The relationship between the family’s socio-economic status and physical activity level of pre-school children

• Autorzy: Miklankova L. , Gorny M. , Klimesova I.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Preschool-aged children respond very positively to the educational impact based on targeted incentives and suitable designs. It is thus relatively easy to cultivate the habit of healthy lifestyle choices and optimal physical exercise regimen at this stage of life. The family plays a fundamental role in forming a healthy lifestyle of children. The aim of the present study was to analyse relationships between family’s socio-economic status and the physical activity levels of preschool-aged children. The research sample consisted of 200 children (96 girls, 104 boys) aged 5.71 ± 1.0 years. Family history (parents’ age; parents’ education; number of siblings; type of housing; economic, spatial and traffic stimuli; participation in physical activity) was assessed with the use of a modified Czech version of the Environmental Stimulus for Physical Activities questionnaire [1]. Informed consent was obtained from the parents before any research procedures. The level of physical activity was evaluated on the basis of the results of monitoring active energy expenditure (kcal × kg × day⁻¹) recorded with ActiGraph GT3X+. The parents’ education was found to be related to the children’s greater involvement in sports organizations (p < 0.03). The statistically significant relationship noted between the level of parents’ education and economic and spatial stimuli at home (p < 0.01) confirmed the purposeful and intentional influence of parents in the optimization of daily exercise regimen of their children. The parents’ inclination towards the development of their children’s active lifestyle is closely related to the children’s membership and participation in youth/sports organizations (p < 0.002).

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Trends in Sport Sciences
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 23
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.192-202,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Miklankova L.

• Department of Primary and Preschool Education, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic

autor

Gorny M.

• Department of Physical Education for Persons with Disabilities, Poznan University School of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland

autor

Klimesova I.

• Department of Natural Sciences in Kinanthropology, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• 1. Renson R, Vanreusel B. The sociocultural and physical activity inventory. In: Simons J, et al., eds., Growth and fitness of flemish girls (the Leuven growth study) (pp. 41- -46). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books. Metabolic Disorders. 1999; 22: 287-293.
• 2. Rašková M. The problems of adolescence – prepuberty and puberty. Olomouc: UP; 2014.
• 3. Stožický F, Pizingerová K. The Basic Paediatrics. Prague: Karolinum; 2006.
• 4. Kuo J, Voorhees CC, Haythornthwaite JA, Young DR. Associations between family support, family intimacy, and neighborhood violence and physical activity in urban adolescent girls. Retrieved 17.11.2006 from http://www. kidshealth.org/parent/nutrition_fit/fitness/exercise.html.
• 5. Kay T. The family factor in sport: A review of family factors affecting sports participation. Loughborough University: Institute of Sport and Leisure Policy; 2004.
• 6. Greendorfer S, Lewko J, Rosengren KS. Family and gender based influences in sport socialization of children and adolescents. In: Smoll FL and Smith RE, eds., Children and youth in sport: A biopsychosocial perspective (2nd ed.) Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark; 2002, pp. 153-186.
• 7. Gordon-Larsen P, McMurray RG, Popkin BM. Determinants of adolescent physical activity and inactivity patterns. Pediatrics. 2000; 105: 83-90.
• 8. Telama R, Yang X, Viikari J, Välimäki I, Wanne O, Raitakari O. Physical activity from childhood to adulthood: A 21 year tracking study. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28(3): 267-273.
• 9. Cote J. The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. Sport Psychol. 1999; 13(4): 395-417.
• 10. Horne J, Tomlinson A, Whannel G. Understanding Sport. London: E. and F. N. Spon. Retrieved 5.11.2006 from World Wide Web: http//: www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/ hlst/documents/johlste/.../0114.pdf.
• 11. Trost SG, Sirard JR, Dowda M, Pfeiffer KA, Pate RR. Physical activity in overweight and nonoverweight preschool children. Int J Obesity. 2003; 27(7): 834-839.
• 12. Logstrup S, ed. Children and young people – the importance of physical activity. European Heart Health Initiative: Brussels; 2001.
• 13. Sichieri R, Taddei JA, Everhart JE. Influence of parental height and sociodemographic factors on adolescent height in Brazil. J Adolescent Health. 2000; 26(6): 414-419.
• 14. Silventoinen K. Determinants of variation in adult body height. J Biosoc Sci. 2003; 35: 263-285.
• 15. Miklánková L. Stimuli of social participation of children primary school age. In: Pavlik J, ed., Proceedings of the International Conference “Sport and Quality of Life”. Brno: Masaryk University; 2004.
• 16. Coakley J. Sport in society: Issues and controversies (7thed.). New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
• 17. Laing P. Childhood obesity: A public health threat. Paediatric Nursing. 2002; 14(10): 14-16.
• 18. David P. Children and adolescents in competitive sports. Czech Kinanthropology. 2000; 4(1): 73-83.
• 19. Vignerová J, Riedlová J, Bláha P, Kobzová J, Krejčovský L, Brabec M, Hrušková M. 6th nationwide anthropological research on children and youth 2001. Czech Republic, 2006.
• 20. Miklánková L, Sigmund E, Frömel K. Monitoring physical activity preschool children. In: Blahutková M. ed., Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Sport and Quality 2006. Masaryk University in Brno; 2006. pp. 72-75.
• 21. Dowda M, Dishman RK, Pfeiffer KA, Pate RR. Family support for physical activity in girls from 8th to 12th grade in South Carolina. Prev Med. 2006; 44(2): 153-159.
• 22. Gustafson SL, Rhodes RE. Parental correlates of physical activity in children and early adolescents. Sports Med. 2006; 36: 79-97.
• 23. Lioret S, Maire B, Volatier JL, Charles MA. Child overweight in France and its relationship with physical activity, sedentary behaviour and socioeconomic status. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007; 61(4): 509-516.
• 24. Research Unit Sport Scotland-The National Agency for Sport. Let’s Make Scotland More Active – A strategy for physical aktivity. Edinburg: NHS Health Scotland Retrieved 3. 11. 2006 from the World Wide Web: http://www.healthscotland.com/ uploads/documents/ /9159-1150 HS%20PA%205yr%20Review%20Final.pdf.
• 25. Zask A, Van Beurden E, Barnett L, Brooks LO, Dietrich UC. Active school playgrounds-myth or reality? Results of the ‘move it groove it’ project. Prev Med. 2001; 33(5): 402-408.
• 26. Dishman RK, Sallis JF. Determinants and interventions for physical activity and exercise. In: Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T, eds., Physical activity, fitness, and health: International proceedings and consensus statement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1994. pp. 214-238.
• 27. Raudsepp L. The relationship between socio-economic status, parental support and adolescent physical activity. Acta Paediatr. 2007; 95(1): 93-98.
• 28. Salonna F, van Dijk JP, Geckova AM, Sleskova M, Groothoff JW, Reijneveld SA. Social inequalities in changes in health-related behaviour among Slovak adolescents aged between 15 and 19: a longitudinal study. Public Health. 2008; 8: 57.
• 29. Lasheras L, Aznar L, Merino B, López EG. Factors associated with physical activity among Spanish youth through the National Health Survey. Prev Med. 2001; 32: 455-464.
• 30. McVeigh JA, Norris SA, de Wet T. The relationship between socio-economic status and physical activity patterns in South African children. Acta Paediatr. 2004; 93: 982-988.
• 31. Miklánková L, Klimešová I, Reich P, Górny M. Body mass index in the context of certain aspects of children’s eating. J Health Sci. 2013; 3(13): 68-82.
• 32. Slepička P, Slepičková I. Sport from the perspective of Czech society – I., Czech Kinanthropology. 2002; 6(1): 7-23.
• 33. Australian Institute of Family Studies. The Longitudinal Study of Australian Children: Growing Up In Australia. 2007-08 Annual Report. Retrieved 7. 3. 2007 from World Wide Web: http://www.aifs.gov.au/growingup/pubs/ar/ annualreport2007-08.html.
• 34. Aytur SA, Rodriguez DA, Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Rosamond WD. The sociodemographics of land use planning: Relationships to physical activity, accessibility, and equity. Health Place. 2008; 14(3): 367-385.
• 35. Baxter J, Gray M, Alexander M, Strazdins L, Bittman M. Mothers and fathers with young children: Paid employment, caring and wellbeing (Social Policy Research Paper 30). Canberra, ACT: Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. Retrieved 5.9.2008 from World Wide Web: http://www. fahcsia.gov.au/about/ publicationsarticles/research/socialpolicy/Documents/ /prp 30/index.htm.
• 36. Pate RR, Pfeiffer KA, Trost SG, Ziegler P, Dowda M. Physical activity among children attending preschools. Pediatrics. 2004; 114(5): 1258-1263.
• 37. Trudeau F, Shephard RJ. Contribution of school programmes to physical activity levels and attitudes in children and adults. Sports Med. 2005; 35(2): 89-105.
• 38. Dollman K, Norton L, Norton K. Evidence for secular trends in children’s physical activity behaviour. Brit J Sport Med. 2005; 39: 892-897.
• 39. Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2000; 32: 963-975.
• 40. Sallis JF, Conway TL, Prochaska JJ, McKenzie TL, Marshall SJ, Brown M. The association of school environments with youth physical activity. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(4): 618-620.
• 41. Miklánková L. Physical activity in parents’ way of life. In: Tilinger P, Perič T, eds., Proceedings of the National Conference of Sport in the Czech Republic at the beginning of the new millennium. Prague: Charles University; 2001. pp. 176-180.
• 42. Čillík I, Čillíková A. Stimulation younger school-age children to physical activities. In motion, sports, health Banská Bystrica: Matej Bel University, Faculty of the Humanities and Scientific Society for Physical Education and Sport; 2004. pp. 14-19.
• 43. Roemmich JN, Epstein LH, Raja S, Yin L. The neighborhood and home environments: Disparate relationships with physical activity and sedentary behaviors in youth. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 33(1): 29-38.
• 44. Miklánková L, Sigmund E, Frömel K. Physical activity children of 6-10 years of age. In: Blahutková M, ed., Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Sport and Quality of Life 8-9.11.2007. Masaryk University in Brno, FSpS; 2007. pp. 88-89.
• 45. Ball K, Timperio AF, Crawford DA. Understanding environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity behaviors: Where should we look and what should we count? Int J Behav Nutr Phys. 2006: 3-33.
• 46. Cradock AL, Melly SJ, Allen JG, Morris JS, Gortmaker SL. Characteristics of school campuses and physical activity among youth. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33(2): 106-113.
• 47. Burdette HL, Whitaker RC. A national study of neighborhood safety, outdoor play, television viewing, and obesity in preschool children. Pediatrics. 2005; 116(3): 657-662.
• 48. Cohen DA, Ashwood JS, Scoty M. Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls. Pediatrics. 2006; 118: 1381-1389.
• 49. Wendel-Vos W, Droomers M, Kremers S, Brug J, van Lenthe F. Potential environmental determinants of physical activity in adults: A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2007; 8(5): 425-440.
• 50. Rychtecký A, Naul R. Lifestyle activities and participation in sports among Czech and German youth. AUC – Kinanthropologica. 2002; 38(1): 39-40.
• 51. Mandigo JL, Thompson L, Spence J, Melnychuk N, Schwartz M, Marshall D, Causgrove DJ. A descriptive profile of physical education teachers and related program characteristics in Alberta. Alberta J Educ Res. 2004; 50: 87-102.
• 52. Miklánková L. The level of stimulation to physical activities during their compulsory schooling. Czech Kinanthropology. 2002; 6(2): 41-51.
• 53. Hrčka J, Michal J, Bartík J, Krška P. School tours affinity for sports and its experience with illicit drugs. Phys Educ Sport. 2005; 15(3, 4): 5-10.
• 54. Strauss RS, Rodzilsky D, Burack G, Colin M. Psychosocial correlates of physical activity in healthy children. Arch Pediat Adol Med. 2001; 155: 897-902.
• 55. Bocarro J, Kanters K, Casper J. Leisture for life: The role of schools should be to promote lifelong recreational sport and physical activity participation. Parks & Recreation. 2006: 22-27.
• 56. Rychtecký A, Tilinger P, Chytráčková J, Sloupová A, Unger V, Řepka E, et al. Monitoring of youth participation in sport and physical activity in the Czech Republic. [Final Report Ministry LS 0503]. Prague: FTVS UK; 2006.
• 57. Dzewaltowski D, Ryan GJ, Rosenkranz RR. Parental bonding may moderate the relationship between parent physical activity and youth physical activity after school. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2008; 9(6): 848-854.
• 58. Zabinski MF, Norman GJ, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ, Patrick K. Patterns of sedentary behaviour among adolescents. Health Psychol. 2007; 26 (1): 113-120.
• 59. Lioret S, Touvier M, Lafay L, Volatier JL, Maire B. Dietary and physical activity patterns in French children are related to overweight and socioeconomic status. J Nutr. 2008; 138: 101-107.
• 60. Floriani V, Kennedy Ch. Promotion of physical activity in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008; 20: 90-95.
• 61. Martin M, Dollman J, Norton KA. Decrease in the association between the physical activity patterns of Australian parents and their children 1985–1997. J Sci Med Sport. 2005; 8: 71-76.
• 62. Hedstrom R, Goutd D. Research in youth sports: Critical issues status. Retrieved 23.11.2005 from the World Wide Web: http://edweb3.educ.msu.edu/ysi/articles/ CTSAWhitePapers.pdf.
• 63. Koplan JP, Liverman CT, Kraak VI. Preventing childhood obesity: Health in the balance. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2005.
• 64. Barnett TA, O’Loughlin J, Gauvin L, Paradis G, Hanley J. Opportunities for student physical activity in elementary schools: A cross sectional survey of frequency and correlates. Health Educ Behav. 2006; 33(2): 215-232.
• 65. Tergerson JL, King KA. Do perceived cues, benefits, and barriers to physical activity differ between male and female adolescents? J School Health. 2002; 72: 374-380.
• 66. Bláha P, Vignerová J, Kobzová J, Krejčovský L, Riedlová J, Brabec M, Hrušková M. VI national anthropological research on children and young people of the Czech Republic 2001 (summary results). Prague: Charles University and SZU Retrieved January 7, 2008 from World Wide Web: http://www.szu.cz/publikace/data/6- celostatni-antropologicky-vyzkum.
• 67. Žejglicová K, Kratěnová J, Malý M. HELEN Study: Health and lifestyle of the Czech population – compared I.a II. stage. Prague: Institute of Public Health. Retrieved 10. 5. 2008 from the World Wide Web: http: //www.uzis. cz/download_file.php?file=2987.