PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 25 | 5 |
Tytuł artykułu

Effect of litter quality on leaf-litter decomposition in the context of home-field advantage and non-additive effects in temperate forests in China

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Litter quality is often considered the main driver of rates of decomposition. Litter decomposes faster in its home environment than in any other environment, which is called the home-field advantage (HFA). However, evidence for this phenomenon has not been universal. In addition, litter mixtures of different species can induce a non-additive effect (NAE) on decomposition processes. However, the direction and magnitude of NAE vary and underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of litter quality on leaf-litter decomposition in the context of HFA and NAEs in temperate forests in China. Litterbags containing aspen (Populus davidiana), birch (Betula platyphylla), and oak (Quercus liaotungensis) litter were incubated in situ in pure aspen and broadleaved mixed forests in Chinese temperate forests for 360 days. The main results were: 1. Aspen litter with a low C/N ratio and high initial N concentration decomposed faster than birch litter, both of which decomposed faster than oak litter, which had the lowest quality. 2. The rate of decomposition of oak litter was significantly higher in the broadleaved mixed forest than in pure aspen stands; however, the rate of decomposition of birch litter was not significantly different from pure aspen stands and broadleaved mixed forest. 3. Contrary to what was predicted, the mixture of aspen and birch litter decomposed faster than expected. However, both the aspen/oak and birch/oak mixtures had a neutral mixing effect where the rates of decomposition were slightly faster than expected. 4. Controlling factors based on linear models show that the order of the relative importance of their effect on litter decomposition was as follows: litter quality, forest floor environment, and litter mixtures. This study indicates that: 1. The various litter species exhibited different litter-environment interactions, such as favoring or contradicting the HFA hypothesis. 2. Litter mixture treatments can induce different mixing effects. 3. Compared with environment and litter mixtures, litter quality is the dominant factor in controlling the rate of litter decomposition.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
25
Numer
5
Opis fizyczny
p.1911-1920,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, QingHua East Road 35, Haidian District, Beijing, China 100083
autor
  • College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, QingHua East Road 35, Haidian District, Beijing, China 100083
autor
  • College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, QingHua East Road 35, Haidian District, Beijing, China 100083
Bibliografia
  • 1. SWIFT M.J., HEAL O.W., ANDERSON J.M. Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979.
  • 2. MOORE J.C., BERLOW E.L., COLEMAN D.C., DE RUITER P.C., DONG Q., HASTINGS A., JOHNSON N.C., MCCANN K.S., MELVILLE K., MORIN P.J., NADELHOFFER K., ROSEMOND A.D., POST D.M., SABO J.L., SCOW K.M., VANNI M.J., WALL D.H. Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 7, 584, 2004.
  • 3. GE X.G., ZHOU B.Z., TANG Y.L. Litter Production and Nutrient Dynamic on a Moso Bamboo Plantation following an Extreme Disturbance of 2008 Ice Storm. Advanced in Meteorology, 750, 865, 2014.
  • 4. HOORENS B., COOMES D., AERTS R. Neighbour identity hardly affects litter-mixture effects on decomposition rates of New Zealand forest species. Oecologia, 162, 479, 2010.
  • 5. TAYLOR B.R., PARKINSON D., PARSONS W.F.J. Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates: a microcosm test. Ecology, 70,97,1989.
  • 6. POLYAKOVA O., BILLOR N. Impact of deciduous tree species on litterfall quality, decomposition rates and nutrient circulation in pine stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 253, 11, 2007.
  • 7. BERG B., DAVEY M., DE MARCO A., EMMETT B., FAITURI M., HOBBIE S., JOHANSSON M.B., LIU C., MCCLAUGHERTY C., NORELL L., RUTIGLIANO
  • F., VESTERDAL L., DE VIRZO SANTO A. Factors influencing limit values for pine needle litter decomposition: a synthesis for boreal and temperate pine forest systems. Biogeochemistry, 100, 57, 2010.
  • 8. VANCE E.D., CHAPIN F.S. Substrate limitations to microbial activity in taiga forest floors. Soil Biol. Biochem., 33, 173, 2001.
  • 9. AERTS R. Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos, 79, 439, 1997.
  • 10. LAMARCHE J., BRADLEY R.L., PARE, D., LEGARE, S., BERGERON Y. Soil parent material may control forest floor properties more than stand type or stand age in mixed wood boreal forests. Ecoscience, 11, 228, 2004.
  • 11. LAGANIERE J., PARE D., BRADLEY R.L. Linking the abundance of aspen with soil faunal communities and rates of below ground processes within single stands of mixed aspen – black spruce. Appl. Soil Ecol., 41, 19, 2009.
  • 12. LAGANIERE J., PARE D., BRADLEY R.L. How does a tree species influence litter decomposition? Separating the relative contribution of litter quality, litter mixing, and forest floor conditions. Can. J. For. Res. 40, 465, 2010.
  • 13. GHOLZ H.L., WEDIN D.A., SMITHERMAN S.M., HARMON M.E., PARTON W.J. Long-term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: toward a global model of decomposition. Glob. Change Biol., 6,751, 2000.
  • 14. MOORHEAD D.L., SINSABAUGH R.L. A theoretical model of litter decay and microbial interaction. Ecol. Monogr., 76,151, 2006.
  • 15. WANG Q.K., WANG S.L., HUANG Y. Leaf litter decomposition in the pure and mixed plantations of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Michelia macclurei in subtropical China. Biol. Fertil. Soil, 45, 371, 2009.
  • 16. AYRES E., STELTZER H., BERG S., WALL D.H. Soil biota accelerate decomposition in high-elevation forests by specializing in the breakdown of litter produced by the plant species above them. J. Ecol., 97, 901, 2009.
  • 17. APINTE C., GARCIA L.V., MARANON T. Tree species effect on litter decomposition and nutrient release in Mediterranean oak forests changes over time. Ecosystems, 15, 1204, 2012.
  • 18. VIVANCO L., AUSTIN A.T. Tree species identity alters forest litter decomposition through long-term plant and soil interactions in Patagonia, Argentina. J. Ecol., 96, 727, 2008.
  • 19. GARTNER T.B., CARDON Z.G. Decomposition dynamicsin mixed-species leaf litter a review. Oikos, 104, 230, 2004.
  • 20. OSTROFSKY M.L. A comment on the use of exponential decay models to test non-additive processing hypotheses in multispecies mixtures of litter. J.N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 26, 23, 2007.
  • 21. MCTIERNAN K.B., INESON P., COWARD P.A. Respiration and nutrient release from tree leaf litter mixtures. Oikos, 78, 527, 1997.
  • 22. HATTENSCHWILER S., JORGENSEN H.B. Carbon quality rather than stoichiometry controls litter decomposition in a tropical rain forest. J. Ecol., 98, 754, 2010.
  • 23. HATTENSCHWILER S., TIUNOV A.V., SCHEU S. Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 36, 191, 2005.
  • 24. SALAMANCA E.F., KANEKO N., KATAGIRI S. Rainfall manipulation effects on litter decomposition and the microbial biomass of the forest floor. Appl. Soil Ecol., 22, 271, 2003.
  • 25. JONARD M., ANDRE F., PONETTE Q. Tree species mediated effects on leaf litter dynamics in pure and mixed stands of oak and beech. Can. J. For. Res. 38, 528, 2008.
  • 26. TAN Y.L., CHEN J., YAN L.M., HUANG J.H., WANG L.X., CHEN S.P. Mass loss and nutrient dynamics during litter decomposition under three mixing treatments in a typical steppe in Inner Mongolia. Plan Soil, 366, 107, 2013.
  • 27. WU D.D., LI T.T., WAN S.Q. Time and litter species composition affect litter-mixing effects on decomposition rates. Plant Soil, 371, 355, 2013.
  • 28. WANG J., YOU Y.M., TANG Z.X., LIU S.R., SUN O.J.X. Variations in leaf litter decomposition across contrasting forest stands and controlling factors at local scale. Journal of Plant Ecology, 8, 261, 2015.
  • 29. ZHAO J.L., KANG F.F., WANG L.X., YU X.W., ZHAO W.H., SONG X.S., ZHANG Y.L., CHEN F., SUN Y., HE T.F., HAN H.R. Patterns of Biomass and Carbon Distribution across a Chronosequence of Chinese Pine (Pinus tabulaeformis) Forests. PLoS ONE, 9, e94966, 2014.
  • 30. FAO, ISRIC, ISSS World Reference Base for Soil Resources. Report No. 103. World Soil Resources Reports, Rome, 2006.
  • 31. Forestry Standards “Observation Methodology for Longterm Forest Ecosystem Research” of People’s Republic of China (LY/T 1952-2011). 2011.
  • 32. KARBERG N.J., SCOTT N.A., GIARDINA C.P. Methods for estimating litter decomposition. In: Hoover CM, Ed. Field measurements for forest carbon monitoring. New York: Springer. 103, 2008.
  • 33. OLSON J.S. Energy storage and balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology, 44, 322, 1963.
  • 34. BARLOCHER F. Leaf mass loss estimated by litter bag technique. In: Graca MAS, Barlocher F, Gessner MO (eds) Methods to study litter decomposition – a practical guide. Springer, Dordrecht, 37, 2007.
  • 35. HOORENS B., STROETENGA M., AERTS R. Litter mixture interactions at the level of plant functional types are additive. Ecosystems, 13, 90, 2010.
  • 36. WARDLE D.A., BONNER K.I., NICHOLSON K.S. Biodiversity and plant litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. Oikos, 79, 247, 1997.
  • 37. AYRES E., STELTZER H., SIMMONS B.L., SIMPSON R.T., STEINWEG J.M., WALLENSTEIN M.D., MELLOR N., PARTON W.J., MOORE J.C., WALL D.H. Home-field advantage accelerates leaf litter decomposition in forests. Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 606, 2009.
  • 38. LI D.J., PENG S.L., CHEN B.M. The effects of leaf litter evenness on decomposition depend on which plant functional group is dominant. Plant Soil, 365, 255, 2013.
  • 39. PRESCOTT C.E. Do rates of litter decomposition tell us anything we really need to know? For. Ecol. Manage., 220, 66, 2005.
  • 40. JACOB M., VIEDENZ K., POLLE A., THOMAS F.M. Leaf litter decomposition in temperate deciduous forest stands with a decreasing fraction of beech (Fagus sylvatica). Oecologia, 164, 1083, 2010.
  • 41. RAHMAN M.M., TSUKAMOTO J., TOKUMOTO Y., SHUVO M.A.R. The Role of Quantitative Traits of Leaf Litter on Decomposition and Nutrient Cycling of the Forest Ecosystems. Journal of Forest Science, 29, 38, 2013.
  • 42. ALBERS D., MIGGE S., SCHAEFER M., SCHEU S. Decomposition of beech leaves (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce needles (Picea abies) in pure and mixed stands of beech and spruce. Soil Biol. Biochem., 36, 155, 2004.
  • 43. VIVANCO L., AUSTIN A.T. Tree species identity alters forest litter decomposition through long-term plant and soil interactions in Patagonia, Argentina. J. Ecol., 96, 727, 2008.
  • 44. SARIYILDIZ T. Effects of gap-size classes on long-term litter decomposition rates of beech, oak and chestnut species at high elevations in Northeast Turkey. Ecosystems, 11, 841, 2008.
  • 45. GIEBELMANN U.C., MARTINS K.G., BRANDLE M., SCHADLER M., MARQUES R., BRANDL R. Lack of home-field advantage in the decomposition of leaf litter in the Atlantic Rainforest of Brazil. Applied Soil Ecology, 8, 1, 2013.
  • 46. STRICKLAND M.S., OSBURN E., LQUBER C., FIERER N., BRADFORD M.A. Litter quality is in the eye of the beholder: initial decomposition rates as a function of inoculum characteristics. Functional Ecology, 2, 627, 2009.
  • 47. CHAPMAN S.K., KOCH G.W. What type of diversity yields synergy during mixed litter decomposition in a natural forest ecosystem. Plant Soil, 299, 153, 2007.
  • 48. SCHIMEL J.P., HATTENSCHWILER S. Nitrogen transfer between decomposing leaves of different N status. Soil Biol. Biochem., 39, 1428, 2007.
  • 49. SWAN C.M., PALMER M.A. Preferential feeding by an aquatic consumer mediates non-additive decomposition of species leaf litter. Oecologia, 149, 107, 2006.
  • 50. GESSNER M.O., SWAN C.M., DANG C.K., MCKIE B.G., BARDGETT R.D., WALL D.H., HATTENSCHWILER S. Diversity meets decomposition. Trends Ecol. Evol., 25, 372, 2010.
  • 51. PEREZ-SUAREZ M., ARREDONDO-MORENO T., HUBER-SANNWALD E. Early stage of single and mixed leaf-litter decomposition in semiarid forest pine-oak: the role of rainfall and microsite. Biogeochemistry, 108, 245, 2012.
  • 52. PAULY M., KEEGSTRA K. Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels. Plant J., 54, 559, 2008.
  • 53. HECTOR A., BEALE A.J., MINNS A., OTWAY S.J., LAWTON J.H. Consequences of the reduction of plant diversity for litter decomposition: effects through litter quality and microenvironment. Oikos, 90, 357, 2000.
  • 54. MARCO A.D., MEOLA A., MAISTO G., GIORDANO M., SANTO A.V.D., Non-additive effects of litter mixtures on decomposition of leaf litters in a Mediterranean maquis. Plant Soil, 344, 305, 2011.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-34ac845a-2e1d-4c11-b80a-bd0503304fbd
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.