Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 25 | 1 |
Tytuł artykułu

Spatial econometric model analysis of foreign direct investment and haze pollution in China

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Increasing attention is being paid to spatial distribution characteristics of haze pollution and its relation with socioeconomic factors. This study investigates the spatial autocorrelation of haze pollution in China and the effect of foreign direct investment (FDI) on haze pollution in China using a panel data of 31 provinces over the period 2000-12. Using a widely used spatial autocorrelation index, Moran’s I values, the estimation results suggest that haze pollution in China has strong spatial autocorrelation and spatial clustering phenomenon. Then, our analysis using spatial econometric models further confirms the significant spatial dependence and spatial spillover effects of haze pollution in China. Meanwhile, we also find a significantly positive relationship between FDI and haze pollution in China, in which an increase of 1% in FDI, haze pollution in China will increase by 0.0235%. Based on these results, we provide some important policy implications for the government to control haze pollution.
Słowa kluczowe
Opis fizyczny
  • Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China
  • Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China
  • Public Management School, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510000, China
  • 1. CMA (CHINA METEOROLOGICAL ADMINISTRATION). Specifications for the Surface Meteorological Observations. Meteorological Press, Beijing, 2013 [In Chinese].
  • 2. GAO M., GUTTIKUNDA S.K., CARMICHAEL G.R., WANG Y., LIU Z., STANIER C.O., SAIDE P.E., YU M. Health impacts and economic losses assessment of the 2013 severe haze event in Beijing area. Sci. Total. Environ. 511, 553, 2015.
  • 3. HO R.C.,ZHANG M.W., HO C.S., PAN F., LU Y., SHARMA V.K. Impact of 2013 south Asian haze crisis: study of physical and psychological symptoms and perceived dangerousness of pollution level. Bmc. Psychiatry. 14, 81, 2014.
  • 4. MA J., XU X., ZHAO C., YAN P. A review of atmospheric chemistry research in China: photochemical smog, haze pollution, and gasaerosol interactions. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 29 (5), 1006, 2012.
  • 5. VAN DONKELAAR A., MARTIN R.V., BRAUER M., KAHN R., LEVY R., VERDUZCO C., VILLENEUVE P.J. Global estimates of ambient fine particulate matter concentrations from satellite-based aerosol optical depth: development and application. Environ. Health. Persp. 118, (6), 847, 2010.
  • 6. WANG L., XU J., YANG J., ZHAO X., WEI W., CHENG D., PAN X., SU J. Understanding haze pollution over the southern Hebei area of China using the CMAQ model. Atmos. Environ. 56, 69, 2012.
  • 7. WANG Y., YAO L., WANG L., LIU Z., JI D., TANG G., ZHANG J., SUN Y., HU B., XIN J. Mechanism for the formation of the January 2013 heavy haze pollution episode over central and eastern China. Sci China: Earth Sci. 57, (1), 14, 2014.
  • 8. JAFFE A.B., PETERSON S.R., PORTNEY P.R., STAVINS R.N. Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us. J. Econ. Lit. 33, 132, 1995.
  • 9. WHEELER D. Foreign investment and air pollution in developing countries. J. Environ. Dev. 10 (3), 225, 2001.
  • 10. SMARZYNSKA B., WEI S. Pollution havens and foreign direct investment: dirty secret or popular myth? Contrib. Econ. Anal. Policy. 3 (2), 1, 2004.
  • 11. LIST J.A., CO C.Y. The effects of environmental regulations on foreign direct investment. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 40 (1), 1, 2000.
  • 12. HE J. Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: the case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces. Ecol. Econ. 60 (1), 228, 2006.
  • 13. WAGNER U.J., TIMMINS C.D. Agglomeration effects in foreign direct investment and the pollution haven hypothesis. Environ. Resour. Econ. 43 (2), 231, 2009.
  • 14. COLE M.A., ELLIOTT R.J.R., ZHANG J. Growth, foreign direct investment, and the environment: evidence from Chinese cities. J. Reg. Sci. 51 (1), 121, 2011.
  • 15. CHUNG S. Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: evidence from South Korea. J. Dev. Econ. 108, 222, 2014.
  • 16. LAU L., CHOONG C., ENG Y. Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energ Policy. 68, 490, 2014.
  • 17. BIRDSALL N., WHEELER D. Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: where are the pollution havens? J. Environ. Dev. 2 (1), 137, 1993.
  • 18. LIANG F.H. Does foreign direct investment harm the host country's environment evidence from China. Acad. Manag. 14, 38, 2005.
  • 19. WALTER I., UGELOW J.L. Environmental policies in developing countries. Ambio. 8, 102, 1979.
  • 20. ESKELAND G.S., HARRISON A.E. Moving to greener pastures multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. J. Dev. Econ. 70 (1), 1, 2003.
  • 21. DONG B., GONG J., ZHAO X. FDI and environmental regulation: pollution haven or a race to the top? J. Reg. Econ. 41 (2), 216, 2012.
  • 22. TANG C.F., TAN B.W. The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy. 79, 447, 2015.
  • 23. GROSSMAN G.M., KRUEGER A.B. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper. 1991.
  • 24. BAO Q., CHEN Y., SONG L. Foreign direct investment and environmental pollution in China: a simultaneous equations estimation. Environ. Dev. Econ. 16 (1), 71, 2011.
  • 25. LAN J., KAKINAKA M., HUANG X. Foreign direct investment, human capital and environmental pollution in China. Environ. Resour. Econ. 51 (2), 255, 2012.
  • 26. ANSELIN L. Spatial econometrics in RSUE: retrospect and prospect. Reg. Sci. Urban. Econ. 37 (4), 450, 2007.
  • 27. ANSELIN L. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geogr Anal. 27 (2), 93, 1995.
  • 28. GROSSMAN G.M., KRUEGER A.B. Economic growth and the environment. Quart. J. Econ. 110 (2), 353, 1995.
  • 29. ANTWEILER W., COPELAND B.R., TAYLOR M.S. Is free trade good for the environment? Am. Econ. Rev. 91 (4), 877, 2001.
  • 30. VAN DONKELAAR A., MARTIN R.V., BRAUER M., BOY B.L. Use of satellite observations for long-term exposure assessment of global concentrations of fine particulate matter. Environ. Health. Persp. 123 (2), 135, 2015.
  • 31. ANSELIN L., BERA A.K., FLORAX R. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Reg. Sci. Urban. Econ. 26 (1), 77, 1996.
  • 32. LI Q., SONG J., WANG E., HU H., ZHANG J., WANG Y. Economic growth and pollutant emissions in China: a spatial econometric analysis. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk. Assess. 28 (2), 429, 2014.
  • 33. ELHORST J.P. Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 2 (26), 244, 2003.
  • 34. PARK R., JACOB D., KUMAR N., YANTOSCA R. Regional visibility statistics in the United States: natural and transboundary pollution influences , and implications for the regional haze rule. Atmos. Environ. 40 (28), 5405, 2006.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.