Genetic diversity of perch populations in three lowland reservoirs (Central Poland): perspectives for fish sustainable management

• Autorzy: Mankiewicz-Boczek J. , Imsiridou A. , Kaczkowski Z. , Tsiora A. , Karaiskou N. , Lapinska M. , Minos G. , Zalewski M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Proper multidimensional management of perch, common and one of the most abundant species in European freshwaters, is a challenge both from ecological and commercial perspective. However, all activity relating to the management of the perch must be based on good genetic knowledge in order to ensure a purity of species and further conservation of biodiversity. Therefore, in the present study, the mtDNA cytb and D–loop restriction analysis was applied in order to estimate genetic diversity within and among three perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) populations in reservoirs of Central Poland: Sulejów, Próba and Jeziorsko. Two out of nine, and two out of eight restriction enzymes were polymorphic for cytb and D–loop, respectively. Five different haplotypes were detected with the simultaneous occurrence of haplotype 1 in all three populations. Nucleotide diversity values within investigated populations were low (0.003 to 0.02). No significant differentiation (P = 0.248) among populations representing two different catchments of Pilica and Vistula rivers, was observed. The lack of genetic differentiation of perch populations is the first important element for the development of a strategy to regulate the perch in Polish river systems, with simultaneous reduction of fish in eutrophic reservoirs and increase in amount of perch, in sites favorable for fishing and aquaculture.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

genetic diversity; European perch; Perca fluviatilis; mitochondrial DNA; sustainable management; conservation; biodiversity; lowland reservoir; Central Poland; Jeziorsko Reservoir; Sulejow Reservoir; Proba Reservoir

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 61
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.385-389,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Mankiewicz-Boczek J.

• European Regional Centre for Ecohydrology a/u UNESCO, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Tylna, 90–364 Lodz, Poland

autor

Imsiridou A.

• Alexander Technological Education Institute of Thessaloniki, Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture Technology, 1 N. Miltiadi, 63200 Nea Moudania, Chalkidiki, Greece

autor

Kaczkowski Z.

• Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 12/16 Banacha, 90–237 Lodz, Poland

autor

Tsiora A.

• Alexander Technological Education Institute of Thessaloniki, Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture Technology, 1 N. Miltiadi, 63200 Nea Moudania, Chalkidiki, Greece

autor

Karaiskou N.

• Department of Genetics, Development and Molecular Biology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54 124 Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece

autor

Lapinska M.

• Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 12/16 Banacha, 90–237 Lodz, Poland

autor

Minos G.

• Alexander Technological Education Institute of Thessaloniki, Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture Technology, 1 N. Miltiadi, 63200 Nea Moudania, Chalkidiki, Greece

autor

Zalewski M.

• European Regional Centre for Ecohydrology a/u UNESCO, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Tylna, 90–364 Lodz, Poland

Bibliografia

• Avise J.C., Arnold J., Ball R.M., Bermingham E., Lamb T., Neigel J. E., Reeb C.A., Saunders N.C. 1987 – Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics – Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 489–522.
• Behrmann-Godel J., Gerkach G., Eckmann R. 2006 – Kin and population recognition in sympatric Lake Constance perch (Perca fluviatilis L.): can assortative shoaling driver population divergence? – Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59: 461–468.
• Bergek S., Björklund M. 2007 – Cryptic barriers to dispersal within a lake allow genetic differentiation of Eurasian perch – Evolution, 61: 2035–2041.
• Bergek S., Björklund M. 2009 – Genetic and morphological divergence reveals local subdivision of perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) – Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 96: 746–758.
• Bergek S., Sundblad G., Björklund M. 2010 – Population differentiation in perch Perca fluviatilis: environmental effects on gene flow? – J. Fish Biol. 76: 1159–1172.
• Cowx I.G. 1994 – Stocking strategies – Fisheries Manag. Ecol. 1: 15–30.
• Excoffier L., Smouse P., Quattro J.M. 1992 – Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data – Genetics, 131: 479–49.
• FAME Consortium 2004 – Manual for the application of the European Fish Index – EFI. A fish-based method to assess the ecological status of European rivers in support of the Water Framework Directive. Version 1.1, January 2005.
• FAO 2010 – The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2010 – FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Rome, 218 pp.
• Frankiewicz P., Dąbrowski K., Zalewski M. 1996 – Mechanism of establishing bimodality in a size distribution of age-0 pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.) in the Sulejów Reservoir – Ann. Zool. Fenn. 33: 321–327.
• Hillis D.M., Moritz C., Mable B.K. 1996 – Molecular Systematics – Sunderland, Sinauer Associates, MA, 655 pp.
• Imsiridou A., Triantafyllidis A., Baxevanis A., Triantaphyllidis C. 2009 – Genetic characterization of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) populations from Greece using mitochondrial DNA sequences – Biologia, 64: 781–785.
• Kaczkowski Z. 2006 – Zarybianie gatunkami reofilnymi jako narzędzie ochrony i kształtowania ichtiofauny niewielkich rzek nizinnych [Restocking of rheophilic species as a tool for protection and shaping of ichthyofauna of small lowland rivers] – Ph.D. thesis, University of Lodz, 84 pp.
• Kottelat M., Freyhof J. 2007 – Handbook of European freshwater fishes – Publications Kottelat, Cornol, Switzerland, 646 pp.
• McElroy D., Moran P., B ermingham E., Kornfield, J. 1991 – REAP: The Restriction Enzyme Analysis Package, Version 4.0 – University of Maine, Orono, ME.
• Nesbø C.L., Arab M.O., Jakobsen K.S. 1998 – Heteroplasmy, lengh and sequence variation in the mtDNA control regions of three percide fish species (Perca fluvialilis, Acerina cernua, Stizostedion lucioperca) – Genetics, 148: 1907–1919.
• Nesbø C.L., Fossheim T., Vollestad L.A., Jakobsen K.S. 1999 – Genetic divergence and phylogeographic relationships among european perch (Perca fluviatilis) populations reflect glacial refugia and postglacial colonization – Mol. Ecol. 8: 1387–1404.
• Penczak T., Kruk A. 2000 – Threatened obligatory riverine fishes in human-modified Polish rivers – Ecol. Freshw. Fish, 9: 109–117.
• Raymond M., Rousset F. 1995 – An exact test for population differentiation – Evolution, 49: 1280–1283.
• Schneider S., Roessli D., Excoffier L. 2000 – Arlequin V 2.0. A software for population genetics data analysis – Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
• Song C.B., Near T.J., Page L.M. 1998 – Phylogenetic relations among Percid Fishes as Inferred from Mitochondrial Cytochrome b DNA Sequence Data – Molecular Phylogenetic and Evolution, 10: 343–353.
• Terlecki J. 2000 – Okoń [Perch] (In: Ryby słodkowodne Polski [Freshwater fishes of Poland], Ed: M. Brylińska) – PWN, Warszawa, pp. 455–460.
• Witkowski A., Kotusz J., Przybylski M., Marszał L., Heese T., Amirowicz A., Buras P., Kukuła K. 2004 – Pochodzenie, skład gatunkowy i aktualny stopień zagrożenia ichtiofauny w dorzeczu Wisły i Odry [Origin, species composition and the current degree of risk of ichthyofauna in the basin of the Vistula and Odra] – Arch. Pol. Fish. 12: 7–20 (in Polish, English summary).
• Zalewski M., Brewinska-Zaras B., Frankiewicz P., Kalinowski S. 1990 – The potential for biomanipulation using fry communities in a lowland reservoir: concordance between water quality and optimal recruitment – Hydrobiologia, 200/201: 549–556.