Parameter optimization of double-excess runoff generation model

• Autorzy: Ren B. , Liang J. , Yan B. , Lei X. , Fu W. , Ni. X. , Guo J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Research on the optimization of hydrological model parameters is an important issue in the field of hydrological forecasts, as these parameters not only directly impact the accuracy of forecast programs, but also relate to the development, application, and popularization of hydrological models. In this paper we selected the double-excess runoff generation model as the subject for research, and the data obtained from tens of flooding events in the Fen River Basin were used for the construction of these models. The SCE-UA and MOSCDE algorithms were then taken to optimize the models’ parameters. The results showed that: as compared with the SCE-UA algorithm, higher flood forecast accuracies were obtained through model parameter optimization using the MOSCDE algorithm. During the examination period, the compliance rate of the flood peak magnitude increased from 60% to 70%, while the compliance rate of the flood peak duration increased from 80% to 90%. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of the flood peak magnitudes increased from 0.664 to 0.878, which demonstrates an improvement in goodness-of-fit; the RMSE value of flood peak magnitudes also decreased from 399.8 to 236.84, thus showing a decrease in dispersion and an improvement in goodness-of-fit. With the continuous improvements made in hydrological parameter algorithms and the creation of new optimization algorithms, there is no doubt that the optimization of hydrological model parameters will become more reasonable.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 27
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: P.809-817,fig.ref.

Twórcy

autor

Ren B.

• School of Hydropower & Information Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, P. R. China

autor

Liang J.

• School of Hydropower & Information Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, P. R. China

autor

Yan B.

• School of Hydropower & Information Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, P. R. China

autor

Lei X.

• China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 010000, P. R. China

autor

Fu W.

• School of Hydropower & Information Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, P. R. China

autor

Ni. X.

• School of Hydropower & Information Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, P. R. China

autor

Guo J.

• State Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Reduction for Power Grid Transmission and Distribution Equipment, Changsha 410129, China
• State Grid Hunan Electric Company Disaster Prevention and Reduction Center, Changsha 410129, China

Bibliografia

• 1. Hrachowitz M., Savenije H.H.G., Bloschl G. et al., A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB) – a review, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 6 (58), 1198, 2013.
• 2. Euser T., Winsemius H.C., Hrachowitz M., Fenicia F., Uhlenbrook S., Savenije H.H.G. A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5 (17), 1893, 2013.
• 3. Gharari S., Hrachowitz M., Fenicia F., Gao H., Savenije H.H.G. Using expert knowledge to increase realism in environmental systemmodels can dramatically reduce the need for calibration, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 12 (18), 4839, 2014.
• 4. Gao H., Hrachowitz M., Fenicia F., Gharari S., Savenije H.H.G. Testing the realism of a topographydriven model (FLEX-Topo) in the nested catchments of the Upper Heihe, China, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5 (18), 1895, 2015.
• 5. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I-a discussion of principles, Journal of Hydrology, 3 (10), 282, 1970.
• 6. Yiping Guo, Shuguang Liu, Baetz B.W. Probabilistic rainfall-runoff transformation considering both infiltration and saturation excess runoff generation processes. Water Resources Research, 48, W06513, doi:10.1029/2011WR011613, 2012.
• 7. Pengnian Huang, Zhijia Li, Cheng Yao, Qiaoling Li, Meichun Yan Spatial Combination Modeling Framework of Saturation-Excess and Infiltration-Excess Runoff for Semihumid Watersheds. Advances in Meteorology. 2016, doi.org/10.1155/2016/5173984
• 8. Bruno Majonea, Alberto Bellina, Andrea Borsatob Runoff generation in karst catchments: multifractal analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 294, 176, 2004.
• 9. Bruno Majone, Andrea Bertagnoli, Alberto Bellin A non-linear runoff generation model in small Alpine catchments. Journal of Hydrology, 385, 300, 2010.
• 10. Strouhal, Ludek, David, Václav Role of Infiltration and Saturation Excess in Rainfall-Runoff Modelling in Small Catchements. Journal of Civil Engineering, 8 (1), 5, 2016.
• 11. Chun Fu, Qiang Zhang Summary of hydrological catchment models. Jiangxi Science, 04, 588, 2008.
• 12. Chengmei Luan Study on the optimization of hydrological catchment model parameters. Hohai University, 2005.
• 13. Xiaohua Yang, Zhifeng Yang, Jianqiang Li, Zhenyao Shen, Qiang Chen Prospects and research on hydrological model parameter identification algorithms. Progress in Natural Science, 06, 657, 2006.
• 14. Xiangyang Li Studies on the Optimization and uncertainty analysis of hydrological model parameters. Dalian University of Technology, 2006.
• 15. Delong Li, Xianyun Cheng , Hao Yang , Ping Huang Study on artificial intelligence optimization algorithms for auto-calibration of hydrological models [J].
• 16. Li Li Development and application of flood forecasting models in semi-arid and semi-humid catchments. Xi’An University of Technology, 2009.
• 17. Li Li, Yaoxing Yan , Bing Chen Application of the Double-Excess Model to Semi-Humid Areas. Journal of North University of China (Natural Science Edition), 01, 62, 2008.
• 18. Hua Jin The theories and applications study of doubleexcess runoff generation model. China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2006.
• 19. Jintao Liu , Huiqing Song , Xingnan Zhang , Xi Chen A discussion on advances in theories of Xinanjiang Model. Journal of China Hydrology, 01, 1, 2014.
• 20. Chao Gu Research and implementation of mountain flood warning in improved SCEM-UA algorithm and Xin’anjiang model. Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, 2014.
• 21. Zhangjun Liu , Shenglian Guo , Tianyuan Li, Xingjun Hong Comparative study of Bayesian probabilistic flood forecasting models [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 09, 1019, 2014.
• 22. Huijun Xu, Yangbo Chen, Biqiu Zeng, Jinxiang He, Zhenghong Liao Application of SCE-UA algorithm to parameter optimization of Liuxihe model. Tropical Geography, 01, 32, 2012.
• 23. Jun Guo, Jianzhong Zhou , Chao Zhaou , Guangqian Wang, Yongchuan Zhang Multiobjective optimization for conceptual hydrological models. Advances in Water Science, 04, 447, 2012.
• 24. Shujie Liang Analysis on Characteristics of Fenhe River Floods. Yellow River, 05, 17, 2005.
• 25. Jialan Sun, Xiaohui Lei, Junxi Yin, Yunzhong Jiang, Yuansheng Li Application of distributed flood forecasting model to Fenhe River Basin [J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 01, 21, 2014.
• 26. Hao Ge Parameters of Double Infiltration Model Calibration Based on SCE-UA. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, 07, 26, 2016.
• 27. Jun Guo, Jianzhong Zhou, Qiang Zou, Lixiang Song, Yunguan Zhang Study on Multi-objective parameter optimization of Xinanjiang model. Journal of China Hydrology, 01, 1, 2013.
• 28. Jun Guo, Jianzhong Zhou, Hao Wang, Qiang Zou Structure optimization and parameter calibration of empirical hydrological model under the multi-objective framework. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 02, 1, 2014.
• 29. Feifei Sun, Qin Xu, Liliang Ren, Changqing Lin, Rui Tong An analysis of the parameter sensitivity of hydrological models. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 03, 92, 2014.
• 30. Guodong Liu, Zhenxue Dai, Bing Xing, Yan Wang, Yuchuan Meng, Jun Li Application of bio-inspired algorithms for inverse problems of groundwater models: status and prospects. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, 01, 41, 2016.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/70626