioph., 1961, 93, 440–442.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-3806a6f2-97fb-49c0-a4ae-52f00e731c92
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.