PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 14 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Genotype selection for physico-chemical fruit traits in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) in Turkey

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

PL
Selekcja genotypów według fizykochemicznych cech granatu (Punica granatum L.) w Turcji

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Pomegranate is one of the most important ancient fruit in Turkey where planting of pomegranate has increased rapidly in recent years. This study described desirable pomological and chemical traits of seventeen pomegranate genotypes selected from Narlidere district (Bitlis) in between 2010–2011 years. We found considerable variation on fruit weight, aril weight, fruit length and fruit width that important for pomegranate breeding ranged from 99.77 (N-15) to 515.97 g (N-05), 14.16 (N-01) to 41.92 g (N-10), 51.03 (N-15) to 90.99 mm (N-05) and 58.99 (N-03) to 103.11 mm (N-05) among genotypes, respectively. Chemical parameters are also considerable varied among genotypes and Soluble solid content (SSC), titratable acidity (TA), pH and juice yield of genotypes varied between 5.96 (N-02) to 9.13% (N-03), 0.12 (N-12) to 0.91% (N-14), 2.51 (N-14) to 4.52 (N-10) and 48.58 (N-06) to72.07% (N-01), respectively. Many genotypes were found to be promising both fresh consumption and processing. Promising genotypes indicate it’s importance as genetic resources and they have potential for future use in pomegranate breeding activities.
PL
Granat jest jednym z najstarszych owoców w Turcji, a jego uprawa gwałtownie rozwinęła się w ostatnich latach. W niniejszej pracy opisano pożądane pomologiczne i chemiczne cechy siedemnastu genotypów granatu z okręgu Narlidere (Bitlis) badanych w latach 2010–2011. Stwierdzono znaczne zróżnicowanie cech granatu ważnych dla jego uprawy, takich jak masa owocu, masa osnówki oraz szerokość owocu. Ich rozpiętość wahała się odpowiednio od 99,77 (N-15) do 515.97 g (N-05), 14,16 (N-01) do 41,92 g (N-10), 51,03 (N-15) do 90,99 mm (N-05) oraz 58,99 (N-03) do 103,11 mm (N-05). Cechy chemiczne także znacznie różnicowały badane genotypy. Zawartość rozpuszczalnych substancji stałych (SSC), kwasowość ogólna (TA), pH oraz plon soku wahały się odpowiednio od 5,96 (N-02) do 9,13% (N-03), 0,12 (N-12) do 0,91% (N-14), 2,51 (N-14) do 4,52 (N-10) oraz 48,8 (N-06) do 72,07% (N-01). Stwierdzono, że jeśli chodzi o świeżą konsumpcję i przetwarzanie, jest wiele obiecujących genotypów. Genotypy te stanowia cenne źródło genetyczne, a także mają duży potencjał dla prac hodowlanych.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

14

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.123-132,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey
autor
  • Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey
autor
  • Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey
autor
  • Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey

Bibliografia

  • AOAC (1984). Official Methods of Analysis. Association of official Agricultural Chemists 14th Ed. Washigton DC. Baytop, T. (2004). Therapy with medicinal plants in Turkey (Past and Present). Nobel Press, Istanbul, 353 p.
  • De Nigris, F., Williams-Ignarro, S., Lerman, L.O., Crimi, E., Botti, C., Mansueto, G., D’Armiento, F.P., De Rosa, G., Sica, V., Ignarro, L.J., Napoli, C. (2005). Beneficial effects of pomegranate juice on oxidation-sensitive genes and endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity at sites of perturbed shear stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 4896–4901.
  • Dhanumjaya, R.K., Subramanyam, K. (2009). Growth and yield performance of pomegarnate varieties under scarce rainfall zone. Agric. Sci. Digest., 30(1), 71–72.
  • Ercan, N., Ozvardar, S., Gonulsen, N., Baldiran, E., Onal, K., Karabiyik, N. (1992). Determination of suitable pomegranate cultivars for Aegean region. Proceedings of 1st National Horticultural Congress. 13–16 October, Izmir, Turkey, (in Turkish), pp. 553–557.
  • Ercisli, S. (2004). A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genet. Res. Crop Evol., 51, 419–435.
  • Ercisli, S., Esitken, A. (2004). Fruit characteristics of native rose hip (Rosa spp.) selections from the Erzurum Province of Turkey. New Zeal. J. Crop Hort. 32, 51–53.
  • Ercisli, S., Agar, G., Orhan, E., Yildirim, N., Hizarci, Y. (2007). Interspecific variability of RAPD and fatty acid composition of some pomegranate cultivars (Punica granatum L.) growing in Southern Anatolia Region in Turkey. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 35, 764–769.
  • Ercisli, S., Kafkas, E., Orhan, E., Kafkas, S., Dogan, Y., Esitken, A. (2011). Genetic characterization of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes by AFLP markers. Biol. Res., 44 (4), 345–350.
  • Gozlekci, S., Ercisli, S., Okturen, F., Sonmez, S. (2011a). Physico-chemical characteristics at three development stages in pomegranate cv. ‘Hicaznar’. Not Bot Horti Agroboto., 39(1), 241–245.
  • Gozlekci, S., Saracoglu, O., Onursal, E., Ozgen, M. (2011b). Total phenolic distribution of juice, peel, and seed extracts of four pomegranate cultivars. Pharmacogn. Mag., 7(26), 161–164
  • Gunduz, K. (2013). Morphological and phytochemical properties of Mahonia aquifolium from Turkey. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 50 (3), 439–443.
  • Jahfar, M., Vijayan, K.K., Azadi, P. (2003). Studies on a polysaccharide from the fruit rind of Punica granatum. Res. J. Chem. Environ., 7, 43–50.
  • Karimi, H.R., Zamani, Z., Ebadi, A., Fatahi, R. (2009). Morphological diversity of Pistacia species in Iran. Genet. Res. Crop Evol., 56, 561–571.
  • Koc, A., Bilgener, S. (2013). Morphological characterization of cherry rootstock candidates selected from Samsun Province in Turkey. Turk. J. Agric. For., 37, 575–584.
  • Levin, G.M. (2006). Pomegranate roads: a Soviet botanist’s exile from Eden. B.L. Baer (ed.). Floreat Press, Forestville, CA, 15–183.
  • Li, Y., Guo, C., Yang, J., Wei, J., Xu, J., Cheng, S. (2006). Evaluation of antioxidant properties of pomegranate peel extract in comparison with pomegranate pulp extract. Food Chem., 96(2), 254–260.
  • Malik, A., Afaq, F., Sarfaraz, S., Adhami, V.M., Syed, D.N., Mukhtar, H. (2005). Pomegranate fruit juice for chemoprevention and chemotherapy of prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 14813–14818.
  • Mir, M.M., Jhon, A.Q., Khan, F.U., Nelofar (2007). Studies on physical and chemical characteristics of pomegranate cultivars in Kashmir valley. J. Hort. Sci., 2(2), 139–142.
  • Mirdehghan, S.H., Rahemi, M. (2007). Seasonal changes of mineral nutrients and phenolics in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit. Sci. Hortic., 111(2), 120–127.
  • Muradoglu, F., Balta, M.F., Ozrenk, K. (2006). Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genetic resources from Hakkari, Turkey. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 2(6), 520–525.
  • Muradoglu, F., Gundogdu, M., Yilmaz, H. (2011). Determination of antioxidant capacities and chemical characteristics of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) grown in the Siirt District. Ital. J. Food Sci., 23(4), 360–367.
  • Norouzi, R., Heidari, S., Asgari-Sarcheshmeh, M.A., Shahi-Garahlar, A. (2013). Estimation of phenotypical and morphological differentiation among some selected Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.) accessions. Intl. J. Agron. Plant Prod., 4(9), 2438–2445.
  • Orhan, E., Ercisli, S., Esitken, A. (2013). Morphological diversity among pomegranate genetic resources from Northeastern part of Turkey. J. Food Agric. Environ., 11(2), 470–473.
  • Orhan, E., Ercisli, S., Esitken, A., Sengul, M. (2014). Molecular and morphological characterization of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes sampled from Coruh valley in Turkey. Genet. Mol. Res., 13(3), 6375–6382.
  • Ozgen, M., Durgac, C., Serce, S., Kaya, C. (2008). Chemical and antioxidant properties of pomegaranate cultivars grown in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Food Chem., 111, 703–706.
  • Ozguven, A.I., Yilmaz, C. (2000). Pomegranate Growing in Turkey. Options Mediterraneennes, Ser. A: Seminaires Mediterraneennes, 42, 41–48.
  • Ozguven A.I., Yilmaz M., Yılmaz C., 2009. The fruit traits of some pomegranate cultivars in Adana ecological conditions. Proceedings 2nd International Symposium on Pomegranate and Minor Mediterranean Fruits. 197–200.
  • Poyrazoglu E., Gokmen V., Artik N. (2002). Organic acids and phenolic compounds in pomegranates (Punica granatum L.) grown in Turkey. J. Food Comp. Anal., 15, 567–575.
  • Razi, M.F., Anwar, R., Basra, S.M.A., Khan, M.M., Khan, I.A. (2013). Morphological characterization of leaves and fruit of jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana LAMK.) germplasm in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 50, 211–216.
  • SAS Institute (2005). SAS Online Doc., Version 8. SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USA. Singh, R.S., Sharma, B.D., Bhargava, R., More, T.A. (2009). Introduction and evaluation of anardana type pomegranate under hot arid conditions. Proceedings 2nd International Symposium on Pomegranate and Minor Mediterranean Fruits, 239–242.
  • Taain, D.A. (2013). Study on physico-chemical and physiological characteristics of date palm fruits (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Um-Aldehin. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 50(1), 1–5.
  • Tarai, R.K., Ghosh, S.N. (2006). Performance of different cultivars of pomegranate grown in laterite tracts West Bengal. Proceedings of National Symposium on Production, Utilization and Export of
  • Underutilized Fruits with Commercial Potentialities, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India, 22–24 November, pp. 74–78.
  • Tehranifar, A., Zarei, M., Esfandiyari, B., Nemati, Z. (2010). Physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of pomegranate fruit (Punica granatum) of different cultivars grown in Iran. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol., 51(6), 573–579.
  • Viuda-Martos, M., Fernandez-Lopez, J., Perez-Alvez, J.A. (2010). Pomegranate and its many functional components as related to human health: A Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci., 9, 635–654.
  • Yildiz, K., Muradoglu, F., Oguz, H.I., Yilmaz, H. (2003). Pomological characteristic of pomegranate varieties grown in Hizan town of Bitlis. Proceedings of 4th National Horticultural Congress. 8–12 September. Antalya-Turkey, 238–240.
  • Yilmaz, K.U., Paydas Kargi, S., Kafkas, S. (2012). Morphological diversity of the Turkish apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) germplasm in the Irano-Caucasian ecogeographical group. Turk. J. Agric. For., 36, 688–694.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-10e7ce7f-9ec1-45ca-82ad-f22f6d621aa2
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.