Assessment of the orbit morphometry on West Anatolian dry skulls

• Autorzy: Yonguc G.N. , Gocmen-Mas N. , Aksu F. , Edizer M. , Akyer S.P. , Karabekir S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The orbit is very frequently damaged by traumas which result in not only bone deficits, but also functional deformities if reconstruction is not appropriate. Anatomical exposure of the bony orbit is of importance for both anatomists and surgeons who perform operation on this area. The current study evaluated the group of morphometrical parameters on 74 adult West Anatolian dry skulls and stereological surface area on the dry skull orbits while describing the clinical importance. Surface areas on the orbital base of the skulls were also evaluated using stereological method, bilaterally. Anthropological assessment of orbital base (in terms of width and height) revealed no significant difference between right and left sides. Both width and height of the optic foramen were significantly higher on the right side compared to left. The distances between the margins (medial, lateral, superior, inferior) of the orbital base and the optic foramen were longer on the right side compared to left, except the distances between the lateral margins. There was no significant difference among the subjects between right and left sides with respect to the orbital base in terms of stereological area calculation. The results are significant because there are no recorded anatomical data on West Anatolian skulls at previous researches. (Folia Morphol 2018; 77, 1: 105–109)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 77
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.105-109,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Yonguc G.N.

• Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey

autor

Gocmen-Mas N.

• Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey

autor

Aksu F.

• Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey

autor

Edizer M.

• Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey

autor

Akyer S.P.

• Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey

autor

Karabekir S.

• Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. Acer N, Sahin B, Usanmaz M, et al. Comparison of point counting and planimetry methods for the assessment of cerebellar volume in human using magnetic resonance imaging: a stereological study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008; 30(4): 335–339, doi: 10.1007/s00276-008-0330-9, indexed in Pubmed: 18292960.
• 2. Altunkaynak B, Onger M, Altunkaynak M, et al. A Brief Introduction to Stereology and Sampling Strategies: Basic Concepts of Stereology. NeuroQuantology. 2011; 10(1), doi: 10.14704/nq.2012.10.1.427.
• 3. Barone CM, Jimenez DF, Laskey A, et al. Bony orbital distances among the Filipino population. J Craniofac Surg. 2002; 13(2): 258–261, indexed in Pubmed: 12000883.
• 4. Bas O, Acer N, Mas N, et al. Stereological evaluation of the volume and volume fraction of intracranial structures in magnetic resonance images of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Anat. 2009; 191(2): 186–195, doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2008.12.003, indexed in Pubmed: 19269145.
• 5. Berlis A, Putz R, Schumacher M. [Measurements and variations in the region of the optic canal. CT and anatomy]. Radiologe. 1992; 32(9): 436–440, indexed in Pubmed: 1438728.
• 6. Canan S, Şahin B, Odacı E, et al. Estimation of the reference volume, volume density and volume ratios by a stereological method: Cavalieri’s principle. T Klin J Med Sci. 2002; 22: 7–14.
• 7. Carls FR, Josca R, Sailer HF. [The measurement of orbital volume in reconstruction of the orbital walls]. Minerva Stomatol. 1996; 45(11): 493–499, doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0816, indexed in Pubmed: 9026695.
• 8. Charteris DG, Chan CH, Whitehouse RW, et al. Orbital volume measurement in the management of pure blowout fractures of the orbital floor. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993; 77(2): 100–102, doi: 10.1136/bjo.77.2.100, indexed in Pubmed: 8435407.
• 9. Chebib FS, Chamma AM. Indices of craniofacial asymmetry. Angle Orthod. 1981; 51(3): 214–226, doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1981)051<0214:IOCA>2.0.CO;2, indexed in Pubmed: 6943950.
• 10. Cook T. Ocular and periocular injuries from orbital fractures. J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 195(6): 831–834, indexed in Pubmed: 12495316.
• 11. Deveci M, Oztürk S, Sengezer M, et al. Measurement of orbital volume by a 3-dimensional software program: an experimental study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 58(6): 645–648, indexed in Pubmed: 10847286.
• 12. Ezaldein HH, Metzler P, Persing JA, et al. Three-dimensional orbital dysmorphology in metopic synostosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014; 67(7): 900–905, doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.03.009, indexed in Pubmed: 24820454.
• 13. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, et al. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 103(4): 327–337, doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70013-E, indexed in Pubmed: 8480698.
• 14. Gocmen-Mas N, Pelin C, Canan S, et al. Stereological evaluation of volumetric asymmetry in healthy human cerebellum. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009; 31(3): 177–181, doi: 10.1007/s00276-008-0424-4, indexed in Pubmed: 18941706.
• 15. Gong QY, Tan LT, Romaniuk CS, et al. Determination of tumour regression rates during radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma by serial MRI: comparison of two measurement techniques and examination of intraobserver and interobserver variability. Br J Radiol. 1999; 72(853): 62–72, doi: 10.1259/bjr.72.853.10341691, indexed in Pubmed: 10341691.
• 16. Gundersen H, Bendtsen TF, Korbo L, et al. Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS. 1988; 96(1-6): 379–394, doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1988.tb05320.x.
• 17. Ji Y, Qian Z, Dong Y, et al. Quantitative morphometry of the orbit in Chinese adults based on a three-dimensional reconstruction method. J Anat. 2010; 217(5): 501–506, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01286.x, indexed in Pubmed: 20807268.
• 18. Kahveci OK, Gocmen-Mas N, Okur N, et al. Investigation of temporal bone asymmetry in cases with unilateral tinnitus: morphometric and multicentric clinical study. Folia Morphol. 2013; 72(1): 22–28, doi: 10.5603/FM.2013.0004, indexed in Pubmed: 23749707.
• 19. Karabekir HS, Gocmen-Mas N, Emel E, et al. Ocular and periocular injuries associated with an isolated orbital fracture depending on a blunt cranial trauma: anatomical and surgical aspects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012; 40(7): e189–e193, doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.10.006, indexed in Pubmed: 22093244.
• 20. Lukats O, Vízkelety T, Markella Z, et al. Measurement of orbital volume after enucleation and orbital implantation. PLoS One. 2012; 7(12): e50333, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050333, indexed in Pubmed: 23236368.
• 21. Mağden A, Kaynak S. Bilateral duplication of the optic canals. Ann Anat. 1996; 178(1): 61–64, indexed in Pubmed: 8717328.
• 22. McEvoy F. An application of image processing techniques in computed tomography image analysis. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2007; 48(6): 528–534, doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2007.00290.x.
• 23. Mulick JF. An investigation of craniofacial asymmetry using the serial twin-study method. Am J Orthod. 1965; 51: 112–129, doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(65)90165-X, indexed in Pubmed: 14232060.
• 24. Patil GV, Kolagi S, Padmavathi G, et al. The duplication of the optic canals in human skulls. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011; 5: 536–537.
• 25. Rossi M, Ribeiro E, Smith R. Craniofacial asymmetry in development: an anatomical study. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73(4): 381–385, doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0381:CAIDAA>2.0.CO;2, indexed in Pubmed: 12940558.
• 26. Ruskell GL. The orbit and its content. Chapter 41. In: Standring S (Chief ed.). Gray’s anatomy head and neck. 39th ed. Edinburgh; New York: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone. 2005: 681–700.
• 27. Sahin B, Ergur H. Assessment of the optimum section thickness for the estimation of liver volume using magnetic resonance images: a stereological gold standard study. Eur J Radiol. 2006; 57(1): 96–101, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.07.006, indexed in Pubmed: 16112829.
• 28. Seiji F, Moreira RS, De Angelis MA, et al. Orbital asymmetry in development: an anatomical study. Orbit. 2009; 28(6): 342–346, doi: 10.3109/01676830903162841, indexed in Pubmed: 19929657.
• 29. Selva D, White VA, O’Connell JX, et al. Primary bone tumors of the orbit. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004; 49(3): 328–342, doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.02.011, indexed in Pubmed: 15110669.
• 30. Shah SM, Joshi MR. An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex. Angle Orthod. 1978; 48(2): 141–148, doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1978)048<0141:AAOAIT>2.0.CO;2, indexed in Pubmed: 277077.
• 31. West MJ, Slomianka L, Gundersen HJ. Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of neurons in thesubdivisions of the rat hippocampus using the optical fractionator. Anat Rec. 1991; 231(4): 482–497, doi: 10.1002/ar.1092310411, indexed in Pubmed: 1793176.
• 32. Yilmaz I, Adiguzel E, Akdogan I, et al. Effects of second generation tetracyclines on penicillin-epilepsy-induced hippocampal neuronal loss and motor incoordination in rats. Life Sci. 2006; 79(8): 784–790, doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2006.02.027, indexed in Pubmed: 16554072.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2017.0071