Selected cattle hoof diseases: characteristics, consequences, control and prevention

• Autorzy: Micinski B. , Micinski J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Limb diseases are the most common ones next to the mammary gland diseases (mastitis) and those connected to reproduction (metritis, endometritis). Appearing lameness significantly decrease welfare and have an impact on the culling of cows in herds and what is more important lower milk performance and decrease its composition as well as its technological usefulness in processing. Prevention is based on the timely hoof correction and hoof baths in the 10% copper sulfate water solution or 5% formalin. The assessment of the level of lameness, which is performed on a moving cow (locomotion scoring) with the use of a 5-point Zinpro (2014) scale, is essential to the fast diagnosis. Performing timely hoof correction, should be performed twicea year in case of the all year alcove keeping system. It is advised to prefer the free-standing housing system, which considerably enhances welfare of cows

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Natural Sciences
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 34
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.297-315,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Micinski B.

• Chair of Clinical Physiology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Micinski J.

• Chair of Cattle Breeding and Milk Evaluation, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland

Bibliografia

• ADAMS A., LOMBARD J., FOSSLER C., ROMÁN-MUÑIZ I., KOPRAL C. 2016. Associations between housing and management practices and the prevalence of lameness, hock lesions, and thin cows on US dairy operations. J. Dairy Sci., 100: 2119–2136.
• ALAWNEH J.I., STEVENSON M.A., WILLIAMSON N.B., LOPEZ-VILLALOBOS N., OTLEY T. 2014. The effects of liveweight loss and milk production on the risk of lameness in a seasonally calving pasture fed dairy herd in New Zealand. Prev. Vet. Med., 113: 72–79.
• AL-QUDAH K.M., ISMAIL Z.B. 2012. The relationship between serum biotic and oxidant/antioxi-dant activities in bovine lameness. Res. Vet. Med., 92: 138–141.
• ARCHER S.C., GREEN M.J., HUXLEY J.N. 2010. Association between milk yield and serial locomo-tion score assessments in UK dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 93: 4045–4053.
• BAGGOT D.G., RUSSELL A.M. 1981. Lameness in cattle.Brit. Vet. J., 137(1): 113–132.
• BARAŃSKI W., JANOWSKI T., ZDUŃCZYK S. 2008. Incidence of reproduction disorders, clinical mas-titis and lameness in cross-breed HF x BW cows and Jersey cows maintained in the same con-ditions. Med. Weter., 64: 1201–1204.
• BARKEMA H., WESTRIK J., VAN KEULEN K., SCHUKKEN Y., BRAND A. 1994. The effects of lameness on reproductive performance, milk production and culling in Dutch dairy farms. Prev. Vet. Med., 20: 249–259.
• BERGSTEN C. 1999. Identifying diseases of the bovine foot and their causes. Proc. Hoof. Health Conf. Modesto., CA, pp. 28–33.
• BERGSTEN C., GREENOUGH P., GAY J., SEYMOUR W., GAY C. 2003. Effects of biotin supplementa-tion on performance and claw lesions on a commercial dairy farm. J. Dairy Sci., 86: 3953–3962.
• BIELFELDT J.C., BADERTSCHER R., TÖLLE K.H., KRIETER J. 2005. Risk factors influencing lame-ness and claw disorders in dairy cows. Liv. Prod. Sci., 95: 265–271.
• BRAMLEY E., LEAN I.J., FULKERSON W.J., STEVENSON M.A., RABIEE A.R., COSTA N.D. 2008. The definition of acidosis in dairy herds predominantly fed on pasture and concentrates. J. Dairy Sci., 91: 308–321.
• CHARFEDDINE N. AND PÉREZ-CABAL M.A. 2017. Effect of claw disorders on milk production, fertility, and longevity, and their economic impact in Spanish Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci., 100: 653–665.
• COOK N.B. 2003. Prevalence of lameness among dairy cattle in Wisconsin as a function of housing type and stall surface. J. Americ. Vet. Med. Assoc., 223: 1324–1328.
• CRUZE C., DRIEMEIER D., CERVA C., CORBELLINI L.C. 2001. Bovine digital dermatitis in southern Brazil. Vet. Rec., 148(18): 576–577.
• DE FRAIN J.M., SOCHA M.T., TOMLINSON D.J. 2013. Analysis of foot health records from 17 confine-ments dairies. J. Dairy Sci., 96: 7329–7339.
• ELLIOTT M.K, ALT D.P. 2009. Bovine immune response to papillomatous digital dermatitis (PDD) – associated spirochetes is skewed in isolate reactivity and subclass elicitation. Vet. Imm. Im-munopat., 130(3–4): 256–261.
• EVANS N.J., BROWN J.M., DEMIRKAN I., MURRAY R.D., BIRTLES R.J., HART C.A., CARTER S.D. 2009. Treponema pedis sp. Nov., a spirochaete isolated from bovine digital dermatitis lesions.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 59(5): 987–991.
• FJELDAAS T., SOGSTADÅ., ØSTERÅS O. 2006. Claw trimming routines in relation toclaw lesions, claw shape and lameness in Norwegian dairy herds housed in tie stalls and free stalls. Prev. Vet. Med., 73: 255–271.
• FLEISCHER P.M., METZNER M., BAYERBACH M. 2001. The relationship between milk yield and the incidence of some diseases in dairy cows.J. Dairy Sci., 84: 2025–2028.
• FLIS E. 2015. Problem kulawizny u krów rasy holsztyńsko-fryzyjskiej. In: Nauka w służbie przyrodzie – wybrane zagadnienia. Eds. M. Olszówka, K. Maciąg. Wyd. Fundacja TYGIEL, Lublin, pp. 83–97.
• GLEESON D.E., O’BRIEN B., BOYLE L., EARLY B. 2007. Effect of milking frequency and nutritional level on aspects of the health and welfare of dairy cows. Anim., 1(1): 125–132.
• GOFF J.P., HORST R.L. 1997. Physiological change at parturition and their relationship to meta-bolic disorders. J. Dairy Sci., 80: 1260–1268.
• GREEN L.E., HEDGES V.J., SCHUKKEN Y.H., BLOWEY R.W., PACKINGTON A.J. 2002. The impactof clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 85(9): 2250–2256.
• GREEN L.E., HUXLEY J.N., BANKS C., GREEN M.J. 2014. Temporal associations between low body condition, lameness and milk yield in a UK dairy herd. Prevent. Vet. Med., 113: 63–71.
• GREGORY N.G. 2004. Swelling of cattle heel horn by urine. A. Vet. J., 82(3): 161–163.
• HASKELL M.J., RENNIE L.J., BOWELL V.A., BELL M.J., LAWRENCE A.B. 2006. Housing system, milk production, and zero-grazing effects on lameness and leg injury in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 89: 4259–4266.
• HERLIN A.H., DREVEMO S. 1997. Investigating locomotion of dairy cows by use of high speed cinematography. Eq. Vet. J., 23(S): 106–109.
• HERNANDEZ J., SHEARER J.K., WEBB D.W. 2001. Effect of lameness on the calving – to – conception interval in dairy cows. J. Amer. Vet. Med. A., 218(10): 1611–1614.
• HERNANDEZ J.A., GARBARINO E.J., SHEARER J.K., RISCO C.A., THATCHER W.W. 2005. Comparison of milk yield in dairy cows with different degrees of lameness. J. Amer. Vet. Med. A., 227: 1292–1296.
• HERNANDEZ-MENDO O., KEYSERLINGK M.A.G., VEIRA D.M., WEARY M. 2007. Effects of pasture on lameness in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 90: 1209–1214.
• HOLZHAUER M., HARDENBERG C., BARTELS C.J., FRANKENA K. 2006. Herd – and cow – level prev-alence of digital dermatitis in the Netherlands and associated risk factors. J. Dairy Sci., 89(2): 580–588.
• HUXLEY J. 2013. Impact of lameness and claw lesions in cows on health and production. Livest. Sci., 156: 64–70.
• KILIÇ N., CEYLAN A., SERIN İ., GÖKBULUT C. 2007. Possible interaction between lameness, fertility, some minerals, and vitamin E in dairy cows. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy, 51: 425–429.
• KOECK A., LOKER S., MIGLIOR F., KELTON D.F., JAMROZIK J., SCHANKELA F.S. 2014. Genetic rela-tionship of clinical mastitis, cystic ovaries, and lameness with milk yield and somatic cell score in first lactation Canadian Holsteins.J. Dairy Sci., 97: 5806–5813.
• KOŁACZ R., BODAK E. 1999. Dobrostan zwierząt i kryteria jego oceny. Med. Weter., 3: 147–154.
• KOŁACZ R., TRACZ E. 2008. Systemy utrzymania krów mlecznych i ich dobrostan. Byd., 10: 12–16.
• KÖNIG S., SHARIFI A.R., WENTROT H., LANDMANN D., EISE M., SIMIANER H. 2005. Genetic parameters of claw and foot disorders estimated with logistic models. J. Dairy Sci., 88: 3316–3325.
• KUCZAJ M., ZIELAK A., BLICHARSKI P. 2008. Reasons for the culling of Polish Holstein Friesian cows in a high yield herd. Med. Weter., 64: 1205–1208.
• LAVEN R., HUNT H. 2002. Evaluation of copper sulphate, formalin and peracetic acid in footbaths for the treatment of digital dermatitis in cattle. Vet. Rec., 151: 144–146.
• LEACH K.A., WHAY H.R., MAGGS C.M., BARKER Z.E., PAUL E.S., BELL A.K., MAIN D.C. 2010. Work-ing towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 1. Understandingbarriers to lameness control on dairy farms.Res. Vet. Sci., 89: 311–317.
• LEAN I.J., WESTWOOD C.T., GOLDER H.M., VERMUNT J.J. 2013. Impact of nutrition on lameness and claw health in cattle. Liv. Sci., 156: 71–87.
• MANSKE T. 2002. Hoof lesions and lameness in swedish dairy cattle. Acta Univ. Agri. Sueciae. Vet., 135: 1401–6257. MANSKE T., HULTGREN J., BERGSTEN C. 2002. Prevalence and interrelationships of hoof lesions and lameness in Swedish dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med., 54: 247–263.
• MELENDEZ P., BARTOLOME J., ARCHBALD L.F., DONOVAN A. 2003. The association between lame-ness, ovarian cysts and fertility in lactating dairy cows.Ther., 59: 927–937.
• MICIŃSKI J., KOWALSKI I., ZWIERZCHOWSKI G., SZAREK J., PIEROŻYŃSKI J., ZABŁOCKA E. 2013. Characteristics of cow’s milk proteins including allergenic properties and methods for its re-duction.Pol. Ann. Med., 20(1): 69–76.
• MICIŃSKI J., ZWIERZCHOWSKI G., KOWALSKI I. M., SZAREK J., PIEROŻYŃSKI B., RAISTENSKIS J. 2012. The effect of bovine milk fat on human health. Pol. Ann. Med., 19(2): 170–175.
• MILL J., WARD W. 1994. Lameness in dairy cows and farmers’ knowledge, training and awareness.Vet. Rec., 134: 162–164.
• MORRIS M.J., KANEKO K., WALKER S.L., JONES D.N., ROUTLY J.E., SMITH R.F., DOBSON H. 2011. Influence of lameness on follicular growth, ovulation, reproductive hormone concentrations and estrus behavior in dairy cows. Ther., 76: 658–668.
• NAVARRO G., GREEN L.E., TADICH N. 2013. Effect of lameness and lesion specific causes of lame-ness on time budgets of dairy cows at pasture and when housed. Vet. J., 197: 788–793.
• NAWROCKI L., WINNICKI S., GŁOWICKA R., MYCZKO A., TOMALA A., KOWALSKI K., DEMBOWSKI K. 2004. An example of a technological solution that ensures the welfare of cows. Zesz. Nauk. Zoot. L II AR Wrocław, 505: 179–186.
• NOCEK J.E. 1997. Bovine acidosis: Implications on laminitis. J. Dairy Sci., 80: 1005–1028.
• OLECHNOWICZ J., JAŚKOWSKI J.M. 2010. Impact of clinical lameness, calving season, parity, and month of lactation on milk, fat, protein, and lactose yields during early lactation of dairy cows. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy, 54: 605–610.
• ONYIRO O.M., ANDREWS L.J., BROTHERSTONE S. 2008. Genetic parameters for digital dermatitis and correlations with locomotion, production, fertility traits, and longevity in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 91: 4037–4046.
• PRITCHARD T., COFFEY M., MRODE R., WALL E. 2013. Genetic parameters forproduction, health, fertility and longevity traits in dairy cows. Animal, 7: 34–46.
• READER J.D., GREEN M.J., KALER J., MASON S.A., GREEN L.E. 2011. Effect of mobility score on milk yield and activity in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 94: 5045–5052.
• SEYREK K., YAYLAK E., AKŞIT H. 2008. Serum sialic acid, malondialdehyde, retinol, zinc, and cooper concentrations in dairy cows with lameness. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy, 52: 281–284.
• SOGSTAD A.M., FJELDAAS T., OSTERAS O. 2005. Lameness and claw lesions of the Norwegian red dairy cattle housed in free stalls in relation to environment, parity and stage of lactation. Acta Vet. Scan., 46(4): 203–217.
• SOMERS J.G.C.J., FRANKENA K., NOORDHUIZEN-STASSEN E.N., METZ J.H.M. 2003. Prevalence of claw disorders in Dutch dairy cows exposed to several floor systems. J. Dairy Sci., 86: 2082–2093.
• SWALVE H.H., PIJL R., BETHGE M., ROSNER F., WENSCH DORENDORF M. 2005. Analysis of genetic and environmental effects on claw disorders diagnosed at hoof trimming. 56th annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production 05–08.06. Uppsala, Sweden, Book of ab-stracts, p. 323.
• TELEZHENKO E., BERGSTEN CH. 2004. Influence of floor type on the locomotion of dairy cows.A. Anim. Beh. Sci., 93(3): 183–197.
• TOMLINSON D.J., MÜLLING C.H., FAKLER T.M. 2004. Invited review: formation of keratins in the bovine claw: roles of hormones, minerals, and vitamins in functional claw integrity. J. Dairy Sci., 87: 797–809.
• VAN HERTEM T., MALTZ E., ANTLER A., ROMANINI C.E.B., VIAZZI S., BAHR C., SCHLAGETER-TELLO A.,LOKHORST C., BERCKMANS D., HALACHMI I. 2013. Lameness detection based on multivariate continuous sensing of milk yield, rumination, and neck activity. J. Dairy Sci., 96: 4286–4298.
• VAN NUFFEL A., ZWERTVAEGHER I., PLUYM L., VAN WEYENBERG S., THORUP V.M., PASTELL M., SONCK B., SAEYS W. 2015. Lameness detection in dairy cows: Part 1.How to distinguish between non-lame and lame cows based on differences inlocomotion or behavior. Animal, 5: 838–860.
• VERMUNT J.J., HILL F.I. 2004. Papillomatous digital dermatitis in a Holstein-Friesian bull. New. Zeal. Vet. J., 52(2): 99–101.
• WALKER S.L., SMITH R.F., JONES D.N., ROUTLY J.E., DOBSON H. 2008. Chronic stress, hormone profiles and estrus intensity in dairy cattle. Hormon. Beh., 53: 493–501.
• WEBB N.G., CLARK M. 1981. Livestock foot – floor interactions measured by force and pressure plate. Farm Building Progress, 66: 23–36.
• WHAY H.R. 2002. Locomotion scoring and lameness detection in dairy cattle. In Practice, 24: 444–449.
• WINKLER B., MARGERISON J.K. 2012. Mechanical properties of the bovine claw horn during lacta-tion. J. Dairy Sci., 95: 1714–1728.
• WINNICKI S., NAWROCKI L., WĘGLARZY K. 2006. Maintenance systems and the primiparous purity and hygienic quality of milk. Inż. Rol., 4(79): 341–346
• ZINPRO 2014. Cattle lameness claw lesions: identify, prevent, control. Zinpro Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN.