PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 44 | 1 |
Tytuł artykułu

Molecular markers for parentage analysis in the grouper F1 hybrid Epinephelus coioides x Epinephelus lanceolatus (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Serranidae)

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Background. The aquaculture industry is driven by the need to develop novel interspecific hybrids with improved culture characteristics, however currently no molecular markers are available for the validation of F1 hybrids in the case of groupers. The presently reported study was directed toward the development of molecular markers for F1 hybrids obtained by artificial spawning of eggs derived from orange-spotted grouper, Epinephelus coioides (Hamilton, 1822), with sperm from giant grouper, E. lanceolatus (Bloch, 1790). Materials and Methods. DNA was extracted and purified from the fin clip of a single F1 hybrid of E. coioides × E. lanceolatus. Small insert shotgun genomics libraries were constructed, 40 positive transformants were sequenced, and the sequences deposited at the GenBank. Thirty locus-specific primer pairs were designed and tested across 64 F1 hybrid specimens as well as DNA samples extracted from coral grouper, Epinephelus corallicola (Valenciennes, 1828), and brown-marbled grouper, E. fuscoguttatus (Forsskål, 1775). Results. A panel of thirty molecular markers was developed to verify parentage, of these eleven and six of the markers were inherited from the sire and dam respectively. Two markers were specific to the F1 hybrid and none of the markers could be assigned to the closely related groupers E. corallicola and E. fuscoguttatus. Conclusion. The markers developed can be applied to assign parentage and determine the degree of introgression in interspecific grouper hybrids developed from E. coioides and E. lanceolatus. The methods developed in this study can be extended to characterize Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) and to identify interspecific F1 hybrids in the wild.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
44
Numer
1
Opis fizyczny
p.59-64,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Biotechnology Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
autor
  • Borneo Marine Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
autor
  • Biotechnology Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Biotechnology Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
Bibliografia
  • Aljanabi S.M., Martinez I. 1997. Universal and rapid saltextraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Research 25 (22): 4692–4693. DOI: 10.1093/nar/25.22.4692
  • Allendorf F.W., Leary R.F., Spruell P., Wenburg J.K. 2001.The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16 (11): 613–622. DOI:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02290-X
  • Bezault E., Rognon X., Clota F., Gharbi K., Baroiller J.-F.,Chevassus B. 2012. Analysis of the meiotic segregation In intergeneric hybrids of Tilapias. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2012: 10 pages. DOI:10.1155/2012/817562
  • Craig M.T., Hastings P.A. 2007. A molecular phylogeny of the groupers of the subfamily Epinephelinae (Serranidae) with a revised classification of the Epinephelini (1983). Ichthyological Research 54 (1): 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/s10228-006-0367-x
  • Glamuzina B., Glavić N., Skaramuca B., Kozul V., Tutman P.2001. Early development of the hybrid Epinephelus costae ♀ × E . marginatus ♂. Aquaculture 198 (1–2): 55–61. DOI:10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00511-1
  • Harikrishnan R., Balasundaram C., Heo M.-S. 2010. Molecular studies, disease status and prophylactic measures in grouper aquaculture: Economic importance, diseases and immunology. Aquaculture 309 (1–4): 1–14. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.09.011
  • James C.M., Al-Thobaiti S.A., Rasem B.M., Carlos M.H. 1999. Potential of grouper hybrid (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus × E. polyphekadion) for Aquaculture. Naga, the ICLARM Quarterly 22 (1): 19–23.
  • Kiriyakit A., Gallardo W.G., Bart A.N. 2011. Successful hybridization of groupers (Epinephelus coioides × Epinephelus lanceolatus) using cryopreserved sperm. Aquaculture 320 (1–2): 106–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.05.012
  • Koh I.C.C., Sitti RaehanahM.S., Akazawa N., Ota Y., Senoo S. 2010. Egg and larval development of a new hybrid orangespotted grouper Epinephelus coioides × giant grouper E . lanceolatus. Aquaculture Science 58 (1): 1 –10. DOI:10.11233/aquaculturesci.58.1
  • Liu Z.J., Cordes J.F. 2004. DNA marker technologies and their applications in aquaculture genetics. Aquaculture 238 (1–4): 1–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.05.027
  • López-Fernández H., Bolnick D.I. 2007. What causes partial F1 hybrid viability? Incomplete penetrance versus genetic variation. PLoS ONE 2 (12): e1294. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0001294
  • Na-Nakorn U., Yashiro R.,Wachirachaikarn A., PrakoonW., Pansaen N. 2010. Novel microsatellites for multiplex PCRs in the humpback grouper, Cromileptes altivelis (Valenciennes, 1828), and applications for broodstock management. Aquaculture 306 (1–4): 57–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.05.022
  • Renshaw M.A., Nemeth R.S., Gold J.R. 2012. Isolation of microsatellitemarkers fromtiger grouper (Mycteroperca tigris) and characterization in yellowfin grouper (Mycteroperca venenosa), coney (Cephalopholis fulva), and red hind (Epinephelus guttatus). Conservation Genetics Resources 4 (4):1049–1054. DOI: 10.1007/s12686-012-9704-8
  • Rivera M.A.J., Graham G.C., Roderick G.K. 2003. Isolation and characterization of nine microsatellite loci from the Hawaiian grouper Epinephelus quernus (Serranidae) for population genetic analyses. Marine Biotechnology 5 (2): 126–129. DOI: 10.1007/s10126-002-0093-y
  • Rozen S., Skaletsky H. 1999. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Pp. 365-386. In:Meisner S., Krawetz S.A. (eds.) Bioinformatics methods and protocols. Vol. 132 of Methods in Molecular Biology Humana. Press, Totowa, NJ, USA. DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-192-2:365
  • Stelkens R.B., Schmid C., Selz O., Seehausen O. 2009. Phenotypic novelty in experimental hybrids is predicted by the genetic distance between species of cichlid fish. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9 (December) paper 283: 13 pages. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-283
  • van Herwerden L., Davies C.R., Choat J.H. 2002. Phylogenetic and evolutionary perspectives of the Indo-Pacific grouper Plectropomus species on the Great Barier Reef, Australia. Journal of Fish Biology 60 (6): 1591–1596. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb02451.x
  • Wang S., Su Y., Ding S., Cai Y., Wang J. 2009. Cytogenetic analysis of orange-spotted grouper, Epinephelus coioides, using chromosome banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hydrobiologia 638 (1): 1–10. DOI:10.1007/s10750-009-9980-9
  • Xu D., You F., Li J.,Wu Z., Xiao Z., Zhang P., Xu Y.,Wang B. 2011. First evidence for hybrid breakdown in the backcross of olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus, and summer flounder, Paralichthys dentatus. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 42 (3): 347–353. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2011.00473.x
  • Yaakub S.M., Bellwood D.R., van Herwerden L.,Walsh F.M.2006. Hybridization in coral reef fishes: Introgression and bi-directional gene exchange in Thalassoma (family Labridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40 (1): 84–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.02.012
  • Yang S., Wang L., Zhang Y., Liu X.C., Lin H.R., Meng Z.N. 2011. Development and characterization of 32 microsatellite loci in the giant grouper Epinephelus lanceolatus (Serranidae). Genetics and Molecular Research 10 (4): 4006–4011. DOI: 10.4238/2011.December.12.3
  • Yeh S.-L., Dai Q.-C., Chu Y.-T., Kuo C.-M., Ting Y.-Y., Chang C.-F. 2003. Induced sex change, spawning and larviculture of potato grouper, Epinephelus tukula. Aquaculture 228 (1–4): 371–381. DOI: 10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00316-8
  • Zhang Z., Schwartz S., Wagner L., Miller W. 2000. A Grendy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. Journal of Computational Biology 7 (1–2): 203–214. DOI: 10.1089/10665270050081478
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-115dbee2-797d-4142-a5ef-82fb1d20ecf4
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.