PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 54 | 4 |

Tytuł artykułu

Induction of systemic resistance and defense-related enzymes in tomato plants using Pseudomonas fluorescens CHAO and salicylic acid against root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) are the most economically important group of plant parasitic nematodes on many crops worldwide. Resistance-based management is considered as one of the most sound and effective strategies against these pathogens. Plant-mediated systemic resistance against the M. javanica in tomato cv. CALJN3 was triggered using salicylic acid (SA) and Pseudomonas fluorescens CHAO as elicitors. The effect of each elicitor was assayed by (1) the calculation of nematode indices including the number of nematode galls, egg masses and eggs/egg mass; (2) the analysis of changes in the concentration of reactive oxygen species (ROS); and (3) monitoring the activities of their scavenging enzymes viz. superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POX), and catalase (CAT). The results indicated that SA/bacterial elicitors induced the removal of high concentrations of the toxic ROS via an increase in the activity of their scavenging antioxidant enzymes, especially that of catalase. Moreover, pre- or post-treatment application of the elicitors significantly reduced the number of galls, egg masses or eggs of M. javanica in infected tomato plants as compared to the control. The results of the present study support the involvement of the elicitor-induced ROS and related scavenging enzymes for stimulating plant defense reactions in a moderately resistant tomato challenged with M. javanica.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

54

Numer

4

Opis fizyczny

p.383-389,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Plant Protection, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, 3391653755, Iran
autor
  • Department of Plant Protection, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, 3391653755, Iran
autor
  • Department of Plant Protection, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, 3391653755, Iran
  • Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, 5166616471, Iran
autor
  • Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, 7144165186, Iran

Bibliografia

  • Anita B., Rajendran G., Samiyappan R. 2004. Induction of systemic resistance in tomato against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Nematol. Medit. 32 (1): 47–51.
  • Baker C.J., Orlandi E.W. 1995. Active oxygen in plant pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. of Phytopathol. 33: 299–321.
  • Bakker P.A.H.M., Pieterse C.M.J., van Loon L.C. 2007. Induced systemic resistance by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology 97 (2): 239–243.
  • Branch C., Hwang C.F., Navare D.A., Williamson V.M. 2004. Salicylic acid is part of the Mi-1-mediated defense response to root-knot nematode in tomato. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 17 (4): 351–356.
  • Edreva A. 2004. A novel strategy for plant protection: Induced resistance. J. Cell Mol. Biol. 3 (1): 61–69.
  • Eisenback J.D., Triantaphyllou A.C. 1991. Root-knot nematodes: Meloidogyne species and races. p. 191–274. In: “Manual of Agricultural Nematology” (W.R. Nickle, ed.). Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, USA, 1035 pp.
  • Gheysen G., Mitchum G. 2009. Molecular insights in the susceptible plant response to nematode infection. p. 45–82. In: “Cell Biology of Plant Nematode Parasitism” (R.H. Berg, C.G. Taylor, eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 273 pp.
  • Hartman K.M., Sasser J.N. 1985. Identification of Meloidogyne species on the basis of differential host test and perinealpattern morphology. p. 69–77. In: “An Advanced Treatise on Meloidogyne. Vol. 2. Methodology” (K.R. Barker, C.C. Carter, J.N. Sasser, eds.). North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh, USA, 223 pp.
  • Hasky-Günther K., Hoffmann-Hergarten S., Sikora R.A. 1998. Resistance against the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida systemically induced by the rhizobacteria Agrobacterium radiobacter (G12) and Bacillus sphaericus (B43). Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 21 (5): 511–517.
  • Hussey R.S., Barker K. 1973. A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis. Rep. 57: 1025–1028.
  • Jagdale G.B., Kamoun S., Grewal P.S. 2009. Entomopathogenic nematodes induce components of systemic resistance in plants: biochemical and molecular evidence. Biol. Control 51 (1): 102–109.
  • Karssen G., Van Hoenselaar T. 1998. Revision of the genus Meloidogyne Göldi, 1892 (Nematoda: Heteroderidae) in Europe. Nematologica 44: 713–788.
  • Kone D., Csinos A.S., Jackson K.L., Ji P. 2009. Evaluation of systemic acquired resistance inducers for control of Phytophthora capsici on squash. Crop Prot. 28 (6): 533–538.
  • Lambert K.N. 1995. Isolation of genes induced early in the resistance response to Meloidogyne javanica in Lycopersicon esculentum. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Davis, USA, 180 pp.
  • Maleki Ziarati H. 2006. Biological control of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne javanica, by Trichoderma harzianum in tomato plants and detection of the some plant biochemical defense mechanisms. M.Sc. thesis. College of Aburaihan, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran, 120 pp.
  • Malolepsza U., Rozalska S. 2005. Nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide in tomato resistance, nitric oxide modulates hydrogen peroxide level in o-hydroxyethylorutin-induced resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 43 (1): 623–635.
  • McKenry M.V., Anwar S.A. 2007. Virulence of Meloidogyne spp. and induced resistance in grape rootstocks. J. Nematol. 39 (1): 50–54.
  • Mehdy M.C. 1994. Active oxygen species in plant defense against pathogens. Plant Physiol. 105 (2): 467–472.
  • Mittler R. 2002. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 7 (9): 405–410.
  • Moens M., Perry R.N., Starr J.L. 2009. Meloidogyne speciesa diverse group of novel and important plant parasites. p. 1–17. In: “Root-Knot Nematodes” (R.N. Perry, M. Moens, J.L. Starr, eds.). CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, 488 pp.
  • Niebel A., Heungens K., Barthels N., Inzé D., Van Montagu M., Gheysen G. 1995. Characterization of a pathogen-induced potato catalase and its systemic expression upon nematode and bacterial infection. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 8 (3): 371–378.
  • Nyczepir A.P., Thomas S.H. 2009. Current and future management strategies in intensive crop production systems. p. 412–443. In: “Root-Knot Nematodes” (R.N. Perry, M. Moens, J.L. Starr, eds.). CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, 488 pp.
  • Oka Y., Cohen Y., Speigel Y. 1999. Local and systemic induced resistance to the root-knot tomato by DL-β-amino-n-butyric acid. Phytopathology 89 (12): 1138–1143.
  • Oostendorp M., Sikora R.A. 1990. In vitro relationship between rhizosphere bacteria and Heterodera schachtii. Revue de Nematologie 13 (3): 269–274.
  • Patykowski J., Urbanek H. 2003. Activity of enzymes related to H2O2 generation and metabolism in leaf apoplastic fraction of tomato leaves infected with Botrytis cinerea. J. Phytopathol. 151 (3): 153–161.
  • Rajasekhar S.P., Ganguly A.K., Swain S.C. 1997. Quantitative changes in superoxide dismutase catalase and peroxidase with reference to resistance in tomato to Meloidogyne incognita. Indian J. Nematol. 27 (1): 79–85.
  • Ramamoorthy V., Viswanathan R., Raguchander T., Prakasam V., Samiyappan R. 2001. Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in crop plants against pests and diseases. Crop Prot. 20 (1): 1–11.
  • Reuveni R. 1995. Biochemical markers as tools for screening resistance against plant pathogens. p. 21–42. In: “Noval Approaches to Integrated Pest Management” (R. Reuveni, ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 384 pp.
  • Saed-Moucheshi A., Pakniyat H., Pirasteh-Anosheh H., Azooz M.M. 2014. Role of ROS as signaling molecules in plants. p. 585–626. In: “Reactive Oxygen Species, Antioxidant Network and Signaling in Plants” (P. Ahmad, ed.). Springer Publication, New York, USA, 635 pp.
  • Santhi A., Sivakumar V. 1995. Biocontrol potential of Pseudomonas fluorescens (Migula) against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949 on tomato. J. Biol. Control 9: 113–115.
  • Siddiqui I.A., Shaukat S.S. 2002. Rhizobacteria-mediated induction of systemic resistance (ISR) in tomato against Meloidogyne javanica. J. Phytopathol. 150 (8–9): 469–473.
  • Siddiqui I.A., Shaukat S.S. 2004. Systemic resistance in tomato induced by biocontrol bacteria against the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne javanica is independent of salicylic acid production. J. Phytopathol. 152 (1): 48–54.
  • Siddiqui I.A., Shaukat S.S. 2005. Pseudomonas aeruginosa-mediated induction of systemic resistance in tomato against rootknot nematode. Plant Pathol. J. 4 (1): 21–25.
  • Siddiqui I.A. Ehteshamul-Haque S., Shaukat S.S. 2001. Use of rhizobacteria in the control of root rot-root knot disease complex of mungbean. J. Phytopathol. 149 (6): 337–346.
  • Siddique S., Matera C., Radakovic Z.S., Shamim Hasan M., Gutbrod P., Rozanska E., Sobczak M., Torres M.A., Grundler F.M.W. 2014. Parasitic worms stimulate host NADPH oxidases to produce reactive oxygen species that limit plant cell death and promote infection. Sci. Signal. 7 (320): 1–9.
  • Sikora R.A. 1992. Management of the antagonistic potential in agricultural ecosystems for the biological control of plant parasitic nematodes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 30: 245–270.
  • Sikora R.A., Hoffmann-Hergarten S. 1992. Importance of plant health-promoting rhizobacteria for the control of soilborne fungal diseases and plant parasitic nematodes. Arab. J. Plant Prot. 10: 53–58.
  • Sikora R.A., Schäfer K., Debabat A.A. 2007. Mode of action associated with microbially induced in planta suppression of plantparasitic nematodes. Australas. Plant Pathol. 36 (1): 124–134.
  • Thompson D.C. 1996. Evaluation of bacterial antagonists for reduction of summer patch symptoms in Kentucky blue grass. Plant Dis. 80 (8): 850–862.
  • Tománková K., Luhová L., Petřivalsky M., Peč P., Lebeda A. 2006. Biochemical aspects of reactive oxygen species formation in the interaction between Lycopersicon spp. and Oidium neolycopersici. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 68 (1–3): 1–11.
  • Tomczak A., Koropacka K., Smant G., Goverse A., Bakker E. 2009. Resistant plant responses. p. 83–114. In: “Cell Biology of Plant Nematode Parasitism” (R.H. Berg, C.G. Taylor, eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 273 pp.
  • Van Loon L.C., Bakker P.A.H.M., Pieterse C.M.J. 1998. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 36: 453–483.
  • Van Peer R., Niemann G.J., Schippers B. 1991. Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of Fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS 417r. Phytopathology 81 (7): 728–734.
  • Von Tiedemann A. 1997. Evidence for a primary role of active oxygen species in induction of host cell death during infection of bean leaves with Botrytis cinerea. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 50: 151–166.
  • Vanderspool M.C., Kaplan D.T., McCollum T.G., Wodzinski R.J. 1994. Partial characterization of cytosolic superoxide dismutase activity in the interaction of Meloidogyne incognita with two cultivars of Glycine max. J. Nematol. 26 (4): 422–429.
  • Velikova V., Yordanov I., Edreva A. 2000. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants, protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 151 (1): 59–66.
  • Vidhyasekaran P. 2002. Bacterial Disease Resistance in Plants, Molecular Biology and Biotechnological Applications. Food Products Press, New York, USA, 452 pp.
  • Williamson V.M., Hussey R.S. 1996. Nematode pathogenesis and resistance in plants. Plant Cell 8 (10): 1735–1745.
  • Wojtaszek P. 1997. Oxidative burst: an early plant response to pathogen infection. Biochem. J. 322 (3): 681–692.
  • Zacheo G., Bleve-Zacheo T. 1988. Involement of superoxide dismutases and superoxide radicals in the susceptibility and resistance of tomato plants to Meloidogyne incognita attack. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 32 (2): 313–322.
  • Zacheo G., Bleve-Zacheo T., Pacoda D., Orlando C., Durbin R.D. 1995. The association between heat-induced susceptibility of tomato to Meloidogyne incognita and peroxidase activity. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 46 (6): 491–507.
  • Zacheo G., Bleve-Zacheo T., Melillo M.T. 1997. Biochemistry of plant defence responses to nematode infection. p. 201–213.
  • In: “Cellular and Molecular Aspects of Plant-Nematode Interactions” (C. Fenoll, F.M.W. Grundler, S.A. Ohl, eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 288 pp.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-2111a9a1-0034-4ccc-aed9-2ea411cf5734
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.