Comparison of methods of fertile oestrus induction in female goats outside the physiologic breeding season

• Autorzy: Dzieciol M. , Nizanski W. , Kozdrowski R. , Dejneka G. , Kupczynski R. , Stanczyk E. , Twardon J.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Porównanie skuteczności metod wywoływania płodnej rui u kóz poza sezonem rozrodczym

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of different estrus induction protocols in anoestrus goat. Does were assigned to seven groups (A-G). In the group A, the animals (n=25 ) received intravaginal sponges containing 30 mg of flugestone acetate FGA (Chronogest, Intervet) for 12 days and i.m. injection of 500 I.U. of PMSG (Folligon, Intervet) two days before sponges withdrawal. In the groups B(n=10), C (n=10), D (n=10) females received 12,5 mg progesterone (Progesteronum, Polfa Warszawa S.A.) per animal in i.m. injections respectively for 6, 12 or 2 days. Females from groups E (n=10) and F (n=10) received altrenogest (Regumate, Intervet) p.o. for 6 or 12 day. At the end of progestagen treatment the animals from group B, C, D, E, F received 500 I.U. of PMSG i.m. The goats from control group G (n=10) did not received any treatment. During the experiment, a significant difference was found in the effectiveness of the oestrus induction among applied methods. Oestrus occurred in 72% of females from group A, 60% from group B, 100% from group C and 20 % of females from group G. Oestrus was not observed in any female of group D, E and F. We concluded that the duration of the progestagen treatment significantly influenced the efficiency of the oestrus induction protocol in anoestrus goats.

PL

Celem pracy było porównanie skuteczności różnych protokołów indukcji rui u kóz poza sezonem rozrodczym. Samice zostały podzielone na siedem grup (A-G). Zwierzętom z grupy A (n=25) zaaplikowano gąbki dopochwowe zawierające 30 mg octanu flugestonu FGA (Chronogest, Internet) na okres 12 dni oraz 500 I.U. PMSG (Foligon, Inter- vet) w postaci iniekcji domięśniowej na dwa dni przed usunięciem gąbek. Samice z grup B (n=10), C (n=10) oraz D (n=10) otrzymywały domięśniowe iniekcje 12,5 mg progesteronu (Progesteronum, Polfa Warszawa S.A.) odpowiednio przez okres 6, 12 oraz 2 dni. Kozy z grupy E (n=10) oraz F (n=10) otrzymywały per os altrenogest (Regumate, Intervet) przez okres 6 lub 12 dni. Ostatniego dnia administracji progesteronu/progestagenu samicom z grup B, C, D, E, F podano 500 I.U. PMSG i.m. Grupę kontrolną stanowiły samice z grupy G (n=10), u których nie stosowano żadnych środków hormonalnych. W toku eksperymentu stwierdziliśmy istotną różnicę w skuteczności indukcji rui u kóz pomiędzy poszczególnymi programami. Pełnowartościowa ruja wystąpiła u 72% samic z grupy A, 60% z grupy B, 100% z grupy C oraz 20% z grupy G. W grupach D, E, oraz F nie odnotowano ani jedne­go przypadku rui. Uzyskane wyniki wskazują na istotność długości stosowania programu opartego na podawaniu progesteronu na skuteczność wywoływania rui u kóz poza sezonem rozrodczym.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Medicina Veterinaria
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 10
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.31-38,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Dzieciol M.

• Department and Clinic of Reproduction, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Plac Grunwaldzki 49, 50-366 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Nizanski W.

• Department and Clinic of Reproduction, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Plac Grunwaldzki 49, 50-366 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Kozdrowski R.

• Department and Clinic of Reproduction, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Plac Grunwaldzki 49, 50-366 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Dejneka G.

• Department and Clinic of Reproduction, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Plac Grunwaldzki 49, 50-366 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Kupczynski R.

• Department and Clinic of Reproduction, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Plac Grunwaldzki 49, 50-366 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Stanczyk E.

• Department and Clinic of Reproduction, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Plac Grunwaldzki 49, 50-366 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Twardon J.

• Department and Clinic of Reproduction, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Plac Grunwaldzki 49, 50-366 Wroclaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• Corteel J.M., Leboeuf B., Baril G., 1988. Artificial breeding of adult goats and kids induced with hormones to ovulate outside the breeding season. Small Rumin. Res., 1, 19-35.
• Cruz J.F., Rondina D., Freitas V.J.F., 2005. Ovarian follicular dynamics during anoestrus in anglonubian and saanen goats raised in tropical climate. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 37, 395-402.
• Daniel J.A., Stertle S.W., Mcfadin-Buff E.L., Keisler D.H., 2001. Breeding ewes out-of-season using melegestrol acetate, one injection of progesterone, or a controlled drug releasing device. Theriogenology, 56, 105-110.
• Fonseca J.F., Bruschi J.H., Santos I.C.C., Viana J.H.M., Magalhaes A.C.M, 2005. Induction of estrus in non-lactating dairy goats with different estrus synchrony protocols. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 85, 117-124.
• Freitas V.J.F., Baril G., Saumande J., 1994. The effect of progestagen level at the end of oestrus induction treatment on oestrus synchronization, fertility and fecundity in the anoestrus dairy goat. Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of the EuropeanEmbryoTransfer Association, Lyon, 170.
• Freitas V.J.F., Baril G., Saumande J., 1996. Induction and synchronization of oestrus in goats: the relative efficiency of one versus two flurogestone acetate-impregnated vaginal sponges. Theriogenology, 46, 1251-1256.
• Freitas V.J.F., Baril G., Saumande J., 1997. Oestrus synchronization in goats: use of flurogestone acetate vaginal sponges or norgestomet ear implants. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 46, 237-244.
• Ginther O.J., Kot K., 1994. Follicular dynamics during the ovulatory season in goats. Theriogenology, 42, 987-1001.
• Greyling J.P.C., Nest M., 2000. Synchronization of oestrus in goats: dose effect of progestagen. Small Rum. Res., 36, 210-207.
• Holtz W., 2005. Recent development in assisted reproduction in goats. Small Rum. Res., 60, 95-110.
• Jackson D.J., Whitley N.C., 2002. Effectivness of melengestrol acetate in inducing out-of-season breeding in goats. J. Anim. Sci., 80 (Suppl 2), 29.
• Leboeuf B., Forgerit Y., Bernelas D., Pougnard J.L., Senty E., Driancourt M.A., 2003. Efficiacy of two types of vaginal sponge to control onset of oestrus, time of preovulatory LH peak and kidding rate in goats inseminated with variable numbers of spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 60, 1371-1378.
• Lerma M.A., Stanko R.L., 2003, Estrus induction and synchronization in seasonally anestrus does in south Texas. J. Anim. Sci., 81 (Suppl 2), 11.
• Lopez-Sebastian A., Gonzales-Bulnes A., Carrizosa J.A., Urrutia B., Diaz-Delfa C., Santiago­Moreno J., Gomez-Brunet A., 2007. New estrus synchronization and artificial insemination protocol for goats based on male exposure, progesterone and cloprostenol during the non- breeding season. Theriogenology, 68, 1081-1087.
• McClintock M.K., 1999. Pheromones and regulation of ovulation. Nature, 401, 232-233.
• Morand-Fehr P., Lebbie S.H.B., 2004, Proposal for improving the research efficiency in goats. Small Rum. Res., 51. 145-153.
• Motlomelo K.C., Greyling J.PC., Schwalbach L.M.J., 2002. Synchronization of estrus in goats: the use of different progestagen treatments. Small Rum. Res., 45, 45-49.
• Papachristoforou C., Koumas A., Photiou C., 2007. Initiation of breeding season in ewe lambs and goat kids with melatonin implants. Small Rum. Res., 73, 1 22-126.
• Robin N., Laforest J.P., Lussier J.G., Guilbault L.A., 1994. Induction of estrus with intramuscular injections of GnRH or PMSG in lactating goats (Capra hircus) primed with a progestagen during seasonal anestrus. Theriogenology, 42, 107-116.
• Schwarz T., Wierzchoś E., 2002. Pęcherzyki jajnikowe kóz w okresie spoczynku płciowego. Med. Wet., 58, 620-622.
• Schwarz T., Wierzchoś E., 2004. Wzrost pęcherzyków jajnikowych kóz w okresach przejściowych między sezonem rozrodczym i spoczynkiem płciowym. Med. Wet., 60, 877-879.
• Vinoles C., Forsberg M., Banchero G., Rubianes E., 2001. Effect of long-term and short-term progestagen treatment on follicular development and pregnancy rate in cyclic ewes. Theriogenology, 55, 993-1004.
• Wheaton J.E., Carlson K.M., Windels H.F., Johston L.J., 1993. CIDR: a new progesterone-releasing intravaginal device for induction of estrus and cycle control in sheep and goats. Anim Reprod. Sci., 33, 127-141.
• Whitley N.C., Jackson D.J., 2004. An update on estrus synchronization in goats: A minor species. J. Anim. Sci., 82, 270-276.
• Wildeus S., Collins J.R., Keisler D.H., 2003. Ovarian response and fertility in postpubertal does and hair sheep ewes to an induced estrus using either MGA feeding or progesterone sponges. J. Anim. Sci., 81 (Suppl. 1), 127.
• Worlds T.D., Wildeus S., Keislere D.H., 2003. Use of melegestrol acetate to induce and synchronize estrus in yearling does and hair sheep ewes., [in:] Proc Assoc Res Dir, Atlanta, 129.
• Zarkawi M., Al-Merestani M.R., Wardeh M.F., 1999. Induction of synchronized oestrus in indigenous Damascus goats outside the breeding season. Small Rum. Res., 33, 193-197.
• Zarco L., Rodriguez E.F., Angulo M.R.B., Valencia J., 1995. Female to female stimulation of ovarian activity in the ewe. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 39, 251-258.

Uwagi

PL