PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2012 | 47 | 2 |
Tytuł artykułu

No evidence for offspring sex ratio adjustment in Marsh Tits Poecile palustris breeding in a primeval forest

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
PL
Brak dowodów na dostosowywanie proporcji płci potomstwa przez sikory ubogie gnieżdżące się w lesie pierwotnym
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
When production costs or fitness returns vary between sons and daughters, selection is expected to favor females that adjust sex ratios accordingly. However, to what extent birds can do so remains debatable. Here we analyze the secondary offspring sex ratios in Marsh Tits Poecile palustris breeding in the primeval, strictly protected, part of Białowieża National Park (north-eastern Poland). We collected data on parent birds (age), their breeding performance (laying dates, clutch size, nesting success), and the offspring sex ratio in two types of old growth habitats over three years. The individual broods varied from all male to all female, but no significant deviation from parity was detected at the population level. The inter-brood variation could be accounted for neither by environmental (season, habitat) nor parental (female age, laying dates, clutch size, and brood size) variables analyzed. The primary sex ratios (at laying) did not differ from the secondary (brood) sex ratios. Thus, there was no indication of post-hatching sex ratio adjustments, either. Together, our results do not support the hypothesis of adaptive sex ratio adjustments in the studied Marsh Tit population. We suggest that possible fitness benefits could be insufficient to exceed the costs conferred by sex ratio manipulation in this species.
PL
W sytuacji, gdy koszty i zyski z posiadania synów i córek są różne, powinny być faworyzowane te samice, które będą w stanie odpowiednio dostosować płeć swojego potomstwa. W ostatnich latach wykazano, że samice niektórych gatunków ptaków różnicowały proporcję płci w lęgu w zależności od czynników środowiskowych lub cech swoich i partnera. Wiele badań nie potwierdziło jednak tego zjawiska. W pracy przeanalizowano proporcję płci w lęgach sikor ubogich, gnieżdżących się w pierwotnym lesie, w ściśle chronionej części Białowieskiego Parku Narodowego. Badania terenowe prowadzono w latach 2003-2005. Dane dotyczące wieku samicy, fenologii lęgów, wielkości zniesienia oraz udatności lęgów zbierano w dwóch typach lasu (grąd i łęg) zlokalizowanych na czterech powierzchniach badawczych. Poszczególne lęgi różniły się proporcją samców (Fig. 1), ale na poziomie populacyjnym proporcja płci wśród piskląt nie odbiegała od 1:1 (Tab. 1). Nie stwierdziliśmy, aby samice dostosowywały płeć potomstwa do przebadanych czynników środowiskowych (sezon, typ siedliska) ani też rodzicielskich (wiek samicy fenologia lęgu, wielkość zniesienia oraz liczba piskląt w lęgu) (Tab. 2). Pierwotna proporcja płci (w lęgach, w których pisklęta wykluły się ze wszystkich złożonych jaj) nie różniła się od proporcji w lęgach zredukowanych (liczba piskląt < liczba jaj), nie stwierdzono zatem większej śmiertelności piskląt/embrionów jednej z płci (Tab. 1 i 2).
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
-
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
47
Numer
2
Opis fizyczny
p.111-118,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Behavioural Ecology, Wroclaw University, Sienkiewicza 21, 50–335 Wroclaw, Poland
autor
  • Department of Forest Zoology and Wildlife Management, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02–776 Warsaw, Poland
  • Laboratory of Forest Biology, Wroclaw University, Sienkiewicza 21, 50–335 Wroclaw, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Alonso-Alvarez C. 2006. Manipulation of primary sex-ratio: an updated review. Avian Poult. Biol. Rev. 17: 1-20.
  • Amann F. 1997. Dispersal, territory establishment and behaviour of juvenile Marsh Tits Parus palustris. Orn. Beob. 94: 5-18
  • Andersson M., Wallander J., Oring L., Akst E., Reed J. M., Fleischer R. C. 2003. Adaptive seasonal trend in brood sex ratio: test in two sister spedes with contrasting breeding systems. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 510-515.
  • Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B. 2011. Ime4: Linear mixed- effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-42/r1414. Available from: http://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/lme4/.
  • Bensch S., Westerdahl H., Hansson B., Hasselquist D. 1999. Do females adjust the sex of their offspring in relation to the breeding sex ratio? J. Evol. Biol. 12: 1104-1109.
  • Blank J. L., Nolan V. 1983. Offspring sex ratio in red-winged blackbirds is dependent on maternal age. PNAS 80: 6141-6145.
  • Broughton R., Hill R., Bellamy P., Hinsley S. 2010. Dispersal, ranging and settling behaviour of Marsh Tits Poecile palustris in a fragmented landscape in lowland England. Bird Study 57: 458-472.
  • Broughton R., Hill R., Bellamy P., Hinsley S. 2011. Nest-sites, breeding failure, and causes of non-breeding in a population of British Marsh Tits Poecile palustris. Bird Study 58: 229-237.
  • Budden A. E., Beissinger S. R. 2004. Against the odds? Nestling sex ratio variation in green-rumped parrotlets. Behav. Ecol. 15: 607-613.
  • Champely S. 2009. pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. R package version 1.1.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr
  • Charnov E. L. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Cichoń M., Dubiec A., Stoczko M. 2003. Laying order and offspring sex in blue tits Parus caeruleus. J. Avian Biol. 34: 355-359.
  • Cichoń M., Sendecka J., Gustafsson L. 2005. Male-biased sex ratio among unhatched eggs in great tit Parus major, blue tit P. caeruleus and collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis. J. Avian Biol. 36: 386-390.
  • Clark A. 1978. Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science 201: 163-165.
  • Cockburn A., Legge S., Double M. 2002. Sex ratios in birds and mammals: can the hypotheses be disentangled. In: Hardy I. C. W. (ed.). Sex ratios: concepts and research methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 266-286.
  • Cordero P. J., Vinuela J., Aparicio J., Veiga J. 2001. Seasonal variation in sex ratio and sexual egg dimorphism favouring daughters in first clutches of the spotless starling. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 829-834.
  • Cramp S., Perrins C. M. (eds) 1993. The birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. 7. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Crawley M. 2007. The R book. Wiley, Chichester.
  • Dhondt A. 1970. The sex ratio of nestling great tits. Bird Study 17: 282-286.
  • Dietrich-Bischoff V., Schmoll T., Winkel W., Krackow S., Lubjuhn T. 2006. Extra-pair paternity, offspring mortality and offspring sex ratio in the socially monogamous coal tit Parus ater. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60: 563-571.
  • Dijkstra C., Daan S., Buker J. 1990. Adaptive seasonal variation in the sex ratio of kestrel broods. Funct. Ecol. 4: 143-147.
  • Dreiss A., Richard M., Moyen F., White J., Møller A., Danchin E. 2006. Sex ratio and male sexual characters in a population of blue tits, Parus caeruleus. Behav. Ecol. 17: 13-19.
  • Dyrcz A., Cichoń M. 2009. Sex-specific fledgling success and brood sex ratio in the Great Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus). J. Ornithol. 150: 839-844.
  • Fisher R. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Frank S. A. 1990. Sex Allocation Theory for Birds and Mammals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 13-55.
  • Glutz von Blotzheim U. N., Bauer K. 1991. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Vol. 13. Akademische Verlagsgessellschaft, Wiesbaden.
  • Gowaty P. 1993. Differential dispersal, local resource competition, and sex ratio variation in birds. Am. Nat. 141: 263- 280.
  • Griffith S. C., Örnborg J., Russell A. F., Andersson S., Sheldon B. C. 2003. Correlations between ultraviolet coloration, overwinter survival and offspring sex ratio in the blue tit. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 1045-1054.
  • Griffiths R., Double M. C., Orr K., Dawson R. J. G. 1998. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol. Ecol. 7: 1071-1075.
  • Hasselquist D., Kempenaers B. 2002. Parental care and adaptive brood sex ratio manipulation in birds. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 357: 363-372.
  • Heinsohn R., Langmore N. E., Cockburn A., Kokko H. 2011. Adaptive Secondary Sex Ratio Adjustments via Sex- Specific Infanticide in a Bird. Curr. Biol. 21: 1744-1747.
  • Hjernquist M., Thuman Hjernquist K. A., Forsman J. T., Gustafsson L. 2009. Sex allocation in response to local resource competition over breeding territories. Behav. Ecol. 20: 335.
  • Husby A., Sæther B.-E., Jensen H., Ringsby T. H. 2006. Causes and consequences of adaptive seasonal sex ratio variation in house sparrows. J. Anim. Ecol. 75: 1128-1139.
  • Kilner R. 1998. Primary and secondary sex ratio manipulation by zebra finches. Anim. Behav. 56: 155-164.
  • Kingma S., Hall M., Peters A. 2011. No evidence for offspring sex-ratio adjustment to social or environmental conditions in cooperatively breeding purple-crowned fairy-wrens. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 1203-1213.
  • Komdeur J. 1998. Long-term fitness benefits of egg sex modification by the Seychelles warbler. Ecol. Lett. 1: 56-62.
  • Kölliker M., Heeb P., Werner I., Mateman A. C., Lessells C. M., Richner H. 1999. Offspring sex ratio is related to male body size in the great tit (Parus major). Behav. Ecol. 10: 68-72.
  • Krackow S. 1999. Avian sex ratio distortions: The myth of maternal control. Proceedings 22nd International Ornithological Congress, Durban. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg, pp. 425-433.
  • Krackow S. 2002. Why parental sex ratio manipulation is rare in higher vertebrates. Ethology 108: 1041-1056.
  • Krackow S., Meelis E., Hardy I. C. W. 2002. Analysis of sex ratio variances and sex allocation sequences. In: Hardy I. C. W. (ed.). Sex ratios: concepts and research methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 112-132.
  • Krebs E., Green D., Double M., Griffiths R. 2002. Laying date and laying sequence influence the sex ratio of crimson rosella broods. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51: 447-454.
  • Lessells C., Mateman A., Visser J. 1996. Great tit hatchling sex ratios. J. Avian Biol. 27: 135-142.
  • Markovec M. J. 2001. Demografija gaički na Kuršskoj Kose. In: Kuročkin E. N., Rahimov I. I. (eds). Aktualnyje problemy izučenija ohrany ptic Vostočnoj Evropy i Severnoj Azii.
  • Ministerstwo Ohrany Okryžajuščej Sredy i Prirodnyh Resursov Respubliki Tatarstan, Kazan, pp. 401—402.
  • Nakagawa S., Schielzeth H. 2010. Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol. Rev. 85: 935-956.
  • Nilsson J.-Å. 1988. Causes and consequences of dispersal in marsh tits: time as a fitness factor in establishment. PhD thesis. Lund University, Lund.
  • Nilsson J.-Å. 1989. Establishment of juvenile marsh tits in winter flocks: an experimental study. Anim. Behav. 38: 586-595.
  • Nilsson J.-Å., Smith H. 1988. Effects of dispersal date on winter flock establishment and social dominance in marsh tits Parus palustris. J. Anim. Ecol. 57: 917-928.
  • Palmer A. 2000. Quasireplication and the contract of error: lessons from sex ratios, heritabilities and fluctuating asymmetry. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 441-480.
  • Pen I., Weissing F., Daan S. 1999. Seasonal sex ratio trend in the European Kestrel: an evolutionarily stable strategy analysis. Am. Nat. 153: 384-397.
  • Radford A. N., Blakey J. K. 2000. Is variation in brood sex ratios adaptive in the great tit (Parus major)? Behav. Ecol. 11: 294-298.
  • R Development Core Team 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07- 0. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/.
  • Rosivall B., Török J., Hasselquist D., Bensch S. 2004. Brood sex ratio adjustment in collared flycatchers Ficedula albicollis: results differ between populations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56: 346-351.
  • Saino N., Ambrosini R., Martineiii R., Calza S., Møller A. P., Pilastro A. 2002. Offspring sexual dimorphism and sex- allocation in relation to parental age and paternal ornamentation in the barn swallow. Mol. Ecol. 11: 1533-1544.
  • Sheldon B., Andersson S., Griffith S., Örnborg J., Sendecka J. 1999. Ultraviolet colour variation influences blue tit sex ratios. Nature 402: 874-877.
  • Stauss M., Segelbacher G., Tomiuk J., Bachmann L. 2005. Sex ratio of Parus major and P. caeruleus broods depends on parental condition and habitat quality. Oikos 109: 367-373.
  • Suorsa P., Helle H., Huhta E., Jäntti A., Nikula A., Hakkarainen H. 2003. Forest fragmentation is associated with primary brood sex ratio in the treecreeper (Certhia familiaris). Proc. R. Soc. B 270: 2215-2222.
  • Svensson E., Nilsson J.-Å. 1996. Mate quality affects offspring sex ratio in blue tits. Proc. R. Soc. B 263: 357-361.
  • Tomiałojć L., Wesołowski T. 1990. Bird communities of the primaeval temperate forest of Białowieża, Poland. In: Keast A. (ed.) Biogeography and ecology of forest bird communities. SPB, Academic Publishers, The Hauge, pp. 141-165.
  • Tomiałojć L., Wesołowski T. 2005. The avifauna of Białowieża Forest: a window into the past. Brit. Birds 98: 174-193.
  • Trivers R. L., Willard D. E. 1973. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179: 90-92.
  • van Dijk R., Komdeur J., van der Velde M., Szentirmai I., Yang X., Ffrench-Constant R., Székely T. 2008. Offspring sex ratio in the sequentially polygamous Penduline Tit Remiz pendulinus. J. Ornithol. 149: 521-527.
  • Walankiewicz W. 1991. Do secondary-cavity nesting birds suffer more from competition for cavities or from predation in primaeval deciduous forest? Natural Areas J. 11: 203-212.
  • Werner J. 1965. Selection for the sex ratio. Am. Nat. 99: 419-422.
  • Wesołowski T. 1996. Natural nest sites of Marsh Tits Parus palustris in a primaeval forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Vogelwarte 38: 235-249.
  • Wesołowski T. 1998. Timing and synchronisation of breeding in a Marsh Tit Parus palustris population from a primaeval forest. Ardea 86: 89-100.
  • Wesołowski T. 2000 Time saving mechanisms in the reproduction of Marsh Tits Parus palustris. J. Ornithol. 141: 309-318.
  • Wesołowski T. 2001. Host-parasite interactions in natural holes: marsh tits (Parus palustris) and blow flies (Protocalliphora falcozi). J. Zool. 255: 495-503.
  • Wesołowski T. 2002. Antipredator adaptations in nesting marsh tits Parus palustris - the role of nest site security. Ibis 144: 593-601.
  • Wesołowski T. 2006. Nest-site re-use: Marsh Tit Poecile palustris decisions in a primeval forest. Bird Study 53: 199-204.
  • Wesołowski T. 2007. Primeval conditions — what can we learn from them? Ibis 149: 64S-77S.
  • Wesołowski T., Mitrus C., Czeszczewik D., Rowiński P. 2010. Breeding bird dynamics in a primeval temperate forest over 35 years: variation and stability in a changing world. Acta Ornithol. 45: 209-232.
  • Wesołowski T., Rowiński P. 2006. Is there a cost of reproduction for Marsh Tit Parus palustris in a primeval forest? Ibis 148: 126-132.
  • Wesołowski T., Rowiński P. 2008. Late leaf development in pedunculate oaks Quercus robur L.: An antiherbivore defence? Scand. J. For. Res. 23: 386-394.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-322a0a8c-bcbf-436b-b59b-d2cc37f4c0eb
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.