PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 28 | 4 |
Tytuł artykułu

Yield and economic results of spring barley grown in crop rotation and in monoculture

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The study aimed to evaluate the yield and economic effectiveness of spring barley grown in crop rotation and cereal monoculture under three tillage systems. The experimental factors were crop sequence systems: 1) crop rotation (peas – spring barley – winter wheat) and 2) cereal monoculture (spring barley – winter wheat – winter wheat) and tillage systems: a) conventional tillage (CT), b) reduced tillage (RT), and 3) herbicide tillage (HT). Spring barley grain yield was significantly higher in crop rotation than in cereal monoculture. Also, yield was significantly higher under RT than under CT and HT. The number of weeds per m-2 in cereal monoculture was significantly higher than in crop rotation. Also, more weeds occurred under RT than under CT and HT. Air-dry weight of weeds was higher in cereal monoculture than in crop rotation and it was also higher under RT than under CT. In crop rotation, for each tillage system the production value (EUR ha-1) was higher than in monoculture, whereas the highest production value (EUR ha-1) was achieved in crop rotation in RT sites. The economic analysis showed a clear competitive advantage of RT sites with crop rotation over other sites. The proof is the highest gross margin and income from activity, and the lowest unit cost of production.
Słowa kluczowe
EN
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
28
Numer
4
Opis fizyczny
p.2441-2448,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland
autor
  • Department of Economics and Agribusiness, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland
autor
  • Department of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland
autor
  • Department of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. NEVENS F., REHEUL D. Crop rotation versus monoculture; yield, N yield and ear fraction of silage maize at different levels of mineral N fertilization. Netherlands Journal of Agriculture Science, 49 (4), 405, 2001.
  • 2. WOŹNIAK A. Yield and chemical composition of spring triticale grain depending on cropping and tillage systems. International Journal of Plant Production, 10 (1), 45. 2016.
  • 3. JASKULSKI D., KOTWICA K., JASKULSKA I., PIEKARCZYK M., OSIŃSKI G., POCHYLSKI B. Components of today’s tillage and crop farming systems – production and environmental effects. Fragmenta Agronomica, 29 (3), 61. 2012 [In Polish].
  • 4. HERNANDEZ-RESTREPO M., GROENEWALD J.Z., ELLIOTT M.L., CANNING G., MCMILLAN V.E., CROUS P.W. Take-all or nothing. Studies in Mycology, 83, 19, 2016.
  • 5. WOŹNIAK A., KAWECKA-RADOMSKA M. Crop management effect on chemical and biological properties of soil. International Journal of Plant Production, 10 (3), 391. 2016.
  • 6. DEIKE S., PALLUTT B., MELANDER B., STRASSEMEYER J., CHRISTEN O. Long-term productivity and environmental effects of arable farming as affected by crop rotation, soil tillage intensity and strategy of pesticide use: A case-study of two long term field experiments in Germany and Denmark. European Journal of Agronomy, 29 (4), 191, 2008.
  • 7. CHAUHAN B.S., SINGH R.G., MAHAJAN G. Ecology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture: a review. Crop Protection, 38, 57, 2012.
  • 8. WOŹNIAK A., KWIATKOWSKI C. Effect of longterm reduced tillage on yield and weeds of spring barley. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 15(20), 1335, 2013.
  • 9. LAHMAR R. Adoption of conservation agriculture in Europe lesson of the KASSA project. Land Use Policy, 27 (1), 4, 2010.
  • 10. SHAHZAD M., FAROOQ M., JABRAN K., HUSSAIN M. Impact of different crop rotations and tillage systems on weed infestation and productivity of bread wheat. Crop Protection, 89, 161, 2016.
  • 11. DE VITA P., DI PAOLO E., FECONDO G., DI FONZO N., PISANTE, M. No-tillage and conventional tillage effects on durum wheat yield, grain quality, and soil moisture content in Southern Italy. Soil and Tillage Research, 92 (1-2), 69, 2007.
  • 12. MONTEMURRO F., MAIORANA M. Cropping systems, tillage and fertilization strategies for durum wheat performance and soil properties. International Journal of Plant Production, 8 (1), 51, 2014.
  • 13. WOŹNIAK A., SOROKA M. Structure of weed communities occurring in crop rotation and monoculture of cereals. International Journal of Plant Production, 9 (3), 487, 2015.
  • 14. PARYLAK D., PYTLARZ E. Effects on production of winter wheat in monoculture under reduced Tillage. Fragmenta Agronomica, 30 (4), 114, 2013 [In Polish].
  • 15. NEUMANN A., SCHMIDTKE K., RAUBER R. Effects of crop density and tillage system on grain yield and N uptake from soil and atmosphere of sole and intercropped pea and oat. Field Crops Research, 100, 285, 2007.
  • 16. RÜHLEMANN L., SCHMIDTKE K., BELLINGRATHKIMURA S.D. Short-term effects of differentiated tillage on dry matter production and grain yield of autumn and spring sown grain legumes grown monocropped and intercropped with cereal grains in organic farming. Plant Prod. Sci. 18 (1), 76, 2015.
  • 17. IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, Rome, 2015.
  • 18. KRASOWICZ S. The role of economic evaluation in agricultural research. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 2 (12), 93, 2009. [In Polish].
  • 19. ŻUK-GOŁASZEWSKA K., TRUSZKOWSKI W., WINNICKI T. Possibilities for improvement of economic and energetic effectiveness of spring barley production depending on nitrogen fertilization level. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Agricultura 9 (3), 97, 2010.
  • 20. OLEKSY A., SZMIGIEL A., KOŁODZIEJCZYK M. Effect of cultivation intensity on protein concentrations and its yield of the winter wheat cultivars. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Agricultura, 7 (1), 47, 2008 [In Polish].
  • 21. SKARŻYŃSKA A. Technical, economic and environmental efficiency of production of selected plant products in the agricultural Polish regions. Problems of Agricultural Economics, 1(350), 117, 2017.
  • 22. NASALSKI Z., SADOWSKI T., RYCHCIK B., RZESZUTEK I. Comparison of effectiveness of winter and spring barley cropping after potato. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Agricultura, 3 (1), 99, 2004. [In Polish].
  • 23. WINNICKI T., ŻUK-GOŁASZEWSKA K., TRUSZKOWSKI W. Economic and energy efficiency of spring barley cultivation in relation to plant protection application. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Agricultura 12 (4), 105, 2013.
  • 24. FIRTH CH. The use of gross and net margins in the economic analysis of organic farms In. Powell et al. (eds), UK Organic Research 2002: Proceedings of the COR Conference, 26-28th March 2002, Aberystwyth, 285-288, 2002.
  • 25. KOVACEV I., KOSUTIC S., FILIPOVIC D., POSPISIL M., COPEC K. Economic efficiency of non-conventional soil tillage systems in oil seed rape and winter barley production. Book Series: Actual Tasks on Agricultural Engineering, Zagreb, 39, 271, 2011.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-121a8b6a-6941-46ac-808c-967f114609ab
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.