Faecal pellet group counting as a promising method of wild boar population density estimation

• Autorzy: Plhal R. , Kamler J. , Homolka M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The wild boar is a native animal species of the Czech Republic that has significantly increased its population density in recent years. Objective methods of population density estimation are required to inform the intensity of regulation needed for the sustainable management of the wild boar. Population estimation and regulation of the abundance of the wild boar are problematic in comparison to those of other ungulates, and the only widely used method of control is intensive hunting. The purpose of this study was to test if faecal pellet group (FPG) counting was a reliable method of wild boar population censusing in a forest environment. The density of wild boars was evaluated in an area of 22.56 km2, circumscribed by both natural and man-made barriers that restrict wild boar migration. As it is essential for proper application of FPG count methods, a separate trial was carried out to determine the daily defecation rate of wild boars. The distribution of faeces in different types of habitat in a forest environment was tested. As the period of faeces accumulation fell within the intensive hunting season, the result is biased by the fact that the calculation includes FPGs produced by animals removed from the population through hunting during winter. The average daily defecation rate of adults and piglets was 4.29 and 5.82, respectively. The corrected (without shot animals) average density of wild boars in the study area estimated by the FPG count at the time of the census was 6.08 individuals (ind.)/km2. We have confirmed that an FPG count conducted in winter is applicable for estimation of wild boar abundance on a forested area.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 59
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.561-569,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Plhal R.

• Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Kamler J.

• Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Homolka M.

• Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• Abaigar T, Delbarrio G, Vericad JR (1994) Habitat preference of wild boar (Sus scrofa L, 1758) in a Mediterranean environment—indirect evaluation by signs. Mammalia 58:201–210
• Acevedo P, Quirós-Fernández F, Casal J, Vicente J (2014) Spatial distribution of wild boar population abundance: basic information for spatial epidemiology and wildlife management. Ecol Indic 36:594–600
• Acevedo P, Vicente J, Höfle U, Cassinello J, Ruiz-Fons F, Gortazar C (2007) Estimation of European wild boar relative abundance and aggregation: a novel method in epidemiological risk assessment. Epidemiol Infect 135:519–527 Central
• Apollonio M, Andersen R, Putman R (2010) European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
• Barnes RFW (2002) The problem of precision and trend detection posed by small elephant populations in West Africa. Afr J Ecol 40:179–185
• Braga C, Alexandre N, Fernandez-Llario P, Santos P (2010) Wild boar (Sus scrofa) harvesting using the espera hunting method: side effects and management implications. Eur J Wildl Res 56:465–469
• Brauer A, Lange E, Kaden V (2006) Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: uptake studies of new baits and investigations on the stability of lyophilised C-strain vaccine. Eur J Wildl Res 52:271–276
• Briedermann L (1986) Schwarzwild. VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag, Berlin
• Campbell D, Swanson GM, Sales J (2004) Comparing the precision and cost-effectiveness of faecal pellet group count methods. J Appl Ecol 41:1185–1196
• Cristescu B, Ion I (2007) Density of ungulates at preferential feeding in two hunting grounds of Vrancea County (Romania), with comparison between two study methods. Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii “Al. I. Cuza” din Iasi Sectiunea Biologie Animala, Tom LIII:245–250.
• Cruz F, Donlan CJ, Campbell K, Carrion V (2005) Conservation action in the Galapagos: feral pig (Sus scrofa) eradication from Santiago Island. Biol Conserv 121:473–478
• Ebert C, Knauer F, Spielberger B, Thiele B, Hohmann U (2012) Estimating wild boar Sus scrofa population size using faecal DNA and capture-recapture modelling. Wildl Biol 18:142–152
• Engeman RM, Massei G, Sage M, Gentle MN (2013) Monitoring wild pig populations: a review of methods. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:8077–8091
• Focardi S, Isotti R, Pelliccioni ER, Iannuzzo D (2002) The use of distance sampling and mark-resight to estimate the local density of wildlife populations. Environmetrics 13:177–186
• Fonseca C (2008) Winter habitat selection by wild boar Sus scrofa in southeastern Poland. Eur J Wildl Res 54:361–366
• Fonseca C, Alves J, Vingada J, Soares AMVM (2011) Reproductive performance of wild boar females in Portugal. Eur J Wildl Res 57:363–371
• Fonseca C, Kolecki M, Merta D, Bobek B (2007) Use of line intercept track index and plot sampling for estimating wild boar, Sus scrofa (Suidae), densities in Poland. Folia Zool 56:389–398
• Franzetti B, Ronchi F, Marini F, Scacco M, Calmanti R, Calabrese A, Paola A, Paolo M, Focardi S (2012) Nocturnal line transect sampling of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean forest: long-term comparison with capture-mark-resight population estimates. Eur J Wildl Res 58:385–402
• Fruzinski B, Labudzki L (2002) Management of wild boar in Poland. Z Jagdwiss 48:201–207
• Geisser H, Reyer HU (2005) The influence of food and temperature on population density of wild boar Sus scrofa in the Thurgau (Switzerland). J Zool 267:89–96
• Geisser H (1998) The wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Thurgau (Northeastern Switzerland): population status, damages and the influence of supplementary feeding on damage frequency. Gibier Faune Sauvage 15:547–554
• Gerard JF, Cargnelutti B, Spitz F, Valet G, Sardin T (1991) Habitat use of wild boar in a French agroecosystem from late winter to early summer. Acta Theriol 36:119–129
• Gethöffer F, Sodeikat G, Pohlmeyer K (2007) Reproductive parameters of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in three different parts of Germany. Eur J Wildl Res 53:287–297
• Hansen K (1996) Impact of modern farming on food supply of hares (Lepus europaeus, Pallas) during the summer period. Proceedings of the Ist European Congress of Mammalogy. Museu Bocage, Lisboa:115–124.
• Hebeisen C, Fattebert J, Baubet E, Fischer C (2008) Estimating wild boar (Sus scrofa) abundance and density using capture-resights in Canton of Geneva, Switzerland. Eur J Wildl Res 54:391–401
• Heinze E, Boch S, Fischer M, Hessenmoller D, Klenk B, Muller J, Prati D, Schulze ED, Seele C, Socher S, Halle S (2011) Habitat use of large ungulates in northeastern Germany in relation to forest management. For Ecol Manag 261:288–296
• Hemami MR, Dolman PM (2005) The disappearance of muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) pellet groups in a pine forest of lowland England. Eur J Wildl Res 51:19–24
• Herrero J, García-Serrano A, Couto S, Ortuno VM, García-González R (2006) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. Eur J Wildl Res 52:245–250
• Hladíková B, Zbořil J, Tkadlec E (2008) Population dynamics of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in central Moravia, Czech Republic (Artiodactyla: Suidae). Lynx 39:55–62
• Jedrzejewska B, Okarma H, Jedrzejewski W, Milkowski L (1994) Effects of exploitation and protection on forest structure, ungulate density and wolf predation in Bialowieza Primeval Forest, Poland. J Appl Ecol 31:664–676
• Keuling O, Baubet E, Duscher A, Ebert C, Fischer C, Monaco A, Podgórski T, Prevot C, Ronnenberg K, Sodeikat G, Stier N, Thurfjell H (2013) Mortality rates of wild boar Sus scrofa L. in central Europe. Eur J Wildl Res 59:805–814
• Keuling O, Stier N, Roth M (2008) Annual and seasonal space use of different age classes of female wild boar Sus scrofa L. Eur J Wildl Res 54:403–412
• Killian G, Miller L, Rhyan J, Doten H (2006) Immunocontraception of Florida feral swine with a single-dose GnRH vaccine. Am J Reprod Immunol 55:378–384
• Košnář A, Rajnyšová R (2012) Assessment of a daily defecation rate of fallow deer upon a closed population study. Acta Univ Agric Et Silvic Mendel Brun 60:173–180
• Laing SE, Buckland ST, Burn RW, Lambie D, Amphlett A (2003) Dung and nest surveys: estimating decay rates. J Appl Ecol 40:1102–1111
• Lemel J, Truve J, Soderberg B (2003) Variation in ranging and activity behaviour of European wild boar Sus scrofa in Sweden. Wildl Biol 9:29–36
• Massei G, Bacon P, Genov PV (1998) Fallow deer and wild boar pellet group disappearance in a Mediterranean area. J Wildl Manag 62:1086–1094
• Massei G, Genov PV, Staines BW (1996) Diet, food availability and reproduction of wild boar in a Mediterranean coastal area. Acta Theriol 41:307–320
• Mayle BA, Peace AJ, Gill RMA (1999) How many deer? Forestry Commission, Edinburgh
• Melis C, Szafrańska PA, Jedrzejewska B, Bartoń K (2006) Biogeographical variation in the population density of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in western Eurasia. J Biogeogr 33:803–811
• Merli E, Meriggi A (2006) Using harvest data to predict habitat-population relationship of the wild boar Sus scrofa in Northern Italy. Acta Theriol 5:383–394
• Musial F, Kowalski A, Enck P, Kalveram KT (1999) A computer-controlled, long-term recording system for studying eating, drinking, and defecation behavior in miniature pigs. Physiol Behav 68:73–80
• Neff DJ (1968) Pellet-group count technique for big game trend census and distribution—review. J Wildl Manag 32:597–614
• Passon Ch, Keuling O, Neubauer D, Gräber R, Brün J (2012) Estimating wild boar (Sus scrofa) density using camera traps and distance sampling. In: Book of abstracts—9th International Symposium on Wild Boar and Other Suids, 2–6 September 2012 Hannover, Germany, pp 9
• Plhal R, Kamler J, Homolka M, Adamec Z (2011) An assessment of the applicability of photo trapping to estimate wild boar population density in a forest environment. Folia Zool 60:237–246
• Prugh LR, Krebs CJ (2004) Snowshoe hare pellet-decay rates and aging in different habitats. Wildl Soc B 32:386–393
• Putten G (2000) An ethological definition of animal welfare with special emphasis on pig behaviour. In: Hovi M, Garcia TR (eds) Diversity of livestock systems and definition of animal welfare. Proceedings of the Second NAHWOA Workshop. Palacio de la Merced in Córdoba, 8–11 January 2000, Córdoba, Spain, pp 120–134
• Rodríguez-Estévez V, Martínez A, Gomez AG, Mata C (2005) Feeding activity and other activities during the grazing journey of the Iberian pig in the Montanera fattening period. In: Proceedings of EAAP—56th Annual Meeting. European Association for Animal Production, 5–8 June 2005. Uppsala, Sweden, p 239
• Rowcliffe JM, Field J, Turvey ST, Carbone C (2008) Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition. J Appl Ecol 45:1228–1236
• Schley L, Roper TJ (2003) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mammal Rev 33:43–56
• Sweitzer RA, Van Vuren D, Gardner IA, Boyce WM, Waithman JD (2000) Estimating sizes of wild pig populations in the north and central coast regions of California. J Wildl Manag 64:531–543
• Thurfjell H, Ball JP, Ahlen PA, Kornacher P, Dettki H, Sjoberg K (2009) Habitat use and spatial patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa (L.): agricultural fields and edges. Eur J Wildl Res 55:517–523
• Tottewitz F, Stubbe C, Ahrens M, Dobias K, Goretzki J, Paustian KH (1996) Counting droppings as a method of estimating the population of ruminant game. Z Jagdwiss 42:111–122
• Tsaparis D, Katsanevakis S, Ntolka E, Legakis A (2009) Estimating dung decay rates of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in different habitat types of a Mediterranean ecosystem: an information theory approach. Eur J Wildl Res 55:167–172
• Waithman JD, Sweitzer RA, Van Vuren D, Drew JD, Brinkhaus AJ, Gardner IA (1999) Range expansion, population sizes, and management of wild pigs in California. J Wildl Manag 63:298–308
• Webbon CC, Baker PJ, Harris S (2004) Faecal density counts for monitoring changes in red fox numbers in rural Britain. J Appl Ecol 41:768–779
• West BC, Cooper AL, Armstrong JB (2009) Managing wild pigs: a technical guide. Hum Wildl Interact Monogr 1:1–55

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s13364-014-0194-9