Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2011 | 20 | 5 |
Tytuł artykułu

Impact of agricultural land use on macroinvertebrate fauna in Lithuania

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
The present study aims at assessing changes in macroinvertebrate metrics in relation to the effects of agricultural land use in a lowland river. Cluster analysis techniques were applied to group river sites according to the similarity of total and relative abundances of taxonomic groups. Riverbed morphology and riparian vegetation were the main environmental variables differentiating between clusters. The total abundance of macroinvertebrates, and absolute and relative abundances of EPT, Coleoptera, and Trichoptera were significantly higher in the river sites with a narrow belt of riparian forest in comparison with groups of deforested and straightened river sites. Macroinvertebrate community status based on biotic indices was significantly higher in the natural forested river reaches and was classified as good or even very good, whereas the status of most of the rest of the sites was recognized to be moderate or poor. None of macroinvertebrate variables correlated with water quality parameters. The presence of forest belts along riversides seems to support the good status of macroinvertebrate communities, even if concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus in the river are elevated due to agricultural runoff and exceed maximum permissible concentrations valid in Lithuania. However, single macroinvertebrate metrics, differently from integral metrics, indicated alterations in water quality of the studied river.
Słowa kluczowe
Opis fizyczny
  • Institute of Ecology of Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, LT-08412 Vilnius-21, Lithuania
  • Institute of Ecology of Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, LT-08412 Vilnius-21, Lithuania
  • Institute of Ecology of Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, LT-08412 Vilnius-21, Lithuania
  • 1. COOPER C.M. Biological effects of agriculturally derived surface water pollutants on aquatic systems – A review. J. Environ. Qual. 22, 402, 1993.
  • 2. LENAT D.R., CRAWFORD J.K. Effects of land use on water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina Piedmont streams. Hydrobiologia 294, 185, 1994.
  • 3. ALLAN J.D. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 35, 257, 2004.
  • 4. SONG M.-Y., LEPRIEUR F., THOMAS A., LEK-ANG S., CHON T.-S., LEK S. Impact of agricultural land use on aquatic insect assemblages in the Garonne river catchment (SW France). Aquatic Ecol. 43, 999, 2008.
  • 5. ROSENBERG D.M., MCCULLY P., PRINGLE C.M. Global-scale environmental effects of hydrological alternations: introduction. Bioscience 50, 746, 2000.
  • 6. CHAPMAN L.J., CHAPMAN C.A. Tropical forest degradation and aquatic ecosystems: our current state and knowledge. In: COLLARES-PEREIRA M.J., COWX I.G., COELHO M.M. (Eds.). Conservation of freshwater fishes: options for the future. Fishing News Books. Blackwell: Oxford, pp. 235-249, 2002.
  • 7. KASANGAKI A., CHAPMAN L.J., BALIRWA J. Land use and the ecology of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages of high-altitude rainforest streams in Uganda. Freshwat. Biol. 53, 681, 2008.
  • 8. GAILIUŠIS B., JABLONSKIS J., KOVALENKOVIENĖ M. Lithuanian rivers hydrograph and runoff. Lietuvos energetikos institutes: Kaunas. 2001 [In Lithuanian].
  • 9. KILKUS K. The geography of Lithuanian waters. Apyaušris: Vilnius. 1998 [In Lithuanian].
  • 10. GAIGALIS K., JURGELEVIČIENĖ I., LASINSKAS M., TAUTVYDAS A. The basins of the Nevėžis, Dubysa, Miltuva and Jūra Rivers. Mokslas: Vilnius. 1979 [In Lithuanian].
  • 11. RESH V.H., JACKSON J.K. Rapid assessment approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In: ROSENBERG D.M., RESH V.H. (Ed.). Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Kluwer: London, pp. 195-233, 1993.
  • 12. FAUSCH K.D., LYONS J., KARR J.R., ANGERMEIER P.L. Fish Communities as Indicators of Environmental Degradation. In: ADAMS S.M. (Ed.). Biological Indicators of Stress in Fish. American Fisheries Society Symposium 8: Bethesda, MD, pp. 123-144, 1990.
  • 13. KARR J.R., KERANS B.L. Components of Biological Integrity: Their Definition and Use in Development of an Invertebrate IBI. U.S. EPA Report 905-R-92-003. II: 16 p. Environmental Sciences Div. Chicago. 1991.
  • 14. WILDHABER M.L., SCHMITT C.S. Indices of benthic community tolerance in contaminated great lakes sediments: Relations with sediment contaminant concentrations, sediment toxicity and the sediment quality triad. Environ. Monit. Assess. 49, 23, 1998.
  • 15. HORNE A.J. Wetlands and Rivers: Ecology and Management, CE 118 class reader. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of California: Berkeley, USA. 2003.
  • 16. SKRIVER J., FRIBERG N., KIRKEGAARD J. Biological assessment of running waters in Denmark: introduction of the Danish Stream Fauna Index. Proc. Int. Assoc. Theor. Appl. Limnol. 27, 1822, 2000.
  • 17. HILSENHOFF W.L. Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family-level biotic index. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 7, 65, 1988.
  • 18. KLEEMOLA S., SODERMAN G. Manual for Integrated Monitoring. Programme phase 1993-1996. Hydrobiology of streams. National board of water and the environment: Helsinki. pp. 67-68, 1993.
  • 19. BODE R.W., NOVAK M.A., ABELE L.E. Quality assurance work plan for biological stream monitoring in New York State. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Water Albany, NY. 1991.
  • 20. SHANNON C.E., WEAVER W. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University Illinois Press. 1949.
  • 21. BRAY J.R., CURTIS J.T. An ordination of upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27, 325, 1957.
  • 22. LITHUANIAN STANDARDS. Regulations for wastewater treatment. The Official Gazette, No. 110-4522, 2007 [In Lithuanian].
  • 23. ADAMEK Z., ORENDT C., WOLFRAM G., SYCHRA J. Macrozoobenthos response to environmental degradation in a heavily modified stream: case study in the Upper Elbe River, Czech Republic. Biologia 65, 527, 2010.
  • 24. BIS B., ZDANOWICZ A., ZALEWSKI M. Effect of catchment properties on hydrochemistry, habitat complexity and invertebrate community structure in a lowland river. Hydrobiologia 422/423, 369, 2000.
  • 25. HORSAK M. BOJKOVA J., ZAHRADKOVA S., OMESOVA M., HELEŚIC J. Impact of reservoirs and channelization on lowland river macroinvertebrates: A case study from Central Europe. Limnologica 39, 140, 2009.
  • 26. NEGISHI J.N., INONE M., NUNOKAWA M. Effects of channelisation on stream habitat in relation to a spate and flow refugia for macroinvertebrates in Northern Japan. Freshwat. Biol. 47, 1515, 2002.
  • 27. NAKAMURA F., YAMADA H. The effects of pasture development on the ecological functions of riparian forests in Hokkaido in Nothern Japan. Ecol. Eng. 24, 539, 2005.
  • 28. QUINN J.M., WILLIAMSON R.B., SMITH R.K., VICKERS M.L. Effects of riparian grazing and channelisation on streams in Southland, New Zealand. 2. Benthic invertebrates. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 26, 259, 1992.
  • 29. PLIŪRAITĖ V., KESMINAS V. Response of benthic macroinvertebrates to agricultural pollution and channelisation in Mūša river, Lithuania. Fres. Environ. Bull. 19, (12a), 2929, 2010.
  • 30. COLLIER K.J., SMITH B.J., QUINN J.M., SCARSBROOK M.R., HALLIDAY N.J., CROKER G.F., PARKYN S. M. Biodiversity of stream invertebrate faunas in a Waikato hill-country catchment in relation to land use. N. Z. Entomol. 23, 9, 2000.
  • 31. HALL M.J., CLOSS P., RILEY R.H. Relationships between land use and stream invertebrate community structure in South Island, New Zealand, coastal stream catchment. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 35, 591, 2001.
  • 32. RIOS S.L., BAILEY R.C. Relationship between riparian vegetation and stream benthic communities at three spatial scales. Hydrobiologia 553, 153, 2006.
  • 33. NAIMAN R.J., DECAMPS H., POLLOCK M. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecol. Appl. 2, 209, 1993.
  • 34. TATE C.M., HEINLY J.S. The ordination of benthic invertebrates communities in the South Platte River Basin in relation to environmental factors. Freshwat. Biol. 33, 439, 1995.
  • 35. COUCEIRO S.R.M., HAMADA N., LUR S.L.B., FORSBERG B.R., PIMENTEL T.P. Deforestation and sewage effects on aquatic macroinvertebrates in urban streams in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Hydrobiologia 575, 271, 2007.
  • 36. BENSTEAD J.P., DOUGLAS M.M., PRIGLE C.M. Relationships of stream invertebrate communities to deforestation in Eastern Madagascar. Ecol. Appl. 13, 1473, 2003.
  • 37. DE PAUW N., VANHOOREN G. Method for biological quality assessment of watercourses in Belgium. Hydrobiologia 100, 153, 1983.
  • 38. YOUSEF Y.A., BAKER D., BARBOSA F.F.A.R.: Modeling and impact of metal accumulation in bottom sediments of wet ponds. Sci. Tot. Environ. 189/190, 349, 2000.
  • 39. FRIEDRICH G., CHAPMAN D., BEIM A. The use of Biological Material. In: D. CHAPMAN (Ed.). Water Quality Assessments. 171-238. WHO, UNESCO: London. 1992.
  • 40. TIMM H, MARDI K., MOLS T. Macroinvertebrates in Estonian streams: the effects of habitat, season, and sampling effort on some common metrics of biological quality. Eston. J. Ecol. 57, 37, 2008.
  • 41. TIMM H. Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera larvae as environmental indicators in running waters of Estonia. In: LANDOLT P. SARTORI M. (Eds.), Ephemeroptera & Plecoptera: Biology-Ecology-Systematics: Proc. 8th int. conf. Ephemeroptera, Lausanne, 1995, Mauron+Tinguely & Lanchat, SA: Fribourg, pp. 247-253, 1997.
  • 42. STONE M.L., WHILES M.R., REEVE J.D. Macroinvertebrate communities in agriculturally impacted southern Illinois streams: patterns with riparian vegetation, water quality, and in-stream habitat quality. J. Environ. Qual. 34, 907, 2005.
  • 43. PLIŪRAITĖ V., MICKĖNIENĖ L. Benthic macroinvertebrate communities in agriculturally impaired streams. Environ. Res. Eng. Manag. 3, 10, 2009.
  • 44. PLIŪRAITĖ V., MICKĖNIENĖ L. Changes in macroinvertebrate assemblages in streams under anthropogenic impact. Fres. Environ. Bull. 19, 495, 2010.
  • 45. GALDEAN N., CALLISTO M., BARBOSA F.A.R. Lotic ecosystems of Serra do Cipo, southeast Brazil: water quality and a tentative classification based on the benthic macroinvertebrate community. Aquatic Ecosys. Health Manag. 3, 545, 2000.
  • 46. BARBOUR M.T., GERRITSEN J., SNYDER B.D., STRIBLING J.B. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wade able Rivers: perphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. 2nd ed.: EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. 1999.
  • 47. DE SHON J.E. Development and application of the invertebrate community index (ICI). In: DAVIS W.S., SIMON T.P. (Eds.). Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 217-243, 1995.
  • 48. LENAT D.R. Agriculture and stream water quality: a biological evaluation of erosion control practices. Environ. Manage. 8, 333, 1984.
  • 49. LENAT D.R. A biotic index for the southeastern United States: derivation and list of tolerance values, with criteria for assigning water-quality ratings. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 12, 279, 1993.
  • 50. HOOPER H.L., SIBLY R.M., HUTCHINSON T.M., MAUND S.J. The influence of larval density, food availability and habitat longevity on the life history and population growth rate of the midge Chironomus riparius. Oikos 102, 351, 2003.
  • 51. MARQUES M.M., BARBOSA F.A.R. Biological quality of waters from an impacted tropical watershed (middle Rio Doce basin, southeast Brazil), using benthic macroinvertebrate communities as an indicator. Hydrobiologia 457, 515, 2001.
  • 52. RAE J.G. Chironomid midges as indicators of organic pollution in the Scioto River basin, Ohio. Ohio J. Sci. 89, 5, 1989.
  • 53. HYNES H.B.N. The ecology of running waters. University of Toronto Press: Toronto. 1970.
  • 54. LEUNDA P.M., OSCOZ J., MIRANDA R., ARINO A.H. Longitudinal and seasonal variation of the benthic macroinvertebrate community and biotic indices in an undisturbed Pyrenean river. Ecol. Indic. 9, 52, 2009
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.