Investigations of photosynthetic activity parameters in relation to berries yield of selected grapevine cultivars

• Autorzy: Borowiak K. , Korszun S.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Badania parametrów aktywności fotosyntetycznej wybranych odmian winorośli w odniesieniu do ich plonowania

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Nine grapevine cultivars varying in fruit yield were tested for photosynthetic activity, chlorophyll content and leaf area during the 2010 growing season. Relationships between these parameters and berry yield were examined. Investigations revealed differences between the photosynthetic activity and other parameters of the selected grapevine cultivars. A high net photosynthetic rate was usually associated with high efficiency of CO2 during photosynthesis, due to high stomatal conductance. However, a high net photosynthetic rate was not always related to high leaf area and berry yield. Specific leaf area did not vary between cultivars. Fruit production in some cultivars was positively related to photosynthetic activity, while in other cases plants focused on fruit development, hence low values of photosynthesis and/or low leaf area were recorded.

PL

Badania aktywności fotosyntezy, zawartości chlorofilu i powierzchni liści były prowadzone w 2010 roku na dziewięciu odmianach zróżnicowanych pod względem plonowania jagód. W pracy analizowano również powiązania pomiędzy tymi parametrami. Badania wykazały różnice w poziomach parametrów aktywności fotosyntetycznej pomiędzy wybranymi odmianami winorośli. Wysoki poziom aktywności fotosyntezy netto był zwykle powiązany z dużą wydajnością CO2 w trakcie procesu fotosyntezy, w związku z dużą przewodnością aparatów szparkowych. Aktywność fotosyntezy i wielkość liści nie były ze sobą powiązane. Specyficzna powierzchnia liści nie była zróżnicowana pomiędzy odmianami. W przypadku niektórych odmian stwierdzono powiązanie wysokich poziomów aktywności fotosyntezy z obfitym plonowaniem, podczas gdy inne odmiany wykazywały słabe plonowanie i/lub małe powierzchnie liści.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Nauka Przyroda Technologie. Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 06
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: http://www.npt.up-poznan.net/pub/art_6_8.pdf

Twórcy

autor

Borowiak K.

• Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Piatkowska 94, 60-649 Poznan, Poland

autor

Korszun S.

• Department of Dendrology and Nursery, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• BEN-ASHERA J., TSUYUKIB I., BRAVDOC B.-A., SAGIHAA M., 2006. Irrigation of grapevines in saline water: I. Leaf area index, stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis. Agric. Water Manage. 83: 13-21.
• CRAVER B.F., NEVO E., 1990. Genetic diversity of photosynthetic characters in native populations of Triticum dicoccoides. Photosynth. Res. 25: 119-128.
• DOWNTON W.J.S., GRANT W.J.R., LOVEYS B.R., 1987. Diurnal changes in the photosynthesis of field grown grape vines. New Phytol. 105: 71-80.
• ESCALONA J.M., FLEXAS J., MEDRANO H., 2003. From leaf photosynthesis to grape yield: influence of soil water availability. Vitis 42, 2: 57-64.
• GARNIER E., SHIPLEY B., ROUMET C., LAURENT G., 2001. A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content. Funct. Ecol. 15: 688-695.
• GHILDIYAL M.C., 1992. Effect of urea on photosynthesis and yield in mung bean. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 168: 91-94.
• GHILDIYAL M.C., SINHA S.K., 1971. Variability in photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation in mung bean and cowpea cultivars. In: Physiological studies on pulses. Ed. G.S. Sirohi. IARI, New Delhi: 38-42.
• GHILDIYAL M.C., SINHA S.K., 1977. Physiological analysis of heterosis in Zea mays L. I. Changes in sugars and starch contents in relation to grain development. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 5: 899-904.
• GHILDIYAL M.C., SIROHI G.S., 1986. Photosynthesis in wheat as influenced by leaf position, time of the day and presence of the sink. Wheat Inf. Serv. 65: 38-42.
• HISCOX J.D., ISRAELSTAM G.F., 1978. A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Can. J. Bot. 5: 1332-1334.
• HOFFMANN M., KORSZUN S., 1990 a. Dynamika pobierania makroskładników przez winorośl odm. Skarb Pannonii rozmnażanej z sadzonek zielnych w pierwszym roku uprawy. Rocz. AR Pozn. 217, Ogrodn. 18: 19-31.
• HOFFMANN M., KORSZUN S., 1990 b. Wymagania pokarmowe winorośli odm. Skarb Pannonii w pierwszym roku uprawy. Pr. Kom. Nauk Roln. Kom. Nauk Leśn. PTPN 69: 43-52.
• HOFFMANN M., KORSZUN S., 1992. Uprawa kilku odmian winorośli w nieogrzewanym tunelu foliowym. Rocz. AR Pozn. 238, Ogrodn. 20: 29-38.
• KADIR S., 2006. Thermostability of photosynthesis of Vitis aestivalis and V. vinifera. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 131: 476-483.
• KADIR S., VON WEIHE M., AL-KHATIB K. 2007. Photochemical efficiency and recovery of photosystem II in grapes after exposure to sudden and gradual heat stress. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 132: 764-769.
• LARCHER W., 2003. Physiological plant ecology. Springer, Berlin.
• LECAIN D.R., MORGAN J.A., ZERBI G., 1989. Leaf anatomy and gas exchange in nearly isogenic semi dwarf and tall winter wheat. Crop Sci. 29: 1246-1251.
• MEDRANO H., ESCALONA J.M., CIFRE J., BOTA J., FLEXAS J., 2003. A ten-year study on the physiology of two Spanish grapevine cultivars under field conditions: effects of water availability from leaf photosynthesis to grape yield and quality. Funct. Plant Biol. 30, 6: 607-619.
• MORGAN J.A., LECAIN D.R., 1991. Leaf gas exchange and related leaf traits among 15 winter wheat genotypes. Crop Sci. 31: 443-448.
• PANDEY R., SHARMA-NATU P., GHILDIYAL M.C., 2001. Irrigation decrease loss of leaf nitrogen and rubisco during pod development in chickpea. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 187: 177-183.
• RAO T.R.K., GHILDIYAL M.C., 1985. Analysis of photosynthetic source and sink relationship in mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) Wilczek. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 28: 135-144.
• RAWSON H.M., HINDMARSH J.H., FISCHER R.A., STOCKMAN Y.R., 1983. Changes in leaf photosynthesis with plant ontogeny and relationships with yield per year in wheat cultivars and 120 progeny. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 10: 503-514.
• SCHULTZ H.R., 1996. Water relations and photosynthetic response of two grapevine cultivars of different geographical origin during water stress. Acta Hortic. 427: 251-266.
• SCHULTZ H.R., 2007. Climate change and world viticulture. Cost Action 858 Workshop: Vineyard under environmental constraints: adaptation to climate change. Abiotic stress ecophysiology and grape functional genomics. University of Łódź, Poland.
• SHARMA-NATU P., GHILDIYAL M.C., 2005. Potential targets for improving photosynthesis and crop yield. Curr. Sci. (Bangalore) 8, 12: 1918-1928.
• SHARMA-NATU P., PANDURANGAM V., GHILDIYAL M.C., 2004. Photosynthetic acclimation and productivity of mung bean cultivars under elevated CO2 concentration. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 190: 81-85.
• SHOAF T.W., LIUM B.W., 1976. Improved extraction of chlorophyll a and b from algae using dimethyl sulfoxide. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21: 926-928.
• SINGH R. 1990. Assimilation and partitioning of carbon and nitrogen during growth and development of grain legumes. In: Proceedings of the International Congress Plant Physiology. Eds. S.K. Sinha, P.V. Sane, S.C. Bhargava, P.K. Agrawal. Society for Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, New Delhi: 261-267.
• SINHA S.K., GHILDIYAL M.C., 1971. Transamination of glutamic acid during germination, growth and seed development in Bengal gram. Phytochemistry (Amst.) 10: 2959-2963.
• SIROHI G.S., GHILDIYAL M.C., 1975. Varietal differences in photosynthetic carboxylases and chlorophylls in wheat varietes. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 13: 42-44.
• WANG L.J., FAN L., LOESCHER W., DUAN W., LIU G.-J., CHENG J.-S., LUO H.B., LI S.-H., 2010. Salicylic acid alleviates decrease in photosynthesis under heat stress and accelerates recovery in grapevine leaves. Plant Biol. 10: 34-44.
• WILLIAMS L.E., 1996. Grape. In: Photoassimilate distribution in plants and crops: source-sink relationships. Ed. E. Zamski. Dekker, New York: 851-881.