PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 16 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Prey selection by Rhinolophus hipposideros (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae) in a modified forest in Southwest Europe

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The knowledge of the diet of endangered species provides information on ecology and behaviour that is essential for the adequate management of their populations. Population decline may be indeed associated with diet specialization and unavailability of feeding resources, especially in modified environments. We studied the diet and prey selection of Rhinolophus hipposideros Borkhausen, 1797 in a modified Mediterranean landscape in Portugal, where this species is classified as vulnerable. Diet composition was evaluated by analyzing faecal pellets collected in a breeding colony of R. hipposideros, and the available arthropods were sampled using a light trap set outside the roost. The most consumed prey were Lepidoptera, Tipulidae (Diptera), Hymenoptera, Diptera and Neuroptera. Arthropod diversity remained fairly constant in the diet, but not in terms of prey availability. Our results show that R. hipposideros is a generalist species that feeds on a great number of prey species. However, our data suggest that, within the broad dietary niche, R. hipposideros is not opportunistic, actively selecting Diptera as a preferred food item. Despite the marked differences in foraging habitats, our results are closely match to those of studies done in Western and Central Europe, suggesting that R. hipposideros feeds on similar taxa all across Europe. However, as many studies indicate, this species selects broadleaved woodlands and riparian vegetation to forage, so conservation measures should take into account the protection of native forest and the maintenance of forest corridors among them, as R. hipposideros seems to avoid crossing open areas.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

16

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.75-83,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Biology Department and Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
autor
  • Biology Department and Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
  • Lurio University, Campus de Marrere, Bairro de Marrere, R. nr 4250, km 2.3, Nampula, Mozambique
autor
  • Department of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology, University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU), 48940 Leioa, Biscay, The Basque Country
  • Biology Department and Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
  • Department of Zoology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, S/N - Asa Norte, Brasilia - DF, 70910-900, Brazil

Bibliografia

  • 1. T. Andersen , and U. Greve . 1975. Neuroptera in light-traps at Osteroy, Hordaland. Norsk Entomologisk Tidsskrift, 22: 123–128. Google Scholar
  • 2. R. Arlettaz , S. Godat , and H. Meyer . 2000. Competition for food by expanding pipistrelle bat populations (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) might contribute to the decline of lesser horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus hipposideros). Biological Conservation, 93: 55–60. Google Scholar
  • 3. M. Baez 1988. Diptera. Pp. 503–519, in Bases para un Curso Práctico de Entomología ( J. A. Barrientos , eds). Asocia ción española de Entomología, Salamanca, xii + 754 pp. Google Scholar
  • 4. M. Begon , J. L. Harper , and C. Townsend . 1996a. Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. Blackwell Science, Oxford, xii + 1068 pp. Google Scholar
  • 5. M. Begon , M. Mortimer , and D. J. Thompson . 1996b. Popul a tion ecology: a unified study of animals and plants. Wiley-Blackwell, Cambridge, xiii + 247 pp. Google Scholar
  • 6. F. Bontadina , R. Arlettaz , T. Fankhauser , M. Lutz , E. Mühlethaler , A. Theiler , and P. Zingg . 2001. The Lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros in Switzerland: Present status and research recommendations. Le Rhinolophe, 14: 69–83. Google Scholar
  • 7. F. Bontadina , H. Schofield , and B. Naef-Daenzer . 2002. Radio-tracking reveals that lesser horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus hipposideros) forage in woodland. Journal of Zoology (London), 258: 281–290. Google Scholar
  • 8. F. Bontadina , S. F. Schmied , A. Beck , and R. Arlettaz . 2008. Changes in prey abundance unlikely to explain the demography of a critically endangered Central European bat. Jour nal of Applied Ecology, 45: 641–648. Google Scholar
  • 9. M. J. Cabral , P. R. D. Almeida , J. Almeida , N. F. D. Almeida , T. Dellinger , M. E. Oliveira , J. Palmeirim , A. I. Queiroz , L. Rogado , and M. Santos-Reis . 2005. Livro vermelho dos vertebrados de Portugal. Instituto da Conservação da Natureza, Lisbon, 660 pp. Google Scholar
  • 10. M. Chinery 2007. Insects of Britain and Western Europe. A & C Black, London, 320 pp. Google Scholar
  • 11. C. R. Dickman , and C. Huang . 1988. The reliability of faecal analysis as a method for determining the diet of insectivorous mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 69: 108–113. Google Scholar
  • 12. L. C. Drickamer , S. H. Vessey , and D. Meikle . 1996. Animal behavior: mechanisms, ecology, evolution. Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Chicago, USA, xiii + 494 pp. Google Scholar
  • 13. E. Galante-Patiño , and J. Viejo . 1988. Lepidoptera. Pp. 533–562, in Bases para un curso práctico de entomología ( J. A. Barrientos , ed.). Asociación Española de Entomología, Salamanca, xii + 754 pp . Google Scholar
  • 14. S. Gayudo 1988. Hymenoptera. Pp. 641–658, in Bases para un curso práctico de entomología ( J. A. Barrientos , ed.). Asociación Española de Entomología, Salamanca, xii + 754 pp. Google Scholar
  • 15. U. Goiti , J. R. Aihartza , and I. Garin . 2004. Diet and prey selection in the Mediterranean horseshoe bat Rhinolophus euryale (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae) during the pre-breeding season. Mammalia, 68: 397–402. Google Scholar
  • 16. U. Goiti , I. Garin , D. Almenar , E. Salsamendi , and J. Aihartza . 2008. Foraging by Mediterranean horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus euryale) in relation to prey distribution and edge habitat. Journal of Mammalogy, 89: 493–502. Google Scholar
  • 17. L. Gonsalves , B. Bicknell , B. Law , C. Webb , and V. Monamy . 2013. Mosquito consumption by insectivorous bats: does size matter? PloS ONE, 8: e77183. Google Scholar
  • 18. H. Goulet , J. T. Huber , and C. A. C. R. Branch . 1993. Hymenoptera of the World: an identification guide to families. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Canada, vii + 668 pp. Google Scholar
  • 19. D. Hosmer , and S. Lemeshow . 2000. Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, New York, xii + 373 pp. Google Scholar
  • 20. C. IbÁÑEz 1998. Los quirópteros. Pp. 114–218, in Mamiferos de España I ( J. C. Blanco , ed.). Editorial Planeta S.A., Barcelona, 457 pp. Google Scholar
  • 21. ICNF. . 2003. Plano de ordenamento do Parque Natural de Sintra-Cascais. Parque Natural de Sintra-Cascais, Lisbon, Portugal, 395 pp. Google Scholar
  • 22. ICNF. 2012. Agreement on the conservation of populations of European bats: Report on implementation of the Agreement in Portugal — 2012. 17th Meeting of the Advisory Committee, EUROBATS, 46 pp. Available at: http://www.eurobats.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/National_Reports/nat_rep_Por_2012.pdf. Google Scholar
  • 23. C. Jeuniaux 1961. Chitinase: an addition to the list of hydrolases in the digestive tract of vertebrates. Nature, 192: 135–136. Google Scholar
  • 24. G. Jones 1990. Prey selection by the greater horseshoe bat (Rhi nolophus ferrumequinum): optimal foraging by echolocation? Journal of Animal Ecology, 59: 587–602. Google Scholar
  • 25. C. Kimura , T. Mishima , and K. Hirabayashi . 2011. Species composition and abundance of craneflies (Diptera: Tipulidae) in the highland lakes of Japan. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 26: 91–97. Google Scholar
  • 26. C. J. Krebs 1999. Ecological methodology. HarperCollins Publisher, New York, xii + 654 pp. Google Scholar
  • 27. T. H. Kunz , and J. O. Whitaker . 1983. An evaluation of faecal analysis for determining food-habits of insectivorous bats. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 61: 1317–1321. Google Scholar
  • 28. M. J. Lacki , L. S. Burford , and J. O. Whitaker Jr. 1995. Food habits of gray bats in Kentucky. Journal of Mammalogy, 76: 1256–1259. Google Scholar
  • 29. M. Lousã , J. C. Costa , S. Mesquita , and P. Arsénio . 2005. Flora e vegetação. Pp. 109–176, in Plano verde do Con celho de Sintra — 1ª Fase. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Centro Estudos de Arquitectura Paisagista — Prof. Caldeira Cabral, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisbon, 211 pp. Google Scholar
  • 30. J. Ma , B. Liang , S. Zhang , and W. Metzner . 2008. Dietary composition and echolocation call design of three sympatric insectivorous bat species from China. Ecological Research, 23: 113–119. Google Scholar
  • 31. R. H. MacArthur , and E. R. Pianka . 1966. On optimal use of a patchy environment. American Naturalist: 603–609. Google Scholar
  • 32. D. MacDonald , and P. Barret . 1993. Chiroptera. Pp. 43–87, in Collins field guides to the mammals of Britain and Europe. Harper Collins, London, xii + 754 pp. Google Scholar
  • 33. M. Martinez 1988. Psocoptera. Pp. 445–449, in Bases para un curso práctico de entomología ( J. A. Barrientos , ed.). Asociación Española de Entomología, Salamanca, xii + 754 pp. Google Scholar
  • 34. C. M. McAney , and J. S. Fairley . 1989. Analysis of the diet of the lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros in the west of Ireland. Journal of Zoology (London), 217: 491–498. Google Scholar
  • 35. M. Mier 1988. Homoptera. Pp. 473–489, in Bases para un curso práctico de entomología ( J. A. Barrientos , ed.). Asociación Española de Entomología, Salamanca, xii + 754 pp. Google Scholar
  • 36. G. Motte , and R. Libois . 2002. Conservation of the lesser horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus hipposideros Bechstein, 1800) (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in Belgium. A case study of feeding habitat requirements. Belgian Journal of Zoology, 132: 49–54. Google Scholar
  • 37. I. P. F. Owens , and P. M. Bennett . 2000. Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: Habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced predators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97: 12144–12148. Google Scholar
  • 38. J. Palmeirim , and L. Rodrigues . 1992. Plano nacional de conservação dos morcegos cavernícolas. Estudos de Biologia e Conservação da Natureza 8, Serviço Nacional de Parques Reservas e Conservação da Natureza, Lisbon, 165 pp. Google Scholar
  • 39. A. Purvis , J. L. Gittleman , G. Cowlishaw , and G. M. Mace . 2000. Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 267B: 1947–1952. Google Scholar
  • 40. A. Rainho 2007. Summer foraging habitats of bats in a Mediterranean region of the Iberian Peninsula. Acta Chiropterologica, 9: 171–181. Google Scholar
  • 41. A. Rainho , L. Rodrigues , S. Bicho , C. Franco , and J. Palmeirim . 1998. Morcegos das áreas protegidas portuguesas I. Estudos de Biologia e Conservação da Natureza 26, Instituto da Conservação da Natureza, Lisbon, 118 pp. Google Scholar
  • 42. M. J. Ramos Pereira , H. Rebelo , A. Rainho , and J. M. Palmeirim . 2002. Prey selection by Myotis myotis (Vespertilionidae) in a Mediterranean region. Acta Chiro pterolo gica, 4: 183–193. Google Scholar
  • 43. G. Reiter 2004. The importance of woodland for Rhinolophus hipposideros (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae) in Austria. Mammalia, 68: 403–410. Google Scholar
  • 44. D. Russo , and G. Jones . 2003. Use of foraging habitats by bats in a Mediterranean area determined by acoustic surveys: conservation implications. Ecography, 26: 197–209. Google Scholar
  • 45. K. Safi , and G. Kerth . 2004. A comparative analysis of specialization and extinction risk in temperate-zone bats. Conservation Biology, 18: 1293–1303. Google Scholar
  • 46. J. Salgado , R. Outerello , P. Gamarra , M. Blas , X. Vazquez , E. Vives , and J. Otero . 1988. Coleoptera. Pp. 573–639, in Bases para un curso práctico de entomología ( J. A. Barrientos , ed.). Asociación Española de Entomología, Salamanca, xii + 754 pp. Google Scholar
  • 47. E. Salsamendi , I. Garin , D. Almenar , U. Goiti , M. Napal , and J. Aihartza . 2008. Diet and prey selection in Mehelyi's horseshoe bat Rhinolophus mehelyi (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae) in the south-western Iberian Peninsula. Acta Chiropterologica, 10: 279–286. Google Scholar
  • 48. H. W. Schofield 1996. The ecology and conservation biology of Rhinolophus hipposideros, the lesser horseshoe bat. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, 198 pp. Google Scholar
  • 49. C. Shiel , C. McAney , C. Sullivan , and J. Fairley . 1997. Iden tification of arthropod fragments in bat droppings. Mam mal Society, London, 56 pp. Google Scholar
  • 50. D. Unwin 1988. A key to the families of british coleoptera (beetles) and trepsiptera. Field Studies Council, Williton, 48 pp. Google Scholar
  • 51. N. Vaughan 1997. The diets of British bats (Chiroptera). Mam mal Review, 27: 77–94. Google Scholar
  • 52. M. Vazquez 1988. Heteroptera. Pp. 491–501, in Bases para un curso práctico de entomología ( J. A. Barrientos , ed.). Asociación Española de Entomología, Salamanca, xii + 754 pp. Google Scholar
  • 53. P. Waring , and M. Townsend . 2009. Field guide to the moths of Great Britain and Ireland. British Wildlife, 443 pp. Google Scholar
  • 54. J. Whitaker 1988. Food habits analysis of insectivorous bats. Pp. 171–190, in Ecology and behavioral methods for the study of bats ( T. H. Kunz , eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 920 pp. Google Scholar
  • 55. C. Williams , L. Salter , and G. Jones . 2011. The winter diet of the lesser horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus hipposideros) in Britain and Ireland. Hystrix — Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 22: 159–166. Google Scholar
  • 56. Y. Yom-Tov , and J. Whitaker Jr. 2002. The diet of some insectivorous bats from northern Israel. Mammalian Biology, 67: 378–380. Google Scholar
  • 57. A. Zahn , J. Holzhaider , E. Kriner , A. Maier , and A. Kayikcioglu . 2008. Foraging activity of Rhinolophus hipposideros on the island of Herrenchiemsee, Upper Bavaria. Mammalian Biology, 73: 222–229. Google Scholar
  • 58. J. H. Zar 2007. Biostatistical analysis, 4th edition. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, xii + 929 pp. Google Scholar
  • 59. M. R. K. Zeale , R. K. Butlin , G. L. A. Barker , D. C. Lees , and G. Jones . 2011. Taxon-specific PCR for DNA barcoding arthropod prey in bat faeces. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11: 236–244. Google Scholar

Uwagi

Rekord w opracowaniu

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-146cf476-165e-48bf-aa92-e8b1a5e69da4
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.