PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 23 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Historical land use, actual vegetation, and the hemeroby levels in ecological evaluation of an urban river valley in perspective of its rehabilitation plan

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The rehabilitation of landscapes along river valleys play an ever more important role in urban management. The first step is evaluation of natural conditions of green areas. We propose a validation method based on analysis of land use changes in the last 200 years, actual vegetation mapping, and the hemeroby concept. The field study was conducted in the Sokołówka River valley in Łódź city (Central Poland). All analyses were performed using the GIS software. The results show that after World War II, during urbanization and industrialization of Łódź, a surprising increase in the forest cover and a decline of agricultural areas have been observed in the study area. The current naturalization of the landscape should be used for rehabilitation projects.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

23

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.109-117,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Department of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland
  • European Regional Centre for Ecohydrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lodz, Poland
  • Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
  • Faculty of Environmental Protection and Agriculture, City Council of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
autor
  • European Regional Centre for Ecohydrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lodz, Poland
  • Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
  • Department of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland

Bibliografia

  • 1. BREUSTE J. H. Decision making, planning and design for the conservation of indigenous vegetation within urban development. Landscape Urban Plan. 68, 439, 2004.
  • 2. KONG F., YIN H., NAKAGOSHI N., ZONG Y. Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: Identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling. Landscape Urban Plan. 95, 16, 2010.
  • 3. WALKER L. R., DEL MORAL R. Primary Succession and Ecosystem Rehabilitation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: pp. 442, 2003.
  • 4. HEINK U., KOWARIK I. What are indicators? On the definition of indicators in ecology and environmental planning. Ecological Indicators 10, 584, 2010.
  • 5. ROBERGE J. M., ANGELSTAM P. Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conserv. Biol. 18, 76, 2004.
  • 6. WOLF T., MEYER B. C. Suburban scenario development based on multiple landscape assessment. Ecological Indicators 10, 74, 2010.
  • 7. OLSEN L. M., DALE V. H., FOSTER T. Landscape patterns as indicators of ecological change at Fort Benning, Georgia, USA. Landscape Urban Plan. 79, 137, 2007.
  • 8. ROO-ZIELIŃSKA E. Phytoindicative role of plant communities in a rural landscape (Pińczów case study, south Poland). Fragm. Flor. Geobot. 41, (1), 379, 1996.
  • 9. IIYAMA N., KAMADA M., NAKAGOSHI N. Ecological and social evaluation of landscape in a rural area with terraced paddies in southwestern Japan. Landscape Urban Plan. 70, 301, 2005.
  • 10. SOLON J., ROO-ZIELIŃSKA E., DEGÓRSKI M. Landscape scale of topography-soil-vegetation relationship: influence of land use and land form. Pol. J. Ecol. 60, (1), 3, 2012.
  • 11. BOMANOWSKA A., KIEDRZYŃSKI M. Changing land use in the last decades and its impact on plant cover in agricultural and forest landscape in Poland. Folia Biol. et Oecol. 7, 5, 2011.
  • 12. JALAS J. Hemeroby and hemerochore of plant species. A terminological reform effort. Acta Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn. 72, 1, 1955.
  • 13. SUKOPP H. Change of flora and vegetation in central Europe under the influence of man. Ber. u. Landwirtschaft. Hrsg. Bundesministerium f. Ernahrung Landwirtschaft u. Forsten 50, (1), 112, 1972 [In German].
  • 14. KOWARIK I. The human impact on flora and vegetation. Theoretical concepts and quantify modeling approach using the example of Berlin (West). Landschaftsentw. u. Umweltforsch. 56, 1, 1988 [In German].
  • 15. GRABHERR G., KOCH G., KIRCHMEIR H., REITER K. Hemeroby Austrian forest ecosystems – Presentation of a research project under the Austrian contribution to the UNESCO MAB Programme. Zeitschrift fur Okologie und Naturschutz 4, 131, 1995 [In German].
  • 16. JACKOWIAK B. The hemeroby concept in the evaluation of human influence on the urban flora of Viena. Phytocoenosis 10, 79, 1998.
  • 17. FANELLI G., TESCAROLLO P., TESTI A. Ecological indicators applied to urban and suburban floras. Ecological Indicators 6, 444, 2006.
  • 18. GOLDSMITH F. B. The evaluation of ecological resources in the countryside for conservation purposes. Biol. Conserv. 8, 89, 1975.
  • 19. STEINHARDT U., HERZOG F., LAUSCH A., MULLER E., LEHMANN S. Hemeroby index for landscape monitoring and evaluation. In: Y. A. Pykh, D. D. Hyatt, R. J. Lenz (Eds) Environmental Indices – System Analysis Approach, Oxford, EOLSS Publ.: pp. 237-254. 1999.
  • 20. ZEBISCH M., WECHSUNG F., KENNEWEG H. Landscape response functions for biodiversity – assessing the impact of land-use changes at the county level. Landscape Urban Plan. 67, 157, 2004.
  • 21. SÄUMEL I., KOWARIK I. Urban rivers as dispersal corridors for primarily wind-dispersed invasive tree species. Landscape Urban Plan. 94, 244, 2010.
  • 22. ZALEWSKI M., WAGNER I. Ecohydrology – the use of water and ecosystem processes for healthy urban environments. Aquatic Habitats in Integrated Urban Water Management. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 5, (4), 26, 2006.
  • 23. KUROWSKI J. K., WITOSŁAWSKI P. (Eds). The Green Treasures of Łódź – nature refuges of the city. Department of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of the Łódź City Office, Department of Geobotany and Plant Ecology UŁ, Łódź: pp. 142, 2009 [In Polish].
  • 24. WITOSŁAWSKI P. Atlas of distribution of vascular plants in Łódź. University of Łódź Press, Łódź: pp. 386, 2006.
  • 25. KOTER M. Łódź and its environs in the first half of the 19th c. In: S. Liszewski (Ed.) The Łódź Atlas, Łódź City Council – Geodesy, Cadastre and Inventory Department, Łódź, Sheet IV, 2011.
  • 26. ESRI INC. ArcGIS DesktopTM 9.2. New York Street, Redlands, USA, 1999-2008.
  • 27. MUELLER-DOMBOIS D., ELLEMBERG H. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. Wiley, New York: pp. 547, 1974.
  • 28. BRAUN-BLANQUET J. Plant sociology, Broad Vegetation Science. 3 Aufl. Springer, Wien: pp. 865, 1964 [In German].
  • 29. TUTIN T. G., HEYWOOD V. H., BURGES N. A., VALENTINE D. H., WALTERS S. M., WEBB D. A. Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Vol. IV, 1964-1980.
  • 30. MATUSZKIEWICZ W. Polish plant communities guidebook. Vademecum Geobotanicum, PWN, Warszawa: pp. 537, 2001 [In Polish].
  • 31. BLUME H. P., SUKOPP H. Ecological significance of anthropogenic soil changes. Schr. R. Vegetationskde. 10, 75, 1976 [In German].
  • 32. ELLENBERG H. Vegetation ecology of central Europe. 4th ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: pp. 731, 1986.
  • 33. JONGMAN R. H. G. Homogenization and fragmentation of the European landscape: ecological consequences and solutions. Landscape Urban Plan. 58, (2–4), 211, 2002.
  • 34. YANG X., LILIANG REN L., SINGH V. P., LIU X., YUAN F., JIANG S., YONG B. Impacts of land use and land cover changes on evapotranspiration and runoff at Shalamulun River watershed, China. Hydrology Research, 43, (1-2), 23, 2012.
  • 35. BALD K. The city’s spatial and urban development planning in historical approach. In: S. Liszewski (Ed.) The Łódź Atlas, Łódź City Council – Geodesy, Cadastre and Inventory Department Łódź, Sheet XLII, 2011.
  • 36. GIMONA A., VAN DER HORST D. Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland. Landscape Ecol. 22, (8), 1255, 2007.
  • 37. WILLEMEN L., VERBUNG P. H., HEIN L., VAN MENSVOORT M. E. F. Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landscape Urban Plan. 88, (1), 34, 2008.
  • 38. MANDER U., UUEMAA E. Landscape assessment for sustainable planning. Ecological Indicators 10, 1, 2010.
  • 39. GOMEZ-SAL A., BELMONTES J.-A., NICOLAU J.-M. Assessing landscape values: a proposal for a multidimensional conceptual model. Ecological Modelling 168, 319, 2003.
  • 40. HULSE D., GREGORY S. Integrating resilience into floodplain restoration. Urban Ecosystems 7, 295, 2004.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-329ef4f3-5b61-457a-8ecc-81c8d22cf684
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.