Morphological changes in two tobacco and petunia cultivars under exposure to tropospheric ozone

• Autorzy: Borowiak K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study assessed the effect of cumulative tropospheric ozone on the morphology of an ozone-sensitive (Bel W3) and an ozone-resistant (Bel B) tobacco cultivar, and two petunia cultivars (Mirage, White Cascade). The plants were exposed at two sites differing in tropospheric ozone level for two months during the 2008 growing season. Similar sets of plants were cultivated in control conditions. Morphological parameters of the plants were measured every week during the experiment. The correlation between the recorded results and the cumulative concentrations of tropospheric ozone measured at the two exposure sites was estimated. The ozone-sensitive tobacco cultivar showed increased visible damage after four weeks of the experiment, although ozone was relatively low during the preceding weeks, possibly confirming the cumulative effect of ozone on the plant response. The ozone-resistant tobacco cultivar showed higher mean plant growth and leaf growth than the ozone-sensitive one throughout the experimental period, but at the exposure sites the ozone-sensitive cultivar showed plant growth similar to or higher than the controls, especially at the forest site where ozone concentrations were higher. This suggests a plant defense against reduction of leaf assimilation area (i.e., against leaf necrosis). Petunia cv. Mirage showed lower growth at the control site and had fewer flowers than White Cascade at all sites. White Cascade had more flowers than Mirage in the last week of the experiment at the forest site where tropospheric ozone was higher. Its mean growth was higher at the forest site than at the other exposure site.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

tobacco; petunia; plant cultivar; ozone exposure; tropospheric ozone

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 55
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.58-66,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Borowiak K.

• Ecology and Environmental Protection, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Piatkowska 94C, 60-649 Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• AGRAWAL M, KRIZEK DT, AGRAWAL SB, KRAMER GF, LEE EH, and MIRECKI RM. 1993. Influence of inverse day/nighttemperature on ozone sensitivity and selected morphologicaland physiological responses of cucumber.Journal of American Society for Horticulture Science118: 649–654.
• BANDURSKA H, BOROWIAK K, and MIARA M. 2009. Effect of ozone exposure on the activity of antioxidative enzymes inleaves of two tobacco cultivars with contrasting ozonesensitivity. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia series Botanica51(1): 37–44.
• BARRET LA, BUNCE NJ, and GILLESPIE TJ. 1998. Estimation of tropospheric ozone production using concentrations of hydrocarbons and NOx, and a comprehensive hydrocarbons reactivity parameter. Journal of Photochemistryand Photobiology A 113: 1–8.
• BOROWIAK K, DRZEWIECKA K, GĄSECKA M, ZBIERSKA J, and GRAJCZYŃSKA O. 2010a. Investigations of selected parametersof tobacco plants response to tropospheric ozone inambient air conditions. Fresenius EnvironmentalBulletin 19(11): 2480–2489.
• BOROWIAK K, ZBIERSKA J, and DRAPIKOWSKA M. 2010b. Differences in morpho-anatomical structure of ozonesensitive and ozone-resistant tobacco cultivars. Acta Biologica Hungarica 61(1): 90–100.
• BOROWIAK K, KAYZER D, BUDKA A, ZBIERSKA J, DRZEWIECKA K, BANDURSKA H, and GOLIŃSKI P. 2012. Cumulative tropospheric ozone effect on visible tobacco leaf injury. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 21(2a): 509–517.
• BOOKER F, MUNTIFERING R, MCGRATH M, BURKEY K, DECOTEAU D, FISCUS E, MANNING W, KRUPA S, CHAPPELKA A, and GRANTZ D. 2009. The ozone component of global change: potential effects on agricultural and horticultural plant yield, product quality and interactions with invasive species. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology51(4): 337–351.
• BUDKA A, BOROWIAK K, KAYZER D, and ZBIERSKA J. 2010. Study of ozone-caused leaf injury degree in different physiologicalphases of tobacco plants exposed in ambient airconditions. Biometrical Letters 47(2 ): 147–154.
• CUNY D, DAVRANCHE L, VAN HALUWYN PLAISANCE H, CARON B, and MALRIEU V. 2004. Monitoring ozone by using tobacco,automated network and passive sampler in an industrialarea in France. In: Klumpp A, Klumpp G, Ansel W[eds.], Urban Air Pollution. Bioindication andEnvironmental Awareness, 89–96. Cuvillier Verlag,Göttingen.
• DIZENGREMEL P. 2001. Effects of ozone on the carbon metabolism of forest trees. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry39: 729–742.
• Dz.U. 5, poz. 31. 2008. Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska w sprawie dokonywania oceny poziomów substancji wpowietrzu.
• ELKIEY T, and ORMROD DP. (1979) Petunia cultivar sensitivity to ozone and sulphur dioxide. Scientia Horticulturae-Amsterdam 11: 269–280.
• FENG ZZ, KOBAYASHI K, and AINSWORTH EA. 2008. Impact of elevated ozone concentration on growth, physiology andyield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a meta-analysis.Global Change Biology 14: 2696–2708.
• FISCUS EL, BOOKER FL, and BURKEY KO. 2005. Crop responses to ozone: uptake, modes of action, carbon assimilationand partitioning. Plant, Cell and Environment 28:997–1011.
• FORLANI A, MEROLA, G, and FAGNANO M. 2005. Ozone effects on vegetation in three different localities of CampaniaRegion (Southern Italy). Fresenius EnvironmentalBulletin 14(6): 478–483.
• GODZIK B. 2000. The measurement of tropospheric ozone concentrations in southern Poland using the passive samplersand plant bioindicators. Archives of Environmental Protection 26(2): 7–19.
• GRANTZ DA, and YOUNG S. 1995. Effect of O3 on hydraulic architecture in Pima cotton: biomass allocation and water transport capacity of roots and shoots. PlantsPhysiology 112: 1649–1657.
• HASSAN IA, and TEWFIK I. 2006. CO2 photoassimilation, chlorophyll fluorescence, lipid peroxidation and yield in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv Giza 65) in response to O3. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 3(1): 70–78.
• HETHERINGTON AM, and WOODWARD FI. 2003. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature424: 901–908.
• IPCC 2007. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report Climate Change 2007:Synthesis Report, University Press, Cambridge, GreatBritain.
• KLEIER C, FARNSWORTH B, and WINNER W. 1998. Biomass, reproductive output, and physiological responses ofrapid-cycling Brassica (Brassica rapa) to ozone andmodified root temperature. New Phytologist 139:657–664.
• KLEY D, GEISS H, and MOHNEN VA. 1994. Tropospheric ozone at elevated sites and precursor emission in the United States and Europe. Atmospheric Environment 28(1): 149–158.
• KLUMPP A, ANSEL W, KLUMPP G, VERGNE P, SIFAKIS N, SANZ MJ, RASMUSSEN S, RO-POULSEN H, RIBAS A, PENUELAS J, KAMBEZIDIS H, HEG S, GARREC JP, and CALATAYUD V. 2006. Ozone pollution and ozone biomonitoring in European cities. Part II. Ozone-induced plant injury and its relationship with descriptors of ozone pollution. Atmosphere Environment 40: 7437–7448.
• LONG SP, and NAIDU SL. 2004. Effects of oxidants at the biochemical, cell and physiological level, with particular referenceto ozone. In: Bell JNB, Treshow M [eds.], AirPollution and Plant Life, 69–89. John Wiley and Sons,Chichester.
• MORGAN PB, AINSWORTH EA, and LONG S. 2003. How does elevated ozone impact soybean? A meat-analysis of photosynthesis,growth and yield. Plant, Cell andEnvironment 26: 1317–1328.
• OKSANEN E. 2003. Physiological responses of birch (Betula pendula) to ozone: a comparison between open-soilgrowntrees exposed to six growing seasons and pottedseedlings exposed for one season. Tree Physiology 23: 603–614.
• PÄÄKKÖNEN E, METSÄRINNE S, HOLOPAINEN T, and KÄRENLAPMI L. 1995. The ozone sensitivity of birch (Betula pendulaTorh.) in relation to the developmental stage of leaves.New Phytologist 132: 145–154.
• PN-EN 14625: 2005. Reference method of analysis the level of substances. Atmospheric air quality. Standard methodmeasurement of ozone concentration with using UV photometry.
• RAI R, AGRAWAL M, and AGRAWAL SB. 2007. Assessment of yield losses in tropical wheat using open top chambers.Atmospheric Environment 41: 9543–9554.
• RIIKONEN J, LINDSBERG M-M, HOLOPAINEN T, OKSANEN E, LAPPI J, PELTONEN P, and VAAVOURI E. 2004. Silver birch andclimate change: variable growth and carbon allocationresponses to elevated concentration of carbon dioxideand ozone. Tree Physiology 28: 243–254.
• RIIKONEN J, PERCY KE, KIVIMÄENPÄÄ M, KUBISKE ME, NELSON ND, VAPAAVOURI E, and KARNOSKY DF. 2010. Leaf size and surface characteristics of Betula papyrifera exposed to elevated CO2 and O3. Environmental Pollution 158:1029–1035.
• SAITANIS CJ, and KARANDINOS MG. 2002. Effects of ozone on tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) varieties. Journal ofAgronomy and Crop Science 188: 51–58.
• SHI G, YANG L, WANG Y, KOBAYASHI K, ZHU J, TANG H, PAN S, CHEN T, LIU G, and WANG Y. 2009. Impact of elevatedozone concentration on yield of four Chinese rice cultivarsunder fully open-air field conditions. Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment 131: 178–184.
• VANDERMEIREN K, BLACK C, PLEIJEL H, and DE TEMMERMAN L. 2005. Impact of rising tropospheric ozone on potato: effects on photosynthesis, growth, productivity and yield quality. Plant, Cell and Environment 28: 982–996.
• VAN DINGENEN R, DENTENER FJ, FRANK R, MAURTEN CK, EMBERSON L, and COFALA J. 2009. The global impact of ozone on agricultural crop yield under current and future air quality legislation. Atmospheric Environment 43: 604–618.
• WELFARE K, YEO AR, and FLOWERS TJ. 2002. Effects of salinity and ozone, individually and in combination, on thegrowth and ion contents of two chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) varieties. Environmental Pollution 120:397–403.
• ZOUZOULAS D, KOUTROUBAS SD, VASSILIOU G, and VARDAVAKIS E. 2009. Effects of ozone fumigation on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) morphology, anatomy, physiology, yield and qualitative characteristics of fiber. Environmentaland Experimental Botany 67: 293–303

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu