Indices for assessing potential environmental hazard from future ship scrapping process, determinable in ship design stage

• Autorzy: Liberacki R.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper shortly presents the issue of utilization of ships after their withdrawal from service. Information on number of floating units liquidated in previous years was presented. Hazards to the environment , health and life of workers employed in the Far East ship scrapping yards operating on the beaches, were indicated. Then, the most important rules which have to make the ship recycling process safe were referred to. This author proposed to supplement the rules by environmental hazard indices which would be determined already in ship design stage. According to the concept the indices should take into account amount of dangerous substances used for building the ship as well as degree of their harmfulness (weighing factors). Two approaches to the issue of determining the weighing factors were proposed: deterministic and fuzzy

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Maritime Research
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 25
• Numer: Special Issue S1
• Opis fizyczny: p.243-247,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Liberacki R.

• Gdansk University of Technology, 11/12 Narutowicza St., 80-233 Gdansk, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Januszewski E.: Logic and philosophical issues connected with fuzzy logic (in Polish). Roczniki Filozoficzne. Vol LV, No. 1, 2007.
• 2. Kacprzyk J.: Fuzzy sets in systems analysis (in Polish). PWN, Warszawa, 1986
• 3. Koziński M.: Recycling of ships in EU legislation (in Polish). Zeszyty naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Gdyni (Scientific bulletins of Gdynia Maritime University). No. 87. December, 2014.
• 4. Liberacki R.: A probabilistic model of environmental safety of ship power plant. Polish Maritime Research. Special Issue. Gdańsk, 2004.
• 5. Liberacki R.: Effect of adopted rules of inference and methods of defuzzification on the final result of the evaluation of reliability made using the fuzzy logic methods. Journal of Polish CIMAC. Gdańsk, 2011.
• 6. Skjong R.: Criteria for establishing risk acceptance. Proceedings of ESREL Conference. Vol.2. Maastricht. June 2003.
• 7. Wójcik M.: Assessment methods of conformity of experts’ opinions for foresight research purposes (in Polish). Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach. (Scientific bulletins of Katowice Economic University) No. 220, 2015.
• 8. DNV: Environmental Differentiation of Dues and Fees for Ships. Technical Report No. 97-0212.1997.
• 9. IMO (MEPC 45/13). Formal Safety Assessment Including Environmental Indexing of Ships. 27 June 2000.
• 10. IMO (MSC – MEPC 2/Circ.5): Amendments to the guidelines for formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule – making process. 16.10.2006.
• 11. http://www.shipbreakingplatform.org/shipbrea_wp2011/ wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Worldwide-overview_ FINAL.pdf (30.05.2017)
• 12. http://www.shipbreakingplatform.org/shipbrea_wp2011/ wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Stats- Graphs_2016-List_ FINAL.pdf (30.05.2017)
• 13. http://www.shipbreakingplatform.org/ngo-platformannual-report-2015/ (30.05.2017)
• 14. PRS: Recycling of ships (in Polish). Publikacja informacyjna (Informing publication) No. 33/I,. Gdańsk, 2016.
• 15. http://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/PL/TXT/?qid=14841 29918570&uri=CELEX:32016D2323 (30.05.2017)

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/pomr-2018-0048