Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 15 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Appraisal of process mapping in heavy engineering projects: a case of Nigeria East-West coastal highway

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji



The need to improve project delivery process is one of the leading advocacies of relevant construction industry reports. Improved process is sine qua non for improve performance. Critical to the improvement process, is the need to assess construction process’ capability to meet design and production requirements. The present study examined process mapping of a cable-stayed bridge in the Nigeria’s east-west coastal highway project. Qualitative data was collected through a three phase process mapping protocol using mainly self-generate, one-on-one interview and focus group. Twenty non-related sub-processes were identified from four pre-construction stages: investigation; feasibility; design; and tender. Integrative definition (IDEFO) and Unified Language Modelling (UML) are used to map the feasibility, design and the design sub-processes. The mapping indicates the design sequence is iterative and factually flexible until such a point where functional design satisfies appropriate forcing test. The study provides medium for communicating complex construction functions thereby facilitating common understanding in the way projects are delivered with appropriate information about inputs, output and resources.

Słowa kluczowe








Opis fizyczny



  • School of Built Environment, University of Salford, M5 4WT Salford, U.K.
  • Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Environmental Studies, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria
  • Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Environmental Studies, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria


  • [1] Adedokun O.A., Ogunsemi D.R., Aje I.O., Dairo D.O. (2012). Evaluation of Risk Analysis Techniques in Selected Large Construction Companies in Nigeria, Emerald Group Publishing, Pre-printed version.
  • [2] Arif M. (2013). Quality and Process Improvement in Construction, Lecture Materials, Project & Process Systems, School of Built Environment, University of Salford.
  • [3] Anjard R., Facilities 16(3) (1998) 79-81.
  • [4] Austin S., Steele M., Design Studies 22(3) (2001) 211-232.
  • [5] Azarnejad A., McWhinnie K., Tadros G., Stasky J. (2011). Cable-stayed as an Alternative for Medium and Short and Short Span Bridges, Proceeding of Annual Conference of the Transportation of Canada, Alberta.
  • [6] Barresi S. (2013). Process Modelling Introduction to UML and IDEFO, PG Level 7 Project and Project Systems Learning Packages, School of Built Environment, University of Salford, 2012/2013 session.
  • [7] Blismas N., Pendlebury M. Alister G., Pasquire C. (2005). Constraints to the Use of off- Site production on Construction Projects, University of Loughborough, a Creative Commons Report.
  • [8] Cartlidge D. (2011). New Aspect of Quantity Surveying Practice, 3rd Edition, London: Routledge Spon Press.
  • [9] Clarke A. (2013). What are Focus Groups? SPORTS-Post Graduate Research Lectures Materials, University of Salford, 2012/2013 Session.
  • [10] Clausner J. E., Melby J.A., Scheffner N.W., Butler H.L. (2008). Coastal Engineering – Planning and design Process, Huston: Continuing Education for Engineers.
  • [11] COWI (2012). Marine and Coastal Engineering, Ocean & Coastal Consultants, Inc., North America, available online accessed 2/3/2013:
  • [12] Egbu C., Ellis R., Gorse C. (2004). The Practice of Construction Management, Barry Fryer, 4th Edition, Oxford: Blackwell Science Publishing Co.
  • [13] Ekung S.B. (2013). Pre-construction Process mapping, Risk Register and Matrices and Process Improvement in the Nigeria’s East-West coastal Road as an Iconic Project, Project & Project System Coursework, School of Built Environment, University of Salford, Manchester, 2012/13 session.
  • [14] Flyvberg B., Oxford Review of Economic Policy 25(3) (2009) 344-367.
  • [15] Fowler M. (2009). UML Distilled 3rd edition – A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modelling Language, Addison-Wesley.
  • [16] Fox S., Matsh L., Cockerham G., Construction Management and Economic 21 (2002) 7-10.
  • [17] Gil N., Laundryman C. (2012). The Leadership and Governance of Megaprojects, CID Technical Report No 3/2012, Centre for Infrastructure Development, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester.
  • [18] Grimm C., Woffler T., Bacmann D., Schuttrumpf H. (2012). Risk Management in Coastal Engineering, Applied Coastal Research Projects for Northern Germany, Water and Waste, 53-55.
  • [19] J. Heumann (2003) Introduction to Business Modelling using UML available at accessed 23/01/13:
  • [20] Kagioglou M. (2002). Mapping the Production Process: a Case Study, Proceeding of International Group for Lean Construction, Gramado, Brazil.
  • [21] Klotz L., Horman M., Bi H., Bechtel J., International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 57(8) (2008) 623-636.
  • [22] Larsson J., Simonsson P. (2012). Barriers and Drivers for Increased Use of Offsite Bridge Construction in Sweden, in: Smith, S.D (Ed) Proceeding 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 751-761.
  • [23] Mccabe S. (2007). Benchmarking in Construction, Chichester: John Willey & Sons, 1-24.
  • [24] Nadim W., Goulding J. S., Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 18(1) (2011) 81-101.
  • [25] Ostenfield K.H., Anderson E.Y. (2011). Major Bridge Projects – a Multidisciplinary Approach available online: retrieve 22/2/13
  • [26] Patel M., Robinson H., Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction 15(3) (2010) 216-234.
  • [27] Pighini M., Wallace P., Schwartz A., Flieger R. (2011). Improving Governance of Public Sector Construction Projects, Deloitte Financial Advisory Services.
  • [28] Simm J., Cruickshank I. (1998). Construction Risk in Coastal Engineering, London: Thomas Telford, 155-178.
  • [29] Tang S.M.T. (2009). How Front End Factors Affect project Outcomes: A Look at Four Infrastructure Projects in Asia, Working Paper No 34, Collaboratory for Research on Global Projects.
  • [30] Yeomans S.G., Bouchlaghem N.M., El-Hamalawi A., Automation in Construction 15(2) (2006) 139-149.

Typ dokumentu



Identyfikator YADDA

JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.