Usefulness of four rootstocks and mycorhization treatment in production of sweet cherry maiden trees in a nursery

• Autorzy: Swierczynski S. , Stachowiak A.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Przydatność czterech podkładek i zabiegu mikoryzacji w produkcji okulantów czereśni w szkółce

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In nursery production there are very few verified rootstocks for production of sweet cherry maiden trees. They do not always guarantee good growth results as well. GiSelA 5 and PHL-A seem to be very interesting ones, however, so far not well examined in a nursery. For a better adaptation of plants and improvement of condition for their growth, mycorrhizal fungus are used more and more often. In the experiment carried out in years 2007–2010 usefulness of four rootstocks and also of mycorrhization treatment for nursery production of maiden trees of two cultivars of sweet cherry trees was checked. The studies covered the following rootstocks: Prunus avium, Colt, GiSelA 5, PHL-A, and sweet cherry trees cultivars: ‘Sumit’ and ‘Vanda’, as well as mycorrhizal inoculum produced by companies: ‘Mycoflor’(inoculum 1) and ‘Suplo’ (inoculum 2). Prunus avium rootstock grew the strongest in the nursery, the weakest one was PHL-A. Mycorrhization process, together with the application of inoculum 1 significantly influenced on the growth of rootstocks, but application of inoculum 2 did not significantly change results of growth compared to control group without mycorrhization. The most intensive growth of sweet cherry maiden trees was obtained on ‘Colt’ rootstock and the least on PHL-A. The best productivity of maiden trees was obtained on ‘Colt’ and PHL-A rootstocks and the worst on Prunus avium. Application of mycorrhization process positively influenced the diameter of maiden trees and their fresh mass.

PL

W szkółkarstwie mało jest sprawdzonych podkładek do produkcji okulantów czereśni oraz nie zawsze uzyskuje się przy ich zastosowaniu pożądane wyniki wzrostu drzewek. Ciekawymi podkładkami, ale mało jeszcze poznanymi w szkółce są GiSelA 5 i PHL-A. Do łatwiejszej adaptacji roślin i polepszenia warunków ich wzrostu stosuje się coraz częściej szczepionki mikoryzowe. W doświadczeniu przeprowadzonym w latach 2007–2010 sprawdzono przydatność czterech podkładek oraz zabiegu mikoryzacji do produkcji okulantów dwóch odmian czereśni w szkółce. Badaniami objęto następujące podkładki: Prunus avium, Colt, GiSelA 5, PHL-A i odmiany czereśni: ‘Sumit’ i ‘Vanda’ oraz szczepionkę mikoryzową firmy ‘Mycoflor’ (szczepionka 1) i ‘Suplo’ (szczepionka 2). W szkółce najsilniej rosła podkładka Prunus avium, a najsłabiej PHL-A. Zabieg mikoryzacji przy zastosowaniu szczepionki 1 wpłynął istotnie na wzrost podkładek, a szczepionki 2 nie zmienił istotnie wyników wzrostu w stosunku do kontroli bez mikoryzacji. Najintensywniejszy wzrost okulantów czereśni uzyskano na podkładce Colt, a najsłabszy na podkładce PHL-A. Najlepszą wydajność okulantów otrzymano na podkładkach Colt i PHL-A, a najgorszą na Prunus avium. Zastosowanie zabiegu mikoryzacji podkładek wpłynęło pozytywnie na średnicę okulantów i ich świeżą masę.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Hortorum Cultus
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 11
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.149-159,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Swierczynski S.

• Department of Dendrology and Nursery, University of Life Sciences in Poznan, Szamotulska 28, Baranowo, 62-081 Przezmierowo, Poland

autor

Stachowiak A.

• Department of Dendrology and Nursery, University of Life Sciences in Poznan, Szamotulska 28, Baranowo, 62-081 Przezmierowo, Poland

Bibliografia

• Aka-Kacar Y., Akpinar C., Agar A., Yalcin-Mendi Y., Serce S., Ortas I., 2010. The effect of mycorrhiza in nutrient uptake and biomass of cherry rootstocks during acclimatization. Romanian Biotech. Letters 15 (3), 246–252.
• Baryła P., Kapłan M., 2005. The estimation of the growth and the branching of the six stocks under the cherry and sweet cherry trees. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 4 (1), 119–129.
• Borkowska B., Balla I., Szucs E., Michaczuk B., 2008. Evaluation of the response of micropropagated peach rootstock ‘Cadman’ and cv. ‘Cresthaven’ to mycorrhization using chlorophyll a fluorescence method. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 16, 243–260.
• Branzanti B., Gianinazzi-Pearson A., Gianinazzi S., 1992. Influence of phosphate fertilization on the growth and nutrient status of micropropagated apple infected with endomycorrhizal fungi during the weaning stage. Agronomie 12, 841–845.
• Calvet C., Pinochet J., Camprubi A., Fernandez C., 1995. Increased tolerance to the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus vulnus in mycorrhizal micropropagated BA-29 quince rootstock. Mycorrhiza 5, 253–258.
• Chełpiński P., 2007. Wpływ wybranych podkładek na wzrost i plonowanie oraz skład chemiczny liści i owoców czereśni na Pomorzu Zachodnim.
• Colpaert J.V., Assche J.A., Luitjens K., 1992. A relationship between plant growth and increasing VA mycorrhizal inoculum density. New Phytol. 120, 227–234.
• Colpaert J.V., Van Laere A., Van Assche J.A.., 1996. Carbon and nitrogen allocation in ectomycorrhizal and non –mycorrhizal Pinus sylvestris L. seedlings. Tree Physiology. 16, 787–793.
• Conjeaud C., Scheromm P., Moussain D., 1996. Effects of phosphorum and ectomycorrhiza on maritime pine seedlings (Pinus pinaster). New Phytol. 133, 345–351.
• Cordier C., Trouvelot A., Gianinazzi S., Gianinazzi-Pearson V., 1996. Arbuscular mycorrhiza technology applied to micropropagated Prunus avium and to protection against Phytophthora cinnamomi. Agronomie 16, 679–688.
• Correa A., Strasser J.R., Matins-Loucao M.A., 2008. Response of plants to ectomycorrhizae in Nlimited conditions: which factors determine its variation? Mycorrhiza 18, 413–427.
• Dosskey M.G., Linderman R.G., Boersma L., 1990. Carbon-sink stimulation of photosynthesis in Douglas fir seedlings by some ectomycorrhizas. New Phytol. 115, 269–274.
• Druzic-Orlic J., Cmelik Z., Redzepovic S., 2008. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on fruit rootstocks. Acta Hort. 767, 393–396.
• Eltrop L., Marschner H., 1996. Growth and mineral nutrition of non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings growth in semi-hydroponic sand culture New Phytol. 133, 469–478.
• Fortuna P., Citernesi S., Morini S., Giovannetti M., Loreti F., 1992. Infectivity and effectivneness of different species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in micropropagated plants of Mr S 2/5 plum rootstock. Agronomie 12, 825–829.
• Granger O., Bartschi H., Gay G., 1997. Effect of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Hebeloma cylindrosporum on in vitro rooting of micropropagated cuttings of arbuscular mycorrhiza –forming Prunus avium and Prunus ceracus. J. Tree Structure and Function: 12 (1), 49–56.
• Granger R.L., Plencheete C., Fortin J.A., 1983. Effect of vesicular-arbuscular 9VA endomycorrhizal fungus (Glomus epigaeum) on the growth and leaf mineral content of two apple clones propagated in vitro. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63, 551–555.
• Lopez A., Pinochet J., Fernandez C., Calvet C., Camprubi A., 1997. Growth response of OH × F 333 pear rootstock to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, phosphorus nutrition and Pratylenchus vulnus infection. Fundamental Appl. Nematology 20, 87–93.
• Monticelli S., Puppi G., Damiano C., 2000. Effects of in vivo mycorrhization on micropropagated fruit tree rootstocks. Appl. Soil Ecol. 15, 105–111.
• Raj H., Sharma S.D., 2009. Integration of soil solarization and chemical sterilization wit beneficial microorganisms for the control of white root and growth of nursery apple. Sci. Hort. 119, 126–131.
• Rapparini F., Baraldi R., Bertazza B, Branzanti B, Predieri S., 1994. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation of micropropagated fruit tree. J. Hort. Sci. 69 (6), 1101–1109.
• Rapparini F., Baraldi R., Bertazza B., 1996. Growth and carbohydrate status of Prunus communis L. plantlets inoculated with Glomus sp. Agronomie 16, 653–661.
• Rutto K.L., Mizutani F., 2006. Peach seedling growth in replant and non replant soils after inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38 (9), 2536–2542.
• Sitarek M., Grzyb Z.S., 2007. Nursery results of bud-take and growth of six sweet cherry cultivars budded on four clonal rootstocks. Acta Hort. 732, 345–349.
• Stachowiak A., Świerczyński A., 2009. The influence of mycorrhizal vaccine on the growth of maiden sweet cherry trees of selected cultivars in nursery. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 8 (1), 3–11.
• Świerczyński S., 2008. Influence of rootstocks and appling mycorrhizal vaccine on the growth of maiden trees and trees there years after planting of ‘Woodii’ cultivar. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 7(4), 3–11.
• Schubert A., Lubraco G., 2000. Mycorrhizal inoculation enhances growth and nutrient uptake of micropropagated apple rootstocks during weaning in commercial substrates of high nutrient availability. Appl. Soil Ecol. 15 (2), 113–118.