Use of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, second edition in school practice

• Autorzy: Seflova I. , Kalfirt L. , Indrackova K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Introduction. Physical inactivity is a global public health problem. One of the most important factors, which influence the later participation of children in regular physical activities, is sufficient movement competence level. The BruininksOseretsky, 2nd version, test is considered the most comprehensive diagnostic tool for estimation of motor proficiency. It is used in the field of psychomotricity diagnostics in the Czech Republic. However, there are no Czech normative criteria. Aim of Study. The aim of this study is to investigate the usefulness of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, 2nd version for both diagnostic and evaluative purposes in school practice. Material and Methods. The research sample was made of 45 primary school children (23 girls and 22 boys) of average age 9.2 ± 1.4 years. For the estimation of a motor proficiency we used the Bruininks-Oseretsky test, 2nd version – complete form with German normative criteria. Results: According to the total motor composite performance on BOT™-2, we found 16.7% of children with severe motor difficulties. It can identify the presence of developmental coordination disorder which requires necessary motor intervention. 28.6% of children were in the parameter total motor composite below the average with a risk of motor difficulties. In total, 72% of children had the BOT™-2 score in the 50th percentile or lower. Conclusions. The test is useful and suitable for recognizing signs of different kinds of developmental coordination disorders in school practice. Teachers need to undertake a course to be able to use this test. It is not easy to assess the test battery. The time required for the completion of the test may be too much for some of the children (over 60 minutes). That is why it is recommended to split the test battery into more parts.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Trends in Sport Sciences
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 25
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.195-199,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Seflova I.

• Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Science, Technical University of Liberec, Humanities and Education,Liberec, Czech Republic

autor

Kalfirt L.

• Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Science, Technical University of Liberec, Humanities and Education,Liberec, Czech Republic

autor

Indrackova K.

• Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Science, Technical University of Liberec, Humanities and Education,Liberec, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• 1. Barnett LM, Morgan PJ, van Beurden E, Beard JR. Perceived sports competence mediates the relationship between childhood motor skill proficiency and adolescent physical activity and fitness: a longitudinal assessment. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 8: 1-12. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-40
• 2. Bisi MC, Polmanb R, Stagnia R. Objective assessment of movement competence in children using wearable sensors: An instrumented version of the TGMD-2 locomotor subtest. Gait & Posture. 2017; 42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.025
• 3. Blank R, Jenetzky E, Vinçon S. BOT-2 Bruininks-Oseretsky Test der motorischen Fähigkeiten – Zweite Ausgabe Deutsche Bearbeitung. Pearson: Maulborn, 2014.
• 4. Bošković K, Gava BP, Grajić M, Madić D, Obradović B, Todorović ST. Adaptirana fizička aktivnost u prevenciji i lečenju osteoporoze (Adapted physical activity in the prevention and therapy of osteoporosis). Med Pregl. 2013; 66(5-6): 221-224. Review.
• 5. Bruininks RH. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, (BOT-2). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessment; 2005.
• 6. Cairney J, Missiuna C, Timmons BW, et al. The Coordination and Activity Tracking in Children (CATCH) study: rationale and design. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 1266.
• 7. Carmosino K, Grzeszczak A, McMurray K. Test Items in the Complete and Short Forms of the BOT-2 that Contribute Substantially to Motor Performance Assessments in Typically Developing Children 6-10 Years of Age. J Stud Phys Ther Res. 2014; 7(2): 32-43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-135
• 8. Chow SM, Henderson SE, Barnett AL. The Movement Assessment Battery for Children: a comparison of 4-year-old to 6-year-old children from Hong Kong and the United States. Am J Occup Ther. 2001; 55(1): 55-61. doi:10.5014/ajot.55.1.55
• 9. Gallahue DL, Ozmun JC a Goodway J. Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults. London: McGraw-Hill; 2012.
• 10. Gibbs SJ, Apleton J, Appleton R. Dyspraxia or developmental coordination disorder? Unravelling the enigma. Arch Dis Child. 2007; 92(3): 534-539. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.088054
• 11. Global recommendations on physical activity for health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization [cited 2018 Sep 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_recommendations/en/.
• 12. Goodway JD, Branta CF. Influence of a motor skill intervention on fundamental motor skill development of disadvantaged preschool children. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003; 74: 36-46. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2003.10609062
• 13. Goodwin LD, Leech NL. The Meaning of Validity in the New Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 2017; 36(3): 181-191. doi: 10.1080/07481756.2003.11909741
• 14. Gunter KB, Kasianchuk A. Examining the influence of participation in a community-based running program on skeletal health in growing girls. Osteoporosis Int. 2011; 22(2): 417-439. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e318236e5ee
• 15. Herrmann C, Gerlach E, Seelig H. Development and validation of a test instrument for the assessment of basic motor competencies in primary school. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2015; 19: 80-90. doi: 10.1080/1091367X.2014.998821
• 16. Holický J, Musálek M. Evaluační nástroje motoriky podle vývojových norem u české populace (Evaluation motor according to development motor standards in the Czech population). Studia Sportiva. 2013; 7(2): 103-109. doi: 10.5817/StS2013-2-12
• 17. Hulley S, Cummings S, Browner W. Designing Clinical Research. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
• 18. Kirby A, Sugden DA. Children with Developmental Coordination Disorders. J R Soc Med. 2007; 100(4): 182-186. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.100.4.182
• 19. Kolář P, Smržová J, Kobesová A. Vývojová porucha koordinace – vývojová dyspraxia (The developmental coordination disorder – developmental dyspraxia). Cesk Slov Neurol N. 2011; 74-107(5): 533-538.
• 20. Loprinzi PD, Robert ED, Fu YCH. Early Motor Skill Competence as a Mediator of Child and Adult Physical Activity. Prev Med Rep. 2015; 2, 833-838. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.09.015
• 21. Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Clief DP, Barnett LM, Okely AD. Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents: review of associated health benefits. Sports Med. 2010; 40(12), 1019-1026. doi: 10.2165/11536850-000000000-00000
• 22. Lun FU, CHak A, Cobley SP, Sanders RH. Motor Coordination Training and Pedagogical Approach for Combating Childhood Obesity. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2016; 4(12): 1-13. doi: 10.4236/jss.2016.412001
• 23. Missiuna C, Polatajko H. Developmental dyspraxia by any other name: are they all just clumsy children? Am J Occup Ther. 1995; 49(7): 619-627. doi: 10.5014/ajot.49.7.619
• 24. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report [Internet]. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services [cited 2018 Sep 19]. Available from: https://health.gov/paguidelines/secondedition/report/pdf/PAG_Advisory_Committee_Report.pdf
• 25. Seefeldt V, Malina RM, Clark MA. Factors affecting levels of physical aktivity in adults. Sports Med. 2002; 32(3): 143-168. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232030-00001
• 26. Stodden D, Goodway JD, Langendorfer S. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: an emergent relationship. Quest. 2008; 60: 290-306. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2008.10483582
• 27. Stodden D, Langendorfer S, Roberton MA. The association between motor skill competence and physical fitness in young adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009; 80(2): 223-229. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2009.10599556
• 28. Wuang, YP, Su CY. Reliability and responsiveness of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor ProficiencySecond Edition in children with intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil. 2009; 30(5): 847-855. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2008.12.002
• 29. Zimmer R, Volkamer M. MOT 4-6. Motoriktest für vierbis sechsjährige Kinder. Weinheim: Beltz; 1987.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.23829/TSS.2018.25.4-4