PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2019 | 78 | 2 |
Tytuł artykułu

Prevalence of second canal in the mesiobuccal root of permanent maxillary molars from a Turkish subpopulation: a cone-beam computed tomography study

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Background: Permanent maxillary molar teeth have the most complex root and canal systems. This study aimed to determine the frequency and the localisation of secondary mesiobuccal canal (MB2) in the mesiobuccal roots of permanent maxillary molars in a Turkish subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and compare them by different age groups and gender. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 800 maxillary molar teeth in 200 subjects were investigated. The distances between canals were calculated from the centre point of the MB2 canal (PMB2) to the centre point of the mesiobuccal canal (PMB1) and the centre point of the palatal canal (PP). Results: The incidence of MB2 canals was found to be 33.5% (23.2% in females, 43.6% in males) in 200 subjects. A significant difference was found between age groups and genders in terms of the frequency of MB2 (p < 0.05). The distances between PMB1- -PMB2 were 2.95 ± 0.58 mm, 3.08 ± 0.67 mm for 1MM and 2MM, respectively. For 1MM and 2MM, the averages of PMB2-PP distances were 5.81 ± 1.09 mm and 5.55 ± 1.09 mm, respectively. The contralateral formation of the MB2 canals was 90.5% (16, 26) in the first molars and 93.9% in the second molars (17, 27). The contingency rate in the first quadrant was 86.0% (16, 17) and 83.5% (26, 27) in the second quadrant. Conclusions: It is important for the clinician to know the high probability of finding the MB2 canal in the maxillary first and second molars. CBCT imaging can facilitate the clinician to detect complex and variable root canal anatomy. (Folia Morphol 2019; 78, 2: 351–358)
Słowa kluczowe
EN
Wydawca
-
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
78
Numer
2
Opis fizyczny
p.351–358,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
autor
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
Bibliografia
  • 1. Abarca J, Gómez B, Zaror C, et al. Assessment of mesial root morphology and frequency of MB2 canals in maxillary molars using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Morphol. 2015; 33(4): 1333–1337, doi: 10.4067/s0717-95022015000400023.
  • 2. Abuabara A, Baratto-Filho F, Aguiar Anele J, et al. Efficacy of clinical and radiological methods to identify second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013; 71(1): 205–209, doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.654262, indexed in Pubmed: 22320229.
  • 3. Alaçam T, Tinaz AC, Genç O, et al. Second mesiobuccal canal detection in maxillary first molars using microscopy and ultrasonics. Aust Endod J. 2008; 34(3): 106–109, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00090.x, indexed in Pubmed: 19032644.
  • 4. Alexander FN, Dirk H, Corne PT, et al. The prevalence of second canals in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars: A cone beam computed tomography study. Aust Endod J. 2018 [Epub ahead of print], doi: 10.1111/aej.12263, indexed in Pubmed: 29573065.
  • 5. Barton DJ, Clark SJ, Eleazer PD, et al. Tuned-aperture computed tomography versus parallax analog and digital radiographic images in detecting second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 96(2): 223–228, doi: 10.1016/S1079210403000611, indexed in Pubmed: 12931097.
  • 6. Benson BW, Prihoda TJ, Glass BJ. Variations in adult cortical bone mass as measured by a panoramic mandibular index. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991; 71(3): 349–356, indexed in Pubmed: 2011361.
  • 7. Betancourt P, Navarro P, Cantín M, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography study of prevalence and location of MB2 canal in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary second molar. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(6): 9128–9134, indexed in Pubmed: 26309568.
  • 8. Betancourt P, Navarro P, Muñoz G, et al. Prevalence and location of the secondary mesiobuccal canal in 1,100 maxillary molars using cone beam computed tomography. BMC Med Imaging. 2016; 16(1): 66, doi: 10.1186/s12880-016-0168-2, indexed in Pubmed: 27908285.
  • 9. Blattner TC, George N, Lee CC, et al. Efficacy of conebeam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: a pilot study. J Endod. 2010; 36(5): 867–870, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.023, indexed in Pubmed: 20416435.
  • 10. Christie WH, Thompson GK. The importance of endodontic access in locating maxillary and mandibular molar canals. J Can Dent Assoc. 1994; 60(6): 527–32, 535, indexed in Pubmed: 8032994.
  • 11. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, et al. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod. 2007; 33(9): 1121–1132, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.011, indexed in Pubmed: 17931947.
  • 12. Degerness RA, Bowles WR. Dimension, anatomy and morphology of the mesiobuccal root canal system in maxillary molars. J Endod. 2010; 36(6): 985–989, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.017, indexed in Pubmed: 20478451.
  • 13. Del Fabbro M, Taschieri S, Testori T, et al. Surgical versus non-surgical endodontic re-treatment for periradicular lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007(3): CD005511, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005511.pub2, indexed in Pubmed: 17636803.
  • 14. Eder A, Kantor M, Nell A, et al. Root canal system in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar: an in vitro comparison study of computed tomography and histology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006; 35(3): 175–177, doi: 10.1259/dmfr/73909470, indexed in Pubmed: 16618851.
  • 15. Fogel HM, Peikoff MD, Christie WH. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar: a clinical study. J Endod. 1994; 20(3): 135–137, doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80059-2, indexed in Pubmed: 7996086.
  • 16. Ghobashy AM, Nagy MM, Bayoumi AA. Evaluation of root and canal morphology of maxillary permanent molars in an egyptian population by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2017; 43(7): 1089–1092, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.02.014, indexed in Pubmed: 28476465.
  • 17. Gilles J, Reader A. An SEM investigation of the mesiolingual canal in human maxillary first and second molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990; 70(5): 638–643, indexed in Pubmed: 2234885.
  • 18. Görduysus MO, Görduysus M, Friedman S. Operating microscope improves negotiation of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars. J Endod. 2001; 27(11): 683–686, indexed in Pubmed: 11716081.
  • 19. Guo J, Vahidnia A, Sedghizadeh P, et al. Evaluation of root and canal morphology of maxillary permanent first molars in a North American population by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2014; 40(5): 635–639, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.002, indexed in Pubmed: 24767556.
  • 20. Hartwell G, Bellizzi R. Clinical investigation of in vivo endodontically treated mandibular and maxillary molars. J Endod. 1982; 8(12): 555–557, doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80016-2, indexed in Pubmed: 6962275.
  • 21. Henry BM. The fourth canal: its incidence in maxillary first molars. J Can Dent Assoc. 1993; 59(12): 995–996, indexed in Pubmed: 8275393.
  • 22. Ibarrola JL, Knowles KI, Ludlow MO, et al. Factors affecting the negotiability of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars. J Endod. 1997; 23(4): 236–238, doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80054-4, indexed in Pubmed: 9594773.
  • 23. Ilgüy D, Ilgüy M, Fisekcioglu E, et al. Detection of jaw and root fractures using cone beam computed tomography: a case report. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009; 38(3): 169–173, doi: 10.1259/dmfr/54020205, indexed in Pubmed: 19225088.
  • 24. Imura N, Hata GI, Toda T, et al. Two canals in mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars. Int Endod J. 1998; 31(6): 410–414, indexed in Pubmed: 15551608.
  • 25. Parker J, Mol A, Rivera EM, et al. CBCT uses in clinical endodontics: the effect of CBCT on the ability to locate MB2 canals in maxillary molars. Int Endod J. 2017; 50(12): 1109–1115, doi: 10.1111/iej.12736, indexed in Pubmed: 27977863.
  • 26. Karaman GT, Onay EO, Ungor M, et al. Evaluating the potential key factors in assessing the morphology of mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first and second molars. Aust Endod J. 2011; 37(3): 134–140, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00240.x, indexed in Pubmed: 22117721.
  • 27. Kim Y, Chang SW, Lee JK, et al. A micro-computed tomography study of canal configuration of multiple-canalled mesiobuccal root of maxillary first molar. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17(6): 1541–1546, doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0852-8, indexed in Pubmed: 23053704.
  • 28. Kim Y, Lee SJ, Woo J. Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion. J Endod. 2012; 38(8): 1063–1068, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.025, indexed in Pubmed: 22794206.
  • 29. Kontakiotis EG, Tzanetakis GN. Four canals in the mesial root of a mandibular first molar. A case report under the operating microscope. Aust Endod J. 2007; 33(2): 84–88, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00068.x, indexed in Pubmed: 17697250.
  • 30. Kottoor J, Velmurugan N, Sudha R, et al. Maxillary first molar with seven root canals diagnosed with cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a case report. J Endod. 2010; 36(5): 915–921, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.015, indexed in Pubmed: 20416446.
  • 31. Kulild JC, Peters DD. Incidence and configuration of canal systems in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first and second molars. J Endod. 1990; 16(7): 311–317, indexed in Pubmed: 2081944.
  • 32. La SH, Jung DH, Kim EC, et al. Identification of independent middle mesial canal in mandibular first molar using cone-beam computed tomography imaging. J Endod. 2010; 36(3): 542–545, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.008, indexed in Pubmed: 20171380.
  • 33. Lee JH, Kim KD, Lee JK, et al. Mesiobuccal root canal anatomy of Korean maxillary first and second molars by cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 111(6): 785–791, doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.11.026, indexed in Pubmed: 21439860.
  • 34. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, et al. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 103(1): 114–119, doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.001, indexed in Pubmed: 17178504.
  • 35. Nattress BR, Martin DM. Predictability of radiographic diagnosis of variations in root canal anatomy in mandibular incisor and premolar teeth. Int Endod J. 1991; 24(2): 58–62, indexed in Pubmed: 1917090.
  • 36. Neaverth EJ, Kotler LM, Kaltenbach RF. Clinical investigation (in vivo) of endodontically treated maxillary first molars. J Endod. 1987; 13(10): 506–512, doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80018-3, indexed in Pubmed: 3482228.
  • 37. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars in an Indian population. J Endod. 2010; 36(10): 1622–1627, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.07.006, indexed in Pubmed: 20850665.
  • 38. Parker J, Mol A, Rivera EM, et al. CBCT uses in clinical endodontics: the effect of CBCT on the ability to locate MB2 canals in maxillary molars. Int Endod J. 2017; 50(12): 1109–1115, doi: 10.1111/iej.12736, indexed in Pubmed: 27977863.
  • 39. Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, et al. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. Int Endod J. 2009; 42(6): 447–462, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01530.x, indexed in Pubmed: 19298577.
  • 40. Pattanshetti N, Gaidhane M, Al Kandari AM. Root and canal morphology of the mesiobuccal and distal roots of permanent first molars in a Kuwait population--a clinical study. Int Endod J. 2008; 41(9): 755–762, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01427.x, indexed in Pubmed: 18637850.
  • 41. Peeters HH, Suardita K, Setijanto D. Prevalence of a second canal in the mesiobuccal root of permanent maxillary first molars from an Indonesian population. J Oral Sci. 2011; 53(4): 489–494, indexed in Pubmed: 22167035.
  • 42. Ratanajirasut R, Panichuttra A, Panmekiate S. A cone-beam computed tomographic study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second permanent molars in a thai population. J Endod. 2018; 44(1): 56–61, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.020, indexed in Pubmed: 29061352.
  • 43. Reis AG, Grazziotin-Soares R, Barletta FB, et al. Second canal in mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars is correlated with root third and patient age: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2013; 39(5): 588–592, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.003, indexed in Pubmed: 23611373.
  • 44. Schwarze T, Baethge C, Stecher T, et al. Identification of second canals in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first and second molars using magnifying loupes or an operating microscope. Aust Endod J. 2002; 28(2): 57–60, indexed in Pubmed: 12360670.
  • 45. Silva EJ, Nejaim Y, Silva AIV, et al. Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary molars in a Brazilian population using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging: an in vivo study. J Endod. 2014; 40(2): 173–176, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.002, indexed in Pubmed: 24461399.
  • 46. Stropko JJ. Canal morphology of maxillary molars: clinical observations of canal configurations. J Endod. 1999; 25(6): 446–450, doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80276-3, indexed in Pubmed: 10530248.
  • 47. Studebaker B, Hollender L, Mancl L, et al. The Incidence of Second Mesiobuccal Canals Located in Maxillary Molars with the Aid of Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J Endod. 2018; 44(4): 565–570, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.026, indexed in Pubmed: 29153734.
  • 48. Thomas RP, Moule AJ, Bryant R. Root canal morphology of maxillary permanent first molar teeth at various ages. Int Endod J. 1993; 26(5): 257–267, indexed in Pubmed: 8300257.
  • 49. Tian XM, Yang XW, Qian L, et al. Analysis of the root and canal morphologies in maxillary first and second molars in a chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2016; 42(5): 696–701, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.017, indexed in Pubmed: 26994598.
  • 50. Vasundhara V, Lashkari KP. An study to find the incidence of mesiobuccal 2 canal in permanent maxillary first molars using three different methods. J Conserv Dent. 2017; 20(3): 190–193, doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.218308, indexed in Pubmed: 29279624.
  • 51. Verma P, Love RM. A Micro CT study of the mesiobuccal root canal morphology of the maxillary first molar tooth. Int Endod J. 2011; 44(3): 210–217, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01800.x, indexed in Pubmed: 20880136.
  • 52. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984; 58(5): 589–599, indexed in Pubmed: 6595621.
  • 53. Weine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, et al. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. 1969. J Endod. 2012; 38(10): 1305–1308, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.08.005, indexed in Pubmed: 22980167.
  • 54. Weissman J, Johnson JD, Anderson M, et al. Association between the presence of apical periodontitis and clinical symptoms in endodontic patients using cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiographs. J Endod. 2015; 41(11): 1824–1829, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.004, indexed in Pubmed: 26349581.
  • 55. Weng XL, Yu SB, Zhao SL, et al. Root canal morphology of permanent maxillary teeth in the Han nationality in Chinese Guanzhong area: a new modified root canal staining technique. J Endod. 2009; 35(5): 651–656, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.02.010, indexed in Pubmed: 19410077.
  • 56. Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X, et al. Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation. Int Endod J. 2011; 44(2): 162–169, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01826.x, indexed in Pubmed: 21091495.
  • 57. Zhang Y, Xu H, Wang D, et al. Assessment of the second mesiobuccal root canal in maxillary first molars: a conebeam computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2017; 43(12): 1990–1996, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.06.021, indexed in Pubmed: 29032819.
  • 58. Zheng Qh, Wang Y, Zhou Xd, et al. A cone-beam computed tomography study of maxillary first permanent molar root and canal morphology in a Chinese population. J Endod. 2010; 36(9): 1480–1484, doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.018, indexed in Pubmed: 20728713.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-230d678c-4926-458e-92bc-f26195ccbc32
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.