Geographic and potential distribution of a poorly known South American bat, Histiotus macrotus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)

• Autorzy: Gimenez A.L. , Giannini N.P. , Schiaffini M.I. , Martin G.M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The vespertilionid bat Histiotus macrotus occurs in western Argentina, central regions of Chile and south of Argentina and Chile, and it may be also present in Bolivia and southern Peru. In this work, we analyzed the geographic and potential distribution of a poorly known species of South American bat. As a tool, environmental niche modeling has been used to study the distributional patterns of species and more recently, taxonomic boundaries of cryptic species. We used MaxEnt v 3.3.e, Worldclim database and a vegetation map, covering the entire area of species' occurrence. We registered 64 localities from Argentina (43), Chile (10), Peru (8) and Bolivia (5). We divided recording localities in different datasets according to several taxonomic schemes, and analyzed potential distribution models separately (i.e., all known records; Argentina-Chile; Peru) in five different models. Models including all known localities showed a disjoint distribution, with two basic core areas of high predictive values, one in NW Argentina and another in southern Chile and SW Argentina separated by the South American Arid Diagonal. A third area appeared in Atacama and Sechura deserts in the models that included Peruvian and Bolivian localities. Model including only Peruvian localities showed the opposite pattern, with high predictive values only in arid environments from southern Peru. We interpreted that localities correctly assigned to H. macrotus belong to a taxonomic complex distributed in two contrasting areas, each one inhabited by a different taxon: 1) Bolivia and NW Argentina and 2) S and central Chile and SW Argentina. Given the systematic uncertainty of Histiotus, these two forms might be sister species or may not share an immediate common ancestor within the genus. Further, we consider that the specimens from localities referred to H. macrotus from southern Peru should be revised. These alternatives await a comprehensive molecular phylogenetic analysis of Histiotus.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Chiropterologica
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 17
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.143-158,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Gimenez A.L.

• Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Evolucion y Biodiversidad (LIEB), Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Esquel, Chubut, Argentina
• Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET), Esquel, Chubut, Argentina

autor

Giannini N.P.

• Catedra de Biogeografia, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucuman, San Miguel de Tucuman, Argentina
• Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET), San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina

autor

Schiaffini M.I.

• Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Evolucion y Biodiversidad (LIEB), Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Esquel, Chubut, Argentina
• Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET), Esquel, Chubut, Argentina

autor

Martin G.M.

• Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Evolucion y Biodiversidad (LIEB), Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Esquel, Chubut, Argentina
• Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET), Esquel, Chubut, Argentina

Bibliografia

• 1. L. Acosta , and C. Venegas . 2006. Algunas consideraciones taxonómicas de Histiotus laephotis e H. macrotus, en Bolivia. Kempffiana, 2: 109–115. Google Scholar
• 2. L. F. Aguirre 2011. Lista oficial de los murciélagos de Bolivia (On line). Murciélagos de Bolivia. Available at http://www.murcielagosdebolivia.com. Google Scholar
• 3. F. Ahmadzadeh, M. Flecks , M. A. Carretero , O. Mozaffari , W. Böhme , D. Harris , S. Freitas , and D. Rödder . 2013. Cryptic speciation patterns in Iranian rock lizards uncovered by integrative taxonomy. PLoS ONE, 8: e80563. Google Scholar
• 4. S. Anderson 1997. Mammals of Bolivia, taxonomy and distribution. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 231: 1–656. Google Scholar
• 5. G. Aragón , and M. Aguirre . 2014. Distribución de murciélagos (Chiroptera) de la Región Tacna, Perú. Idesia, 32: 119–127. Google Scholar
• 6. R. M. Barquez 2006. Orden Chiroptera Blumenbach, 1779. Pp. 56–86, in Mamíferos de Argentina: sistemática y distribución ( R. M Barquez , M. M Díaz , and R. A. Ojeda , eds.). So ciedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Ma mí feros (SAREM), Tucumán, 356 pp. Google Scholar
• 7. R. M. Barquez , and M. M. Díaz . 2001. Bats of the Argentine Yungas: a sistematic and distributional analysis. Acta Zoologica Mexicana (N.S.), 82: 29–81. Google Scholar
• 8. R. M. Barquez , and M. Díaz . 2008. Histiotus macrotus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015.2. Available at www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 23 May 2015. Google Scholar
• 9. R. M. Barquez , and M. M. Díaz . 2009. Los murciélagos de Argen tina. Clave de identificación. Programa de Conservación de Murciélagos de Argentina (PCMA), Tucumán, 84 pp. Google Scholar
• 10. R. M. Barquez , and S. C. Lougheed . 1990. New distributional records of some Argentine bat species. Journal of Mammalogy, 71: 261–263. Google Scholar
• 11. R. M. Barquez , and R. A. Ojeda . 1992. The bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the Argentine Chaco, Annals of Carnegie Museum, 61: 239–261. Google Scholar
• 12. R. M. Barquez , N. P. Giannini , and M. A. Mares . 1993. Guide to the bats of Argentina. Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, Norman, viii + 119 pp. Google Scholar
• 13. R. M. Barquez , M. A. Mares , and J. K. Braun . 1999. The bats of Argentina. Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Teach University, Lubbock, 42: 1–275. Google Scholar
• 14. S. Bontemps , P. Defourney , E. Van Bogaert , O. Arino , V. Kalogirou , and J. Ramos Perez . 2011. GlobCover 2009 - products description and validation report. ESA and Université Catholique de Louvain, Fracasti, Italy, 53 pp. Google Scholar
• 15. J. C. Bracamonte 2010. Murciélagos de bosque montano del Parque Provincial Potrero de Yala, Jujuy, Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical, 17: 361–366. Google Scholar
• 16. A. D. Brown 2009. Las selvas pedemontanas de las Yungas: manejo sustentable y conservación de la biodiversidad de un ecosistema prioritario del noroeste argentino. Pp. 13–36, in Selva pedemontana de las Yungas. Historia natural, ecología y manejo de los ecosistemas en peligro ( A. D. Brown , P. G. Blenginger , T. Lomáscolo , and P. Garcíabes , eds.). Fundación ProYungas, Ediciones del Suptrópico, Tucumán, 487 pp. Google Scholar
• 17. E. D. Bruniard 1982. La diagonal árida argentina: un límite climático real. Revista Geográfica, 95: 5–20. Google Scholar
• 18. R. Burkart , N. O. Bárbaro , R. O. Sánchez , and D. A. Gómez . 1999. Eco-regiones de la Argentina. Administración de Parques Nacionales, Programa Desarrollo Institucional Ambiental, Buenos Aires, 42 pp. Google Scholar
• 19. A. Cabrera 1930. Breve sinopsis de los murciélagos argentinos. Revista del Centro de Estudiantes de Agronomía y Veterinaria, Universidad de Buenos Aires, 23: 418–442. Google Scholar
• 20. M. Canals , B. Grossi , J. Iriarte-Díaz , and C. Veloso . 2005. Biomechanical and ecological relationships of wing morphology of eight Chilean bats. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 78: 215–227. Google Scholar
• 21. Y. Cao , R. E. Dewalt , J. L. Robinson , T. Tweddale , L. Hinz , and M. Pessino . 2013. Using Maxent to model the historic distributions of stonefly species in Illinois streams: the effects of regularization and threshold selections. Ecological Modelling, 259: 30–39. Google Scholar
• 22. N. Chetan , K. K. Praveen , and G. K. Vasudeva . 2014. De lineating ecological boundaries of hanuman langur species complex in Peninsular India using MaxEnt modeling approach. PLoS ONE, 9: e91497. Google Scholar
• 23. M. M. Díaz , L. F. Aguirre , and R. M. Barquez . 2011. Clave de identificación de los murciélagos del cono sur de Sudamérica. Centro de Estudios en Biología Teórica y Aplicada, Cochabamba, Bolivia, 94 pp. Google Scholar
• 24. J. F. Eisenberg , and K. H. Redford . 1999. Mammals of the Neo tropics. Volume 3. The Central Neotropics: Ecuador, Perú, Bo livia, Brazil. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, x + 609 pp. Google Scholar
• 25. J. Elith , C. H. Graham , R. P. Anderson , M. Dudík , S. Ferrier , A. Guisan , R. J. Hijmans , F. Huettmann , J. R. Leathwick , A. Lehmann , et al. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29: 129–151. Google Scholar
• 26. R. Engler , A. Guisan , and L. Rechsteiner . 2004. An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41: 263–274. Google Scholar
• 27. R. Ferreyra 1983. Los tipos de vegetación de la costa peruana. Anales Jardín Botánico de Madrid, 40: 241–256. Google Scholar
• 28. J. Franklin 2009. Mapping species distributions, spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, New York, 336 pp. Google Scholar
• 29. J. L. Galaz , and J. Yañez . 2006. Los murciélagos de Chile: guía para su reconocimiento. Ediciones del Centro de Ecología Aplicada, Santiago, 80 pp. Google Scholar
• 30. A. L. Giménez 2010. Primeros registros de Histiotus macrotus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) en la Provincia del Chubut, Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical, 17: 375–380. Google Scholar
• 31. A. L. Giménez , N. P. Giannini , M. I. Schiaffini , and G. M. Martin . 2012. New records of the rare Histiotus magellani cus (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) and other bats from Cen tral Patagonia, Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical, 19: 213–224. Google Scholar
• 32. M. E. Godown , and A. T. Peterson . 2000. Preliminary distributional analysis of U.S. endangered bird species. Biodiversity and Conservation, 9: 1313–1322. Google Scholar
• 33. A. Guisan , O. Broennimann , R. Engler , M. Vust , N. G. Yoccoz , A. Lehmann , and N. E. Zimmermann . 2006. Using niche based models to improve the sampling of rare species. Conservation Biology, 20: 501–511. Google Scholar
• 34. E. E. Gutiérrez , R. A. Boria , and R. P. Anderson . 2014. Can biotic interactions cause allopatry? Niche models, competition, and distributions of South American mouse opossums. Ecography, 37: 741–753. Google Scholar
• 35. C. O. Handley Jr. , and A. L. Gardner . 2007. Genus Histiotus P. Gervais, 1856. Pp. 450–457, in Mammals of South America. Volume 1: marsupials, xenarthrans, shrews and bats ( A. L. Gardner , ed.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 651 pp. Google Scholar
• 36. R. J. Hijmans , S. E. Cameron , J. L. Parra , P. G. Jones , and A. Jarvis . 2005a. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25: 1965–1978. Google Scholar
• 37. R. J. Hijmans , L. Guarino , P. Mathur , P. Jarvis , E. Rojas , M. Cruz , and I. Barrantes . 2005b. DIVA-GIS version 7.5.0.0. Available at http://www.diva-gis.org. Google Scholar
• 38. S. R. Hoofer , and R. A. Van Den Bussche . 2003. Molecular phylogenetic of the chiropteran family Vespertilionidae. Acta Chiropterologica, 5: 1–63. Google Scholar
• 39. J. P. Jayat , and P. E. Ortiz . 2010. Mamíferos del pedemonte de Yungas de la alta cuenca del Río Bermejo en Argentina: una línea de base de diversidad. Mastozoología Neotropical, 17: 69–86. Google Scholar
• 40. K. E. Jones , A. Purvis , and J. L. Gittleman . 2003. Biological correlates of extinction risk in bats. The American Naturalist, 161: 601–614. Google Scholar
• 41. K. F. Koopman 1978. Zoogeography of Peruvian bats with emphasis on the role of the Andes. American Museum Novitates, 2651: 1–33. Google Scholar
• 42. K. F. Koopman 1982. Biogeography of the bats of South America. Pp. 273–302, in Mammalian biology in South America ( M. A. Mares and H. H. Genoways , eds.). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 539 pp. Google Scholar
• 43. J. B. Lack , and R. A. Van Den Bussche . 2010. Identifying the confounding factors in resolving phylogenetic re lation ships in Vespertilionidae. Journal of Mammalogy, 91: 1435–1448. Google Scholar
• 44. P. Laclau 1997. Los ecosistemas forestales y el hombre en el sur de Chile y Argentina. Fundación Vida Silvestre Buenos Aires, Argentina, Fondo Mundial para la Naturaleza. Boletín Técnico, 34: 1–147. Google Scholar
• 45. C. LÓPez-GonzÁLez 2005. Murciélagos del Paraguay. Biosfera, Publicaciones del Comité Español del Programa Hombre y Biosfera-Red IberoMaB, UNESCO, Madrid, iv + 300 pp. Google Scholar
• 46. C. López-González , S. J. Presley , R. D. Owen , M. R. Willig , and I. Gamarra De Fox . 1998. Noteworthy records of bats (Chiroptera) from Paraguay. Mastozoología Neotrop ical, 5: 41–45. Google Scholar
• 47. L. Malizia , S. Pacheco , C. Blundo , and A. D. Brown . 2012. Caracterización altitudinal, uso y conservación de las Yungas Subtropicales de Argentina. Ecosistemas, 21: 53–73. Google Scholar
• 48. M. V. Mancini , M. M. Paez , A. R. Prieto , S. Stutz , M. Tonello , and I. Vilanova . 2005. Mid-Holocene climatic variability reconstruction from pollen records (32°-52°S, Argentina). Quaternary International, 132: 47–59. Google Scholar
• 49. G. Mann Fischer 1978. Los pequeños mamíferos de Chile, marsupiales, quirópteros, edentados y roedores. Gayana (Zoología), 40: 1–342. Google Scholar
• 50. M. A. Mares , R. M. Barquez , and J. K. Braun . 1995. Distribution and ecology of some Argentine bats. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 64: 219–237. Google Scholar
• 51. M. A. Mares , R. M. Barquez , J. K. Braun , and R. A. Ojeda . 1996. Observations of the mammals of Tucuman Province, Argentina. I. Systematics, distribution, and ecology of the Didelphimorphia, Xenarthra, Chiroptera, Primates, Carnivora, Peryssodactyla, Artiodactyla, and Lagomorpha. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 65: 8–152. Google Scholar
• 52. N. A. Mason , P. O. Title , C. Cicero , K. J. Burns , and R. C. K. Bowie . 2014. Genetic variation among western populations of the horned lark (Eremophila alpestris) indicates recent colonization of the Channel Islands off southern California, mainland-bound dispersal, and postglacial range shifts. Ornithological Advances, 131: 162–174. Google Scholar
• 53. B. K. McNab 1983. Energetics, body size, and the limits to endothermy. Journal of Zoology (London), 199: 1–29. Google Scholar
• 54. J. M. D. Miranda , M. F. M. Azevedo-Barros , and F. C. Passos . 2007. First record of Histiotus laephotis Thomas (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) from Brazil. Revista Brasil eira de Zoologia, 24: 1188–1191. Google Scholar
• 55. R. Moratelli , C. S. De Andreazzi , J. A. De Oliveira , and J. L. P. Cordeiro . 2011. Current and potential distribution of Myotis simus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Mammalia, 75: 227–234. Google Scholar
• 56. J. A. Morello 1985. Grandes ecosistemas de Sudamérica. Textos para discusión. Fundación Bariloche/3, Bariloche, 116 pp. Google Scholar
• 57. R. Moreno , R. Zamora , J. R. Molina , A. Vasquez , and M. A. Herrera . 2011. Predictive modeling of microhabits for en demic birds in South Chilean temperate forests using max imum entropy (Maxent). Ecological Informatics, 6: 364–370. Google Scholar
• 58. J. J. Morrone 2006. Biogeographic areas and transition zones of Latin America and the Caribbean Islands based on Panbiogeographic and cladistic analyses of the entomofauna. Annual Review of Entomology, 51: 467–94. Google Scholar
• 59. J. J. Morrone 2009. Evolutionary biogeography: an integrative approach with case studies. Columbia University Press, New York, 301 pp. Google Scholar
• 60. M. Naumann 2006. Atlas del Gran Chaco Sudamericano. Sociedad Alemana de Cooperación Técnica (GTZ), ErreGé & Asoc., Buenos Aires, 96 pp. Google Scholar
• 61. U. M. Norberg , and J. M. V. Rayner . 1987. Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera): wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 316B: 335–427. Google Scholar
• 62. R. A. Ojeda , and S. Tabeni . 2009. The mammals of the Monte Desert revisited. Journal of Arid Environments, 73: 173–181. Google Scholar
• 63. R. A. Ojeda , P. G. Blendinger , and R. Brandl . 2000. Mammals in South American drylands: faunal similarity and trophic structure. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 9: 115–123. Google Scholar
• 64. R. A. Ojeda , V. Chillo , and G. B. Diaz Isenrath . 2012. Libro Rojo de Mamíferos Amenazados de Argentina. Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos (SAREM), Argentina, 257 pp. Google Scholar
• 65. C. C. Olrog 1959. Notas mastozoológicas. II. Sobre la colección del Instituto Miguel Lillo. Acta Zoológica Lilloana, 17: 403–419. Google Scholar
• 66. D. M. Olson , E. Dinerstein , E. D. Wikramanayake , N. D. Burgess , G. V. N. Powell , E. C. Underwood , J. A. D'Amico , I. Itoua , H. E. Strand , J. C. Morrison , et al. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. BioScience, 51: 933–938. Google Scholar
• 67. T. Ortiz-Martínez , V. Rico-Gray , and E. Martínez-Meyer . 2008. Predicted and verified distributions of Ateles geoffroyi and Alouatta palliata in Oaxaca, Mexico. Primates, 49: 186–194. Google Scholar
• 68. W. H. Osgood 1943. The mammals of Chile. Field Museum of Natural History, Zoological Series, 30: 1–268. Google Scholar
• 69. S. Pacheco , L. R. Malizia , and A. D. Brown . 2010. La provisión de agua como servicio ambiental de la Reserva de Biosfera de las Yungas, Argentina. Pp. 9–20, in Reservas de la Biosfera, su contribución a la provisión de servicios de los ecosistemas ( P. Araya Rosas and M. Closeneer-Godt , eds.). UNESCO, Chile, 224 pp. Google Scholar
• 70. M. Papes , and P. Gaubert . 2007. Modeling ecological niches from low numbers of occurrences: assessment of the conservation status of poorly known viverrids (Mammalia, Carnivora) across two continents. Diversity and Distributions, 13: 890–902. Google Scholar
• 71. J. M. Paruelo , A. Beltrán , E. Jobbágy , O. E. Sala , and R. A. Golluscio . 1998. The climate of Patagonia: general patterns and controls on biotic processes. Ecología Austral, 8: 85–101. Google Scholar
• 72. O. P. Pearson 1995. Annotated keys for identifying small mam mals living in or near Nahuel Huapi National Park or Lanin National Park, Southern Argentina. Mastozoología Neo tropical, 2: 99–148. Google Scholar
• 73. O. P. Pearson , and A. K. Pearson . 1989. Reproduction of bats in Southern Argentina. Pp. 549–566, in Advances in Neotropical Mammalogy ( K. H. Redford and J. F. Eisen Berg , eds.). University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 614 pp. Google Scholar
• 74. A. T. Peterson , M. Papes , and M. Eaton . 2007. Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent. Ecography, 30: 550–560. Google Scholar
• 75. S. J. Phillips , M. Dudík , and R. E. Schapire . 2004. A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. Pro ceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, Banff, Canada, 8 pp. Google Scholar
• 76. S. J. Phillips , R. P. Anderson , and R. E. Schapire . 2006. Max imum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190: 231–259. Google Scholar
• 77. E. Poeppig 1835. Reise in Chile, Peru, und auf dem Amazo nenstrome während der Jahre 1827–1832. F. Fleischer & J.C. Hinrichssche Buchhandlung, Leipzig, 1: xviii + 466 pp. Google Scholar
• 78. M. Ponce , K. Mehltreter , and E. R. De La Sota . 2002. Análisis biogeográfico de la diversidad pteridofítica en Argentina y Chile continental. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 75: 703–717. Google Scholar
• 79. C. J. Raxworthy , C. M. Ingram , N. Rabibisoa , and R. G. Pearson . 2007. Applications of ecological niche modeling for species delimitation: a review and empirical evaluation using day geckos (Phelsuma) from Madagascar. Systematic Biology, 56: 907–923. Google Scholar
• 80. E. Sanabria , L. Quiroga , J. Villavicencio , and G. Cánovas . 2004. Lista comentada y estado de conservación de algunos quirópteros de la provincia de San Juan, Argentina. Nótulas Faunísticas, 17: 1–4. Google Scholar
• 81. M. L Sandoval , M. S. Sánchez , and R. M. Barquez . 2010. Mammalia, Chiroptera Blumenbach, 1779. New locality records, filling gaps, and geographic distribution maps from Northern Argentina. CheckList, 6: 64–7. Google Scholar
• 82. T. Särkinen , P. Gonzáles , S. Knapp . 2013. Distribution models and species discovery: the story of a new Solanum species from the Peruvian Andes. PhytoKeys, 31: 1–20. Google Scholar
• 83. N. B. Simmons 2005. Order Chiroptera. Pp. 312–529, in Mam mals species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic references, 3rd edition ( D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder , eds.). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 2142 pp. Google Scholar
• 84. D. A. Sotomayor Melo , and P. Jiménez Milón . 2008. Condiciones meteorológicas y dinámica vegetal del ecosistema costero Lomas de Atiquipa (Caravelí-Arequipa) en el Sur del Chile. Ecología Aplicada, 7: 1–8. Google Scholar
• 85. O. Thomas 1916. Notes on the bats of the genus Histiotus. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 8 (17): 272–276. Google Scholar
• 86. J. S. Thorn , V. Nijman , D. Smith , and A. I. Nekaris . 2009. Ecological niche modelling as a technique for assessing threats and setting conservation priorities for Asian slow lorises (Primates: Nycticebus). Diversity and Distributions, 15: 289–298. Google Scholar
• 87. M. D. Tuttle 1970. Distribution and zoogeography of peruvian bats, with comments on natural history. The University of Kansas, Science Bulletin, 49: 46–86. Google Scholar
• 88. P. Valladares Faúndez 2012. Mamíferos terrestres de la Región de Atacama, Chile. Comentarios sobre su distribución y estado de conservación. Gayana, 76: 22–37. Google Scholar
• 89. J. N. Urbina-Cardona , and O. Flores-Villela . 2010. Ecological-niche modeling and prioritization of conservationarea networks for Mexican herpetofauna. Conservation Biol ogy, 24: 1031–1041. Google Scholar
• 90. D. L. Warren , and S. N. Seifert . 2011. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecological Applications, 21: 335–342. Google Scholar
• 91. H. Zeballos , L. Villegas , R. Gutiérrez , K. Caballero , and P. Jiménez . 2000. Vertebrados de las Lomas de Atiquipa y Mejía, sur del Perú. Revista de Ecología Latinoamericana, 7: 11–18. Google Scholar
• 92. H. Zeballos , V. Pacheco , and L. Baraybar . 2001. Diversidad y conservación de los mamíferos de Arequipa, Perú. Revista Peruana de Biología, 8: 94–104. Google Scholar

Identyfikatory

DOI

0.3161/15081109ACC2015.17.1.012