Potential distribution modeling and mapping of brutian pine stands in the inner parts of the middle Black Sea Region in Turkey

• Autorzy: Senturk O. , Gulsoy S. , Tumer I.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Brutian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) is one of the most common and precious coniferous tree species in Turkey. Except for its main distribution areas such as the Mediterranean and Aegean regions, brutian pine can be found in isolated areas due to its different forest site factors. Therefore, our aim was to obtain a model and map of this species in the Aydınca District, which is one of these isolated areas. For these purposes, the presence or absence of data of target species was collected from 453 sample plots. Environmental variables – including elevation, slope, heat index, topographic position index, slope position, bedrock types, BIO1, and BIO12 – were selected for generating a model and map of brutian pine via the generalized additive model. The model and map show that BIO1, BIO12, elevation, heat index, and bedrock were the most important explanatory variables. As a result of the obtained model, potential distribution of brutian pine was determined to range from 400 to 806 m elevation. In addition to this result, climate conditions for brutian pine were areas where the annual mean temperature was 11-12.5°C and annual mean precipitation was 428-439 mm. Besides, more suitable areas for brutian pine occurred where the heat index values are higher. Finally, brutian pine preferred limestone, schist, and other bedrock types in the district. In this study especially, climatic features that depend on elevation showed significant influence on potential distribution of brutian pine in Aydınca.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 28
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.321-327,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Senturk O.

• Goolhisar Vocational School, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Golhisar, Burdur, Turkey

autor

Gulsoy S.

• Division of Soil Science and Ecology, Department of Forest Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Isparta, Turkey

autor

Tumer I.

• Division of Soil Science and Ecology, Department of Forest Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Isparta, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. GUISAN A., ZIMMERMANN N.E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological modelling, 135 (2), 147, 2000.
• 2. ELITH J., LEATHWICK J.R. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 40, 677, 2009.
• 3. MARMION M., PARVIAINEN M., LUOTO M., HEIKKINEN R. K., THUILLER W. Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling. Diversity and distributions, 15 (1), 59, 2009.
• 4. HANSPACH J., KÜHN I., SCHWEIGER O., POMPE S., KLOTZ S. Geographical patterns in prediction errors of species distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20 (5), 779, 2011.
• 5. LINDER H.P., BYKOVA O., DYKE J., ETIENNE R.S., HICKLER T., KÜHN I., MARION G., OHLEMÜLLER R., SCHYMANSKI S.J., SINGER A. Biotic modifiers, environmental modulation and species distribution models. Journal of Biogeography, 39 (12), 2179, 2012.
• 6. HAMANN A., AITKEN S.N. Conservation planning under climate change: accounting for adaptive potential and migration capacity in species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions, 19 (3), 268, 2013.
• 7. PRADERVAND J.-N., DUBUIS A., PELLISSIER L., GUISAN A., RANDIN C. Very high resolution environmental predictors in species distribution models: Moving beyond topography? Progress in Physical Geography, 38 (1), 79, 2014.
• 8. FRANKLIN J. Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. 2010.
• 9. RICHARDSON D.M., WHITTAKER R.J. Conservation biogeography-foundations, concepts and challenges. Diversity and Distributions, 16 (3), 313, 2010.
• 10. FEELEY K.J., SILMAN M.R. Keep collecting: accurate species distribution modelling requires more collections than previously thought. Diversity and Distributions, 17 (6), 1132, 2011.
• 11. NAIMI B., SKIDMORE A.K., GROEN T.A., HAMM N.A. Spatial autocorrelation in predictors reduces the impact of positional uncertainty in occurrence data on species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography, 38 (8), 1497, 2011.
• 12. ÖZKAN K., SENTÜRK Ö., MERT A., NEGIZ M.G. Modeling and mapping potential distribution of Crimean juniper (Juniperus excelsa Bieb.) using correlative approaches. Journal of environmental biology, 36 (1), 9, 2015.
• 13. RÖDDER D., LÖTTERS S. Potential distribution of the alien invasive brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis (Reptilia: Colubridae). Pacific Science, 64 (1), 11, 2010.
• 14. BRAMBILLA M., FICETOLA G.F. Species distribution models as a tool to estimate reproductive parameters: a case study with a passerine bird species. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81 (4), 781, 2012.
• 15. AHMADI M., KABOLI M., NOURANI E., SHABANI A.A., ASHRAFI S. A predictive spatial model for gray wolf (Canis lupus) denning sites in a human-dominated landscape in western Iran. Ecological research, 28 (3), 513, 2013.
• 16. RAMESHPRABU N., SWAMY P. Prediction of environmental suitability for invasion of Mikania micrantha in India by species distribution modelling. Journal of Environmental Biology, 36 (3), 565, 2015.
• 17. SÁNCHEZ-GARCIA F.J., GALIÁN J., GALLEGO D. Distribution of Tomicus destruens (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) mitochondrial lineages: phylogeographic insights and niche modelling. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 15 (1), 101, 2015.
• 18. ÖZKAN K., MERT A., ŞENTÜRK Ö. Estimation of Potential Distribution of Non-Wood Trading Species Richness Using Classification and Regression Tree Technique: A case study from Lakes district, Turkey. II. International Non-Wood Forest Products Symposium, Eds: Fakir, H., Dutkuner, İ., Gürlevik, N., Sarıkaya, Babalık, A., 238, 2011.
• 19. ÖZKAN K., ŞENTÜRK Ö. The Application of Group Discrimination Techniques to Predict The Potential Distribution Of Turbentine Tree. Internatinal Scientific Conference People Buildings And Environment, 7, 2012.
• 20. ÖZKAN K. Using the non-parametric classifier CART to model lebanon cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich) distribution in a mountain Mediterranean Forest District. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 22 (2), 495, 2013.
• 21. GÜLSOY S., ŞENTÜRK Ö. Modeling the Potential Geographical Distribution of Anatolian Black Pine (Pinus nigra Arnold. subsp. pallasiana Lamb. Holmboe) in the Inner Parts of Central Black Sea Region. 4th International Geography Symposium (Edited by Recep EFE and İsa Cürebal), 288, 2016.
• 22. ŞENTÜRK Ö., GÜLSOY S., TÜMER İ. Relationship between distribution of Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.) and site factors in Aydınca district forests of Amasya, Turkey. The Journal of Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 5 (2), 13, 2014.
• 23. GÜLSOY S., ŞENTÜRK Ö., KARAKAYA F. Modeling the potential distribution of Turkish oak (Quercus cerris L.) in Kunduz district (Vezirköprü), Turkey. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 20 (2), 2016.
• 24. ÖZÇELIK R., KARAER K. Development of merchantable volume equations for natural brutian pine and black pine stands in Eğirdir District. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 66 (1), 59, 2016.
• 25. ÖZKAN K., KUZUGÜDENLİ E. The relations between site index of brutian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) and ecological site factors in Sütçüler district from the Mediterranean region. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 1 (1), 16, 2010.
• 26. KARATEPE Y., ÖZÇELIK R., GÜRLEVIK N., YAVUZ H., KIRIŞ R. Ecological evaluation of vegetation structure in Turkish red pine forests (Pinus brutia Ten.) in different sites of western Mediterranean region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 15, 1-8, 2014.
• 27. ÇELİK H., ÖZKAN K. ARelationships between some environmental characteristic and site index of brutian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) in the Ovacık mountain district, Antalya. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 19 (2), 2015.
• 28. ARBEZ M. Distribution, ecology and variation of Pinus brutia in Turkey. Forest Genetic Resources, 3, 0-7, 1974.
• 29. KANDEMIR G., KAYA Z., TEMEL F., ÖNDE S. Genetic variation in cold hardiness and phenology between and within Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) populations: implications for seed transfer. Silvae Genet, 59, 49, 2010.
• 30. TÜMER İ. The Relationships Between the Distribution of the Main Tree Species and Site Factors in the Forests of the Aydinca District (Amasya). Suleyman Demirel University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Master Thesis, 113, 2015.
• 31. PARKER K.C. Environmental relationships and vegetation associates of columnar cacti in the northern Sonoran Desert. Vegetatio, 78 (3), 125, 1988.
• 32. OLSSON P.A., MARTENSSON L.-M., BRUUN H.H. Acidification of sandy grasslands-consequences for plant diversity. Applied Vegetation Science, 12 (3), 350, 2009.
• 33. HIJMANS R.J., CAMERON S.E., PARRA J.L., JONES P.G., JARVIS A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International journal of climatology, 25 (15), 1965, 2005.
• 34. TAGIL S., JENNESS J. GIS-based automated landform classification and topographic, landcover and geologic attributes of landforms around the Yazoren Polje, Turkey. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 910, 2008.
• 35. GUISAN A., EDWARDS T.C., HASTIE T. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecological modelling, 157 (2), 89, 2002.
• 36. MOISEN G.G., FREEMAN E.A., BLACKARD J.A., FRESCINO T.S., ZIMMERMANN N.E., EDWARDS JR T.C. Predicting tree species presence and basal area in Utah: a comparison of stochastic gradient boosting, generalized additive models, and tree-based methods. ecological modelling, 199 (2), 176, 2006.
• 37. LEHMANN A., OVERTON J.M., LEATHWICK J.R. GRASP: generalized regression analysis and spatial prediction. Ecological modelling, 157 (2), 189, 2002.
• 38. ÖZKAN K. Identification of driving factors for presence of endemic species in the Aglasun district of the Mediterranean Region, Turkey. Pol. J. Ecol, 60 (2), 291, 2012.
• 39. GÜLSOY S., ÖZKAN K. Determination of environmental factors and indicator plant species for site suitability assessment of Crimean Juniper in the Acipayam District, Turkey. Sains Malaysiana, 42 (10), 1439, 2013.
• 40. OZKAN K., SENOL H., GULSOY S., MERT A., SUEL H., ESER Y. Vegetation-environment relationships in Mediterranean mountain forests on limeless bedrocks of southern Anatolia, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 17 (3), 154, 2009.
• 41. ATALAY I. Forest composition changes with competition in the norhern part of Turkey. European Scientific Journal, 2, 364, 2014.
• 42. ATALAY I., EFE R., ÖZTÜRK M. Ecology and Classification of Forests in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120, 788, 2014.
• 43. ATALAY İ., SEZER İ., ÇUKUR H. Kızılçam (Pinus brutia Ten.) ormanlarının ekolojik özellikleri ve tohum nakli açısından bölgelere ayrılması [In Turkish]. Orman Ağaçları ve Tohumları Islah Araştırma Müdürlüğü, Yay. No: 6, Ankara. 1998.
• 44. ATALAY İ., EFE R. Türkiye Biocoğrafyası [In Turkish]. Meta Basım Matbaacılık Hizmetleri, İzmir, 1, 536, 2015.
• 45. SAATÇİOĞLU F., PAMAY B. The importance of Pinus brutia in the development of Adana region and its silviculture. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 12 (2), 88, 1962.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/81682