Status of cattle and beef external trade of Poland and Hungary outside the European Union between 2002 and 2015

• Autorzy: Meszaros K. , Lencses E.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Stan polskiego i węgierskiego handlu zagranicznego bydłem i wołowiną poza Unię Europejską w latach 2002 i 2015

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Both Hungary and Poland are net exporter in cattle and beef trade. Because of the large Polish and Hungarian supply these countries cannot sell all products on domestic and EU single markets. Cattle and beef production of both countries have to be sold on non-EU markets. These markets have a special attribute because import of cattle and beef to EU is regulated but the export to these countries is not under European limitation. This special attribute results in the fact that there are less available scientific indexes to use studying the international trade. In this paper we aimed to examine the comparative advantages of Hungarian and Polish cattle and beef export to non-EU markets between 2002 and 2015. Out analysis based primary on Balassa index (RCA) which is compared with the share of product export of the reference countries in their entire export. Secondary, the Revealed Symmetric Comparative Advantage (RSCA) was used as a correction of RCA (makes the RCA symmetrical). Primary we established that both studied countries have the same non-EU target markets with the highest importance of Turkey and Russia. During the examined period several changes were resulted, for example the decrease of Turkish market and the Russian embargo. These changes had an effect on comparative advantages.

PL

Celem artykułu jest określenie przewag komparatywnych dla eksportu bydła i mięsa wołowego z Polski i Węgier poza jednolity rynek Unii Europejskiej w latach 2002-2015. Analizę oparto na wskaźniku Balassa (RCA ) porównywanym z eksportem krajów odniesienia w całości eksportu. Obliczono także symetryczne przewagi komparatywne (RSCA ). W wyniku analiz stwierdzono, że oba kraje mają takie same rynki docelowe spoza UE . Największe znaczenia miały Turcja i Rosja. W badanym okresie wystąpiło kilka zmian, np. spadek eksportu do Turcji oraz wprowadzone embarga, miały one wpływ na powstanie przewag komparatywnych.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cattle; beef; trade; export; European Union; comparative advantage; comparative disadvantage

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 19
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.165-170,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Meszaros K.

• Institute of Business Studies, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Szent Istvan University, Pater K.u.1, H-2100 Godollo, Hungary

autor

Lencses E.

• Institute of Business Studies, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Szent Istvan University, Pater K.u.1, H-2100 Godollo, Hungary

Bibliografia

• Balassa Béla. 1965. “Trade liberalization and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School 33: 99-122.
• Bahar Dany, Ricardo Hausmann, César Hildago. 2012. International knowledge diffusion and the comparative advantage of nations. Faculty Research Working Paper Series. Harvard: CID, Harvard Kennedy School.
• Dohy János. 1999. „Ajánlások a magyarországi állattenyésztés fejlesztéséhez”. Gazdálkodás 43 (6): 19-24.
• EUROSTAT: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/portal/page/portal/statistics/theme.
• Fertő Imre. 2003. „A komparatív előnyök mérése”. Statisztikai 81 (4): 309-327.
• Fertő Imre, Lionel J. Hubbard. 2001. „Competitiveness and comparative advantage in Hungarian agriculture”. MTA Műhelytanulmányok 2: 1-20.
• Hinloopen Jeoren, Charles van Marrewijk. 2001. „On the empricial distribution of the Balassa index”. Weltwirtshaftliches Archiv 137: 1-35.
• Jámbor Attila. 2009. „A magyar gabonafélék és feldolgozott termékeinek komparatív előnyei és versenyképessége az EU-15 országok piacain”. Közgazdasági Szemle LVI: 443-463.
• Kiss Judit. 2000. „Agrárkereskedelmünk a CEFTA-val”. MTA Világgazdasági Kutatóintézet Kihívások 131: 1-11.
• Kőnig Gabor. 2007. The Development of the Hungarian Agricultural Trade after the EU accession. [In] European Association of Agricultural Economists 104th Seminar. Budapest: Corvinus University, http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/7780/1/sp07ko05.pdf.
• Laursen Keld. 1998. Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. DRUID Working Paper no. 98-30. Copenhagen: . Business School.
• Lengyel Imre. 2003. Verseny és területi fejlődés: Térségek versenyképessége Magyarországon. Szeged: JATEPress.
• Mészáros Kornélia, Enikő Lencsés. 2016. „Cattle and beef external trade of Poland and Hungary outside to the European Union”. Annals of The Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists XVIII (5): 171-175.
• Osztrogonácz Visegrádi, Miklós Vásáry. 2007. A visegrádi országok agrárstruktúrája. [In] AVA International Conference on Agricultural Economics, 2007, March 20-21, http://www.avacongress.net/ava2007/presentations/aks1/5.pdf.
• Potori Norbert, Paweł Chmieliński, Bożena Karwat-Woźniak. 2014. A comparison of the agro-food sectors in Poland and Hungary from a macro perspective. [In] Stuctural changes in Polish and Hungarian agriculture since EU accession: lessons learned and implications for the design of future agricultural policies, ed. I. Kapronczai, 9-31. Budapest: Research Institute of Agricultural Economics.
• Rapkin David P., William. P. Avery. 1995. National competitiveness in a global economy. London: Lynne Rienner.
• Réti Tamás. 2000. „A kelet-közép-európai kereskedelem. Gazdasági együttműködés a szomszédos kis országokkal”. Közgazdasági Szemle XLVII: 6480.
• Szabó József. 2012. „Török piaci esélyeink”. Magyar Mezőgazdaság. http://magyarmezogazdasaglap.hu/hu/irasok/allattenyesztes/torok-piaci-eselyeink.
• Takács-György Katalin, Anna Bandlerova, Adam Sadowski. 2008. Land use and land reform in former Central and East European Countries. Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Central and Eastern Europe. [In] Agricultural economics and transition: What was expected, what we observed, the lessons learned, ed. Cs. Csáki, Cs. Forgács, 243-252. Budapest: IAMO.
• Török Ádám. 1996. A versenyképesség-elemzés egyes módszertani kérdései. Műhelytanulmány. Egyetem: Budapesti Közgazdaságtudományi.
• Vollrath Thomas. L. 1991. “A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage”. Review of World Economics 127 (2): 265-280.
• Wigier Marek. 2014. „The competitiveness of Polish agriculture after accession to the EU”. Economics of Agricuture 61 (1): 87-102, http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/165720/2/8%20EP%201%202014.pdf.
• Zalai-Mészáros Kornélia. 2016. Competitiveness of foreign trade of beef sector. PhD thesis.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0010.1182