Validation of the Polish version of Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Effect of gender, level of participation and sport type on intrinsic and extrinsic motives

• Autorzy: Walczak M. , Tomczak M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Sport Motivation Scale (SMS), based on self-determination theory was validated into Polish conditions. The study was aimed to assess psychometric properties of the SMS on a sample of Polish athletes as well as to determine relationships between SMS factors and gender, level of participation and type of practiced sport. The sample comprised 613 (380 male and 233 female) individual and team, recreational and high performance athletes, aged 19.12 years (SD = 2.31). The results demonstrated a relatively high internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the SMS subscales. Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated that the fit of the SMS model to data was not fully satisfactory.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Trends in Sport Sciences
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 26
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.187-195,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Walczak M.

• Department of Psychology, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland

autor

Tomczak M.

• Department of Psychology, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Brière NM, Vallerand RJ, Blais MR, Pelletier LG. Développement et validation d’une mesure de motivation intrinsèque, extrinsèque et d’amotivation en contexte sportif: L’Échelle de Motivation dans les Sports (EMS). Int J Sport Psychol. 1995; 26: 465-489.
• 2. Burtscher J, Furtner M, Sachse P, Burtscher M. Validation of a German version of the Sport Motivation Scale (SMS28) and motivation analysis in competitive mountain runners. Percept Mot Ski. 2011; 112: 807-820. DOI: 10.2466/05.06.25.pms.112.3.807-820.
• 3. Chatzisarantis NLD, Hagger MS. The moral worth of sport reconsidered: contributions of recreational sport and competitive sport to life aspirations and psychological well-being. J Sports Sci. 2007; 25: 1047-1056. DOI: 10.1080/02640410600959954.
• 4. Chatzisarantis NLD, Hagger MS, Biddle SJH, Smith B, Wang J. A meta-analysis of perceived locus of causality in exercise, sport, and physical education contexts. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2003; 25: 284-306.
• 5. Clancy RB, Herring MP, Campbell MJ. Motivation measures in sport: a critical review and bibliometric analysis. Front Psychol. 2017; 8(348).
• 6. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press; 2004.
• 7. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behavior. New York: Plenum; 1985.
• 8. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000; 11: 227-268. DOI: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
• 9. De Pero R, Amici S, Benvenuti C, Minganti C, Capranica L, Pesce C. Motivation for sport participation in older Italian athlets: the role of age, gender and competition level. Sport Sci Health. 2009; 5: 61-69. DOI: 10.1007/s11332-009-0078-6.
• 10. Doganis G. Development of a Greek version of the Sport Motivation Scale. Percept Mot Ski. 2000; 90: 505-512. DOI: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.2.505.
• 11. Fortier M, Vallerand RJ, Briere M, Provencher P. Competitive and recreational sport structures and tender: a test of their relationship with sport motivation. Int J Sport Psychol. 1995; 26: 24-39.
• 12. Georgiadis MM, Biddle SJH, Chatzisarantis NL. The mediating role of self-determination in the relationship between goal orientations and physical self-worth in Greek exercisers. Eur J Sport Sci. 2001; 1: 1-8.
• 13. Granero-Gallegos A, Baena-Extremera A, Gómez-López M, Sánchez-Fuentes JA, Abraldes JA. Psychometric properties of the “Sport Motivation Scale (SMS)” adapted to physical education. J Sport Sci Med. 2014; 13(4), 801-807.
• 14. Hollembeak J, Amorose AJ. Perceived coaching behaviors and college athletes’ intrinsic motivation: a test of selfdetermination theory. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2005; 17: 20-36.
• 15. Kazak Z. A study on reliability and validity of “The Sport Motivation Scale -SMS-“ for Turkish athletes. Hacettepe J Sport Sci. 2004; 15: 191-206.
• 16. Konarski R. Structural equations models. Theory and practice. Warszawa: PWN; 2009.
• 17. Li F, Harmer P. Testing the simplex assumption underlying the Sport Motivation Scale: a structural equation modeling analysis. Res Q Exercise Sport. 1996; 67: 196-405.
• 18. Mallett CJ, Kawabata M, Newcombe P, Otero-Forero A, Jackson S. Sport Motivation Scale-6 (SMS-6): a revised sixfactor sport motivation scale. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2007; 8: 600-614; DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.12.005.
• 19. Martens MP, Webber SN. Psychometric properties of the Sport Motivation Scale: an evaluation with college varsity athlets from the U.S. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2002; 24: 254-270.
• 20. Nunez JL, Martin-Albo J, Navarro JG, Gonzalez VM. Preliminary validation of a Spanish version of the Sport Motivation Scale. Percept Mot Skills. 2006; 102: 919-930. DOI: 10.2466/pms.102.3.919-930.
• 21. Paic R, Kajos A, Meszler B, Prisztóka G. Validation of the Hungarian Sport Motivation Scale (H-SMS). Cogn Brain Behav. 2017; XXI(4): 275-291. DOI: 10.24193/cbb.2017.21.17.
• 22. Pelletier LG, Rocchi MA, Vallerand RJ, Deci EL, Ryan RM. Validation of the revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II). Psychol Sport Exer. 2013; 14: 329-341.
• 23. Pelletier LG, Tuson KM, Fortier MS, Vallerand RJ, Briére NM, Blais MR. Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation in sports. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1995; 17: 35-53.
• 24. Pelletier LG, Vallerand RJ, Sarrazin P. The revised six-factor sport motivation scale (Mallett, Kawabata, Newcombe, Otero-Forero, & Jackson, 2007): Something old, something new, and something borrowed. Psychol Sport Exer. 2007; 8: 615-621. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport. 2007.03.006.
• 25. Ryan RM, Connell JP. Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989; 57: 749-761. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.5.749.
• 26. Ryan RM, Deci E. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000; 55: 68-78. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68.
• 27. Ryan RM, La Guardia JG. What is being optimized over development?: A self-determination theory perspective on basic psychological needs across the life span. In: Qualls S, Abeles N, editors. Psychology and the aging revolution. Washington, DC: APA Books, 145-172; 2000.
• 28. Teo EW, Khoo S, Wong R, Wee EH, Lim BH, Rengasamy SS. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among adolescent ten-pin bowlers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. J Hum Kinet. 2015; 45: 241-251. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0025.
• 29. Vallerand RJ. Toward a methodology for the transcultural validation of psychological questionnaires: implications for research in the French language. Can Psychol. 1989; 30: 662-680.
• 30. Walczak M, Tomczak M. Psychometric properties of the Polish version of Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). In: Serpa S, Teixera N, Almeida MJ, Rosado A, editors. Sport and Exercise Psychology: Human Performance, Well-Being and Health. Proceedings of the 13th FEPSAC European Congress of Sport Psychology, Madeira; 2011.
• 31. Wininger SR. Self-determination theory and exercise behavior: an examination of the psychometric properties of the Exercise Motivation Scale. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2007; 19: 471-486.
• 32. Yıldız A, Altıntaş A, Elmas S, Aşçı FH. Investigating the psychometric properties of Sport Motivation Scale-II. Turk J Sports Med. 2019; 54(1): 33-44. DOI: 10.5152/tjsm.2019.114.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.23829/TSS.2019.26.4-7