Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2013 | 22 | 2 |
Tytuł artykułu

Pea and spring cereal intercropping systems: advantages and suppression of broad-leaved weeds

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Our experiments were designed to investigate yield formation of intercrops and their influence on broadleaved weeds under organic cropping conditions. Pea (Pisum sativum L. (Partim) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori et Paol.), spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), and spring triticale (× Triticosecale Wittm.) were sown as intercrops (50:50 – a relative proportion of grain legume and spring cereal seeds) or as a sole crop. The results suggest that pea/wheat, pea/oat, and pea/triticale intercrops were superior to sole pea crop. However, intercrops and sole cereal crops exhibited similar weed suppression capabilities. According to the reduction of weed number and mass, the intercrops were ranked in the following order: pea/oat > pea/wheat; pea/triticale > pea/barley. Crop density significantly influenced the reduction of total weed numbers and air-dried mass. In crops with lower plant density, weed suppression depended on crop height.
Słowa kluczowe
Opis fizyczny
  • Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Instituto av. 1, Akademija, Kėdainiai distr., Lithuania
  • Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Instituto av. 1, Akademija, Kėdainiai distr., Lithuania
  • Joniškėlis Experimental Station of the Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Joniškėlis, Pasvalys distr., Lithuania
  • Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Instituto av. 1, Akademija, Kėdainiai distr., Lithuania
  • Joniškėlis Experimental Station of the Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Joniškėlis, Pasvalys distr., Lithuania
  • 1. LAZAUSKAS P. Agronomical practices against weeds. Mokslas: Vilnius, pp. 15-66, 1990 [In Lithuanian].
  • 2. MAIKSTENIENE S., VELYKIS A., ARLAUSKIENE A., SATKUS A. Investigations of weed-suppressing ability of cereals on Clay Loam. Vagos. 72, (25), 24, 2006 [In Lithuanian].
  • 3. DERKSEN D. A., ANDERSON R. L., BLACKSHAW R. E., MAXWELL B. Weed dynamics and management strategies for cropping systems in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy J. 94, 174, 2002.
  • 4. BARBERI P. Weed management in organic agriculture: Are we addressing the right issues? Weed Res. 42, (3), 177, 2002.
  • 5. HATCHER P. E., MELANDER B. Combining physical, cultural and biological methods: Prospects for integrated non-chemical weed management strategies. Weed Res. 43, pp. 303, 2003.
  • 6. ANDERSON R. L. A. Rotation design to reduce weed density in organic farming. Ren Agri Food System. 25, (3), 189, 2010.
  • 7. LIEBMAN M., GALLANDT E. R. Many little hammers:ecological management of crop–weed interactions. Ecology in Agriculture. Jackson L. E. (Ed.), AcademicPress: San Diego, pp. 291-343, 1997.
  • 8. MOHLER C. L. Enhancing the competitive ability of crops. Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds, Liebman M., Mohler C. L., Staver, C. P. ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK . pp. 1231-1269, 2001.
  • 9. BUHLER D. D. Weed biology, cropping systems, and weed management. J Crop Prod. 8, (2), 245, 2003.
  • 10. DAVIES D. H. K., WELSH J. P. Weed control in organic cereals and pulses. Organic cereals and pulses, Younie D., Taylor B. R., Welch J. M. and Wilkinson J.M. Ed. Chalcombe Publications: Bedfordshire, pp. 77-114, 2002.
  • 11. KOOCHEKI A., NASSIRI M., ALOMORADI L., GHORBANI R. Effect of cropping systems and crop rotations on weeds. Agronomie. 29, 401, 2009.
  • 12. KRAMBERGER B., GSELMAN A., KAPUN S., KALIGARIC M. Effect of sowing rate of italian ryegrass drilled into pea stubble on removal of soil mineral nitrogen and autumn nitrogen accumulation by herbage yield. Pol. J. Environ Stud. 16, (5), 705, 2007.
  • 13. LIEBMAN M., DAVIS. A. S. Managing weeds in organic farming systems: an ecological approach. Organic Farming: The Ecological System. C. A. Francis ed.; American Society of Agronomy: Madison. pp. 173-196, 2009.
  • 14. DEVEIKYTE I., KADZIULIENE Z., SARUNAITE L., FEIZIENE D. Investigations of weed-suppressing ability of leguminous plant under organic agriculture conditions. Vagos. 79, (32), 43, 2008 [In Lithuanian].
  • 15. ANIL L., PARK R., PHIPPS R. H., MILLER F. A. Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: a review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. Grass Forage Sci. 53, 301, 1998.
  • 16. MALÉZIEUX E., CROZAT Y., DUPRAZ C., LAURANS M., MAKOWSKI D., OZIER-LAFONTAINE H., RAPIDEL B., DE TOURDONNET S., VALANTIN-MORISON M. Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models. A review. Agronomie. 29, (1), 43, 2009.
  • 17. HAUGGAARD-NIELSEN H., JØRNSGAARD B., KINANE J., JENSEN E. S. Grain legume – cereal intercropping: The practical application of diversity, competition and facilitation in arable and organic cropping systems. Ren Agri Food System. 23, (1), 3, 2008.
  • 18. MONTI M., CROZAT Y., DAHLMANN C., DIBET A., VON FRAGSTEIN P., GOODING M. J., HAUGGAARD-NIELSEN H., JENSEN E. S., KASYANOVA E., MUGUERZA BELLOSTAS N., PRISTERI A. Agronomic performance and yield stability of pea-barley intercropping in European organic farming system. Joint Organic Congress: Organic farming and European Rural Development, Odense, Denmark, May 30-31, pp. 310-311, 2006.
  • 19. BREEN J., OGASWARA M. A vision for weed science in the twenty-first century. Weed Biol. Manag. 11, (3), 113, 2011.
  • 20. PELZER E., BAZOT M., MAKOWSKI D., CORRE-HELLOU G., NAUDIN C., RIFAÏ M., BARANGER E., BEDOUSSAC L., BIARNÈS V., BOUCHENY P., CARROUÉE B., DORVILLEZ D., FOISSY D., GAILLARD B., GUICHARD L., MANSARD M. CH., OMON B., PRIEUR L., YVERGNIAUX M., JUSTES E., MARIE-HÉLÈNE JEUFFROY M. H. Pea-wheat intercrops in lowinput conditions combine high economic performances and low environmental impacts. Eur. J. Agron. 40, 39, 2012.
  • 21. WEINER J., GRIEPENTROG H. W., KEISTENSEN L. Suppression of weeds by spring wheat Triticum eastivum increases with crop density and spatial uniformity. J. Appl. Ecol. 38, 784, 2001.
  • 22. NEUMANN A.; WERNER J., RAUBER R. Evaluation of yield-density relationships and optimization of intercrop compositions of field-grown pea-oat intercrops using the replacement series and response surface design. Field Crop. Res. 114, (2), 285, 2009.
  • 23. BRISSON N., BUSSIERE F., OZIER-LAFONTAINE H., TOURNEBIZE R., SINOQUET H. Adaptation of the crop model STICS to intercropping. Theoretical basis and parameterisation. Agronomie. 24, 1, 2004.
  • 24. TARAKANOVAS P., RAUDONIUS S. The statistical analysis of datas of agricultural researches applying computers programs Anova, Stat, Split-Plot from a package Selection and Irristat. Academy, pp. 58, 2003 [In Lithuanian].
  • 25. SPAAR D., DRAEGER D., ZAKHARENKO A., KRATZSCH G., KRACHT W., MAKOWSKI N., POSTNIKOV A., TARANUKHO G., SCHUMANN P., SCHTSCHERBAKOV V., ELLMER F., JASTER K. Grain legumes. Spaar D. (Ed.). FUAinform: Minsk. pp. 98-131, 2000 [In Russian].
  • 26. ANDERSEN M. K., HAUGGAARD-NIELSEN H., WEINER J., JENSEN E. S. Competitive dynamics in twocomponent intercrops. J Appl Ecol. 44, (3), 545, 2007.
  • 27. BILALIS D., PAPASTYLIANOU P., KONSTANTAS A., PATSIALI S., KARKANIS A., EFTHIMIADOU A. Weedsuppressive effects of maize-legume intercropping in organic farming. Int J Pest Manag. 56, (2), 173, 2010.
  • 28. RAUBER R.; SCHMIDTKE K.; KIMPEL-FREUND H. The performance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and its role in determining yield advantages in mixed stands of pea and oat (Avena sativa L.). J Agron Crop Sci. 187, (2), 137, 2001.
  • 29. BHADORIA P. B. S. Allelopathy: a natural way towards weed management. Am J Exp Agr. 1, (1), 7, 2011.
  • 30. PROTASOV N. The tendency of change of weed phytocenosis in the North-Eastern part of Byelorussia. Weed Control in the Changing Situation of Farming in the Baltic Region, Trečiokas, K.; Liakas, V. ed., Vilnius Technical University Press: Vilnius. pp. 203-210, 1995.
  • 31. GHARINEH M. H., MORADI-TELAVAT M. R. Investigation of ecological relationship and density acceptance of canola in canola-field bean intercropping. Asian J Agr Res. 3, (1), 11, 2009.
  • 32. POGGIO S. L. Structure of weed communities occurring in monoculture and intercropping of pea and barley. Agr Ecosys Environ. 109, 48, 2005.
  • 33. ARLAUSKIENĖ A., MAIKŠTĖNIENĖ S., ŠARŪNAITĖ L., KADŽIULIENĖ Ž., DEVEIKYTĖ I., ŽĖKAITĖ V., ČESNULEVIČIENĖ R. Competitiveness and productivity of organically grown pea and spring cereal intercrops. Žemdirbystė=Agriculture. 98, (4), 339, 2011.
  • 34. ZHANG F., LI, L. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficency. Plant Soil. 248, 305, 2003.
  • 35. LAUNAY N, BRISSON N., SATGER S., HAUGGAARD-NIELSEN H., CORRE-HELLOU G., KASYNOVA E., RUSKE R., JENSEN E.S., GOODING M.J. Exploring options for managing strategies for pea-barley intercropping using a modeing approach. Eur J Agron. 31, (2), 85, 2009.
  • 36. HAUGGAARD-NIELSEN H., MUNDUS S., JENSEN E.S. Nitrogen dynamics following grainlegumes and subsequent catch crop and the effects on succeeding cereal crops. Nutr Cycl Agroec. 84, (3), 281, 2009.
  • 37. SUBKOWICZ P., TENDZIAGOLSKA E. Competition and productivity in mixture of oats and wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 191, (5), 377, 2005.
  • 38. SAUCKE H., ACKERMANN K. Weed suppression in mixed cropped grain peas and false flax (Camelina sativa). Weed Res. 46, 453, 2006.
  • 39. DIBET A., HAUGGAARD-NIELSEN H., KASYANOVA E., RUSKE R., GOODING M., PRISTERI A., MONTI M., DAHLMANN CH., FRAGSTEIN P., AMBUS P., JENSEN E., CROZAT Y. Pea-barley intercropping for the control of weeds in Joint Organic Congress: Organic farming and European Rural Development, Odense, Denmark, May 30-31, pp. 258-259, 2006.
  • 40. CORRE-HELLOU G., DIBET A., HAUGGAARD-NIELSEN H., CROZAT Y., GOODING M., AMBUS P., DAHLMANN C., VON FRAGSTEIN P., PRISTERI A., MONTI M., JENSEN E. S. The competitive ability of peabarley intercrops against weeds and interactions with crop productivity and soil N availability. Field Crop Res. 122, (3), 264, 2011.
  • 41. ŠPOKIENĖ N., POVILIONIENĖ E. Weed. Lithuanian University of Agriculture: Kaunas, 200, 2003 [In Lithuanian].
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.