The length, number, and endodermis area of needles discriminate two genetically distinct populations of Cedrus atlantica Manetti in the Moroccan Middle Atlas

• Autorzy: El Bakkali N. , Bendriss Amraoui M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The variation in some adaptive characters of cedar needles was studied in two different regions of the Moroccan Middle Atlas that have different local environmental conditions and levels of genetic diversity. The two populations are localized in the Azrou and Ifrane regions. Tukey’s tests showed that the needle/brachyblast number (Nn/R), length (Nl), and needle width (Nw) showed the greatest variation. In addition, all anatomical characters studied showed a significant correlation with Nw, whereas only the area of the vascular bundles (AVb) was related to Nl. Discriminant analysis revealed that Nn/R, Nl, and the area of the central cylinder (ACc) are high-discriminating characters among populations of Azrou and Ifrane and confirms their isolation. These adaptations of the morphological and anatomical traits of the Atlas cedar needles of the Azrou and Ifrane regions are discussed in relation to the local environmental conditions and have been found to be in harmony with their genetic distinctiveness revealed previously.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 87
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: Article 3591 [12p.],fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

El Bakkali N.

• Laboratory of Biotechnology and Preservation of Natural Resources, Faculty of Sciences Dhar el Mahraz, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, P.O. Box 1796, Atlas, Fez, Morocco

autor

Bendriss Amraoui M.

• Laboratory of Biotechnology and Preservation of Natural Resources, Faculty of Sciences Dhar el Mahraz, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, P.O. Box 1796, Atlas, Fez, Morocco

Bibliografia

• 1. Urbaniak L, Karliński L, Popielarz R. Variation of morphological needle characters of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) populations in different habitats. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2003;72:37–44. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2003.005
• 2. Charco J. Guía de los árboles y arbustos del norte de África. Madrid: Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional; 2001. (Ediciones Mundo Árabe e Islam).
• 3. Blokhina N, Afonin MA. Fossil wood Cedrus penzhinaensis sp. nov. (Pinaceae) from the Lower Cretaceous of north-western Kamchatka (Russia). Acta Palaeobotanica. 2007;47:379–389.
• 4. Manzi G, Magri D, Palombo MR. Early-Middle Pleistocene environmental changes and human evolution in the Italian Peninsula. Quat Sci Rev. 2011;30:1420–1438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.034
• 5. Ivanov D, Utescher T, Mosbrugger V, Syabryaj S, Djordjević-Milutinović D, Molchanoff S. Miocene vegetation and climate dynamics in Eastern and Central Paratethys (Southeastern Europe). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2011;304:262–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.07.006
• 6. Ezzahiri M, Belghazi B. Synthèse de quelques résultats sur la régénération naturelle du cèdre de l’Atlas au Moyen Atlas (Maroc). Science et Changements Planétaires/Sécheresse. 2000;11:79–84.
• 7. Terrab A, Hampe A, Lepais O, Talavera S, Vela E, Stuessy TF. Phylogeography of North African Atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica, Pinaceae): combined molecular and fossil data reveal a complex quaternary history. Am J Bot. 2008;95(10):1262–1269. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800010
• 8. Terrab A, Paun O, Talavera S, Tremetsberger K, Arista M, Stuessy TF. Genetic diversity and population structure in natural populations of Moroccan Atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica; Pinaceae) determined with cpSSR markers. Am J Bot. 2006;93(9):1274–1280. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.9.1274
• 9. Renau-Morata B, Nebauer SG, Sales E, Allainguillaume J, Caligari P, Segura J. Genetic diversity and structure of natural and managed populations of Cedrus atlantica (Pinaceae) assessed using random amplified polymorphic DNA. Am J Bot. 2005;92:875– 884. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.5.875
• 10. Bariteau M. L'amélioration génétique des cèdres en France. In: M’Hirit O, Samih A, Malagnoux M, editors. Le cedre de l’atlas Cedrus atlantica (Manetti). Casablanca: Imprimerie Najah ElJadida; 1994. p. 464–472. (Annales de la Recherche Forestière au Maroc; vol 27).
• 11. M’Hirit O. Le cèdre de l’atlas (Cedrus atlantica Manetti) présentation générale et état des connaissances à travers le réseau Silva Mediterranea “le cèdre”. In: M’Hirit O, Samih A, Malagnoux M, editors. Le cedre de l’atlas Cedrus atlantica (Manetti). Casablanca: Imprimerie Najah ElJadida; 1994. p. 3–21. (Annales de la Recherche Forestière au Maroc; vol 27).
• 12. Sabatier S, Barthelemy D. Premières observations sur l’architecture du cèdre de l’Atlas, Cedrus atlantica (ENDL.) Manetti ex carrière (Pinaceae). In: M’Hirit O, Samih A, Malagnoux M, editors. Le cedre de l’atlas Cedrus atlantica (Manetti). Casablanca: Imprimerie Najah ElJadida; 1994. p. 364–377. (Annales de la Recherche Forestière au Maroc; vol 27).
• 13. Ripert C, Boisseau B. Ecologie et croissance de cèdre de l’Atlas en Provence. In: M’Hirit O, Samih A, Malagnoux M, editors. Le cedre de l’atlas Cedrus atlantica (Manetti). Casablanca: Imprimerie Najah ElJadida; 1994. p. 156–164. (Annales de la Recherche Forestière au Maroc; vol 27).
• 14. Ferrandes P. Cèdres. Revue Forestière Française. 1986;(special issue):139–142. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/25705
• 15. Lanier L. Les champignons des cédraies en Algérie (Etude comparative). In: M’Hirit O, Samih A, Malagnoux M, editors. Le cedre de l’atlas Cedrus atlantica (Manetti). Casablanca: Imprimerie Najah ElJadida; 1994. p. 554–561. (Annales de la Recherche Forestière au Maroc; vol 27).
• 16. Ludlow M. Strategies of response to water stress. In: Kreb KH, Richter H, Hinckley TM, editors. Structural and functional responses to environmental stresses. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing; 1989. p. 269–281.
• 17. Epron D. Effects of drought on photosynthesis and on the thermotolerance of photosystem II in seedlings of cedar (Cedrus atlantica and C. libani). J Exp Bot. 1997;48(315):1835–1841. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/48.10.1835
• 18. Benabid A. Biogéographie phytosociologie et phytodynamique des cédraies de l’Atlas Cedrus atlantica (Manetti). In: M’Hirit O, Samih A, Malagnoux M, editors. Le cedre de l’atlas Cedrus atlantica (Manetti). Casablanca: Imprimerie Najah ElJadida; 1994. p. 61–76. (Annales de la Recherche Forestière au Maroc; vol 27).
• 19. Bariteau M, Panetsos KP, M’hirit O, Scaltsoyiannes A. Variabilité génétique du cèdre de l’atlas en comparaison avec les autres cèdres méditerranéens. Forêt Méditerranéenne. 1999;20:175–190.
• 20. Sabatier S, Baradat P, Barthelemy D. Intra- and interspecific variations of polycyclism in young trees of Cedrus atlantica (Endl.) Manetti ex. Carrière and Cedrus libani A. Rich (Pinaceae). Ann For Sci. 2003;60:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2002070
• 21. Jasińska AK, Boratyńska K, Sobierajska K, Romo A, Ok T, Bou Dagher Kharat M, et al. Relationships among Cedrus libani, C. brevifolia and C. atlantica as revealed by the morphological and anatomical needle characters. Plant Syst Evol. 2013;299:35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0700-y
• 22. Jasińska AK, Wachowiak W, Muchewicz E, Boratyńska K, Montserrat JM, Boratyński A. Cryptic hybrids between Pinus uncinata and P. sylvestris. Bot J Linn Soc. 2010;163:473– 485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01065.x
• 23. Jasińska AK, Boratyńska K, Dering M, Sobierajska KI, Ok T, Romo A, et al. Distance between South-European and South-West Asiatic refugial areas involved morphological differentiation – Pinus sylvestris case study. Plant Syst Evol. 2014;300:1487–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-013-0976-6
• 24. Boratyńska K, Sękiewicz K, Jasińska KA, Tomaszewski D, Iszkuło G, Ok T, et al. Effect of geographic range discontinuity on taxonomic differentiation of Abies cilicica. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2015;84(4):419–430. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2015.037
• 25. Douaihy B, Sobierajska K, Jasińska KA, Boratyńska K, Ok T, Romo A, et al. Morphological versus molecular markers to describe variability in Juniperus excelsa subsp. excelsa (Cupressaceae). AoB Plants. 2012;2012:pls013. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/pls013
• 26. Sekiewicz K, Sękiewicz M, Jasińska KA, Boratyńska K, Iszkuło G, Romo A, et al. Morphological diversity and structure of West Mediterranean Abies species. Plant Biosyst. 2013;125–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2012.753130
• 27. Sękiewicz K, Dering M, Sękiewicz M, Boratyńska K, Iszkuło G, Litkowiec M, et al. Effect of geographic range discontinuity on species differentiation – East- Mediterranean Abies cilicica: a case study. Tree Genet Genomes. 2015;11:810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-014-0810-5
• 28. Alvarez SG, Juaristi CM, Gutierrez JS, García-Amorena I. Taxonomic differences between Pinus sylvestris and P. uncinata revealed in the stomata and cuticle characters for use in the study of fossil material. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2009;155(1–2):61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.01.002
• 29. Nicholić B, Bojović S, Marin PD. Morpho-anatomical properties of Pinus heldreichii needles from natural populations in Montenegro and Serbia. Plant Biosyst. 2016;150(2):254–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.984008
• 30. Wortely AH, Scotland RW. The effect of combining molecular and morphological data in published phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biol. 2006;55(4):677–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150600899798
• 31. Jenner RA. Accepting partnership by submission? Morphological phylogenetics in a molecular millennium. Syst Biol. 2004;53(2):333–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490423962
• 32. Labhar M, Lebaut S. Les cédraies du Moyen Atlas Central (Maroc): structure et dynamique actuelle. Revue de l’Association Forum du Nord du Maroc. 2012;6–8:2–19.
• 33. Ruzin S. Plant microtechnique and microscopy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1999.
• 34. Arbez M, Ferrandes P, Uyar N. Contribution à l’étude de la variabilité géographique des Cèdres. Ann For Sci. 1978;35(4):265–284. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/19780402
• 35. Grill D, Tausz M, Pöllinger UTE, Jiménez MS, Morales D. Effects of drought on needle anatomy of Pinus canariensis. Flora. 2004;199:85–89. https://doi.org/10.1078/0367-2530-00137
• 36. Tabachnik BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: Harper Collins College Publishers; 1996.
• 37. Climate-Data.org. Climat: Ifrane [Internet] 2012 [cited 2018 Aug 31]. Available from: https://fr.climate-data.org/location/21510/
• 38. Climate-Data.org. Climat: Azrou [Internet] 2012 [cited 2018 Aug 31]. Available from: https://fr.climate-data.org/location/21511/
• 39. de Lillo M, Fusaro E. Field comparison of different Cedrus atlantica provenances from Morocco and relative morpho-physiological characteristics. In: Proceedings of the International Cedar Symposium; 1990 Oct 22–27; Antalya, Turkey. Ankara: Forest Research Institute; 1990. p. 353–365. (Miscellaneous Publications; vol 59).
• 40. Farjon A. A handbook of the world’s conifers. Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill; 2010.
• 41. Cinnirella S, Magnani F, Saracino A, Borghetti M. Response of a mature Pinus laricio plantation to a three-year restriction of water supply: structural and functional acclimation to drought. Tree Physiol. 2002;22:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/22.1.21
• 42. Ducrey M. Adaptation du cèdre de l’atlas (Cedrus atlantica Manetti) au climat méditerranéen: aspects écophysiologiques de sa réaction à la sécheresse. In: M’Hirit O, Samih A, Malagnoux M, editors. Le cedre de l’atlas Cedrus atlantica (Manetti). Casablanca: Imprimerie Najah ElJadida; 1994. p. 139–153. (Annales de la Recherche Forestière au Maroc; vol 27).
• 43. Ladjal M, Huc R, Ducrey M. Drought effects on hydraulic conductivity and xylem vulnerability to embolism in diverse species and provenances of Mediterranean cedars. Tree Physiol. 2005;25:1109–1117. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.9.1109
• 44. Eveno E, Collada C, Guevara MA, Léger V, Soto A, Díaz L, et al. Contrasting patterns of selection at Pinus pinaster Ait. Drought stress candidate genes as revealed by genetic differentiation analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:417–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm272
• 45. Wahid N, González-Martínez SC, Alía R, Boulli A. Exploration et conservation des ressources génétiques du pin maritime au Maroc. Forêt Méditerranéenne. 2009;3:245– 256.
• 46. Maurice CG, Crang RE. Increase in Pinus strobus needle transectional areas in response to acid misting. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1986;15:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055251
• 47. Bleweiss G, Werker E, Peleg M. Air-pollution effects on Cedrus libani trees – a case-study. Environ Conserv. 1985;12(1):70–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900015186
• 48. Marin M, Koko V, Duletić-Laušević S, Marin PD. Effects of air pollution on needles of Cedrus atlantica (Endl.) Carriere in industrial area of Pančevo (Serbia). Bot Serb. 2009;33(1):69–73.
• 49. Böcher TW. Xeromorphic leaf types. Evolutionary strategies and tentative semophyletic sequences. Copenhagen: E. Munksgaard; 1979. (Biologiske Skrifter; vol 22).
• 50. Jaramillo-Correa JP, Aguirre-Planter E, Eguiarte LE, Khasa DP, Bousquet J. Evolution of an ancient microsatellite hotspot in the conifer mitochondrial genome and comparison with other plants. J Mol Evol. 2013;76(3):146–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-013-9547-2
• 51. Qiao CY, Ran JH, Li Y, Wang XQ. Phylogeny and biogeography of Cedrus (Pinaceae) inferred from sequences of seven paternal chloroplast and maternal mitochondrial DNA regions. Ann Bot. 2007;100:573–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm134
• 52. Laiou A, Mandolini LA, Predda R, Bellarosa R, Simeone MC. DNA barcoding as a complementary tool for conservation and valorisation of forest resources. Zookeys. 2013;365:197–213. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5670

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5586/asbp.3591