PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 18 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Evaluation of late plum cultivars in the region of Belgrade (Serbia)

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Phenological traits, yield, and fruit characteristics of 14 plum cultivars of late maturation period were studied in the region of Belgrade in the five-year period (2013–2017). The control cultivar for comparison was ‘Stanley’. The average time of flowering was in the first half of April, and of fruit maturation in the second half of August and the beginning of September. Yield per tree was lowest in the cultivar ‘Pozna Plava’ (10.2 kg) and highest in the cultivar ‘Topking’ (23.6 kg). Compared to the control, significantly lower yield was achieved in three cultivars: ‘Pozna Plava’, ‘Vengerka Pozdnyaya’, and ‘Narach’. Fruit weight ranged from 26.1 g in the cultivar ‘Elena’ to 57.0 g in the cultivar ‘Empress’. Compared to the control, it was significantly higher in three cultivars (‘Empress’, ‘Vengerka Pozdnyaya’, and ‘Tophit’). All studied cultivars had high soluble solids content, ranging from 17.1% to 21.6%. The best rated cultivar for fruit appearance was ‘Empress’, while cultivars ‘Nada’ and ‘Pozna Plava’ were best scored for taste.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

18

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.67-74,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia
autor
  • Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia
autor
  • Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia
autor
  • Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia
autor
  • Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia

Bibliografia

  • Blažek, J., Pišteková, J. (2009). Preliminary evaluation results of new plum cultivars in a dense planting. Hortic. Sci., 36(2), 45–54.
  • Blažek, J., Vávra, R., Pištěková, I. (2004). Orchard performance of new plum cultivars on two rootstocks in a trial at Holovousy in 1998–2003. Hortic. Sci., 31(2), 37–43.
  • Bohačenko, I., Pinkrová, J., Komárková, J., Paprštein, F. (2010). Selected processing characteristics of new plum cultivars grown in the Czech Republic. Hortic. Sci., 37(2), 39–45.
  • Bozhkova, V. (2013). Plum genetic resources and breeding. AgroLife Sci. J., 2(1), 83–88.
  • Božović, D., Bosančić, B., Velimirović, A., Ercisli, S., Jaćimović, V., Keles, H. (2017). Biological characteristics of some plum cultivars grown in Montenegro. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 16(2), 35–45. DOI: 10.24326/asphc.2017.2.0.
  • Butac, M., Bozhkova, V., Zhivondov, A., Milosevic, N., Bellini, E., Nencetti, V., Blazek, J., Balsemin, E., Lafarque, B., Kaufmane, E., Gravite, I., Vasiljeva, M., Pintea, M., Juraveli, A., Webster, T., Hjalmarsson, I., Trajkovski, V., Hjeltnes, S.H. (2013). Overview of plum breeding in Europe. Acta Hortic., 981, 91–98. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.981.9.
  • Cmelik, Z., Druzic Orlic, J., Duralija, B., Tonjko, S., Strikic, F. (2007). Growth and yield of plum trees ‘Felsina’, ‘Top’ and ‘Elena’ grafted on GF 655/2. Acta Hortic., 734, 337–339. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.734.47.
  • Crisosto, C.H., Garner, D., Crisosto, G.M., Bowerman, E. (2004). Increasing ‘Blackamber’ plum (Prunus salicina Lindley) consumer acceptance. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 34, 237‒244. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio. 2004.06.003.
  • Dragoyski, K., Minev, I., Dinkova, H., Stoyanova, T., Minkov, P. (2010). Evaluation of some introduced plum cultivars in RIMSA Troyan. Acta Hortic., 874, 311–316. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.874.44. FAOSTAT (2018). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC [date of access: 3.01.2018].
  • Glišić, I., Milatović, D., Milošević, N., Lukić, M. (2015). Biological and pomological properties of promising plum hybrids created at the Fruit Research Institute, Čačak. VI International Scientific Agricultural Symposium “Agrosym 2015”, Jahorina, pp. 424–429.
  • Glišić, I.P., Milošević, T., Glišić, I.S., Ilić, R., Paunović, G., Milošević, N. (2016a). Tree vigour and yield of plum grown under high density planting system. Acta Hortic., 1139, 131–136. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1139.23.
  • Glišić, I., Karaklajić-Stajić, Ž., Paunović, S.A., Lukić, M. (2016b). Plum cultivars Zlatka and Pozna Plava (Prunus domestica L.) bred at the Fruit Research Institute in Čačak. Hortic. Sci., 43(1), 10–16. DOI: 10.17221/61/2015HORTSCI.
  • Hartmann, W. (1998). New plum cultivars from Hohenheim. Acta Hortic., 478, 171–174. DOI: 10.17660/ ActaHortic.1998.478.26.
  • Ionica, M.E., Nour, V., Trandafir, I., Cosmulescu, S., Botu, M.(2013). Physical and chemical properties of some European plum cultivars. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj Napoca, 41(2), 499–503. DOI: 10.15835/nbha4129354.
  • Jacob, H.B. (1998). Top, Topper and Tophit: Three new late ripening plum cultivars for a profitable market. Acta Hortic., 478, 165–168. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1998. 478.24.
  • Jacob, H.B. (2007). Twenty-five years plum breeding in Geisenheim, Germany: breeding targets and previous re
  • alisations. Acta Hortic., 734, 341–346. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.734.48.
  • Kovács, S. (2013). Examination of the adaptation of German plum varieties in Hungary. Hung. Agric. Res., 22(2), 4–11.
  • Markuszewski, B., Kopytowski, J. (2013). Evaluation of plum cultivars grafted on ‘Wangenheim Prune’ rootstock in the northeast of Poland. Folia Hortic., 25(2), 101–106. DOI: 10.2478/fhort-2013-0011.
  • Milatović, D. (2005). Cvetanje sorti kajsije u beogradskom području. Voćarstvo, 39, 285–293.
  • Milatović, D. (2013). Pflaumen- und kirschenanbau in Serbien. Obstbau, 38(2), 115–119.
  • Milatović D., Đurović D., Zec G., Radović M. (2016). Phenological traits, yield and fruit quality of plum cultivars created at the Fruit Research Institute in Čačak, Serbia. VII International Scientific Agriculture Symposium “Agrosym 2016”, Jahorina, pp. 789–795.
  • Milošević, N., Mratinić, E., Glišić, S.I., Milošević, T. (2012). Precocity, yield and postharvest physical and chemical properties of plums resistant to Sharka grown in Serbian conditions. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 11(6),
  • 23–33.
  • Molnár, Á.M., Ladányi, M., Kovács, S. (2016). Evaluation of the production traits and fruit quality of German plum cultivars. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun., 64(1), 109–114. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664010109.
  • Monselise, S.P., Goldschmidt, E.E. (1982). Alternate bearing in fruit trees. Hort. Rev., 4, 129–173. DOI: 10.1002/9781118060773.ch5. Neumüller, M. (2010). Fundamental and applied aspects of plum (Prunus domestica L.) breeding. Fruit Veg. Cereal Sci. Biotech., 5(spec. issue 1), 139‒156.
  • Ruml, M., Milatović, D., Vulić, T., Vuković, A. (2011). Predicting apricot phenology using meteorological data. Int. J.Biometeorol., 55(5), 723‒732. DOI: 10.1007/s00484010-0387-0.
  • Sosna, I. (2004). The estimation of the production value of several plum cultivars grafted on ‘Myrobalan’ seedlings in Wroclaw area (Poland). Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 3(1), 47–54. Voća, S., Galić, A., Šindrak, Z., Dobričević, N., Pliestić, S., Družić, J. (2009). Chemical composition and antioxidant capacity of three plum cultivars. Agric. Conspec. Sci., 74(3), 273–276.
  • Wertheim, S.J. (1996). Methods for cross pollination and flowering assessment and their interpretation. Acta Hortic., 423, 237–241. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1996.423.30.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-111464f0-3a18-49e4-806d-20de3753fab3
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.