Reliability of Functional Movement Screen and sexual differentiation in FMS scores and the cut-off point among amateur athletes

• Autorzy: Domaradzki J. , Kozlenia D.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Introduction. Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a tool used in injury prediction based on the quality of movement patterns. Crucial is to determine the cut-off point which indicates the injury risk increment. Most of the researches regard professional athletes. Aim of Study. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of the FMS test, and sexual differentiation in the value of the FMS total score test and subtests. Furthermore, the study aimed to evaluate the values of injury risk cut-off point in the FMS test in young male and female individuals from the moderately-active population. Material and Methods. The study group consisted of 89 physically active individuals not involved in high-performance sport: 42 males aged 20.5 ± 1.10 years, and 47 females aged 20.0 ± 0.68 years. FMS, a questionnaire concerning the previous injury history of 12 months preceding the study were used. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the reliability of the FMS test and a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for FMS cut-off scores was calculated. Results. The FMS test showed excellent agreement between two screenings. There were some differences in the quality of movement patterns between men and women in subtests. The values of injury risk cut-off scores were different between sexes, 14 points for males and 17 points for females. Conclusions. The FMS test is a highly reliable research tool. For the average population of physically active young male and female amateur athletes, the cut-off score values in the FMS test should be evaluated separately between sexes to determine injury risks.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Trends in Sport Sciences
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 27
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.87-92,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Domaradzki J.

• Department of Biostructure, Faculty of Physical Education, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Kozlenia D.

• Department of Biostructure, Faculty of Physical Education, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Chorba RS, Chorba DJ, Bouillon LE, Overmyer CA, Landis JA. Use of a functional movement screening tool to determine injury risk in female collegiate athletes. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2010; 5(2): 47-54.
• 2. Chimera NJ, Knoeller S, Cooper R, Nicholas K, Smith C, Warren M. Prediction of Functional Movement Screen™ performance from lower extremity range of motion and core tests. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017; (12)2: 173-181.
• 3. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Revised ed. Academic Press; 1997.
• 4. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function – Part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 1(2): 62-72.
• 5. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function – Part 2. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 1(3): 132-139.
• 6. Dorrel B, Long T, Shaffer S, Myer GD. The Functional Movement Screen as a predictor of injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II athletes. J Athl Train. 2018; 53(1): 29-34.
• 7. Duke SR, Martin SE, Gaul CA. Preseason Functional Movement Screen predicts risk of time-loss injury in experienced male rugby union athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2017; 31(10): 2740-2747.
• 8. Garrison M, Westrick R, Johnson MR, Benenson J. Association between the functional movement screen and injury development in college athletes. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015; 10(1): 21-28.
• 9. Gribble P, Brigle J, Pietrosimone B, Pfile K, Webster K. Intrarater reliability of the Functional Movement ScreenTM. J Strength Cond Res. 2013; (27)4: 978-981.
• 10. Harańczyk G. ROC curves, the rating of quality the classifier and the search for the optimal cut-off point. Statsoft Poland; 2010.
• 11. Hotta T, Nishiguchi S, Fukutani N, Tashiro Y, Adachi D, Morino S, et. al. Functional Movement Screen for predicting running injuries in 18- to 24-year-old competitive male runners. J Strength Cond Res. 2015; 29(10): 2808-2815.
• 12. Kibler WB, Chandler TJ, Uhl T, Maddux RE. A musculoskeletal approach to the preparticipation physical examination: preventing injury and improving performance. Am J Sports Med. 1989; 17(4): 525-531.
• 13. Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a Preseason Functional Movement Screen? N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2007; 2(3): 147-158.
• 14. Koo TK, MY L. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2): 155-163.
• 15. Krutsch W, Krutsch V, Hilber F, Pfeifer C, Baumann F. Weber J, et. al. 11.361 sports injuries in a 15-year survey of a Level I emergency trauma department reveal different severe injury types in the 6 most common team sports. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2018; (32)2: 111-119.
• 16. Letafatkar A, Hadadnezhad M, Shojaedin S, Mohamadi E. Relationship between functional movement screening score and history of injury. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014; 9(1): 21-27.
• 17. Lisman P, O’connor FG, Deuster PA, Knapik JJ. Functional Movement Screen and aerobic fitness predict injuries in military training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45(4): 636-643.
• 18. Rechel JA, Yard EE, Comstock RD. An epidemiologic comparison of high school sports injuries sustained in practice and competition. J Athl Train. 2008; 43(2): 197-204.
• 19. Schneiders AG, Davidsson A, Horman E, Sullivan SJ. Functional Movement Screen normative values in a young, active population. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 6: 75-82.
• 20. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86: 420-428.
• 21. Smith PD, Hanlon MP. Assessing the effectiveness of the Functional Movement Screen in predicting noncontact injury rates in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2017; (31)12: 3327-3332.
• 22. Stanek JM, Dodd DJ, Kelly AR, Wolfe AM, Swenson RA. Active duty firefighters can improve Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores following an 8-week individualized client workout program. Work. 2017; 56(2): 213-220.
• 23. Teyhen DS, Shaffer SW, Lorenson CL. The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 42(6): 530-540.
• 24. Złotkowska R, Skiba M, Mroczek A, Bilewicz-Wyrozumska T, Król K, Lar K, et. al. Negative effects of physical activity and sports training. Hyg Pub Health. 2015; 50(1): 41-46.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.23829/TSS.2020.27.2-5